| dc.creator (作者) | 邵軒磊 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Shao, Hsuan-lei | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2009-09 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 19-Jul-2016 16:27:16 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 19-Jul-2016 16:27:16 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 19-Jul-2016 16:27:16 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99147 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 「福特亞細亞基金會事件」是現代日本中國學界最重要的論爭之一，內容為美國在1962年時以巨額資金補助特定研究，造成一波學界關於學術倫理問題之討論。由此引發了日本學界對「研究主體性」之認識與反省，也使學界群體逐漸走向對立，造成各界對文革觀感完全不同。論爭中主要的批判在於「學術研究對於社會的責任、亞非拉美觀點與發展路徑的關係、對美國區域研究方法的批判與認識」三個層次。本文從知識系譜角度出發，試圖解釋此期間日本中國學界如何接受西方思潮（特別是美國），包括知識論上的「科學主義」、方法論上的「區域研究」與發展觀上的「西方近代化路徑」三個面向。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | “The Asia-Ford Foundation Event” was one of the most important debate on China studies in Japan. Triggered by US Ford Foundation’s large amount of research grant, the event created heated discussion over academic ethics and “subjectivity of research” in Japan’s academic community, and made academic community divided over China’s Cultural Revolution. The main issues included researcher’s social responsibility, Asian/African/Latin American development approach, and critiques on area studies in the US. This paper attempts to explain how Japanese academic community accepts “western（especially American）research methods” and three aspects will be addressed, which include “scientific principle” in Epistemology, “area study” in methodology, and “Western model” in modernizing process. | |
| dc.format.extent | 1884210 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 中國大陸研究, 52(3), 71-90 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 美國區域研究; 現代中國研究; 福特基金會事件; 戰後日本; 學術社群 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Asia/Ford Foundation; American area studies; postwar Japan; modern China studies; academic community | |
| dc.title (題名) | 「西方」如何影響日本的「中國研究」？—以日本福特基金會論爭為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title.alternative (其他題名) | How “West” Affects China Studies in Japan? A Case Study on the Ford Foundation Debate | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | |
