| dc.creator (作者) | Marble, Andrew D. | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2003-03 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 14-Oct-2016 16:28:25 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 14-Oct-2016 16:28:25 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 14-Oct-2016 16:28:25 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/102822 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | This article seeks to highlight the methods by which The China Quarterly (CQ)-the founding journal of the modern China studies field-has helped create a larger communal identity among researchers interested in China. The argument is that CQ has used a variety of tools at its disposal-including choices regarding articles, book reviews, research notes, obituaries, cover design, editorial staff advisory board, editorial notes, advertisements, and extra-journal activities and publications. (1) to create an editor-readership connection that creates a more intimate ”community of like-minded scholars”; (2) to maintain an informal yet quite public ”China studies field membership list”; (3) to act as community newsletter noting events, institutes, and publications of interest to the field; (4) to present a ”living textual history” of the development of the field; and (5) to define or debate the topics, methodologies, and broad research directions that constitute China studies research. These five functions have allowed CQ to shape a communal identity among China watchers that extends far beyond the journal itself The article closes by drawing implications for attempts to define the China studies field today. | |
| dc.format.extent | 2347579 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | Issues & Studies,38(4)&39(1),289-319 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | state of the field;academic journal;journal editing;The China Quarterly;China studies field;community building | |
| dc.title (題名) | The China Quarterly`s Creation of Communal Identity-Lessons for Defining the China Studies Field | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | |
