1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Commerce
  4. Periodical Articles
  5. Item

學術產出-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 Ranking Taiwanese management journals: A case study
作者 Kao C.;Lin H.W.;Chung S.L.;蔡維奇;Chiou J.S.;Chen Y.L.
Chiang Kao, Hsiou-Wei Lin, San-Lin Chung, Wei-Chi Tsai, Jyh-Shen Chiou, Yen-Liang Chen, Liang-Hsuan Chen, Shih-Chieh Fang, Hwei-Lan Pao
日期 2008
上傳時間 25-Nov-2008 10:48:19 (UTC+8)
摘要 To improve the quality of journals in Taiwan, the National Science Council (NSC) of the Republic of China evaluates journals in the fields of humanities and social sciences periodically. This paper describes the evaluation of 46 management journals conducted by the authors, as authorized by the NSC. Both a subjective approach, with judgments solicited from 345 experts, and an objective approach, with data collected on four indicators: journal cross citation, dissertation citation, authors’ scholastic reputation, and author diversity, were used to make a comprehensive evaluation. Performance in the four indicators were aggregated using weights which were most favourable to all journals, in a compromise sense, to produce the composite indices. The subjective evaluation reflects the general image, or reputation, of journals while the objective evaluation discloses blind spots which have been overlooked by experts. The results show that using either approach alone would have produced results which are misleading, which suggests that both approaches should be used. All of the editors of the journals being evaluated agreed that the evaluation was appropriate and the results are reasonable.
關聯 Scientometrics, 76, 95-115
資料類型 article
dc.creator (作者) Kao C.;Lin H.W.;Chung S.L.;蔡維奇;Chiou J.S.;Chen Y.L.en_US
dc.creator (作者) Chiang Kao, Hsiou-Wei Lin, San-Lin Chung, Wei-Chi Tsai, Jyh-Shen Chiou, Yen-Liang Chen, Liang-Hsuan Chen, Shih-Chieh Fang, Hwei-Lan Pao-
dc.date (日期) 2008en_US
dc.date.accessioned 25-Nov-2008 10:48:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 25-Nov-2008 10:48:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 25-Nov-2008 10:48:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/10290-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) To improve the quality of journals in Taiwan, the National Science Council (NSC) of the Republic of China evaluates journals in the fields of humanities and social sciences periodically. This paper describes the evaluation of 46 management journals conducted by the authors, as authorized by the NSC. Both a subjective approach, with judgments solicited from 345 experts, and an objective approach, with data collected on four indicators: journal cross citation, dissertation citation, authors’ scholastic reputation, and author diversity, were used to make a comprehensive evaluation. Performance in the four indicators were aggregated using weights which were most favourable to all journals, in a compromise sense, to produce the composite indices. The subjective evaluation reflects the general image, or reputation, of journals while the objective evaluation discloses blind spots which have been overlooked by experts. The results show that using either approach alone would have produced results which are misleading, which suggests that both approaches should be used. All of the editors of the journals being evaluated agreed that the evaluation was appropriate and the results are reasonable.-
dc.format application/en_US
dc.language enen_US
dc.language en-USen_US
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.relation (關聯) Scientometrics, 76, 95-115en_US
dc.title (題名) Ranking Taiwanese management journals: A case studyen_US
dc.type (資料類型) articleen