1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Social Science
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 以專利衡量研發創新投入之資源錯置問題 - 以中國內外資製造業廠商為例
Misallocation of R&D Inputs by Using Patent Value Index - A Case of the Manufacturing Companies with Foreign Investment and Domestic Investment
作者 歐潤芸
貢獻者 李文傑<br>王信實
歐潤芸
關鍵詞 公司所有權
研發創新
專利價值指數
資源錯置
Ownership
Innovation
Patent value index
Misallocation
日期 2016
上傳時間 1-Jul-2016 15:24:12 (UTC+8)
摘要 創新能力是近年產業發展的趨勢，過去文獻常只單用專利數量來衡量研發效率，方法直觀卻無法真實反應專利價值。本研究嘗試利用專利數量及專利價值指數一起衡量廠商研發投入與產出間的效率，研究對象為2005年至2007年間中國規模水準以上廠商，利用其專利總價值指數與該公司所投入的資本要素與勞動要素探討該公司資源錯置的現象。有鑑於中國積極引進外資企業進駐中國，本研究依公司註冊登記類型將公司分為國有企業、民營企業及外資企業三大類，藉以研究中國經濟發展政策對此三類企業研發效率發展的影響。結果顯示，國有企業的研發效率優於民營企業與外資企業。因為政府積極實施產業政策以促進國內研發創新能力，給予國有企業相當多的政策優惠，故國有企業擁有較高的研發生產力；而民營企業因核心技術的不足，多以替國外大廠代工為主要經營模式，研發創新能力較低。中國改革開放後，積極引進外資企業進駐中國，而當時外資企業看中的是中國低廉的勞動成本與廣大的潛在市場，核心研發技術並未引進中國，導致外資企業研發能力在資料區間內呈現最為低落的情形。
Innovation has become the trend for the industrial development nowadays. In the past, little research can measure the industrial outcome due to inadequate knowledge on patent value index. In this paper, I compute the patent value index based on the surveyed data of the manufacturing firms in China from 2005 to 2007. The misallocation between research output and input is computed as the major result. Based on firm registration data, I divided firms into three categories, state-owned firms, private firms and foreign firms. Our result shows that state-owned firms have higher innovation efficiency than others. The high research efficiency belonging to state-owned firms benefited from many industrial policies and preferential policy implemented by government. Due to the lack of innovation technology characterized by OEM (Original equipment manufacturer) model, private firms record lower research performance. Other than domestic firms, foreign firms simply utilize cheap production inputs and the larger market size as a base for process trade. Innovation activities are only conducted by parent companies. That is why foreign firms’ record lower innovation efficiency in this research.
參考文獻 英文參考文獻
1. Aiginger, K. (2014). Industrial Policy for a sustainable growth path. Policy Paper, (13).
2. Aitken, B. J., & Harrison, A. E. (1999). Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American economic review, 605-618.
3. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of management review, 20(2), 343-378.
4. Chen, C. P., Hu, J. L., & Yang, C. H. (2013). Produce patents or journal articles? A cross-country comparison of R&D productivity change. Scientometrics, 94(3), 833-849.
5. Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. economica, 4(16), 386-405.
6. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: the two faces of R & D. The economic journal, 99(397), 569-596.
7. Djankov, S., & Hoekman, B. (2000). Foreign investment and productivity growth in Czech enterprises. The World Bank Economic Review, 14(1), 49-64.
8. Driffield, N. (2001). The impact on domestic productivity of inward investment in the UK. The Manchester School, 69(1), 103-119.
9. Eaton, J., & Kortum, S. (1996). Trade in ideas Patenting and productivity in the OECD. Journal of international Economics, 40(3), 251-278.
10. Griffith, R., Redding, S., & Van Reenen, J. (2004). Mapping the two faces of R&D: Productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries. Review of economics and statistics, 86(4), 883-895.
11. Gu, F. (2005). Innovation, future earnings, and market efficiency. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 20(4), 385-418.
12. Howitt, P. (2000). Endogenous growth and cross-country income differences.American Economic Review, 829-846.
13. Hsieh, C. T., & Klenow, P. J. (2009). Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India (No. w13290). National Bureau of Economic Research.
14. Hsieh, C. T., & Klenow, P. J. (2012). The life cycle of plants in India and Mexico(No. w18133). National Bureau of Economic Research.
15. Jaef, F., & Roberto, N. (2012). Entry, Exit and Misallocation Frictions. Mimeo, IMF.
16. Klenow, P. J., & Rodriguez-Clare, A. (2005). Externalities and growth.Handbook of economic growth, 1, 817-861.
17. Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (2004). Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators*. The Economic Journal, 114(495), 441-465.
18. Lutz, S., & Talavera, O. (2004). Do Ukrainian firms benefit from FDI?.Economics of Planning, 37(2), 77-98.
19. Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra‐industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695-1725.
20. Riboud, M. (2000). Foreign investment and restructuring: the evidence from Hungary (Vol. 453). World Bank Publications.
21. Robinson, J. A. (2009). Industrial policy and development: a political economy perspective. Washington, DC: The World Bank..
22. Romer P., 1990, “Endogenous Technological Change“, Journal of Political Economy 98(5)：71-102.
23. Song, Z., & Wu, G. L. (2011). A structural estimation on capital market distortions in UK and Chinese manufacturing firms. Unpublished manuscript, Booth Sch. Bus., Univ. Chicago.
24. Tsai, K. H., & Wang, J. C. (2004). The R&D performance in Taiwan`s electronics industry: a longitudinal examination. R&D Management, 34(2), 179-189.
25. Xu, B., & Chiang, E. P. (2005). Trade, patents and international technology diffusion. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 14(1), 115-135.
26. Yang, M. J. (2011). Micro-level misallocation and selection: Estimation and aggregate implications. Mimeo, UC Berkeley.

中文參考文獻
1. 何潔. (2000). 外國直接投資對中國工業部門外溢效應的進一步精確量化. 世界經濟, 23(12), 29-36.
2. 辛永容,陳圻, &肖俊哲. (2009).要素產出彈性與技術進步貢獻率的測算. 管理科學 ,22 (1), 113-120.
3. 徐濤. (2003).引進FDI與中國技術進步. 世界經濟 , 26 (10), 22-27
4. 張小蒂, & 王中興. (2008). 中國 R&D 投入與高技術產業研發產出的相關性分析. 科學學研究, 26(3), 526-529.
5. 謝長泰,&宋錚. (2015).抓大放小：中國國有部門的轉型
6. 蔣殿春, &夏良科. (2005).外商直接投資對中國高技術產業技術創新作用的經驗分析. 世界經濟 , 28 (8), 3-10.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
經濟學系
103258027
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103258027
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 李文傑<br>王信實zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 歐潤芸zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 歐潤芸zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2016en_US
dc.date.accessioned 1-Jul-2016 15:24:12 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 1-Jul-2016 15:24:12 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Jul-2016 15:24:12 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0103258027en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98644-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 經濟學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 103258027zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 創新能力是近年產業發展的趨勢，過去文獻常只單用專利數量來衡量研發效率，方法直觀卻無法真實反應專利價值。本研究嘗試利用專利數量及專利價值指數一起衡量廠商研發投入與產出間的效率，研究對象為2005年至2007年間中國規模水準以上廠商，利用其專利總價值指數與該公司所投入的資本要素與勞動要素探討該公司資源錯置的現象。有鑑於中國積極引進外資企業進駐中國，本研究依公司註冊登記類型將公司分為國有企業、民營企業及外資企業三大類，藉以研究中國經濟發展政策對此三類企業研發效率發展的影響。結果顯示，國有企業的研發效率優於民營企業與外資企業。因為政府積極實施產業政策以促進國內研發創新能力，給予國有企業相當多的政策優惠，故國有企業擁有較高的研發生產力；而民營企業因核心技術的不足，多以替國外大廠代工為主要經營模式，研發創新能力較低。中國改革開放後，積極引進外資企業進駐中國，而當時外資企業看中的是中國低廉的勞動成本與廣大的潛在市場，核心研發技術並未引進中國，導致外資企業研發能力在資料區間內呈現最為低落的情形。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Innovation has become the trend for the industrial development nowadays. In the past, little research can measure the industrial outcome due to inadequate knowledge on patent value index. In this paper, I compute the patent value index based on the surveyed data of the manufacturing firms in China from 2005 to 2007. The misallocation between research output and input is computed as the major result. Based on firm registration data, I divided firms into three categories, state-owned firms, private firms and foreign firms. Our result shows that state-owned firms have higher innovation efficiency than others. The high research efficiency belonging to state-owned firms benefited from many industrial policies and preferential policy implemented by government. Due to the lack of innovation technology characterized by OEM (Original equipment manufacturer) model, private firms record lower research performance. Other than domestic firms, foreign firms simply utilize cheap production inputs and the larger market size as a base for process trade. Innovation activities are only conducted by parent companies. That is why foreign firms’ record lower innovation efficiency in this research.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 7
第一節 研究背景 7
第二節 研究動機 8
第三節 研究目的 11
第四節 研究架構 12
第二章 文獻回顧 13
第三章 資料來源及處理 16
第一節 資料來源 16
第二節 資料整理 16
第四章 模型介紹 22
第一節 研究問題 22
第二節 研究方法 24
第三節 專利價值指數計算方法 28
第四節 變數說明 29
第五章 模型結果 32
第一節 模型參數估計結果 32
第二節 資源錯置離散程度 32
第三節 模型運算結果 34
第六章 結論與建議 40
第一節 研究結論 40
第二節 研究建議 41
附錄 44
附錄一 NBER產業分類與美國專利號產業分類比對 44
附錄二 各產業專利指標權重 46
附錄三 分類各別離散程度 48
附錄四 國有/民營/外資企業之APK與APL分佈圖 49		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 996878 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103258027en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公司所有權zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 研發創新zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 專利價值指數zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 資源錯置zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Ownershipen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Innovationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Patent value indexen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Misallocationen_US
dc.title (題名) 以專利衡量研發創新投入之資源錯置問題 - 以中國內外資製造業廠商為例zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Misallocation of R&D Inputs by Using Patent Value Index - A Case of the Manufacturing Companies with Foreign Investment and Domestic Investmenten_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 英文參考文獻
1. Aiginger, K. (2014). Industrial Policy for a sustainable growth path. Policy Paper, (13).
2. Aitken, B. J., & Harrison, A. E. (1999). Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American economic review, 605-618.
3. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of management review, 20(2), 343-378.
4. Chen, C. P., Hu, J. L., & Yang, C. H. (2013). Produce patents or journal articles? A cross-country comparison of R&D productivity change. Scientometrics, 94(3), 833-849.
5. Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. economica, 4(16), 386-405.
6. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: the two faces of R & D. The economic journal, 99(397), 569-596.
7. Djankov, S., & Hoekman, B. (2000). Foreign investment and productivity growth in Czech enterprises. The World Bank Economic Review, 14(1), 49-64.
8. Driffield, N. (2001). The impact on domestic productivity of inward investment in the UK. The Manchester School, 69(1), 103-119.
9. Eaton, J., & Kortum, S. (1996). Trade in ideas Patenting and productivity in the OECD. Journal of international Economics, 40(3), 251-278.
10. Griffith, R., Redding, S., & Van Reenen, J. (2004). Mapping the two faces of R&D: Productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries. Review of economics and statistics, 86(4), 883-895.
11. Gu, F. (2005). Innovation, future earnings, and market efficiency. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 20(4), 385-418.
12. Howitt, P. (2000). Endogenous growth and cross-country income differences.American Economic Review, 829-846.
13. Hsieh, C. T., & Klenow, P. J. (2009). Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India (No. w13290). National Bureau of Economic Research.
14. Hsieh, C. T., & Klenow, P. J. (2012). The life cycle of plants in India and Mexico(No. w18133). National Bureau of Economic Research.
15. Jaef, F., & Roberto, N. (2012). Entry, Exit and Misallocation Frictions. Mimeo, IMF.
16. Klenow, P. J., & Rodriguez-Clare, A. (2005). Externalities and growth.Handbook of economic growth, 1, 817-861.
17. Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (2004). Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators*. The Economic Journal, 114(495), 441-465.
18. Lutz, S., & Talavera, O. (2004). Do Ukrainian firms benefit from FDI?.Economics of Planning, 37(2), 77-98.
19. Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra‐industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695-1725.
20. Riboud, M. (2000). Foreign investment and restructuring: the evidence from Hungary (Vol. 453). World Bank Publications.
21. Robinson, J. A. (2009). Industrial policy and development: a political economy perspective. Washington, DC: The World Bank..
22. Romer P., 1990, “Endogenous Technological Change“, Journal of Political Economy 98(5)：71-102.
23. Song, Z., & Wu, G. L. (2011). A structural estimation on capital market distortions in UK and Chinese manufacturing firms. Unpublished manuscript, Booth Sch. Bus., Univ. Chicago.
24. Tsai, K. H., & Wang, J. C. (2004). The R&D performance in Taiwan`s electronics industry: a longitudinal examination. R&D Management, 34(2), 179-189.
25. Xu, B., & Chiang, E. P. (2005). Trade, patents and international technology diffusion. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 14(1), 115-135.
26. Yang, M. J. (2011). Micro-level misallocation and selection: Estimation and aggregate implications. Mimeo, UC Berkeley.

中文參考文獻
1. 何潔. (2000). 外國直接投資對中國工業部門外溢效應的進一步精確量化. 世界經濟, 23(12), 29-36.
2. 辛永容,陳圻, &肖俊哲. (2009).要素產出彈性與技術進步貢獻率的測算. 管理科學 ,22 (1), 113-120.
3. 徐濤. (2003).引進FDI與中國技術進步. 世界經濟 , 26 (10), 22-27
4. 張小蒂, & 王中興. (2008). 中國 R&D 投入與高技術產業研發產出的相關性分析. 科學學研究, 26(3), 526-529.
5. 謝長泰,&宋錚. (2015).抓大放小：中國國有部門的轉型
6. 蔣殿春, &夏良科. (2005).外商直接投資對中國高技術產業技術創新作用的經驗分析. 世界經濟 , 28 (8), 3-10.		zh_TW