1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Social Science
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 科技專案計畫之資源錯置研究：以專利價值指標為研發產出
Misallocation of Technology Development Programs: Using Patent Value Index as the R&D Output
作者 王琬茵
Wang, Wan Yin
貢獻者 王信實<br>李文傑
Wang, Shinn Shyr<br>Lee, Wen Chieh
王琬茵
Wang, Wan Yin
關鍵詞 資源錯置
專利價值指標
執行效率
misallocation
patent value index
executive efficiency
日期 2016
上傳時間 21-Jul-2016 10:37:28 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究針對科技專案計畫2004至2014年執行效率的審視，主要針對科專計劃產業分類和執行單位分類進行各組間的生產效率錯置的比較。另外，本篇將專利價值指標當作生產產出，結合專利的三項指標：引證數、被引證數以及範圍數，主要是透過因素分析方法計算三者在美國全國經濟研究所(NBER)分類中的各產業比例。研究結果顯示在2005年至2007年期間，依產業分類下，機電運輸與生醫材化的執行效率達到高峰，之後則逐年下降，但電資通光則相對兩產業來的穩定。除此之外，依執行單位別分類，工研院在研究的11年間相較中科院和其他執行單位波動較大。較特別的是，我們發現當使用專利價值指標當作產出時，其效率值明顯較低，特別是在機電運輸、生醫材化、中科院以及其他執行單位的分類中。
This paper assesses the executive efficiency of Technology Development Programs (TDPs) from 2004 to 2014, mainly focusing on the resource misallocation of TDPs among three industries and executive institutes. In addition, the patent value index combing three indicators of patent, which are forward citation, backward citation and claims, is utilized as the research and development (R&D) output of the TDPs and the weights of the three indicators in all industries, based on the categorization of The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), are calculated by the method of factor analysis. The result indicates that from 2005 to 2007, the efficiencies of machinery and transportation (MT) & biotechnology, pharmaceutical, material, chemical (BPMC) reached to the peak and then has declined year by year; however, the industry of electronics, information, communication, optoelectronics (EICO) is comparably more stable than the other two industries. Additionally, in terms of the executive institutes, Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) has fluctuated sharply over the 11 years, which is more unstable than the other two groups, National Chung-Shan Institute of Science & Technology (CSIST) and the other institutes. In particular, the result shows that the efficiency is higher while using the patent granted number as the output instead of the patent value index and this phenomenon is especially obvious in MT, BPMC, CSIST and the other institutes.
參考文獻 Bartelsman, E., Haltiwanger, J., & Scarpetta, S. (2013). Cross-Country Differences in Productivity: The Role of Allocation and Selection. American Economic Review, pp. 305-334.
Chang, S. T., & Miao, W. C. (2011). The Study of Multiple Performance Measures Model-The Empirical Study of Technology Development Program of Ministry of Economic Affairs. Soochow Journal of Accounting, 4(1), pp. 95-123.
Chang, S. T., & Tsu, C. H. (2009). The Efficiency Evaluation of the Technology Development Program-Data Envelopment Analysis and Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach. Soochow Journal of Accounting, 2(1), pp. 51-72.
Chen, C. H., & Yang, J. R. (2001). R&D, Technology Import and Patent-GMM on Count Panel Data. Taiwan Economic Review, 29(1), pp. 69-87.
Griliches, Z., Hausman, J., & Hall, B. H. (1984). Econometric models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship. Econometrica, 52(4), pp. 909-938.
Hall, B. H., & Ziedonis, R. H. (2001). The Patent Paradox Revisted: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry. RAND Journal of Economics, 32(1), pp. 101-128.
Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (1999). Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3), pp. 511-515.
Hirshleifer, D., Hsu, P. H., & Li, D. (n.d.). Innovative Efficiency and Stock Returns. Journal of Finanical Economics, 107, pp. 632-654.
Hsieh, C. T., & Klenow, P. J. (2009). Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4), pp. 1403-1448.
Hsu, P. H. (2009). Technological Innovations and Aggregate Risk Premiums. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), pp. 264-279.
Huang, G. G., & Jang, S. L. (2005). The Evaluation of Public Science & Technology Projects in Taiwan. Journal of Science and Philosophy, 17(3), pp. 459-489.
Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (2004). Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicator. The Economic Journal, 114(495), pp. 441-465.
Liang, C. C., & Yuan, M. S. (2009). The Study of Development of Patent Indexes. Journal of Library and Information Science, 35(2), pp. 88-106.
Lin, H. L., & Li, X. F. (1996). The Relationship between Patent Numbers and R&D Expenditures in Taiwan: An Application of Non-Negative Integer. Taiwan Economics Review, 24(2), pp. 273-301.
Lin, X. W. (2003, 4). The Assessment of the Efficiency Technology Development Programs` System. Sci-Tech Policy Review. (in Chinese)
Pakes, A., & Griliches, Z. (1984). Patents and R and D at the Firm Level: A First Look. NBER Working Paper, 561.
Putnam, J. (1996). The Value of International Patent Rights.
Restuccia, D., & Rogerson, R. (2008). Policy Distortions and Aggregate Productivity with Heterogeneous Establishments. Review of Economic Dynamics, 11(4), pp. 707-720.
Retizig, M. (2003). What Determines Patent Value?: Insights from the Semiconductor industry. Research Policy, 32(1), pp. 13-26.
Wang, P., & Tallman, E. (1994). Human Capital and Endogenous Growth: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Monetary Economics, 34, 101-124.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
經濟學系
103258032
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103258032
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 王信實<br>李文傑zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Wang, Shinn Shyr<br>Lee, Wen Chiehen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 王琬茵zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Wang, Wan Yinen_US
dc.creator (作者) 王琬茵zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Wang, Wan Yinen_US
dc.date (日期) 2016en_US
dc.date.accessioned 21-Jul-2016 10:37:28 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 21-Jul-2016 10:37:28 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 21-Jul-2016 10:37:28 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0103258032en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99440-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 經濟學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 103258032zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究針對科技專案計畫2004至2014年執行效率的審視，主要針對科專計劃產業分類和執行單位分類進行各組間的生產效率錯置的比較。另外，本篇將專利價值指標當作生產產出，結合專利的三項指標：引證數、被引證數以及範圍數，主要是透過因素分析方法計算三者在美國全國經濟研究所(NBER)分類中的各產業比例。研究結果顯示在2005年至2007年期間，依產業分類下，機電運輸與生醫材化的執行效率達到高峰，之後則逐年下降，但電資通光則相對兩產業來的穩定。除此之外，依執行單位別分類，工研院在研究的11年間相較中科院和其他執行單位波動較大。較特別的是，我們發現當使用專利價值指標當作產出時，其效率值明顯較低，特別是在機電運輸、生醫材化、中科院以及其他執行單位的分類中。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This paper assesses the executive efficiency of Technology Development Programs (TDPs) from 2004 to 2014, mainly focusing on the resource misallocation of TDPs among three industries and executive institutes. In addition, the patent value index combing three indicators of patent, which are forward citation, backward citation and claims, is utilized as the research and development (R&D) output of the TDPs and the weights of the three indicators in all industries, based on the categorization of The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), are calculated by the method of factor analysis. The result indicates that from 2005 to 2007, the efficiencies of machinery and transportation (MT) & biotechnology, pharmaceutical, material, chemical (BPMC) reached to the peak and then has declined year by year; however, the industry of electronics, information, communication, optoelectronics (EICO) is comparably more stable than the other two industries. Additionally, in terms of the executive institutes, Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) has fluctuated sharply over the 11 years, which is more unstable than the other two groups, National Chung-Shan Institute of Science & Technology (CSIST) and the other institutes. In particular, the result shows that the efficiency is higher while using the patent granted number as the output instead of the patent value index and this phenomenon is especially obvious in MT, BPMC, CSIST and the other institutes.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents Abstract 2
Contents 3
1. Introduction 4
2. Literature Review 8
3. The Introduction of Technology Development Programs 12
3-1 The History 12
3-2 The Organization TDP 15
4. Data Description and Sources 17
4-1 The TDP Yearbook 17
4-2 The U.S. Patents of TDPs 19
4-3 Four Indicators of the Patents 20
4-4 The U.S. Granted Patents in NBER 21
4-5 The limitation 21
5. Methodology 23
5-1 The Composite Patent Quality Index 23
5-2 Misallocation 25
6. Empirical Results 30
6-1 Industries 30
6-2 Executive Institutes 33
7. Concluding Remarks 36
Reference 38
Appendix 40		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 616013 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103258032en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 資源錯置zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 專利價值指標zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 執行效率zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) misallocationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) patent value indexen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) executive efficiencyen_US
dc.title (題名) 科技專案計畫之資源錯置研究：以專利價值指標為研發產出zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Misallocation of Technology Development Programs: Using Patent Value Index as the R&D Outputen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bartelsman, E., Haltiwanger, J., & Scarpetta, S. (2013). Cross-Country Differences in Productivity: The Role of Allocation and Selection. American Economic Review, pp. 305-334.
Chang, S. T., & Miao, W. C. (2011). The Study of Multiple Performance Measures Model-The Empirical Study of Technology Development Program of Ministry of Economic Affairs. Soochow Journal of Accounting, 4(1), pp. 95-123.
Chang, S. T., & Tsu, C. H. (2009). The Efficiency Evaluation of the Technology Development Program-Data Envelopment Analysis and Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach. Soochow Journal of Accounting, 2(1), pp. 51-72.
Chen, C. H., & Yang, J. R. (2001). R&D, Technology Import and Patent-GMM on Count Panel Data. Taiwan Economic Review, 29(1), pp. 69-87.
Griliches, Z., Hausman, J., & Hall, B. H. (1984). Econometric models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship. Econometrica, 52(4), pp. 909-938.
Hall, B. H., & Ziedonis, R. H. (2001). The Patent Paradox Revisted: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry. RAND Journal of Economics, 32(1), pp. 101-128.
Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (1999). Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3), pp. 511-515.
Hirshleifer, D., Hsu, P. H., & Li, D. (n.d.). Innovative Efficiency and Stock Returns. Journal of Finanical Economics, 107, pp. 632-654.
Hsieh, C. T., & Klenow, P. J. (2009). Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4), pp. 1403-1448.
Hsu, P. H. (2009). Technological Innovations and Aggregate Risk Premiums. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), pp. 264-279.
Huang, G. G., & Jang, S. L. (2005). The Evaluation of Public Science & Technology Projects in Taiwan. Journal of Science and Philosophy, 17(3), pp. 459-489.
Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (2004). Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicator. The Economic Journal, 114(495), pp. 441-465.
Liang, C. C., & Yuan, M. S. (2009). The Study of Development of Patent Indexes. Journal of Library and Information Science, 35(2), pp. 88-106.
Lin, H. L., & Li, X. F. (1996). The Relationship between Patent Numbers and R&D Expenditures in Taiwan: An Application of Non-Negative Integer. Taiwan Economics Review, 24(2), pp. 273-301.
Lin, X. W. (2003, 4). The Assessment of the Efficiency Technology Development Programs` System. Sci-Tech Policy Review. (in Chinese)
Pakes, A., & Griliches, Z. (1984). Patents and R and D at the Firm Level: A First Look. NBER Working Paper, 561.
Putnam, J. (1996). The Value of International Patent Rights.
Restuccia, D., & Rogerson, R. (2008). Policy Distortions and Aggregate Productivity with Heterogeneous Establishments. Review of Economic Dynamics, 11(4), pp. 707-720.
Retizig, M. (2003). What Determines Patent Value?: Insights from the Semiconductor industry. Research Policy, 32(1), pp. 13-26.
Wang, P., & Tallman, E. (1994). Human Capital and Endogenous Growth: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Monetary Economics, 34, 101-124.		zh_TW