學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 基於眼動技術發展具視覺互動文本閱讀模式
Developing Visual Interactive Context and Reading Mode Based on Eye Tracking Technology
作者 林裕傑
貢獻者 陳志銘
林裕傑
關鍵詞 眼動追蹤技術
視覺互動文本
閱讀模式
日期 2016
上傳時間 22-八月-2016 10:59:53 (UTC+8)
摘要   高互動的閱讀模式能夠引發學習者更高的學習動機與意願,同時也帶給學習者更直覺的閱讀學習體驗。過去使用眼動進行讀者與文本互動的閱讀模式研究仍缺乏有效的實驗驗證其對於提升閱讀理解成效的助益,因此本研究使用眼動追蹤儀器,結合網頁技術與閱讀標註概念,發展一套基於眼動技術發展之視覺互動文本閱讀模式,同時探討此一閱讀模式在支援英語文本閱讀之學習成效、學習時間、認知負荷、科技接受度與閱讀歷程序列等面向上,是否優於滑鼠操作之閱讀標註互動文本閱讀模式。
     
       研究結果顯示:(1)採用眼動操作的實驗組學習者閱讀問答式說明文文體結構具閱讀標註補充之互動式閱讀文本進行閱讀的學習成效顯著優於採用滑鼠操作的控制組學習者;(2)眼動操作的實驗組學習者在閱讀問答式說明文文體結構具閱讀標註補充之互動式閱讀文本進行閱讀的學習時間、標註觸發次數、標註觸發時間、閱讀序列長度與單位學習時間標註觸發次數均顯著優於滑鼠操作的控制組學習者;(3)採用眼動技術操作的場地獨立型學習者對於閱讀問答式說明文文體具有顯著學習成效;(4)採用基於眼動技術發展之閱讀標註互動文本閱讀模式具有引導閱讀者規律進行前後文參照回視之特性;(5)文體結構差異對於採用眼動技術操作與滑鼠操作具閱讀標註補充之互動式閱讀文本之學習成效產生影響。
     
       最後,根據研究結果,本研究提出眼動技術實際應用於閱讀標註互動文本閱讀的教學建議,並針對未來研究方向提出建議。
參考文獻 王梅玲(2013)。從電子書數位閱讀探討圖書館推廣策略。臺北市立圖書館館訊,30(4),9-24。
     余泰魁(2007)。科技媒介學習環境之學習成效比較研究。教育心理學報,39(1),69-90。
     吳志豪(2011)。基於數位閱讀標註行為探勘影響閱讀焦慮因素提升閱讀成效。未出版碩士論文,國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所,臺北市。
     吳紹群(2014)。潮、數位、古美術:從潮文化觀點解析故宮「乾隆潮新媒體藝術展」。臺灣博物季刊,33(2),84-93。
     吳裕益(1987)。認知能力與認知型態個別差異現象之探討。教育學刊,7,51-98。
     林惠卿(2014)。大學圖書館網站首頁讀者視覺注意力之眼動分析研究。未出版碩士論文,國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所,臺北市。
     張麗玉、顧叔剛(2007)。朗文全民英檢初級閱讀測驗。臺北市:臺灣培生。
     許博盛(2014)。展現寫作思考流程的範文閱讀平臺。未出版碩士論文,國立中央大學資訊工程學系,桃園市。
     郭乃文、陳家進、官大紳(2010)。以應用腦波與神經心理衡鑑訊息之方式來建立注意力功能缺損兒童之自主治療模式並研究其療效。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(NSC98-2410-H006-020-MY3)。
     陳木金(2009)。認知風格理論對有效學習策略的啟示。國立政治大學教學發展中心電子報,27。檢自 http://ctld.nccu.edu.tw/ctld/?p=4431
     陳勇汀(2011)。合作式閱讀標註之知識萃取機制研究。未出版碩士論文,國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所,臺北市。
     陳科佑(2014)。電子書互動功能應用雲端特性之使用者體驗研究。未出版碩士論文,國立成功大學資訊管理研究所,臺南市。
     陳海泓(2011)。說明文體的閱讀理解教學。教師天地,172,28-43。
     馮明珠(2015)。藝域漫遊:郎世寧新媒體藝術展。臺北市:國立故宮博物院。
     楊芝瑜、柯華歲、張毓仁(2012)。記憶廣度及語境效應對閱讀歧義詞彙的影響:來自眼動的證據。教育與心理研究,35(3),1-36。
     廖御圻、郭乃文、陳信昭、蔡幸芳、蘇倍儀(2015)。以神經生理回饋為主之神經心理治療對改善注意力監控之療效研究-以注意力缺陷/過動疾患兒童為例。教育心理學報,47(2),281-304。
     趙新民(2010)。先進輔具專業技術-阿春眼動看護。中華民國職能治療師會刊,25,12-15。檢自 http://www.oturoc.org.tw/download/25期會刊.pdf
     劉鑑儀(2014)。低價眼動儀硬體與軟體開發。未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學電機工程研究所,臺北市。
     蔡介立(2000)。從眼動控制探討中文閱讀的訊息處理歷程:應用眼動誘發呈現技術之系列研究。未發表博士論文,國立政治大學心理學研究所,臺北市。
     蔡介立、顏妙璇、汪勁安(2005)。眼球移動測量及在中文閱讀研究之應用。應用心理研究,28,91-104。
     蔡佩璇、游萬來(2005)。電子故事書融入語文學習互動設計之探討。第四屆全球華文網路教育研討會,臺北市。
     蔡懷恩(2013)。發展具閱讀標註數位文本之體感互動閱讀模式及其成效評估研究。未出版碩士論文,國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所,臺北市。
     鄭妃玲(2002)。說明文結構對國小六年級學童閱讀理解的影響。未出版碩士論文,國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所,嘉義市。
     韓承靜、蔡介立(2008)。眼球軌跡記錄—科學學習研究的明日之星。科學教育,310,2-11。
     Jabr, F. (2014)。大腦偏愛紙本書(鐘樹人譯)。科學人,144,45-49。
     Amunwa, J. (2012). Long Page Scrolling Designs That Work. Retrieved from http://www.dtelepathy.com/blog/inspiration/long-page-scrolling-designs
     Baker, J. R. (2003). The impact of paging vs. scrolling on reading online text passages. Usability News, 5(1). Retrieved from http://usabilitynews.org/the-impact-of-paging-vs-scrolling-on-reading-online-text-passages/
     Biedert, R., Buscher, G., Schwarz, S., Hees, J., & Dengel, A. (2010). Text 2.0. CHI`10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 4003-4008
     Biedert, R., Buscher, G., Schwarz, S., Möller, M., Dengel, A., & Lottermann, T. (2010). The text 2.0 framework: writing web-based gaze-controlled realtime applications quickly and easily. Proceedings of the 2010 workshop on Eye gaze in intelligent human machine interaction, 114-117
     Biedert, R., Dengel, A., Elshamy, M., & Buscher, G. (2012). Towards robust gaze-based objective quality measures for text. Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications. 201-204.
     Chen, H. (2006). Flow on the net: Exploring online Web users’ positive affects and their flow state. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2), 222-233.
     Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
     Deng, L. Y., Hsu, C. L., Lin, T. C., Tuan, J. S., & Chang, S. M. (2010). EOG-based Human–Computer Interface system development. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(4), 3337-3343.
     El Hosseiny, M., Biedert, R., Dengel, A., & Buscher, G. (2011). The eyePad-Tom Riddle in the 21st Century. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Eye Gaze in Intelligent Human Machine Interaction held in conjunction with IUI 2011.
     Fahey C. (2008) . The Scrolling Experience and “The Fold”. Retrieved from http://www.graphpaper.com/2008/07-29_the-scrolling-experience-and-the-fold
     Garcia, M. R., Stark, M. M., & Miller, E. (1991). Eyes on the News. Poynter Institute.
     Gazepoint. (2014). FAQ - Gazepoint. Retrieved from http://www.gazept.com/faq/
     Gevensleben, H., Holl, B., Albrecht, B., Schlamp, D., Kratz, O., Studer, P., Wangler, S., Rothenberger, A., Moll, G. H., & Heinrich, H. (2009). Distinct EEG effects related to neurofeedback training in children with ADHD: a randomized controlled trial. International journal of psychophysiology, 74(2), 149-157.
     Green, M. C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38(2), 247-266.
     Holmqvist, K., Holsanova, J., Barthelson, M., & Lundqvist, D. (2003). Reading or scanning? A study of newspaper and net paper reading. Mind, 2(3), 4.
     Hwang, G. J., Yang, L. H., & Wang, S. Y. (2013), A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students’ learning performance in natural science courses. Computers & Education, 69, 121-130.
     Ismail, F., Biedert, R., Dengel, A., & Buscher, G. (2011). Emotional Text Tagging. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Eye Gaze in Intelligent Human Machine Interaction held in conjunction with IUI 2011.
     Jacobs, A.M. (2011). Neurokognitive Poetik: Elemente eines Modells des literarischen Lesens (Neurocognitive poetics: elements of a model of literary reading). In: Schrott, R., Jacobs, A.M., editors. Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren. Mu¨nchen: Carl Hanser Verlag, 492–524.
     Jones, P., & England, M. M. (2014). An alternative mechanism for the delivery of scholarly journal articles: readcube access at the university of Utah.
     Kim, E. S., Naples, A., Gearty, G. V., Wang, Q., Wallace, S., Wall, C., ... & Volkmar, F. (2014). Development of an untethered, mobile, low-cost head-mounted eye tracker. Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications. 247-250.
     Liu, T. C., Fan, M. H. M., & Paas, F. (2014). Effects of digital dictionary format on incidental acquisition of spelling knowledge and cognitive load during second language learning: Click-on vs. key-in dictionaries. Computers & Education, 70, 9-20.
     Mantiuk, R., Kowalik, M., Nowosielski, A., & Bazyluk, B. (2012). Do-it-yourself eye tracker: Low-cost pupil-based eye tracker for computer graphics applications. 115-125. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
     Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University press.
     Melanie, W. & Giselle, D. P. (2014). The battle of the e-textbook: libraries` role in facilitating student acceptance and use of e-textbooks. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 80(2), 17-26.
     Moussa‐Inaty, J., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2012). Improving listening skills in English as a foreign language by reading rather than listening: A cognitive load perspective. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(3), 391-402.
     Oliveira, J. M., Camacho, M., & Gisbert, M. (2014). Exploring student and teacher’s perception of e-textbooks in a primary school. Comunicar, 21(42), 87-95.
     Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 1–4.
     Pavlas, D., Lum, H., & Salas, E. (2012). How to build a low-cost eye-tracking system. Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications, 20(1), 18-23.
     Piltch, A. (2015). MSI Adds Tobii Eye Control, G-Sync to the G72 Dominator. Retrieved from http://www.laptopmag.com/articles/msi-gt72-with-tobii
     Stockholm Brain Institute. (2014). Natmeg/checklist MEG preparation - SBIwiki. Retrieved from http://sbiwiki.cns.ki.se/mediawiki/index.php/Natmeg/checklist_MEG_preparation
     Stuart, S., Alcock, L., Galna, B., Godfrey, A., Lord, S., & Rochester, L. (2013). Re-test reliability of the Dikablis eye-tracker when sitting, standing and walking. British Ocular Motor Group Meeting, 16.
     Sweller, J. (2010). Element Interactivity and Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 123-138.
     Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational psychology review, 10(3), 251–296.
     Tafaj, E., Kubler, T. C., Peter, J., Rosenstiel, W., Bogdan, M., & Schiefer, U. (2011). Vishnoo—An open-source software for vision research. Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), 2011 24th International Symposium on. 1-6. IEEE.
     Tuzun, H., Akinci, A., Kurtoglu, M., Atal, D., & Pala, F. K. (2013). A Study on the Usability of a University Registrar`s Office Website through the Methods of Authentic Tasks and Eye-Tracking. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 12(2), 26-38.
     Vance, D. E., & Farr, K. F. (2007). Spaced retrieval for enhancing memory: Implications for nursing practice and research. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 33(9), 46.
     Witkin, H. A., Dyk, R. B., Faterson, H. F., Goodenough, D. R., & Karpy, S. A. (1963). Psychological Differentiation: Studies of Development. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 137(1), 104.
     Witkin, H. A., Oltman. P. K., Raskin, E. & Karpy, S. A. (1971). A manual for the embedded finures tests. California: Consulting psychologist Press Inc.
     Wu, H. S., & Lin, L. C. (2012). Application of Spaced Retrieval Training on Patients With Dementia. Hu Li Za Zhi, 59(5), 79.
     Wu, Y. L., Yeh, C. T., Hung, W. C., & Tang, C. Y. (2014). Gaze direction estimation using support vector machine with active appearance model. Multimedia tools and applications, 70(3), 2037-2062.
     Young, J. Q., Van Merrienboer, J., Durning, S., & Ten Cate, O. (2014). Cognitive load theory: Implications for medical education: AMEE guide No. 86. Medical teacher, 36(5), 371-384.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊與檔案學研究所
103155012
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103155012
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 陳志銘zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) 林裕傑zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 林裕傑zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2016en_US
dc.date.accessioned 22-八月-2016 10:59:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 22-八月-2016 10:59:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 22-八月-2016 10:59:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0103155012en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100489-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 圖書資訊與檔案學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 103155012zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要)   高互動的閱讀模式能夠引發學習者更高的學習動機與意願,同時也帶給學習者更直覺的閱讀學習體驗。過去使用眼動進行讀者與文本互動的閱讀模式研究仍缺乏有效的實驗驗證其對於提升閱讀理解成效的助益,因此本研究使用眼動追蹤儀器,結合網頁技術與閱讀標註概念,發展一套基於眼動技術發展之視覺互動文本閱讀模式,同時探討此一閱讀模式在支援英語文本閱讀之學習成效、學習時間、認知負荷、科技接受度與閱讀歷程序列等面向上,是否優於滑鼠操作之閱讀標註互動文本閱讀模式。
     
       研究結果顯示:(1)採用眼動操作的實驗組學習者閱讀問答式說明文文體結構具閱讀標註補充之互動式閱讀文本進行閱讀的學習成效顯著優於採用滑鼠操作的控制組學習者;(2)眼動操作的實驗組學習者在閱讀問答式說明文文體結構具閱讀標註補充之互動式閱讀文本進行閱讀的學習時間、標註觸發次數、標註觸發時間、閱讀序列長度與單位學習時間標註觸發次數均顯著優於滑鼠操作的控制組學習者;(3)採用眼動技術操作的場地獨立型學習者對於閱讀問答式說明文文體具有顯著學習成效;(4)採用基於眼動技術發展之閱讀標註互動文本閱讀模式具有引導閱讀者規律進行前後文參照回視之特性;(5)文體結構差異對於採用眼動技術操作與滑鼠操作具閱讀標註補充之互動式閱讀文本之學習成效產生影響。
     
       最後,根據研究結果,本研究提出眼動技術實際應用於閱讀標註互動文本閱讀的教學建議,並針對未來研究方向提出建議。
zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
     第一節 研究動機 1
     第二節 研究目的與問題 2
     第三節 研究範圍與限制 3
     第四節 名詞解釋 4
     第二章 文獻探討 7
     第一節 眼動技術 7
     第二節 認知負荷 10
     第三節 數位閱讀模式 12
     第三章 研究方法與實驗設計 14
     第一節 研究架構 14
     第二節 研究方法 16
     第三節 研究對象 17
     第四節 研究工具 17
     第五節 實驗設計 25
     第六節 資料蒐集分析 29
     第七節 研究步驟 31
     第四章 實驗結果與分析 33
     第一節 實驗對象基本資料 33
     第二節 英語閱讀學習成效分析 33
     第三節 實驗組與控制組學習時間、認知負荷、科技接受度與使用系統功能差異分析 39
     第四節 實驗組與控制組閱讀歷程序列分析 50
     第五節 訪談整理 55
     第六節 討論 58
     第五章 結論、建議與未來研究方向 63
     第一節 結論 63
     第二節 教學實施建議 64
     第三節 未來研究方向 65
     參考文獻 66
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 1644716 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103155012en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 眼動追蹤技術zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 視覺互動文本zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 閱讀模式zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 基於眼動技術發展具視覺互動文本閱讀模式zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Developing Visual Interactive Context and Reading Mode Based on Eye Tracking Technologyen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王梅玲(2013)。從電子書數位閱讀探討圖書館推廣策略。臺北市立圖書館館訊,30(4),9-24。
     余泰魁(2007)。科技媒介學習環境之學習成效比較研究。教育心理學報,39(1),69-90。
     吳志豪(2011)。基於數位閱讀標註行為探勘影響閱讀焦慮因素提升閱讀成效。未出版碩士論文,國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所,臺北市。
     吳紹群(2014)。潮、數位、古美術:從潮文化觀點解析故宮「乾隆潮新媒體藝術展」。臺灣博物季刊,33(2),84-93。
     吳裕益(1987)。認知能力與認知型態個別差異現象之探討。教育學刊,7,51-98。
     林惠卿(2014)。大學圖書館網站首頁讀者視覺注意力之眼動分析研究。未出版碩士論文,國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所,臺北市。
     張麗玉、顧叔剛(2007)。朗文全民英檢初級閱讀測驗。臺北市:臺灣培生。
     許博盛(2014)。展現寫作思考流程的範文閱讀平臺。未出版碩士論文,國立中央大學資訊工程學系,桃園市。
     郭乃文、陳家進、官大紳(2010)。以應用腦波與神經心理衡鑑訊息之方式來建立注意力功能缺損兒童之自主治療模式並研究其療效。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(NSC98-2410-H006-020-MY3)。
     陳木金(2009)。認知風格理論對有效學習策略的啟示。國立政治大學教學發展中心電子報,27。檢自 http://ctld.nccu.edu.tw/ctld/?p=4431
     陳勇汀(2011)。合作式閱讀標註之知識萃取機制研究。未出版碩士論文,國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所,臺北市。
     陳科佑(2014)。電子書互動功能應用雲端特性之使用者體驗研究。未出版碩士論文,國立成功大學資訊管理研究所,臺南市。
     陳海泓(2011)。說明文體的閱讀理解教學。教師天地,172,28-43。
     馮明珠(2015)。藝域漫遊:郎世寧新媒體藝術展。臺北市:國立故宮博物院。
     楊芝瑜、柯華歲、張毓仁(2012)。記憶廣度及語境效應對閱讀歧義詞彙的影響:來自眼動的證據。教育與心理研究,35(3),1-36。
     廖御圻、郭乃文、陳信昭、蔡幸芳、蘇倍儀(2015)。以神經生理回饋為主之神經心理治療對改善注意力監控之療效研究-以注意力缺陷/過動疾患兒童為例。教育心理學報,47(2),281-304。
     趙新民(2010)。先進輔具專業技術-阿春眼動看護。中華民國職能治療師會刊,25,12-15。檢自 http://www.oturoc.org.tw/download/25期會刊.pdf
     劉鑑儀(2014)。低價眼動儀硬體與軟體開發。未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學電機工程研究所,臺北市。
     蔡介立(2000)。從眼動控制探討中文閱讀的訊息處理歷程:應用眼動誘發呈現技術之系列研究。未發表博士論文,國立政治大學心理學研究所,臺北市。
     蔡介立、顏妙璇、汪勁安(2005)。眼球移動測量及在中文閱讀研究之應用。應用心理研究,28,91-104。
     蔡佩璇、游萬來(2005)。電子故事書融入語文學習互動設計之探討。第四屆全球華文網路教育研討會,臺北市。
     蔡懷恩(2013)。發展具閱讀標註數位文本之體感互動閱讀模式及其成效評估研究。未出版碩士論文,國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所,臺北市。
     鄭妃玲(2002)。說明文結構對國小六年級學童閱讀理解的影響。未出版碩士論文,國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所,嘉義市。
     韓承靜、蔡介立(2008)。眼球軌跡記錄—科學學習研究的明日之星。科學教育,310,2-11。
     Jabr, F. (2014)。大腦偏愛紙本書(鐘樹人譯)。科學人,144,45-49。
     Amunwa, J. (2012). Long Page Scrolling Designs That Work. Retrieved from http://www.dtelepathy.com/blog/inspiration/long-page-scrolling-designs
     Baker, J. R. (2003). The impact of paging vs. scrolling on reading online text passages. Usability News, 5(1). Retrieved from http://usabilitynews.org/the-impact-of-paging-vs-scrolling-on-reading-online-text-passages/
     Biedert, R., Buscher, G., Schwarz, S., Hees, J., & Dengel, A. (2010). Text 2.0. CHI`10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 4003-4008
     Biedert, R., Buscher, G., Schwarz, S., Möller, M., Dengel, A., & Lottermann, T. (2010). The text 2.0 framework: writing web-based gaze-controlled realtime applications quickly and easily. Proceedings of the 2010 workshop on Eye gaze in intelligent human machine interaction, 114-117
     Biedert, R., Dengel, A., Elshamy, M., & Buscher, G. (2012). Towards robust gaze-based objective quality measures for text. Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications. 201-204.
     Chen, H. (2006). Flow on the net: Exploring online Web users’ positive affects and their flow state. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2), 222-233.
     Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
     Deng, L. Y., Hsu, C. L., Lin, T. C., Tuan, J. S., & Chang, S. M. (2010). EOG-based Human–Computer Interface system development. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(4), 3337-3343.
     El Hosseiny, M., Biedert, R., Dengel, A., & Buscher, G. (2011). The eyePad-Tom Riddle in the 21st Century. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Eye Gaze in Intelligent Human Machine Interaction held in conjunction with IUI 2011.
     Fahey C. (2008) . The Scrolling Experience and “The Fold”. Retrieved from http://www.graphpaper.com/2008/07-29_the-scrolling-experience-and-the-fold
     Garcia, M. R., Stark, M. M., & Miller, E. (1991). Eyes on the News. Poynter Institute.
     Gazepoint. (2014). FAQ - Gazepoint. Retrieved from http://www.gazept.com/faq/
     Gevensleben, H., Holl, B., Albrecht, B., Schlamp, D., Kratz, O., Studer, P., Wangler, S., Rothenberger, A., Moll, G. H., & Heinrich, H. (2009). Distinct EEG effects related to neurofeedback training in children with ADHD: a randomized controlled trial. International journal of psychophysiology, 74(2), 149-157.
     Green, M. C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38(2), 247-266.
     Holmqvist, K., Holsanova, J., Barthelson, M., & Lundqvist, D. (2003). Reading or scanning? A study of newspaper and net paper reading. Mind, 2(3), 4.
     Hwang, G. J., Yang, L. H., & Wang, S. Y. (2013), A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students’ learning performance in natural science courses. Computers & Education, 69, 121-130.
     Ismail, F., Biedert, R., Dengel, A., & Buscher, G. (2011). Emotional Text Tagging. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Eye Gaze in Intelligent Human Machine Interaction held in conjunction with IUI 2011.
     Jacobs, A.M. (2011). Neurokognitive Poetik: Elemente eines Modells des literarischen Lesens (Neurocognitive poetics: elements of a model of literary reading). In: Schrott, R., Jacobs, A.M., editors. Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren. Mu¨nchen: Carl Hanser Verlag, 492–524.
     Jones, P., & England, M. M. (2014). An alternative mechanism for the delivery of scholarly journal articles: readcube access at the university of Utah.
     Kim, E. S., Naples, A., Gearty, G. V., Wang, Q., Wallace, S., Wall, C., ... & Volkmar, F. (2014). Development of an untethered, mobile, low-cost head-mounted eye tracker. Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications. 247-250.
     Liu, T. C., Fan, M. H. M., & Paas, F. (2014). Effects of digital dictionary format on incidental acquisition of spelling knowledge and cognitive load during second language learning: Click-on vs. key-in dictionaries. Computers & Education, 70, 9-20.
     Mantiuk, R., Kowalik, M., Nowosielski, A., & Bazyluk, B. (2012). Do-it-yourself eye tracker: Low-cost pupil-based eye tracker for computer graphics applications. 115-125. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
     Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University press.
     Melanie, W. & Giselle, D. P. (2014). The battle of the e-textbook: libraries` role in facilitating student acceptance and use of e-textbooks. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 80(2), 17-26.
     Moussa‐Inaty, J., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2012). Improving listening skills in English as a foreign language by reading rather than listening: A cognitive load perspective. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(3), 391-402.
     Oliveira, J. M., Camacho, M., & Gisbert, M. (2014). Exploring student and teacher’s perception of e-textbooks in a primary school. Comunicar, 21(42), 87-95.
     Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 1–4.
     Pavlas, D., Lum, H., & Salas, E. (2012). How to build a low-cost eye-tracking system. Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications, 20(1), 18-23.
     Piltch, A. (2015). MSI Adds Tobii Eye Control, G-Sync to the G72 Dominator. Retrieved from http://www.laptopmag.com/articles/msi-gt72-with-tobii
     Stockholm Brain Institute. (2014). Natmeg/checklist MEG preparation - SBIwiki. Retrieved from http://sbiwiki.cns.ki.se/mediawiki/index.php/Natmeg/checklist_MEG_preparation
     Stuart, S., Alcock, L., Galna, B., Godfrey, A., Lord, S., & Rochester, L. (2013). Re-test reliability of the Dikablis eye-tracker when sitting, standing and walking. British Ocular Motor Group Meeting, 16.
     Sweller, J. (2010). Element Interactivity and Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 123-138.
     Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational psychology review, 10(3), 251–296.
     Tafaj, E., Kubler, T. C., Peter, J., Rosenstiel, W., Bogdan, M., & Schiefer, U. (2011). Vishnoo—An open-source software for vision research. Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), 2011 24th International Symposium on. 1-6. IEEE.
     Tuzun, H., Akinci, A., Kurtoglu, M., Atal, D., & Pala, F. K. (2013). A Study on the Usability of a University Registrar`s Office Website through the Methods of Authentic Tasks and Eye-Tracking. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 12(2), 26-38.
     Vance, D. E., & Farr, K. F. (2007). Spaced retrieval for enhancing memory: Implications for nursing practice and research. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 33(9), 46.
     Witkin, H. A., Dyk, R. B., Faterson, H. F., Goodenough, D. R., & Karpy, S. A. (1963). Psychological Differentiation: Studies of Development. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 137(1), 104.
     Witkin, H. A., Oltman. P. K., Raskin, E. & Karpy, S. A. (1971). A manual for the embedded finures tests. California: Consulting psychologist Press Inc.
     Wu, H. S., & Lin, L. C. (2012). Application of Spaced Retrieval Training on Patients With Dementia. Hu Li Za Zhi, 59(5), 79.
     Wu, Y. L., Yeh, C. T., Hung, W. C., & Tang, C. Y. (2014). Gaze direction estimation using support vector machine with active appearance model. Multimedia tools and applications, 70(3), 2037-2062.
     Young, J. Q., Van Merrienboer, J., Durning, S., & Ten Cate, O. (2014). Cognitive load theory: Implications for medical education: AMEE guide No. 86. Medical teacher, 36(5), 371-384.
zh_TW