1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of International Affairs
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 反思「民主和平論」以及檢證「貿易和平論」 ：「南海」個案研究
Re-examine “Democratic Peace” and Testify “Trade Peace” : The Case of the South China Sea
作者 林惠儀
貢獻者 張文揚
林惠儀
關鍵詞 民主和平
貿易和平
南海主權爭端
戰爭與和平
Democratic Peace
Trade Peace
Territorial disputes of the South China Sea
Armed Conflict
日期 2016
上傳時間 22-Aug-2016 13:30:00 (UTC+8)
摘要 本文最主要的目的有二。其一為評估「民主和平論」是否依然有效地解釋「戰爭與和平」議題。若然，那麼同為自由主義的「貿易和平」是否相較之下之解釋力較佳。第二則是個案研究，聚焦於「南海爭端」用以進一步驗證本文的論述。本文認為以制度層面而言，貿易量事實上相較於政治體制是較能降低衝突帶來和平。
This thesis has two purposes: the first one is to re-examine “Democratic Peace” and to testify “Trade Peace” with an eye to finding a more explainable solution on the issue of Conflict and Peace; and the second purpose is by providing a case study centering on the region of the South China Sea, the premise of this thesis will further be evaluated. The premise in here is that from an institutional perspective, trade is the more efficient and less costly method to reduce the possibility of initiating armed conflicts than polities.
參考文獻 1. BBC 中文網，2012，〈點評中國：中非的黃岩島對峙〉，http://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/focus_on_china/2012/05/120514_cr_southchinasea，2016/7/29。
2. 中央通訊社，2015，〈Q&A南海爭端吵什麼？〉，http://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/201510270177-1.aspx，2016/4/2。
3. 中央通訊社，2016a，〈南海緊張 陸控渚碧礁燈塔啟用〉，http://www.cna.com.tw/news/acn/201604060431-1.aspx，2016/4/9。
4. 中央通訊社，2016b，〈南海風雲急 美國軍援菲律賓創15年新高〉，http://www.cna.com.tw/news/aopl/201604080428-1.aspx，2016/4/9。
5. 中華民國外交部，2015，〈中華民國對南海問題之立場聲明〉，http://www.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content_M_2.aspx?n=8742DCE7A2A28761&sms=491D0E5BF5F4BC36&s=02A142E7057EF2C2，2016/03/30。
6. 中華民國外交部，2016, 〈「區域全面經濟夥伴協定」(RCEP)簡介〉 ，http://www.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=5F02B11AD7FC4A1B&sms=37D27039021F6DF7&s=E1D4B867A637D3B3. 2016/5/16.
7. 丘宏達著，陳純一修訂， 2013，《現代國際法》，台北市：三民書局：1-1256。
8. 王義桅、唐小松譯，2014，《大國政治的悲劇》，台北市：麥田出局：1-621。譯自Mearsheimer, John. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. Norton & Company. 2014.
9. 毛正氣，2012，〈南海的自然資源與爭奪〉，中華民國國防部，https://www.mnd.gov.tw/Upload/201208/1-南海的自然資源與爭奪.pdf，2016/3/31。
10. 世界地圖，2012，台北市：大輿出版：1-206。
11. 邱稔壤，2002，《從政治外交層面看南錐禿鷹行動引發之人權爭議-以智利皮諾契爭權為例》，台北市：印刻出版有限公司: 1-427。
12. 呂建良，2008，〈東海油田氣〉，國立政治大學國際關係研究中心，http://iiro.nccu.edu.tw/index.php?include=article&id=2317，2016/4/2。
13. 朱雪瑛，2005，〈“民主和平論” 之分析與美國 “推廣民主” 戰略〉，《臺灣民主季刊》，2(1)：123-158。
14. 宋連海，2014，〈2014年中越南海爭端對我安全影響〉，中華民國國防部https://www.mnd.gov.tw/Upload/201409/001-020.pdf. 2016/5/16，2016/8/13。
15. 林佳瑩審閱，蔡毓智譯，2013，《研究方法：基礎理論與技巧》，台北市：雙葉出版。譯自Babbie, Earl. Introduction to Social Research, 5th edition. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. 2011.
16. 林添貴譯，2016，《中國海：下一世紀的亞洲是誰的？》，台北市：麥田出版。譯自Kaplan, Robert D. Asia’s Cauladron: The South China Sea and the End of a Stable Pacific. Random House Trade Paperbacks. 2015.
17. 張文揚，2014，〈民主和平論與非民主和平論之經驗檢證: 政治制度相似性的關鍵作用〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》， 26(1)：1-39。
18. 張麟徵，2002，《近代國際關係史》， 台北市：揚智文化：1-522。
19. 陳貞如，2013，〈近年南海海域黃岩島爭端之法律分析〉，《司法新聲》，108: 60-80. http://ja.lawbank.com.tw/pdf/近年南海海域黃岩島爭端之法律分析.pdf ，2016/8/12。
20. 盛智明與韓佳譯，2012，《好研究 如何設計：用量化邏輯做質化研究》，新北市：權森印刷事業社。譯自King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O, and Verba, Sidney. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press. 2012.
21. 程富陽，2011，〈析論中東「阿拉伯之春」的衝擊與影響〉，《國防雜誌》 27(1):18-29。
22. 黃旻華，2001，〈[民主和平] 研究的方法論:[聽眾成本] 概念之辨析〉，《問 題與研究，40(1)：87-107。
23. 蔡明彥，2014，〈近期中共與越南在南海衝突事件之觀察〉，《大陸與兩岸情勢 簡報》，http://www.mac.gov.tw/public/Attachment/47710474517.pdf 2016/8/12。
24. 趙春山主編，郭瑞華、郭瑞華、張五岳、楊開煌、高長等編著，2013，《兩岸關係與政府大陸政策》，台北市：三民書局：1-289。
25. 謝登隆，2015，《國際貿易理論與政策》， 台北市：智勝出版：1-392。
26. Baldwin, David. A. 1993. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press.
27. Barbieri, Katherine. 1996. “Economic Interdependence: A Path to Peace or a Source of Interstate Conflict?” Journal of Peace Research 33(1): 29-49.
28. Barbieri, Katherine & Jack S. Levy. 1999. “Sleeping with the Enemy: The Impact of War on Trade.” Journal of Peace Research 36(4): 463-479.
29. Barbieri, Katherine. 2002. The Liberal Illusion: Does Trade Promote Peace? An-n Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
30. Barnett, Michael & Martha Finnemore. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. NY: Cornell University.
31. BBC News. 2015. “Q&A: South China China Sea Dispute.” in http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-13748349. Latest update April 2 2016.
32. Bermeo, Nancy. 2016. “On Democratic Backsliding.” Journal of Democracy 27(1): 5-19.
33. Bermeo, Nancy. 2016. “On Democratic Backsliding: Supplemental List.” in http://www.journalofdemocracy.org/sites/default/files/Bermeo%20Supplemental-List%20of%20Coded%20Coups-27-1.pdf. Latest update March 30 2016.
34. Brinkley, Douglas. 1997. “Democratic Enlargement: The Clinton Doctrine.”
35. Foreign Policy 106 (spring):110-127.
36. Brooks, Stephen G., John G. Ikenberry & William C. Wohlforth. 2012. “Don`t Come Home, America: The Case Against Retrenchment.” International
37. Security 37(3): 7-51.
38. Burchill, S., A. Linklater, R. Devetak, J. Donnelly, T. Nardin, M. Paterson, J. Ture. 2009. Theories of International Relations. Forth Edition. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
39. Carothers, Thomas. 2002. “The End of the Transition Paradigm.” Journal of Democracy 13(1):5-21.
40. Cheong, Inkyo and Jose Tongzon. 2013. “Comparing the Economic Impact of the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership.” Asian Economic Papers 12(2): 144-170.
41. Copeland, Dale C. 1996. “Economic Interdependence and War: A Theory of Trade Expectations.” International Security 20(4): 5-41.
42. Copeland, Dale C. 1999. “Trade Expectations and the Outbreak of Peace: Détente 1970–74 and the End of the Cold War 1985–91.” Security Studies 9(1-2):15-58.
43. CNN. 2003. “The Rise and Fall of a Dictator.” in http://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/12/14/sprj.irq.saddam.profile/. Latest update 24 March 2016.
44. Dawson, James & Seán Hanley. 2016. “The Fading Mirage of the “Liberal Consensus”.” Journal of Democracy 27(1): 20-34.
45. De Mesquita, Bruce, James D. Morrow, Randolph M. Siverson and Alastair Smith. 1999. “An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace.” American Political Science Review 93(4): 791-807.
46. De Mesquita, Bruce., Alastair Smith, Randolph Siverson & James D. Morrow. 2005. The Logic of Political Survival. Massachusetts: MIT press.
47. Department of Peace and Conflict Research. 2016. “UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset,v.4-2015.”in http://www.pcr.uu.se/research/ucdp/datasets/ucdp_prio_armed_conflict_dataset/. Latest update May 28 2016.
48. Desker, Berry. 2015. “China`s conflicting signals on the South China Sea.” Brookings in http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2015/07/29-china-conflicting-signals-south-china-sea-desker. Latest update April 7 2016.
49. Diamond, L. 2015. “Facing Up to the Democratic Recession.” Journal of Democracy 26(1):141-155.
50. Diamond, L. 1996. “Is the Third Wave Over?” Journal of Democracy 7(3): 20-37.
51. Dimitrov, M.K. 2013. Why Communism Did Not Collapse: Understanding Authoritarian Regime Resilience in Asia and Europe. Landon: Cambridge University Press.
52. Domke, W. K. 1988. War and The Changing Global System. New Haven: Yale University Press.
53. Doyle, Michael. W. 1983. “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 12(3): 205-235.
54. Doyle, Michael. W. 1986. “Liberalism and world politics.” American Political Science Review 80(04): 1151-1169.
55. Doyle, Michael. W. 2005. “Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace.” American Political Science Review 99(03): 463-466.
56. Economist, The, 2014a. “The Lesson of Algeria.” in http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21600984-even-if-arab-spring-has-sorely-disappointed-dictators-even-benevolent-ones-are-not. Latest update 24 march 2016.
57. Economist, The, 2014b. “What’s Gone With Democracy.” in http://www.economist.com/news/essays/21596796-democracy-was-most-successful-political-idea-20th-century-why-has-it-run-trouble-and-what-can-be-do. Latest update 24 March 2016.
58. Economist, The, 2015. “Sea of Troubles: A Disputed Sea is a Growing Security Nightmare and Increasingly an Ecological One.” in http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21650122-disputed-sea-growing-security-nightmareand-increasingly-ecological-one-sea-troubles. Latest update 24 March 2016.
59. Farber, H. S., & J. Gowa. 1995. “Polities and Peace.” International Security 20(2): 123-146.
60. Freedom House. “Freedom in the World Country Ratings” in https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/Country%20Status%20%26%20Ratings%20Overview%2C%201973-2016.pdf. Latest update 05 April 2016.
61. Freedom House. 2015a. “Nations in Transit 2015 Report.” in https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/nations-transit-2015#.VvOCisc4MdU. Latest update 23 March 2016.
62. Freedom House. 2015b. “Nations in Transition 2015 Methodology.” in https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit-2015/methodology. Latest update 24 March 2016.
63. Freedom House. 2015c. “Freedom in the World 2015: China.” in https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2015/china. Latest update April 6 2016.
64. Freedom House. 2015d. “ Freedom in the World 2015: Vietnam.” in https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2015/vietnam. Latest update April 6 2016.
65. Freedom House. 2015e. “Freedom in the World 2015: Philippines.” in https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2015/philippines.Latest update April 7 2016.
66. Freedom House. 2016. “Regions: Sub-Saharan Africa.” in https://freedomhouse.org/regions/sub-saharan-africa. Latest update April 13 2016.
67. Frieden, Jeffery A. & David A. Lake. 2000. International Political Economy: Perspective on Global Power and Wealth. 4th edition. London: Routledge.
68. Friedman, Thomas. 2006. The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. Landon: Macmillan.
69. Fukuyama, Francis. 2015. “Why is Democracy Performing So Poorly?” Journal of Democracy 26(1):11-20.
70. Gartzke, Erik. 1998. Kant We All Just Get Along? Opportunity, Willingness, and the Origins of the Democratic Peace.” American Journal of Political Science 42(2):1-27.
71. Glaser, Bonnie S. 2012. “China’s Coercive Economic Diplomacy.” The Diplomat in http://thediplomat.com/2012/07/chinas-coercive-economic-diplomacy/. Latest update 24 July 2016.
72. Guardian, The. (2014). “Philippines stands by rejection of Beijing`s claims to
73. the South China Sea in http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/31/philippines-beijing-south-china-sea-benigno-aquino-arbitration. Latest update 24 March
甲、 2016.
74. Ikenberry, G. John. 2005. American Foreign Policy: Theoretical Essays 5th Edition. New York: Princeton University.
75. Habdank-Kołaczkowska, Sylvana. 2016. “Democracy on the Defensive in
甲、 Europe and Eurasia.” Freedom House in https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit-2015/democracy-defensive-europe-and-eurasia. Latest update 23 March 2016.
76. Huntington, Samuel. P. 1993. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma press.
77. IMF. 2016a. Direction of Trade Statistics, in http://data.imf.org/?sk=9D6028D4-F14A-464C-A2F2-59B2CD424B85. Latest update 24 March 2016.
78. IMF. 2016b. Direction of Trade Statistics: Export, FOB to Partner Countries, in
79. http://data.imf.org/regular.aspx?key=61013712. Latest update 26 march 2016.
80. IMF. 2016c. Direction of Trade Statistics: Import, CIF to Partner Countries, in http://data.imf.org/regular.aspx?key=61013712. Latest update 26 March 2016.
81. Kant, Immanuel. 1970. Perpetual Peace. In Kant’s Political Writings ed. Hans Reisstrans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82. Kazianis, Harry, J. 2016. “The Flash War of `74: China and Vietnam`s South China Sea Showdown.” The National Interest in http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/the-flash-war-74-china-vietnams-south-china-sea-showdown-15540?page=2. Latest update May 16 2016.
83. Keohane, Robert. O., & Joseph S. Nye.1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Little: Brown Boston.
84. Kissinger, Henry. 2014. World Order. London: Penguin Press.
85. Krastev, Ivan. 2007. “The Strange Death of the Liberal Consensus: Is East Central Europe Backsliding?” Journal of Democracy 18 (4): 56-63.
86. Krastev, Ivan. 2016. “Liberalism’s Failure to Deliver: What’s Wrong with East-Central Europe?” Journal of Democracy 27(1): 35-38.
87. Layne, Christopher. 1994. “Kant or Cant: The Myth of the Democratic Peace.” International Security 19(2): 5-49.
88. Layne, Christopher. 1997. “Lord Palmerston and the Triumph of Realism: Anglo-French Relations, 1830–48.” In Paths to Peace: Is Democracy the Answer?” Cambridge: MIT Press.
89. Levitsky, S., & L. A. Way. 2002. “The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 13(2): 51-65.
90. Levitsky, S., & L. A. Way. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. New Haven: Cambridge University Press.
91. Mansfield, Edward. D. 1994. Power, Trade, and War. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
92. Mansfield, Edward. D. & Brian M. Pollins edited. 2003. Economic Interdependence and International Conflict: New Perspective on an Enduring Debate. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
93. Maoz, Z., & B. Russett. 1993. “Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946–1986.” American Political Science Review 87(03):624-638.
94. Mearsheimer, John. J. 1990. “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War.” International Security 15(1): 5-56.
95. Mearsheimer, John. J. 2014a. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. WW: Norton & Company.
96. Mearsheimer, John. J. 2014b. “Taiwan’s Dire Straits.” The National Interest 130 (May/April): 29-39.
97. Mitrany, David. 1948. “The Functional Approach to World Organization.” International Affairs 24(3): 350-363.
98. Morgenthau, Hans J. 1973. Politics Among Nations. Knopf: New York.
99. Naím, Moisés. 2009. “Globalization.” Foreign Policy 171(Mar/Apr): 28-34.
100. Nye, Joseph S. 1998. “Neorealism and Neoliberalism.” World Politics 40(2): 235-251.
101. Oneal, John R., & Bruce M. Russett. 1997. “The Classical Liberals were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950–1985.” International Studies Quarterly 41(2): 267-294.
102. Oneal, John R., & Bruce Russett. 1999. “Assessing the Liberal Peace with Alternative Specifications: Trade Still Reduces Conflict.” Journal of Peace Research 36(4): 423-442.
103. Oneal, John R., Bruce Russett & M. L. Berbaum. 2003. “Causes of Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885–1992.” International Studies Quarterly 47(3): 371-393.
104. Panda, Ankit. 2015. “Chinese J-11 Fighters Exercise in the South China Sea After US Navy Patrols.” The Diplomat in http://thediplomat.com/2015/11/chinese-j-11-fighters-exercise-in-the-south-china-sea-after-us-navy-patrols/. Latest update May 16 2016.
105. Parameswaran, Prashanth. 2015. “The Truth About Philippine Military Modernization and the ‘China Threat’.” The Diplomat in http://thediplomat.com/2015/07/the-truth-about-philippine-military-modernization-and-the-china-threat/. Latest update May 16 2016.
106. Parameswaran, Prashanth. 2016. “America’s New Maritime Security Initiative
107. for Southeast Asia.” The Diplomat in http://thediplomat.com/2016/04/americas-new-maritime-security-initiative-for-southeast-asia/. Latest update April 6 2016.
108. Peceny, M., C. C. Beer & S. Sanchez-Terry .2002. “Dictatorial Peace?” American Political Science Review 96(01): 15-26.
109. Peceny, M., & C.K. Butler. 2004. “The Conflict Behavior of Authoritarian Regimes.” International Politics 41(4): 565-581.
110. Plattner, M. F. 2015. “Is Democracy in Decline?” Journal of Democracy 26 (1): 5-10.
111. Polachek, S.W.,1999. “Liberalism and Interdependence: Extending the Trade-Conflict Model.” Journal of Peace Research 36(4): 405-422.
112. Puddington, Arch. 2015. “Discarding Democracy: Return to an Iron Fist.” Freedom House. in https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world-2015/discarding-democracy-return-iron-fist. Latest update 24 March 2016.
113. Ricardo, D., E. C. K. Gonner & Q. Li. 1819. The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. World Scientific.
114. Katzenstein, Peter J. 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. NY: Columbia University Press.
115. Keohane, Robert O.1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. NJ: Princeton University Press.
116. Keohane, Robert O. & Joseph S. Nye. 2000. “Globalization: What’s New? What’s Not? (And So What?).” Foreign Policy 118(Spring): 104-119.
117. Rock, Stephen R. 1997. “Anglo–US Relations, 1845–1930: Did Shared Liberal Values and Democratic Institutions Keep the Peace?” In Paths to Peace: Is Democracy the Answer? MA: MIT Press.
118. Rourke, John T. 1994. Presidential Wars and American Democracy. Washington, DC: Marlowe&Co..
119. Rosato, Sabastian. 2003. “The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory.” American Political Science Review 97 (04): 585-602.
120. Rosato, Sabastian. 2005. “Explaining the Democratic Peace.” American Political Science Review 99(03): 467-472.
121. Roy, Denny. 2015. “New PRC South China Sea Bases No Cause to ‘Relax’’. The Diplomat in http://thediplomat.com/2015/04/new-prc-south-china-sea-bases-no-cause-to-relax/. Latest update April 6 2016.
122. Rousseau, David L., Christopher Gelpi, Dan Reiter and Paul K. Huth. 1996. “Assessing the Dyadic Nature of the Democratic Peace, 1918-88.” American Political Science Review 90(3): 512-533.
123. Russett, Bruce. 1994. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. NJ: Princeton university press.
124. Samons, L. J. 2004. What`s Wrong with Democracy? : from Athenian Practice to American Worship. University of California Press.
125. Shambaugh, David. 2004/2005. “China Engages Asia: Reshaping the Regional Order.” International Security 29(3): 64-99.
126. Smith, Michael. 2014. “EU-China Relations and the Limits of Economic Diplomacy.” Asia Europe Journal 12(1): 35-48.
127. Stepan, Alfred & Juan J. Linz. 2013. “Democratization Theory and the “Arab Spring”” Journal of Democracy 24(2): 15-30.
128. Stiglitz, Joseph. 2002. “Globalism’s Discontents.” The American Prospect(Winter): 16-21.
129. Strand, H., L. Wilhelmsen, & N. P. Gleditsch. 2003. Armed Conflict Dataset Codebook in Oslo: PRIO.
130. Thayer, Carl. 2015. “The Philippines, Malaysia, and Vietnam Race to South China Sea Defense Modernization.” The Diplomat in http://thediplomat.com/2015/01/the-philippines-malaysia-and-vietnam-race-to-south-china-sea-defense-modernization/. Latest update May 16 2016.
131. Thayer, Carlyle A. 2011. “China’s New Wave of Aggressive Assertiveness in the South China Sea.” International Studies of China Study 2(3): 555-583.
132. “Vietnam/China: Vietnam`s trade with china flourishes despite south china sea
甲、 tensions.” 2012. Asia News Monitor, in http://search.proquest.com/docview/1082305981?accountid=10067.Latest update August 13 2016.
133. Walt, Stephen M. 2000. “Two Cheers for Clinton`s Foreign Policy.” Foreign Policy 79(2):63-79.
134. Waltz, Kenneth N. 2000. “Globalization and American Power.” The National Interest 59(Spring):46-56.
135. Waltz, Kenneth N. 2010. Theory of International Politics. Long Grove: Waveland Press.
136. Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
外交學系
103253022
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103253022
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 張文揚zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 林惠儀zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 林惠儀zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2016en_US
dc.date.accessioned 22-Aug-2016 13:30:00 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 22-Aug-2016 13:30:00 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 22-Aug-2016 13:30:00 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0103253022en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100544-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 外交學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 103253022zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本文最主要的目的有二。其一為評估「民主和平論」是否依然有效地解釋「戰爭與和平」議題。若然，那麼同為自由主義的「貿易和平」是否相較之下之解釋力較佳。第二則是個案研究，聚焦於「南海爭端」用以進一步驗證本文的論述。本文認為以制度層面而言，貿易量事實上相較於政治體制是較能降低衝突帶來和平。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This thesis has two purposes: the first one is to re-examine “Democratic Peace” and to testify “Trade Peace” with an eye to finding a more explainable solution on the issue of Conflict and Peace; and the second purpose is by providing a case study centering on the region of the South China Sea, the premise of this thesis will further be evaluated. The premise in here is that from an institutional perspective, trade is the more efficient and less costly method to reduce the possibility of initiating armed conflicts than polities.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 壹、 緒論 1
第一節、 研究動機 2
第二節、 研究目的 5
第三節、 研究方法: 個案研究法 (case study) 6
第四節、 研究範圍以及研究限制 8
一、 研究範圍 8
二、 研究限制 9
貳、 文獻探討 10
第一節、 民主和平論 10
一、 康德的永久和平： 10
二、 民主和平論：區隔性和平 Separate Peace 12
三、 疑「民主和平論」者之觀點 16
四、 本文觀察 18
第二節、 貿易和平論 20
一、 自由主義之貿易說 20
二、 衝突與貿易 24
三、 疑「貿易和平論」者之觀點 26
四、 本文觀察 29
參、 反思「民主和平」以及檢證「貿易和平」 31
第一節、 反思「民主和平論」 31
一、 自變數：民主國家數量變動 31
二、 依變數：2000年至2014年國際武裝衝突發生數量 37
第二節、 檢證貿易和平論 39
一、 自變數：全球貿易量Direction of Trade Statistics 39
二、 自變數與依變數之關係 41
肆、 個案研究：南海主權爭端 44
第一節、 背景介紹 45
第二節、 檢視配對國之貿易往來 49
一、 中國與菲國 50
二、 中國與越南 53
三、 越南與菲律賓 56
第三節、 多邊貿易往來 58
第四節、 結語 60
伍、 結論 62
參考文獻 67		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 1928851 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103253022en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 民主和平zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 貿易和平zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 南海主權爭端zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 戰爭與和平zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Democratic Peaceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Trade Peaceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Territorial disputes of the South China Seaen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Armed Conflicten_US
dc.title (題名) 反思「民主和平論」以及檢證「貿易和平論」 ：「南海」個案研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Re-examine “Democratic Peace” and Testify “Trade Peace” : The Case of the South China Seaen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1. BBC 中文網，2012，〈點評中國：中非的黃岩島對峙〉，http://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/focus_on_china/2012/05/120514_cr_southchinasea，2016/7/29。
2. 中央通訊社，2015，〈Q&A南海爭端吵什麼？〉，http://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/201510270177-1.aspx，2016/4/2。
3. 中央通訊社，2016a，〈南海緊張 陸控渚碧礁燈塔啟用〉，http://www.cna.com.tw/news/acn/201604060431-1.aspx，2016/4/9。
4. 中央通訊社，2016b，〈南海風雲急 美國軍援菲律賓創15年新高〉，http://www.cna.com.tw/news/aopl/201604080428-1.aspx，2016/4/9。
5. 中華民國外交部，2015，〈中華民國對南海問題之立場聲明〉，http://www.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content_M_2.aspx?n=8742DCE7A2A28761&sms=491D0E5BF5F4BC36&s=02A142E7057EF2C2，2016/03/30。
6. 中華民國外交部，2016, 〈「區域全面經濟夥伴協定」(RCEP)簡介〉 ，http://www.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=5F02B11AD7FC4A1B&sms=37D27039021F6DF7&s=E1D4B867A637D3B3. 2016/5/16.
7. 丘宏達著，陳純一修訂， 2013，《現代國際法》，台北市：三民書局：1-1256。
8. 王義桅、唐小松譯，2014，《大國政治的悲劇》，台北市：麥田出局：1-621。譯自Mearsheimer, John. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. Norton & Company. 2014.
9. 毛正氣，2012，〈南海的自然資源與爭奪〉，中華民國國防部，https://www.mnd.gov.tw/Upload/201208/1-南海的自然資源與爭奪.pdf，2016/3/31。
10. 世界地圖，2012，台北市：大輿出版：1-206。
11. 邱稔壤，2002，《從政治外交層面看南錐禿鷹行動引發之人權爭議-以智利皮諾契爭權為例》，台北市：印刻出版有限公司: 1-427。
12. 呂建良，2008，〈東海油田氣〉，國立政治大學國際關係研究中心，http://iiro.nccu.edu.tw/index.php?include=article&id=2317，2016/4/2。
13. 朱雪瑛，2005，〈“民主和平論” 之分析與美國 “推廣民主” 戰略〉，《臺灣民主季刊》，2(1)：123-158。
14. 宋連海，2014，〈2014年中越南海爭端對我安全影響〉，中華民國國防部https://www.mnd.gov.tw/Upload/201409/001-020.pdf. 2016/5/16，2016/8/13。
15. 林佳瑩審閱，蔡毓智譯，2013，《研究方法：基礎理論與技巧》，台北市：雙葉出版。譯自Babbie, Earl. Introduction to Social Research, 5th edition. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. 2011.
16. 林添貴譯，2016，《中國海：下一世紀的亞洲是誰的？》，台北市：麥田出版。譯自Kaplan, Robert D. Asia’s Cauladron: The South China Sea and the End of a Stable Pacific. Random House Trade Paperbacks. 2015.
17. 張文揚，2014，〈民主和平論與非民主和平論之經驗檢證: 政治制度相似性的關鍵作用〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》， 26(1)：1-39。
18. 張麟徵，2002，《近代國際關係史》， 台北市：揚智文化：1-522。
19. 陳貞如，2013，〈近年南海海域黃岩島爭端之法律分析〉，《司法新聲》，108: 60-80. http://ja.lawbank.com.tw/pdf/近年南海海域黃岩島爭端之法律分析.pdf ，2016/8/12。
20. 盛智明與韓佳譯，2012，《好研究 如何設計：用量化邏輯做質化研究》，新北市：權森印刷事業社。譯自King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O, and Verba, Sidney. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press. 2012.
21. 程富陽，2011，〈析論中東「阿拉伯之春」的衝擊與影響〉，《國防雜誌》 27(1):18-29。
22. 黃旻華，2001，〈[民主和平] 研究的方法論:[聽眾成本] 概念之辨析〉，《問 題與研究，40(1)：87-107。
23. 蔡明彥，2014，〈近期中共與越南在南海衝突事件之觀察〉，《大陸與兩岸情勢 簡報》，http://www.mac.gov.tw/public/Attachment/47710474517.pdf 2016/8/12。
24. 趙春山主編，郭瑞華、郭瑞華、張五岳、楊開煌、高長等編著，2013，《兩岸關係與政府大陸政策》，台北市：三民書局：1-289。
25. 謝登隆，2015，《國際貿易理論與政策》， 台北市：智勝出版：1-392。
26. Baldwin, David. A. 1993. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press.
27. Barbieri, Katherine. 1996. “Economic Interdependence: A Path to Peace or a Source of Interstate Conflict?” Journal of Peace Research 33(1): 29-49.
28. Barbieri, Katherine & Jack S. Levy. 1999. “Sleeping with the Enemy: The Impact of War on Trade.” Journal of Peace Research 36(4): 463-479.
29. Barbieri, Katherine. 2002. The Liberal Illusion: Does Trade Promote Peace? An-n Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
30. Barnett, Michael & Martha Finnemore. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. NY: Cornell University.
31. BBC News. 2015. “Q&A: South China China Sea Dispute.” in http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-13748349. Latest update April 2 2016.
32. Bermeo, Nancy. 2016. “On Democratic Backsliding.” Journal of Democracy 27(1): 5-19.
33. Bermeo, Nancy. 2016. “On Democratic Backsliding: Supplemental List.” in http://www.journalofdemocracy.org/sites/default/files/Bermeo%20Supplemental-List%20of%20Coded%20Coups-27-1.pdf. Latest update March 30 2016.
34. Brinkley, Douglas. 1997. “Democratic Enlargement: The Clinton Doctrine.”
35. Foreign Policy 106 (spring):110-127.
36. Brooks, Stephen G., John G. Ikenberry & William C. Wohlforth. 2012. “Don`t Come Home, America: The Case Against Retrenchment.” International
37. Security 37(3): 7-51.
38. Burchill, S., A. Linklater, R. Devetak, J. Donnelly, T. Nardin, M. Paterson, J. Ture. 2009. Theories of International Relations. Forth Edition. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
39. Carothers, Thomas. 2002. “The End of the Transition Paradigm.” Journal of Democracy 13(1):5-21.
40. Cheong, Inkyo and Jose Tongzon. 2013. “Comparing the Economic Impact of the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership.” Asian Economic Papers 12(2): 144-170.
41. Copeland, Dale C. 1996. “Economic Interdependence and War: A Theory of Trade Expectations.” International Security 20(4): 5-41.
42. Copeland, Dale C. 1999. “Trade Expectations and the Outbreak of Peace: Détente 1970–74 and the End of the Cold War 1985–91.” Security Studies 9(1-2):15-58.
43. CNN. 2003. “The Rise and Fall of a Dictator.” in http://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/12/14/sprj.irq.saddam.profile/. Latest update 24 March 2016.
44. Dawson, James & Seán Hanley. 2016. “The Fading Mirage of the “Liberal Consensus”.” Journal of Democracy 27(1): 20-34.
45. De Mesquita, Bruce, James D. Morrow, Randolph M. Siverson and Alastair Smith. 1999. “An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace.” American Political Science Review 93(4): 791-807.
46. De Mesquita, Bruce., Alastair Smith, Randolph Siverson & James D. Morrow. 2005. The Logic of Political Survival. Massachusetts: MIT press.
47. Department of Peace and Conflict Research. 2016. “UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset,v.4-2015.”in http://www.pcr.uu.se/research/ucdp/datasets/ucdp_prio_armed_conflict_dataset/. Latest update May 28 2016.
48. Desker, Berry. 2015. “China`s conflicting signals on the South China Sea.” Brookings in http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2015/07/29-china-conflicting-signals-south-china-sea-desker. Latest update April 7 2016.
49. Diamond, L. 2015. “Facing Up to the Democratic Recession.” Journal of Democracy 26(1):141-155.
50. Diamond, L. 1996. “Is the Third Wave Over?” Journal of Democracy 7(3): 20-37.
51. Dimitrov, M.K. 2013. Why Communism Did Not Collapse: Understanding Authoritarian Regime Resilience in Asia and Europe. Landon: Cambridge University Press.
52. Domke, W. K. 1988. War and The Changing Global System. New Haven: Yale University Press.
53. Doyle, Michael. W. 1983. “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 12(3): 205-235.
54. Doyle, Michael. W. 1986. “Liberalism and world politics.” American Political Science Review 80(04): 1151-1169.
55. Doyle, Michael. W. 2005. “Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace.” American Political Science Review 99(03): 463-466.
56. Economist, The, 2014a. “The Lesson of Algeria.” in http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21600984-even-if-arab-spring-has-sorely-disappointed-dictators-even-benevolent-ones-are-not. Latest update 24 march 2016.
57. Economist, The, 2014b. “What’s Gone With Democracy.” in http://www.economist.com/news/essays/21596796-democracy-was-most-successful-political-idea-20th-century-why-has-it-run-trouble-and-what-can-be-do. Latest update 24 March 2016.
58. Economist, The, 2015. “Sea of Troubles: A Disputed Sea is a Growing Security Nightmare and Increasingly an Ecological One.” in http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21650122-disputed-sea-growing-security-nightmareand-increasingly-ecological-one-sea-troubles. Latest update 24 March 2016.
59. Farber, H. S., & J. Gowa. 1995. “Polities and Peace.” International Security 20(2): 123-146.
60. Freedom House. “Freedom in the World Country Ratings” in https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/Country%20Status%20%26%20Ratings%20Overview%2C%201973-2016.pdf. Latest update 05 April 2016.
61. Freedom House. 2015a. “Nations in Transit 2015 Report.” in https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/nations-transit-2015#.VvOCisc4MdU. Latest update 23 March 2016.
62. Freedom House. 2015b. “Nations in Transition 2015 Methodology.” in https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit-2015/methodology. Latest update 24 March 2016.
63. Freedom House. 2015c. “Freedom in the World 2015: China.” in https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2015/china. Latest update April 6 2016.
64. Freedom House. 2015d. “ Freedom in the World 2015: Vietnam.” in https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2015/vietnam. Latest update April 6 2016.
65. Freedom House. 2015e. “Freedom in the World 2015: Philippines.” in https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2015/philippines.Latest update April 7 2016.
66. Freedom House. 2016. “Regions: Sub-Saharan Africa.” in https://freedomhouse.org/regions/sub-saharan-africa. Latest update April 13 2016.
67. Frieden, Jeffery A. & David A. Lake. 2000. International Political Economy: Perspective on Global Power and Wealth. 4th edition. London: Routledge.
68. Friedman, Thomas. 2006. The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. Landon: Macmillan.
69. Fukuyama, Francis. 2015. “Why is Democracy Performing So Poorly?” Journal of Democracy 26(1):11-20.
70. Gartzke, Erik. 1998. Kant We All Just Get Along? Opportunity, Willingness, and the Origins of the Democratic Peace.” American Journal of Political Science 42(2):1-27.
71. Glaser, Bonnie S. 2012. “China’s Coercive Economic Diplomacy.” The Diplomat in http://thediplomat.com/2012/07/chinas-coercive-economic-diplomacy/. Latest update 24 July 2016.
72. Guardian, The. (2014). “Philippines stands by rejection of Beijing`s claims to
73. the South China Sea in http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/31/philippines-beijing-south-china-sea-benigno-aquino-arbitration. Latest update 24 March
甲、 2016.
74. Ikenberry, G. John. 2005. American Foreign Policy: Theoretical Essays 5th Edition. New York: Princeton University.
75. Habdank-Kołaczkowska, Sylvana. 2016. “Democracy on the Defensive in
甲、 Europe and Eurasia.” Freedom House in https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit-2015/democracy-defensive-europe-and-eurasia. Latest update 23 March 2016.
76. Huntington, Samuel. P. 1993. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma press.
77. IMF. 2016a. Direction of Trade Statistics, in http://data.imf.org/?sk=9D6028D4-F14A-464C-A2F2-59B2CD424B85. Latest update 24 March 2016.
78. IMF. 2016b. Direction of Trade Statistics: Export, FOB to Partner Countries, in
79. http://data.imf.org/regular.aspx?key=61013712. Latest update 26 march 2016.
80. IMF. 2016c. Direction of Trade Statistics: Import, CIF to Partner Countries, in http://data.imf.org/regular.aspx?key=61013712. Latest update 26 March 2016.
81. Kant, Immanuel. 1970. Perpetual Peace. In Kant’s Political Writings ed. Hans Reisstrans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82. Kazianis, Harry, J. 2016. “The Flash War of `74: China and Vietnam`s South China Sea Showdown.” The National Interest in http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/the-flash-war-74-china-vietnams-south-china-sea-showdown-15540?page=2. Latest update May 16 2016.
83. Keohane, Robert. O., & Joseph S. Nye.1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Little: Brown Boston.
84. Kissinger, Henry. 2014. World Order. London: Penguin Press.
85. Krastev, Ivan. 2007. “The Strange Death of the Liberal Consensus: Is East Central Europe Backsliding?” Journal of Democracy 18 (4): 56-63.
86. Krastev, Ivan. 2016. “Liberalism’s Failure to Deliver: What’s Wrong with East-Central Europe?” Journal of Democracy 27(1): 35-38.
87. Layne, Christopher. 1994. “Kant or Cant: The Myth of the Democratic Peace.” International Security 19(2): 5-49.
88. Layne, Christopher. 1997. “Lord Palmerston and the Triumph of Realism: Anglo-French Relations, 1830–48.” In Paths to Peace: Is Democracy the Answer?” Cambridge: MIT Press.
89. Levitsky, S., & L. A. Way. 2002. “The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 13(2): 51-65.
90. Levitsky, S., & L. A. Way. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. New Haven: Cambridge University Press.
91. Mansfield, Edward. D. 1994. Power, Trade, and War. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
92. Mansfield, Edward. D. & Brian M. Pollins edited. 2003. Economic Interdependence and International Conflict: New Perspective on an Enduring Debate. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
93. Maoz, Z., & B. Russett. 1993. “Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946–1986.” American Political Science Review 87(03):624-638.
94. Mearsheimer, John. J. 1990. “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War.” International Security 15(1): 5-56.
95. Mearsheimer, John. J. 2014a. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. WW: Norton & Company.
96. Mearsheimer, John. J. 2014b. “Taiwan’s Dire Straits.” The National Interest 130 (May/April): 29-39.
97. Mitrany, David. 1948. “The Functional Approach to World Organization.” International Affairs 24(3): 350-363.
98. Morgenthau, Hans J. 1973. Politics Among Nations. Knopf: New York.
99. Naím, Moisés. 2009. “Globalization.” Foreign Policy 171(Mar/Apr): 28-34.
100. Nye, Joseph S. 1998. “Neorealism and Neoliberalism.” World Politics 40(2): 235-251.
101. Oneal, John R., & Bruce M. Russett. 1997. “The Classical Liberals were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950–1985.” International Studies Quarterly 41(2): 267-294.
102. Oneal, John R., & Bruce Russett. 1999. “Assessing the Liberal Peace with Alternative Specifications: Trade Still Reduces Conflict.” Journal of Peace Research 36(4): 423-442.
103. Oneal, John R., Bruce Russett & M. L. Berbaum. 2003. “Causes of Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885–1992.” International Studies Quarterly 47(3): 371-393.
104. Panda, Ankit. 2015. “Chinese J-11 Fighters Exercise in the South China Sea After US Navy Patrols.” The Diplomat in http://thediplomat.com/2015/11/chinese-j-11-fighters-exercise-in-the-south-china-sea-after-us-navy-patrols/. Latest update May 16 2016.
105. Parameswaran, Prashanth. 2015. “The Truth About Philippine Military Modernization and the ‘China Threat’.” The Diplomat in http://thediplomat.com/2015/07/the-truth-about-philippine-military-modernization-and-the-china-threat/. Latest update May 16 2016.
106. Parameswaran, Prashanth. 2016. “America’s New Maritime Security Initiative
107. for Southeast Asia.” The Diplomat in http://thediplomat.com/2016/04/americas-new-maritime-security-initiative-for-southeast-asia/. Latest update April 6 2016.
108. Peceny, M., C. C. Beer & S. Sanchez-Terry .2002. “Dictatorial Peace?” American Political Science Review 96(01): 15-26.
109. Peceny, M., & C.K. Butler. 2004. “The Conflict Behavior of Authoritarian Regimes.” International Politics 41(4): 565-581.
110. Plattner, M. F. 2015. “Is Democracy in Decline?” Journal of Democracy 26 (1): 5-10.
111. Polachek, S.W.,1999. “Liberalism and Interdependence: Extending the Trade-Conflict Model.” Journal of Peace Research 36(4): 405-422.
112. Puddington, Arch. 2015. “Discarding Democracy: Return to an Iron Fist.” Freedom House. in https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world-2015/discarding-democracy-return-iron-fist. Latest update 24 March 2016.
113. Ricardo, D., E. C. K. Gonner & Q. Li. 1819. The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. World Scientific.
114. Katzenstein, Peter J. 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. NY: Columbia University Press.
115. Keohane, Robert O.1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. NJ: Princeton University Press.
116. Keohane, Robert O. & Joseph S. Nye. 2000. “Globalization: What’s New? What’s Not? (And So What?).” Foreign Policy 118(Spring): 104-119.
117. Rock, Stephen R. 1997. “Anglo–US Relations, 1845–1930: Did Shared Liberal Values and Democratic Institutions Keep the Peace?” In Paths to Peace: Is Democracy the Answer? MA: MIT Press.
118. Rourke, John T. 1994. Presidential Wars and American Democracy. Washington, DC: Marlowe&Co..
119. Rosato, Sabastian. 2003. “The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory.” American Political Science Review 97 (04): 585-602.
120. Rosato, Sabastian. 2005. “Explaining the Democratic Peace.” American Political Science Review 99(03): 467-472.
121. Roy, Denny. 2015. “New PRC South China Sea Bases No Cause to ‘Relax’’. The Diplomat in http://thediplomat.com/2015/04/new-prc-south-china-sea-bases-no-cause-to-relax/. Latest update April 6 2016.
122. Rousseau, David L., Christopher Gelpi, Dan Reiter and Paul K. Huth. 1996. “Assessing the Dyadic Nature of the Democratic Peace, 1918-88.” American Political Science Review 90(3): 512-533.
123. Russett, Bruce. 1994. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. NJ: Princeton university press.
124. Samons, L. J. 2004. What`s Wrong with Democracy? : from Athenian Practice to American Worship. University of California Press.
125. Shambaugh, David. 2004/2005. “China Engages Asia: Reshaping the Regional Order.” International Security 29(3): 64-99.
126. Smith, Michael. 2014. “EU-China Relations and the Limits of Economic Diplomacy.” Asia Europe Journal 12(1): 35-48.
127. Stepan, Alfred & Juan J. Linz. 2013. “Democratization Theory and the “Arab Spring”” Journal of Democracy 24(2): 15-30.
128. Stiglitz, Joseph. 2002. “Globalism’s Discontents.” The American Prospect(Winter): 16-21.
129. Strand, H., L. Wilhelmsen, & N. P. Gleditsch. 2003. Armed Conflict Dataset Codebook in Oslo: PRIO.
130. Thayer, Carl. 2015. “The Philippines, Malaysia, and Vietnam Race to South China Sea Defense Modernization.” The Diplomat in http://thediplomat.com/2015/01/the-philippines-malaysia-and-vietnam-race-to-south-china-sea-defense-modernization/. Latest update May 16 2016.
131. Thayer, Carlyle A. 2011. “China’s New Wave of Aggressive Assertiveness in the South China Sea.” International Studies of China Study 2(3): 555-583.
132. “Vietnam/China: Vietnam`s trade with china flourishes despite south china sea
甲、 tensions.” 2012. Asia News Monitor, in http://search.proquest.com/docview/1082305981?accountid=10067.Latest update August 13 2016.
133. Walt, Stephen M. 2000. “Two Cheers for Clinton`s Foreign Policy.” Foreign Policy 79(2):63-79.
134. Waltz, Kenneth N. 2000. “Globalization and American Power.” The National Interest 59(Spring):46-56.
135. Waltz, Kenneth N. 2010. Theory of International Politics. Long Grove: Waveland Press.
136. Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.		zh_TW