Publications-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
Google ScholarTM
NCCU Library
Citation Infomation
Related Publications in TAIR
題名 模糊統計於校長職業幸福感測量之應用
The Application of Measuring Occupational Well-being of Principals with Fuzzy Statistics作者 李康莊
Lee, Kang Chuang貢獻者 吳政達<br>傅如馨
Wu, C. T.<br>Fu, J. T.
李康莊
Lee, Kang Chuang關鍵詞 模糊統計
校長職業幸福感
fuzzy statistics
occupational well-being of principals日期 2016 上傳時間 9-Aug-2016 14:41:17 (UTC+8) 摘要 現今對於幸福感此一主題的測量,主要採用自陳量表的方式。然傳統量表無法精確描述人類多元行為,為期能更正確的瞭解受訪者的內在感受與想法,因此本研究提出模糊統計模式,期能針對過去傳統自陳量表之不足予以改進。而校長身為一間學校的領導者與管理者,其幸福感之程度,必會對學校的氣氛與發展產生直接或間接地影響。雖目前對於教師幸福感及學生幸福感的研究頗多,但針對校長職業幸福感之研究迄今仍尚付闕如,是故此主題值得深究。本研究採用問卷調查法,以北北基地區國中校長共50位為對象,採用「中學校長職業幸福感量表」為工具,並以敘述統計、偏最小平方法、曼-惠特尼 U 檢定、克-瓦單因子等級變異數分析、Pearson積差相關分析、模糊統計等統計方法進行分析。主要研究結果如下:1. 北北基地區中學校長對職業幸福感的知覺與感受程度屬中高程度,以「內心滿足感」最高,「職業成就感」居次,最後為「職業滿意感」構面。2. 服務年資在1-8年的校長的「職業幸福感」高於服務8年以上之校長。3. 任職「國民中學」的校長其「職業幸福感」高於任職「完全中學」的校長。4. 模糊語意尺度所得之信度與建構效度均優於傳統問卷尺度所得。本研究根據資料分析結果進行討論,並提出數點建議供後續相關工作及研究參考。
Well-being of principals is one of the most important indicators of a school. Principals as leaders and managers in schools, their condition of well-being can directly or indirectly affect the atmosphere and development of schools. The most common measurement regarding the topic is self-report inventory, However, traditional inventories cannot reflect human’s behaviors. In order to clearly understand interviewees’ feelings and thoughts, the study provided fuzzy statistics model in the hope of improving insufficiencies of traditional inventories.In the study, a questionnaire survey method is used, and 50 principals from Taipei-Keelung metropolitan area are surveyed with stratified sampling. Data analysis includes descriptive statistics, PLS-SEM, Mann–Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA by ranks, Pearson product–moment correlation analysis, and fuzzy statistics. The main conclusions are as follows:1. The occupational well-being of principals from Taipei-Keelung metropolitan area was above the medium level. “Inner satisfaction” factor was the highest score on “occupational well-being”.2. The principals with 1-8 years of service, their occupational well-being was better than the principals who have 8 or more years of service.3. The occupational well-being of principals in junior high school was better than the principals in complete high school.4. The reliability and construct validity calculated by fuzzy scales were better than by traditional scales.This research mainly focuses on the data analysis and discussion, and provides some suggestions for future studies.參考文獻 中文部分王朝茂(1996)。教師信念量表。台北市:心理出版社有限公司。古婷菊(2006)。國中教師幸福感及其相關因素之研究。臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系在職進修碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。朱智洺(2007)。李克特式量表與模糊語意量表計分的差異比較-以正態模糊數模擬為例。統計與決策,22,160-162。何偉雲(1995)。學生學習成就的模糊統計分析。屏東師院學報,8,167-180。何榮桂、籃如玉(2001)。乏晰語義辨別在職業認知輔導之應用。第五屆華人社會心理與教育測驗學術研討會論文。台北市:國立臺灣師範大學。汪洋、孫林岩(2008)。李克特式量表與模糊語意量表計分的差異比較-以梯形模糊數模擬為例。運籌與管理,17(1),48-52。吳柏林(1994)。模糊統計分析:問卷調查研究之新方向。國立政治大學研究通訊,2,65-80。吳柏林、楊文山(1997)。模糊統計在社會調查分析的應用。社會科學計量方法發展與應用。台北市:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。吳柏林、曾能芳(1998)。模糊迴歸參數估計及在景氣對策信號之分析應用。中國統計學報,36(4),399-420。吳柏林(2005)。模糊統計導論:方法與應用。台北:五南。林子雯(1996)。成人學生多重角色與幸福感之相關研究。高雄師範大學成人教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。林信惠、蕭文峰(2001)。模糊口語評估尺度之歸屬函數建構及特性探討。資訊管理學報,8,1-19。林信榕(2007)。校長領導與學校文化探究。台北市:師大書苑。林原宏(2001)。模糊語意變數量表計分之信度模擬分析。測驗統計年刊,9,193-219。林原宏(2002)。模糊語意量表的語意模糊數建構演算與實證分析。調查研究,11,31-71。林原宏(2002)。模糊語意變數的多準則評量之研究。國立台中師範學院學報,16,451-470。林原宏、楊慧玲(2002)。模糊語意量表與傳統量表計分之模擬比較分析。第四屆華人心理學家學術研討會暨第六屆華人心理與行為科際學術研討會。台北市:中央研究院。林淑惠、黃韞臻(2008)。高中職學生學校生活與主觀幸福感關係之研究。輔導與諮商學報,30(2),83-106。邱皓政(2011)。結構方程模式:LISREL的理論,技術與應用。臺北市:雙葉書廊。胡悅倫、吳柏林(2002)。模糊統計在分析樂觀量表之應用。教育與心理研究,25,457-484。胡悅倫、陳皎眉、吳柏林(2006)。應用模糊統計於A型量表分類之研究。教育與心理研究,29(1),151-181。施建彬(1995)。幸福感及其相關因素之探討。高雄醫學院行為科學研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。施建彬、陸洛(合譯)(1997)。Michael Argyle著。幸福心理學。臺北市:巨流圖書公司(原出版年:1993)。徐村和、朱國明、詹惠君(2001)。模糊語意尺度之研究。企業管理學報,51,27-52。浦憶娟(2009)。高中職教師人際關係與幸福感關係之研究。國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班,未出版,臺北市。翁琴雅(2012)。我國中學校長職業幸福感研究。華東師範大學教育管理研究所博士論文,未出版,上海市。陸洛(1996)。中國人幸福感相關因素之探討。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(NSC85-2413-H-037-002)。高雄:高雄醫學院行為科學研究所。陸洛(1998)。中國人幸福感之內涵、測量及相關因素探討。國家科學委員會研究彙編:人文及社會科學,8(1),115-137。張春興(2006)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:東華。張紹勳(2012)。模糊多準則評估法及統計。臺北市:五南。張傳琳(2013)。正向心理學。臺北市:洪葉。連經宇(2001)。家戶購屋決策影響因素之初探研究-結合模糊語意的因素分析法之實證比較。台灣土地研究,4,29-51。陳昭宏(1998)。以 Fuzzy 演算法分析評量用詞對問卷調查之影響。東方工商學報,21,76-82。陳世芬(2007)。加護病房護理人員之非理性信念、情緒特質與情緒管理對人際關係影響路徑之建構。政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。陳郁茜(2009)。不同國高中班級組織型態、人格特質、壓力因應方式與大學生幸福感之研究。政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。陳奎憙(1998)。現代教育社會學。台北市:師大書苑。陳柏邑(2012)。以WHOQOL-BREF探討傳統與模糊量表間的一致性與測驗恆等性。臺灣大學心理學研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。陳慧姿(2007)。高中教師靈性健康與幸福感之相關研究。高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。曾文志(2008)。大學生的生活事件、人際長處與心理健康之復原力取向研究:中介與調節效果的探討。教育心理學報,40(2),221-240。楊宜音、張志學、彭泗清(1997)。性格與社會心理測量總覽。台北市:遠流。楊國樞(1980)。生活素質的心理學觀。中華心理學刊,22(2),11-24。楊國樞(1992)。中國人的社會取向:社會互動的觀點。中國人的心理與行為—理念方法篇,87-142。臺北市:桂冠。劉敏珍(2000)。老年人人際親密、依附風格與幸福感之關係研究。高雄師範大學成人教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。鄭景俗、楊國隆(1998)。模糊集合論在教育評分等級系統之應用。模糊系統學刊,4(2),81-89。謝名娟、吳柏林(2012)。模糊統計在試題難度上的應用。教育心理學報,44(2),207-228。謝名娟、吳柏林(2012)。網路教育問卷調查新技術與線上模糊統計分析建構。國家教育研究院專題研究計畫成果報告(NAER-100-24-B-2-01-00-2-01)。台北市:國家教育研究院。謝玫芸(2008)。高雄市國小教師外向性人格、角色壓力與幸福感之關係研究。高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。羅昭強(2000)。模糊理論在數學科基本能力測驗上的應用。八十九學年度師範學院教育學術論文發表會論文集。新竹市:國立新竹師範學院。蕭文龍(2013)。統計分析入門與應用。台北市:碁峰資訊。英文部分Andrews, F. A., & Withey, S.B. (1976). Social Indicators of Well-being in America: The Development and Measurement of Perceptual Indicators. New York: Plenum Press.Argyle, M. (1987). The psychology of happiness. London: Routedge.Argyle, M. & Lu, L. (1990). The happiness of extraverts. Personality and Individual Difference, 11, 1011-1017.Argyle, M. & Lu, L. (1990). Happiness and social skills. Personality and Individual Difference, 11, 1255-1261.Bagnoli, C., & Smith, H. C. (1998). The theory of fuzzy logic and its application to real estate valuation. Journal of Real Estate Research, 16(2), 169-199.Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 248-287.Berkman, L. F., & Glass, T. (2000). Social integration, social networks, social support, and health. Social epidemiology, 1, 137-173.Blunch, N. (2012). Introduction to structural equation modeling using IBM SPSS statistics and AMOS. London: Sage.Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1978). Lottery winner and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 917-927.Bryant, F. B., & Veroff, J. (1982). The structure of psychological well-being: A sociohistorical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 653-673.Buckley, J. J. (2004). Fuzzy statistics (Vol. 149). New York: Springer Science & Business Media.Chekola, M.G. (1975). The concept of happiness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan. Dissertation abstracts international, 35, 4609.Chen, S. H. & Hwang, C. L. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. New York: Springer-VerlagCloninger, C. R. (2004). Feeling Good. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 668-678.Costas, C. S. L, Maranon, P. P., & Cabrera, J. A. H. (1994). Application of diffuse measurement to the evaluation of psychological structures. Quality and Quanty, 28, 305-313.DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits snd subjective well-being. Psychology Bulletin, 124, 197-229.Devos, G., Bouckenooghe, D., Engels, N., Hotton, G., & Aelterman, A. (2007). An assessment of well-being of principals in Flemish primary schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(1), 33-61.Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.Diener, E., Sandvik, E. & Larsen, R. J. (1985). Age and sex effects for emotional intensity. Developmental Psychology, 21: 542-6.Diener, E., Sandvik, E. Seidlitz, L. & Diener, M. (1993). The relationship between income and subjective well-being: relative or absolute. Social Indicators Research, 28, 195-223.Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276-302.Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American psychologist, 55(1), 34.Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1983). Ranking fuzzy number in the setting of possibility theory. Information Science, 30, 183-224.Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management review, 17(2), 183-211.Gmelch, W. H., & Gates, G. (1998). The impact of personal, professional and organizational characteristics on administrator burnout. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(2), 146-159.Headey, B. & Wearing, A. (1989). Personality, life events, and subjective well-being: Toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 731-739.Heck, R. H., & Marcoulides, G. A. (1996). School culture and performance: Testing the invariance of an organizational model. School effectiveness and school improvement, 7(1), 76-95.Herrera, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2000). Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 116, 67-82.Hersh, H. M. & Caramazza, A. A. (1976). A fuzzy set approach to modifiers and vagueness in natural language. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 105, 254-276.Hesketh, B., Pryor, R., & Gleitzman, M., & Hesketh, T. (1988). Practical applications and psychometric evaluation of a computerized fuzzy graphic ration scale. In T. Zetenyi(ed.) Fuzzy Sets in Psycholog(pp.425-454). New York: North-Holland.Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2002). The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire: a compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1073–1082.Holahan, C. K. (1988). Relation of life goals at age 70 to activity participation and health and psychological well-being among terman’s gifted men and women. Psychology and Aging, 3(3), 286-291.Holmes E. (2005). Teacher well-being. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). London: Sage Publications.Ishikawa, A., Amagasa, T., Tamizawa, G., Totsuta, R., & Mieno, H. (1993). The max-min delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 55, 241-253.Ivancevich, J. M., & Matteson, M. (2002). Organisational Management and Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.Judge, T. A., & Bauer, T. N. (1997). Personality and work role affect. Academy of Management Annualmeeting, boston, ma.Jamal, M., & Baba, V. V. (2003). Type A behavior, components, and outcomes: A study of Canadian employees. International journal of stress management,10(1), 39.Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 121-140.Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007-1022.Keyes, C. L. M. & Magyar-Mor, J. L. (2003). The measurement and utility of adult subjective well-being. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Synder (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures, 411-425, Washington, DC: American Psychologicla Association.Klir, G. J., & Yuan, B.(1995). Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic theory and application. NJ:Prentice-Hall.Klir, G. J., & Folger, T. A. (1988). Fuzzy sets, uncertainty and information. NJ: Prentice-Hall.Law. C. K. (1996). Using fuzzy numbers in educational grading system. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 83, 311-323.Law, C. K. (1997). A fuzzy logical model to aggregate several heterogeneous educational grades from a reductionist grading scheme. Proceedings of 8 th International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematical Modeling and Applications.Liang, G. S., & Wang, M. J. (1991). A fuzzy multicriteria decision making method for facility site selection. Internation Journal of Production Research, 29(11), 2313-2330.Lin, H. C. (2014). Fuzzy PLS path modeling of interpersonal relationship, social support, job achievement and subjective well-being of school principals.International Journal of Intelligent Technologies and Applied Statistics, 7(4), 323-337.Lu, L. & Argyle, M. (1991). Happiness and cooperation. Personality and Individual Difference, 12, 1019-1030.Lu, L., & Shih, J. B. (1997). Personality and happiness: Is mental health a mediator? Personality and Indivdual Differences, 22, 249–256.Lu, L., Shih, J. B., Lin, Y. Y., & Ju, L. S. (1997). Personal and environmental correlates of happiness. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 453-462.Man, F., Nygard, R., & Gjesme, T. (1994). The Achievement Motives Scale (AMS): theoretical basis and results from a first try‐out of a Czech form.Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 38(3-4), 209-218.McGrath, J. E. (1970). Social and psychological factors in stress. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Michalos, A. C.(1985). Multiple discrepacies theory. Social Indicators Research, 16, 347-414.Omodei, M. M., & Wearing, A. J. (1990). Need satisfaction and involvement in personal projects: Toward an integrative model of subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 762-769.Pryor, R. G. L., Hesketh, B., & Gleitzman, M.(1989). Making things clearer by making them fuzzy: counseling illustrations of a fuzzy graphic rating scale. The career development quarterly, 38, 136-146.Rim, Y, (1993). Values, happiness and family structure variables. Personality and Individual Difference, 15(5), 595-598.Roth, M., Decker, O., Herzberg, P. Y., & Brähler, E. (2008). Dimensionality and norms of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in a German general population sample. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24(3), 190-197.Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorationns on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081.Scott, C., & Dinham, S. (2003). The development of scales to measure teacher and school executive occupational satisfaction. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(1), 74-86.Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5-14.Seligman, M. E. P. (2012). Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being. New York: Simon and Schuster.Sergiovanni, T. J. (2006). Rethinking leadership. CA: Corwin.Spector, P. E. (1988). Development of the work locus of control scale. Journal of occupational psychology, 61(4), 335-340.Spector, P. E., & O`Connell, B. J. (1994). The contribution of personality traits, negative affectivity, locus of control and Type A to the subsequent reports of job stressors and job strains. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67(1), 1-12.Thoits, P. A. (1982). Conceptual, methodological and theoretical problem in studying social supports as a buffer against life stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 23, 145-159.Tichatonga. J. (1999). Determinants and prevalence of occupational stress among Zimbabwean school administrators. Journal of Educational Administration, 37(3), 256-272.Turksen I. B.(1988). Stochastic fuzzy sets: a survey. In J. Kacprzyk & M.Fedrizzi (Eds.), Combing fuzzy imprecision with probabilistic uncertainty in decision making(pp.168-183). New York: Springer-VerlagTurksen, I. B. (1991). Measurement of membership functions and their acquisition. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 40, 5-38.Veenhoven, R. (1991). Is happiness relative? Social Indicators Research, 24, 1-34.Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: how good are single-item measures?. Journal of applied Psychology, 82(2), 247.Yamashita, T. (1997). On a support system for human decision making by the combination of fuzzy reasoning and fuzzy structural modeling. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 87, 257-263.Yen, C. L. (1996). Using fuzzy sets in developing mathematical learning progress indicator. The proceedings of National Science Council (part D), 6, 57-64.Zadeh, L. A. (1972). A fuzzy set theoretical interpretation of hedges. Journal of Cybernetics, 2, 4-34.Zadeh, L. A. (1995). Discussion: probability theory and fuzzy logic are complementary rather than competitive. Technometrics, 37(3), 271-276.Zimmermann, H. J. (1991). Fuzzy set theory and its application. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
學校行政碩士在職專班
101911001資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101911001 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 吳政達<br>傅如馨 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Wu, C. T.<br>Fu, J. T. en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 李康莊 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Lee, Kang Chuang en_US dc.creator (作者) 李康莊 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Lee, Kang Chuang en_US dc.date (日期) 2016 en_US dc.date.accessioned 9-Aug-2016 14:41:17 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 9-Aug-2016 14:41:17 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 9-Aug-2016 14:41:17 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0101911001 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99869 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 學校行政碩士在職專班 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 101911001 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 現今對於幸福感此一主題的測量,主要採用自陳量表的方式。然傳統量表無法精確描述人類多元行為,為期能更正確的瞭解受訪者的內在感受與想法,因此本研究提出模糊統計模式,期能針對過去傳統自陳量表之不足予以改進。而校長身為一間學校的領導者與管理者,其幸福感之程度,必會對學校的氣氛與發展產生直接或間接地影響。雖目前對於教師幸福感及學生幸福感的研究頗多,但針對校長職業幸福感之研究迄今仍尚付闕如,是故此主題值得深究。本研究採用問卷調查法,以北北基地區國中校長共50位為對象,採用「中學校長職業幸福感量表」為工具,並以敘述統計、偏最小平方法、曼-惠特尼 U 檢定、克-瓦單因子等級變異數分析、Pearson積差相關分析、模糊統計等統計方法進行分析。主要研究結果如下:1. 北北基地區中學校長對職業幸福感的知覺與感受程度屬中高程度,以「內心滿足感」最高,「職業成就感」居次,最後為「職業滿意感」構面。2. 服務年資在1-8年的校長的「職業幸福感」高於服務8年以上之校長。3. 任職「國民中學」的校長其「職業幸福感」高於任職「完全中學」的校長。4. 模糊語意尺度所得之信度與建構效度均優於傳統問卷尺度所得。本研究根據資料分析結果進行討論,並提出數點建議供後續相關工作及研究參考。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Well-being of principals is one of the most important indicators of a school. Principals as leaders and managers in schools, their condition of well-being can directly or indirectly affect the atmosphere and development of schools. The most common measurement regarding the topic is self-report inventory, However, traditional inventories cannot reflect human’s behaviors. In order to clearly understand interviewees’ feelings and thoughts, the study provided fuzzy statistics model in the hope of improving insufficiencies of traditional inventories.In the study, a questionnaire survey method is used, and 50 principals from Taipei-Keelung metropolitan area are surveyed with stratified sampling. Data analysis includes descriptive statistics, PLS-SEM, Mann–Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA by ranks, Pearson product–moment correlation analysis, and fuzzy statistics. The main conclusions are as follows:1. The occupational well-being of principals from Taipei-Keelung metropolitan area was above the medium level. “Inner satisfaction” factor was the highest score on “occupational well-being”.2. The principals with 1-8 years of service, their occupational well-being was better than the principals who have 8 or more years of service.3. The occupational well-being of principals in junior high school was better than the principals in complete high school.4. The reliability and construct validity calculated by fuzzy scales were better than by traditional scales.This research mainly focuses on the data analysis and discussion, and provides some suggestions for future studies. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 7第一節 研究動機與目的 7第二節 研究問題與假設 10第三節 重要名詞解釋 12第四節 研究範圍與限制 14第二章 文獻探討 15第一節 幸福感的意涵與相關理論 15第二節 校長職業幸福感意涵與相關研究 24第三節 模糊理論意涵與相關研究 30第三章 研究方法 37第一節 研究架構 37第二節 研究對象 38第三節 研究工具 41第四節 研究步驟 44第五節 資料處理與分析 46第四章 研究結果分析與討論 51第一節 職業幸福感之架構分析 51第二節 中學校長職業滿意感、職業成就感、內心滿足感及職業幸福感之現況分析 55第三節 不同背景變項下中學校長職業滿意感、職業成就感、內心滿足感及職業幸福感之差異情形 59第四節 中學校長職業滿意感、職業成就感、內心滿足感及職業幸福感之相關分析 74第五節 模糊統計測量與傳統問卷測量之比較 80第五章 結論與建議 84第一節 結論 84第二節 建議 88參考文獻 90中文部分 90英文部分 94附錄一 103 zh_TW dc.format.extent 1498827 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101911001 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 模糊統計 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 校長職業幸福感 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) fuzzy statistics en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) occupational well-being of principals en_US dc.title (題名) 模糊統計於校長職業幸福感測量之應用 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The Application of Measuring Occupational Well-being of Principals with Fuzzy Statistics en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分王朝茂(1996)。教師信念量表。台北市:心理出版社有限公司。古婷菊(2006)。國中教師幸福感及其相關因素之研究。臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系在職進修碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。朱智洺(2007)。李克特式量表與模糊語意量表計分的差異比較-以正態模糊數模擬為例。統計與決策,22,160-162。何偉雲(1995)。學生學習成就的模糊統計分析。屏東師院學報,8,167-180。何榮桂、籃如玉(2001)。乏晰語義辨別在職業認知輔導之應用。第五屆華人社會心理與教育測驗學術研討會論文。台北市:國立臺灣師範大學。汪洋、孫林岩(2008)。李克特式量表與模糊語意量表計分的差異比較-以梯形模糊數模擬為例。運籌與管理,17(1),48-52。吳柏林(1994)。模糊統計分析:問卷調查研究之新方向。國立政治大學研究通訊,2,65-80。吳柏林、楊文山(1997)。模糊統計在社會調查分析的應用。社會科學計量方法發展與應用。台北市:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。吳柏林、曾能芳(1998)。模糊迴歸參數估計及在景氣對策信號之分析應用。中國統計學報,36(4),399-420。吳柏林(2005)。模糊統計導論:方法與應用。台北:五南。林子雯(1996)。成人學生多重角色與幸福感之相關研究。高雄師範大學成人教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。林信惠、蕭文峰(2001)。模糊口語評估尺度之歸屬函數建構及特性探討。資訊管理學報,8,1-19。林信榕(2007)。校長領導與學校文化探究。台北市:師大書苑。林原宏(2001)。模糊語意變數量表計分之信度模擬分析。測驗統計年刊,9,193-219。林原宏(2002)。模糊語意量表的語意模糊數建構演算與實證分析。調查研究,11,31-71。林原宏(2002)。模糊語意變數的多準則評量之研究。國立台中師範學院學報,16,451-470。林原宏、楊慧玲(2002)。模糊語意量表與傳統量表計分之模擬比較分析。第四屆華人心理學家學術研討會暨第六屆華人心理與行為科際學術研討會。台北市:中央研究院。林淑惠、黃韞臻(2008)。高中職學生學校生活與主觀幸福感關係之研究。輔導與諮商學報,30(2),83-106。邱皓政(2011)。結構方程模式:LISREL的理論,技術與應用。臺北市:雙葉書廊。胡悅倫、吳柏林(2002)。模糊統計在分析樂觀量表之應用。教育與心理研究,25,457-484。胡悅倫、陳皎眉、吳柏林(2006)。應用模糊統計於A型量表分類之研究。教育與心理研究,29(1),151-181。施建彬(1995)。幸福感及其相關因素之探討。高雄醫學院行為科學研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。施建彬、陸洛(合譯)(1997)。Michael Argyle著。幸福心理學。臺北市:巨流圖書公司(原出版年:1993)。徐村和、朱國明、詹惠君(2001)。模糊語意尺度之研究。企業管理學報,51,27-52。浦憶娟(2009)。高中職教師人際關係與幸福感關係之研究。國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班,未出版,臺北市。翁琴雅(2012)。我國中學校長職業幸福感研究。華東師範大學教育管理研究所博士論文,未出版,上海市。陸洛(1996)。中國人幸福感相關因素之探討。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(NSC85-2413-H-037-002)。高雄:高雄醫學院行為科學研究所。陸洛(1998)。中國人幸福感之內涵、測量及相關因素探討。國家科學委員會研究彙編:人文及社會科學,8(1),115-137。張春興(2006)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:東華。張紹勳(2012)。模糊多準則評估法及統計。臺北市:五南。張傳琳(2013)。正向心理學。臺北市:洪葉。連經宇(2001)。家戶購屋決策影響因素之初探研究-結合模糊語意的因素分析法之實證比較。台灣土地研究,4,29-51。陳昭宏(1998)。以 Fuzzy 演算法分析評量用詞對問卷調查之影響。東方工商學報,21,76-82。陳世芬(2007)。加護病房護理人員之非理性信念、情緒特質與情緒管理對人際關係影響路徑之建構。政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。陳郁茜(2009)。不同國高中班級組織型態、人格特質、壓力因應方式與大學生幸福感之研究。政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。陳奎憙(1998)。現代教育社會學。台北市:師大書苑。陳柏邑(2012)。以WHOQOL-BREF探討傳統與模糊量表間的一致性與測驗恆等性。臺灣大學心理學研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。陳慧姿(2007)。高中教師靈性健康與幸福感之相關研究。高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。曾文志(2008)。大學生的生活事件、人際長處與心理健康之復原力取向研究:中介與調節效果的探討。教育心理學報,40(2),221-240。楊宜音、張志學、彭泗清(1997)。性格與社會心理測量總覽。台北市:遠流。楊國樞(1980)。生活素質的心理學觀。中華心理學刊,22(2),11-24。楊國樞(1992)。中國人的社會取向:社會互動的觀點。中國人的心理與行為—理念方法篇,87-142。臺北市:桂冠。劉敏珍(2000)。老年人人際親密、依附風格與幸福感之關係研究。高雄師範大學成人教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。鄭景俗、楊國隆(1998)。模糊集合論在教育評分等級系統之應用。模糊系統學刊,4(2),81-89。謝名娟、吳柏林(2012)。模糊統計在試題難度上的應用。教育心理學報,44(2),207-228。謝名娟、吳柏林(2012)。網路教育問卷調查新技術與線上模糊統計分析建構。國家教育研究院專題研究計畫成果報告(NAER-100-24-B-2-01-00-2-01)。台北市:國家教育研究院。謝玫芸(2008)。高雄市國小教師外向性人格、角色壓力與幸福感之關係研究。高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。羅昭強(2000)。模糊理論在數學科基本能力測驗上的應用。八十九學年度師範學院教育學術論文發表會論文集。新竹市:國立新竹師範學院。蕭文龍(2013)。統計分析入門與應用。台北市:碁峰資訊。英文部分Andrews, F. A., & Withey, S.B. (1976). Social Indicators of Well-being in America: The Development and Measurement of Perceptual Indicators. New York: Plenum Press.Argyle, M. (1987). The psychology of happiness. London: Routedge.Argyle, M. & Lu, L. (1990). The happiness of extraverts. Personality and Individual Difference, 11, 1011-1017.Argyle, M. & Lu, L. (1990). Happiness and social skills. Personality and Individual Difference, 11, 1255-1261.Bagnoli, C., & Smith, H. C. (1998). The theory of fuzzy logic and its application to real estate valuation. Journal of Real Estate Research, 16(2), 169-199.Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 248-287.Berkman, L. F., & Glass, T. (2000). Social integration, social networks, social support, and health. Social epidemiology, 1, 137-173.Blunch, N. (2012). Introduction to structural equation modeling using IBM SPSS statistics and AMOS. London: Sage.Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1978). Lottery winner and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 917-927.Bryant, F. B., & Veroff, J. (1982). The structure of psychological well-being: A sociohistorical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 653-673.Buckley, J. J. (2004). Fuzzy statistics (Vol. 149). New York: Springer Science & Business Media.Chekola, M.G. (1975). The concept of happiness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan. Dissertation abstracts international, 35, 4609.Chen, S. H. & Hwang, C. L. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. New York: Springer-VerlagCloninger, C. R. (2004). Feeling Good. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 668-678.Costas, C. S. L, Maranon, P. P., & Cabrera, J. A. H. (1994). Application of diffuse measurement to the evaluation of psychological structures. Quality and Quanty, 28, 305-313.DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits snd subjective well-being. Psychology Bulletin, 124, 197-229.Devos, G., Bouckenooghe, D., Engels, N., Hotton, G., & Aelterman, A. (2007). An assessment of well-being of principals in Flemish primary schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(1), 33-61.Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.Diener, E., Sandvik, E. & Larsen, R. J. (1985). Age and sex effects for emotional intensity. Developmental Psychology, 21: 542-6.Diener, E., Sandvik, E. Seidlitz, L. & Diener, M. (1993). The relationship between income and subjective well-being: relative or absolute. Social Indicators Research, 28, 195-223.Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276-302.Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American psychologist, 55(1), 34.Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1983). Ranking fuzzy number in the setting of possibility theory. Information Science, 30, 183-224.Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management review, 17(2), 183-211.Gmelch, W. H., & Gates, G. (1998). The impact of personal, professional and organizational characteristics on administrator burnout. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(2), 146-159.Headey, B. & Wearing, A. (1989). Personality, life events, and subjective well-being: Toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 731-739.Heck, R. H., & Marcoulides, G. A. (1996). School culture and performance: Testing the invariance of an organizational model. School effectiveness and school improvement, 7(1), 76-95.Herrera, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2000). Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 116, 67-82.Hersh, H. M. & Caramazza, A. A. (1976). A fuzzy set approach to modifiers and vagueness in natural language. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 105, 254-276.Hesketh, B., Pryor, R., & Gleitzman, M., & Hesketh, T. (1988). Practical applications and psychometric evaluation of a computerized fuzzy graphic ration scale. In T. Zetenyi(ed.) Fuzzy Sets in Psycholog(pp.425-454). New York: North-Holland.Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2002). The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire: a compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1073–1082.Holahan, C. K. (1988). Relation of life goals at age 70 to activity participation and health and psychological well-being among terman’s gifted men and women. Psychology and Aging, 3(3), 286-291.Holmes E. (2005). Teacher well-being. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). London: Sage Publications.Ishikawa, A., Amagasa, T., Tamizawa, G., Totsuta, R., & Mieno, H. (1993). The max-min delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 55, 241-253.Ivancevich, J. M., & Matteson, M. (2002). Organisational Management and Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.Judge, T. A., & Bauer, T. N. (1997). Personality and work role affect. Academy of Management Annualmeeting, boston, ma.Jamal, M., & Baba, V. V. (2003). Type A behavior, components, and outcomes: A study of Canadian employees. International journal of stress management,10(1), 39.Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 121-140.Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007-1022.Keyes, C. L. M. & Magyar-Mor, J. L. (2003). The measurement and utility of adult subjective well-being. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Synder (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures, 411-425, Washington, DC: American Psychologicla Association.Klir, G. J., & Yuan, B.(1995). Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic theory and application. NJ:Prentice-Hall.Klir, G. J., & Folger, T. A. (1988). Fuzzy sets, uncertainty and information. NJ: Prentice-Hall.Law. C. K. (1996). Using fuzzy numbers in educational grading system. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 83, 311-323.Law, C. K. (1997). A fuzzy logical model to aggregate several heterogeneous educational grades from a reductionist grading scheme. Proceedings of 8 th International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematical Modeling and Applications.Liang, G. S., & Wang, M. J. (1991). A fuzzy multicriteria decision making method for facility site selection. Internation Journal of Production Research, 29(11), 2313-2330.Lin, H. C. (2014). Fuzzy PLS path modeling of interpersonal relationship, social support, job achievement and subjective well-being of school principals.International Journal of Intelligent Technologies and Applied Statistics, 7(4), 323-337.Lu, L. & Argyle, M. (1991). Happiness and cooperation. Personality and Individual Difference, 12, 1019-1030.Lu, L., & Shih, J. B. (1997). Personality and happiness: Is mental health a mediator? Personality and Indivdual Differences, 22, 249–256.Lu, L., Shih, J. B., Lin, Y. Y., & Ju, L. S. (1997). Personal and environmental correlates of happiness. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 453-462.Man, F., Nygard, R., & Gjesme, T. (1994). The Achievement Motives Scale (AMS): theoretical basis and results from a first try‐out of a Czech form.Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 38(3-4), 209-218.McGrath, J. E. (1970). Social and psychological factors in stress. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Michalos, A. C.(1985). Multiple discrepacies theory. Social Indicators Research, 16, 347-414.Omodei, M. M., & Wearing, A. J. (1990). Need satisfaction and involvement in personal projects: Toward an integrative model of subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 762-769.Pryor, R. G. L., Hesketh, B., & Gleitzman, M.(1989). Making things clearer by making them fuzzy: counseling illustrations of a fuzzy graphic rating scale. The career development quarterly, 38, 136-146.Rim, Y, (1993). Values, happiness and family structure variables. Personality and Individual Difference, 15(5), 595-598.Roth, M., Decker, O., Herzberg, P. Y., & Brähler, E. (2008). Dimensionality and norms of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in a German general population sample. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24(3), 190-197.Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorationns on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081.Scott, C., & Dinham, S. (2003). The development of scales to measure teacher and school executive occupational satisfaction. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(1), 74-86.Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5-14.Seligman, M. E. P. (2012). Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being. New York: Simon and Schuster.Sergiovanni, T. J. (2006). Rethinking leadership. CA: Corwin.Spector, P. E. (1988). Development of the work locus of control scale. Journal of occupational psychology, 61(4), 335-340.Spector, P. E., & O`Connell, B. J. (1994). The contribution of personality traits, negative affectivity, locus of control and Type A to the subsequent reports of job stressors and job strains. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67(1), 1-12.Thoits, P. A. (1982). Conceptual, methodological and theoretical problem in studying social supports as a buffer against life stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 23, 145-159.Tichatonga. J. (1999). Determinants and prevalence of occupational stress among Zimbabwean school administrators. Journal of Educational Administration, 37(3), 256-272.Turksen I. B.(1988). Stochastic fuzzy sets: a survey. In J. Kacprzyk & M.Fedrizzi (Eds.), Combing fuzzy imprecision with probabilistic uncertainty in decision making(pp.168-183). New York: Springer-VerlagTurksen, I. B. (1991). Measurement of membership functions and their acquisition. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 40, 5-38.Veenhoven, R. (1991). Is happiness relative? Social Indicators Research, 24, 1-34.Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: how good are single-item measures?. Journal of applied Psychology, 82(2), 247.Yamashita, T. (1997). On a support system for human decision making by the combination of fuzzy reasoning and fuzzy structural modeling. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 87, 257-263.Yen, C. L. (1996). Using fuzzy sets in developing mathematical learning progress indicator. The proceedings of National Science Council (part D), 6, 57-64.Zadeh, L. A. (1972). A fuzzy set theoretical interpretation of hedges. Journal of Cybernetics, 2, 4-34.Zadeh, L. A. (1995). Discussion: probability theory and fuzzy logic are complementary rather than competitive. Technometrics, 37(3), 271-276.Zimmermann, H. J. (1991). Fuzzy set theory and its application. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. zh_TW