學術產出-Journal Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 民意乎?黨意乎?-大陸新京報讀者投書的近用權實踐
其他題名 Whose Voice: Chinese People or the Chinese Communist Party?The Right of the Reader’s Access to Media in China through Op-Ed Page : A Case Study of Beijing News
作者 張裕亮
Chang, Yu-liang
關鍵詞 中國大陸傳媒; 讀者投書; 媒介近用權; 輿論引導
China media; op-ed contribution; the right of access to media; public opinion shaping
日期 2009-09
上傳時間 19-Jul-2016 16:26:58 (UTC+8)
摘要 九○年代以來,大陸都市報紛紛開闢讀者投書版,公開向社會大眾徵求就公共議題發表個人看法,也從而開啟了大陸媒介讀者投書的近用權實踐。本研究分析了在北京報業市場首創讀者投書版的新京報,發現投書論述主題背後反映的意義,在打造市民輿論平台,確有其一定成效,但卻明顯迴避了同時間台灣及國際傳媒關注的中國負面新聞。同時,在比對同時間新京報的社論論述主題,發現這些看似「民意」的讀者投書,在經過編輯室守門過程後,往往只是「黨意」的再現,亦即再現黨國當局「輿論引導」的框架。研究也發現,新京報讀者投書版主要是中高社會階層發聲的場域,並非任何民眾都可以參與討論的公共論壇。這說明了新京報讀者投書版距離作為哈伯馬斯所謂的公共論壇,必須具備議題開放、參與成員公平的要件,仍有相當差距。
Since 1990s, many newspapers of major cities in China opened up op-ed pages, soliciting opinions over public issues from readers. This opened up readers’ access right to media in China. Taking a case study of Beijing News, a Beijing newspaper which initiated the op-ed page in Beijing, this paper aims at analyzing the significance of op-ed contents. Beijing News’s op-ed page as a platform did accomplish its functions in certain areas of public concerns. Nevertheless, the newspaper deliberately skipped those news negative to China’s image. Further, those op-ed pieces were likely to be edited before being published. What the above observations imply is that these op-eds only serve the Chinese Communist Party’s goal. This paper also projects that op-ed sections in China’s media have not achieved the level of what Jurgen Habermas calls “public forum,” that opens to all people to discuss all issues regardless of social class, race, gender, political faith, and religion.
關聯 中國大陸研究, 52(3), 1-38
資料類型 article
dc.creator (作者) 張裕亮zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chang, Yu-liang
dc.date (日期) 2009-09
dc.date.accessioned 19-Jul-2016 16:26:58 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 19-Jul-2016 16:26:58 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 19-Jul-2016 16:26:58 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99146-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 九○年代以來,大陸都市報紛紛開闢讀者投書版,公開向社會大眾徵求就公共議題發表個人看法,也從而開啟了大陸媒介讀者投書的近用權實踐。本研究分析了在北京報業市場首創讀者投書版的新京報,發現投書論述主題背後反映的意義,在打造市民輿論平台,確有其一定成效,但卻明顯迴避了同時間台灣及國際傳媒關注的中國負面新聞。同時,在比對同時間新京報的社論論述主題,發現這些看似「民意」的讀者投書,在經過編輯室守門過程後,往往只是「黨意」的再現,亦即再現黨國當局「輿論引導」的框架。研究也發現,新京報讀者投書版主要是中高社會階層發聲的場域,並非任何民眾都可以參與討論的公共論壇。這說明了新京報讀者投書版距離作為哈伯馬斯所謂的公共論壇,必須具備議題開放、參與成員公平的要件,仍有相當差距。
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Since 1990s, many newspapers of major cities in China opened up op-ed pages, soliciting opinions over public issues from readers. This opened up readers’ access right to media in China. Taking a case study of Beijing News, a Beijing newspaper which initiated the op-ed page in Beijing, this paper aims at analyzing the significance of op-ed contents. Beijing News’s op-ed page as a platform did accomplish its functions in certain areas of public concerns. Nevertheless, the newspaper deliberately skipped those news negative to China’s image. Further, those op-ed pieces were likely to be edited before being published. What the above observations imply is that these op-eds only serve the Chinese Communist Party’s goal. This paper also projects that op-ed sections in China’s media have not achieved the level of what Jurgen Habermas calls “public forum,” that opens to all people to discuss all issues regardless of social class, race, gender, political faith, and religion.
dc.format.extent 2536151 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) 中國大陸研究, 52(3), 1-38
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 中國大陸傳媒; 讀者投書; 媒介近用權; 輿論引導
dc.subject (關鍵詞) China media; op-ed contribution; the right of access to media; public opinion shaping
dc.title (題名) 民意乎?黨意乎?-大陸新京報讀者投書的近用權實踐zh_TW
dc.title.alternative (其他題名) Whose Voice: Chinese People or the Chinese Communist Party?The Right of the Reader’s Access to Media in China through Op-Ed Page : A Case Study of Beijing News
dc.type (資料類型) article