| dc.creator (作者) | 李梅玲;石之瑜 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Li, Mei-Ling;Shih, Chih-Yu | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2014-07 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 20-Jul-2016 16:26:38 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 20-Jul-2016 16:26:38 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 20-Jul-2016 16:26:38 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99269 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 依照所選介的中英文文獻觀點，否定中國模式存在的各種論辯角度中，儘管肯認中國現代化進程促成繁榮發展，不過仍不足以支撐模式畜試所影射的「中國特殊論」。中英文文獻駁斥中國模式的理由大致相同，皆以為中國成功的關鍵未超出西方所示範的普世發展定律，又或中國的片面成就顯有其侷限性，甚或該模式實質上僅是中共專政的工具。英文文獻的焦點相對集中在中國模式的錯誤，而中文文獻顯示更多情感上的憂慮，認為中國模式的主張無助於中國加入普世價值的典範勢必與現下普世價值（或西方價值）接軌，才得以為名實相符的現代國家。整理中外各界如何否定中國模式後，才得以為名實相符的現代國家。整理中外各界如何否定中國模式之後，才能凸顯中國模式論者與對其否定者之間，主要是立場的不同，而不是否定者以為的是研究方法的不同而已。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The paper selectively reviews the critical discourses on the China model. It divides the literature into English and Chinese studies and finds that they rely on similar themes in disputing the legitimacy behind advocacy for the China model. They deny the uniqueness of the China model and the alleged success of Chinese experiences of development. They suspect that discourse on the model aims at justifying continuous Communist Party rule over China. However, while the English literature tends to assert the universality of Western modernity, the Chinese literature shows consistent anxiety about the disinterest among China model writers in reading universal implications into China’s experiences of development. | |
| dc.format.extent | 163 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/html | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 東亞研究, 45(2), 1-33 | |
| dc.relation (關聯) | East Asia Studies | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 中國模式; 文明大國; 現代性; 普世價值; 中共 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | China model; civilizational state; modernity; universal values; Chinese Communist Party (CCP) | |
| dc.title (題名) | 無效與無知─檢閱文獻中對中國模式的質疑 | zh_TW |
| dc.title.alternative (其他題名) | Futile and Ignorant: The Critical Literature on the China Model | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | |
