Publications-Issues & Studies
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
Google ScholarTM
NCCU Library
Citation Infomation
Related Publications in TAIR
題名 Human Rights, Asian Values, and the Clash of Civilizations 作者 Freeman, Michael 關鍵詞 human rights;Asian values;clash of civilization 日期 1998-10 上傳時間 4-Oct-2016 17:37:07 (UTC+8) 摘要 During the Cold War a simple, bipolar model of world politics was dominant. After the Cold War, some politicians and scholars believed that the West had won, and that the Western conception of liberal democracy would become a model for the world. This view was, however, almost immediately challenged by the idea of ”Asian values” proposed by certain East Asian political leaders and intellectuals. To the debate about Eastern, Western, and universal values, Samuel Huntington contributed his dramatic thesis of ”the clash of civitlizations.” This thesis caught the attention of many scholars because it evoked both Western fears of challenges from non-Western resentment at Western cultural hegemony. The thesis also seemed consonant with the ”Asian values” challenge. This view of the Huntington thesis is, however, mistaken on several counts. First, the thesis rests on a highly implausible account of human nature and history. Second, the argument is based on a misreading of post-Cold War global politics. Third, the Huntington thesis, far from reinforcing the ”Asian values” argument, is inconsistent with it. Fourth, the ”Asian values” argument is itselfbased on a misreading of contemporary politics. Fifth, the Huntington thesis and the ”Asian values” argument are both dangerous because they could become self-fulfilling prophecies of violent conflict. Sixth, Huntington`s policy conclusions about human rights and international order inconsistent with the thesis of the clash of civilizations.This article concludes, therefore, that both Huntington`s thesis and ”Asian values” argument should be rejected as empirically misleading and politically dangerous. In their place, we should reaffirm the internationalist program of human rights promotion, which Huntington and the ”Asian values” advocates have called into question, mistakenly, and with potential harmful consequences for the future of international relations. 關聯 Issues & Studies,34(10),48-78 資料類型 article dc.creator (作者) Freeman, Michael dc.date (日期) 1998-10 dc.date.accessioned 4-Oct-2016 17:37:07 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 4-Oct-2016 17:37:07 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 4-Oct-2016 17:37:07 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/102558 - dc.description.abstract (摘要) During the Cold War a simple, bipolar model of world politics was dominant. After the Cold War, some politicians and scholars believed that the West had won, and that the Western conception of liberal democracy would become a model for the world. This view was, however, almost immediately challenged by the idea of ”Asian values” proposed by certain East Asian political leaders and intellectuals. To the debate about Eastern, Western, and universal values, Samuel Huntington contributed his dramatic thesis of ”the clash of civitlizations.” This thesis caught the attention of many scholars because it evoked both Western fears of challenges from non-Western resentment at Western cultural hegemony. The thesis also seemed consonant with the ”Asian values” challenge. This view of the Huntington thesis is, however, mistaken on several counts. First, the thesis rests on a highly implausible account of human nature and history. Second, the argument is based on a misreading of post-Cold War global politics. Third, the Huntington thesis, far from reinforcing the ”Asian values” argument, is inconsistent with it. Fourth, the ”Asian values” argument is itselfbased on a misreading of contemporary politics. Fifth, the Huntington thesis and the ”Asian values” argument are both dangerous because they could become self-fulfilling prophecies of violent conflict. Sixth, Huntington`s policy conclusions about human rights and international order inconsistent with the thesis of the clash of civilizations.This article concludes, therefore, that both Huntington`s thesis and ”Asian values” argument should be rejected as empirically misleading and politically dangerous. In their place, we should reaffirm the internationalist program of human rights promotion, which Huntington and the ”Asian values” advocates have called into question, mistakenly, and with potential harmful consequences for the future of international relations. dc.format.extent 2361643 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.relation (關聯) Issues & Studies,34(10),48-78 dc.subject (關鍵詞) human rights;Asian values;clash of civilization dc.title (題名) Human Rights, Asian Values, and the Clash of Civilizations dc.type (資料類型) article
