1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Education
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 性別角色.價值觀念與人際吸引之相關研究
作者 沈姍姍
貢獻者 林邦傑
沈姍姍
日期 1984
上傳時間 8-Nov-2016 15:19:56 (UTC+8)
摘要 論文提要
本研究之主要目的有五：一為探討性別角色與人際吸引之關係，欲瞭解不同性別角色者在交友時是否會受對方性別角色之影響，以及不同性別角色者在班級中受歡迎程度之差異；二為探討不同性別、性別角色與社經地位者在價值觀念上是否有差異；三為探討價值觀念與人際吸引之關係，欲瞭解不同人際吸引程度者在價值觀念上是否有差異，以及價值觀念相似性是否較易形成人際吸引；四為探討社經地位與人際吸引之關係，以瞭解是否彼此社經地位相似者易成為好友。五為根據研究結果，提出建議，以為增進與維繫人際關係之參考。
本研究以北部地區淡江、輔仁與政治三所大學八個系468位學生為研究對象。每位受試者填答「社經地位問卷」、「價值量表」、「性別角色量表」與「社會關係測量問卷」四項資料後，進行統計分析。採用X2檢定、 t 考驗、單因子變異數分析與等級相關考驗等統計方法針對各項研究假設而驗證之。
本研究結果發現：(1)不同性別角色者交友時並不受對方性別角色之影響，而不同性別角色者在受歡迎程度上也沒有顯著差異。(2)不同性別、性別角色與社經地位者在某些價值項目上確實有差異存在。(3)不同人際吸引程度者在「舒適的生活」、「心胸開潤」、「爽朗愉快」、「真誠」「負責」與「自制」價值項目上有顯著差異。(4)價值相似與人際吸引之關係僅是顯著之低相關，表示二者雖有關連，但關連不大。(5)不同社經地位者在所交朋友之社經地位上並未達顯著差異，但約略顯示社經地位過於懸殊者，較不易成為好友。
第一章 緒論1
第一節 研究緣起與目的1
第二節 研究問題與假設7
第三節 有關名詞之操作定義8
第二章 文獻探討11
第一節 人際吸引之概念與理論11
第二節 性別角色與人際吸引21
第三節 價值觀念29
第四節 價值觀念相似與人際吸引43
第三章 研究方法49
第一節 受試者49
第二節 研究工具50
第三節 實施程序58
第四節 研究設計與統計方法59
第四章 研究結果61
第一節 性別角色與人際吸引61
第二節 性別、性別角色、社經地位與價值觀念72
第三節 價值觀念與人際吸引82
第四節 社經地位與人際吸引87
第五章 討論與建議89
第一節 討論89
第二節 研究限制與建議100
參考書目103
附錄129
圖錄
圖2-1：社會情境人際關係圖12
圖2-2：Newcomb平衡關係圖15
表錄
表 3－1 ：受試者之校別、系級、班別及人數50
表 3－2 ：家庭社經地位之評分標準53
表 4－1 ：擇友者與被選者在各性別角色上之人數與百分比62
表 4－2 ：男生擇友者與被選者在各性別角色上之人數與百分比63
表 4－3 ：女生擇友者與被選者在各性別角色上之人數與百分比64
表 4－4 ：男生兩性化者間與男性化者間人際吸引強度之比較64
表 4－5 ：男生兩性化者間與未分化者間人際吸引強度之比較65
表 4－6 ：男生男性化者間與未分化者間人際吸引強度之比較65
表 4－7 ：女生兩性化者間與女性化者間人際吸引強度之比較65
表 4－8 ：女生兩性化者間與未分化者間人際吸引強度之比較66
表 4－9 ：女生女性化者間與未分化者間人際吸引強度之比較66
表 4－10：男生受女性化女生與兩性化女生人際吸引之強度比較67
表 4－11：男生受女性化女生與男性化女生人際吸引之強度比較67
表 4－12：男生受女性化女生與未分化女生人際吸引之強度比較68
表 4－13：女生受兩性化男生與男性化男生人際吸引之強度比較68
表 4－14：女生受兩性化男生與女性化男生人際吸引之強度比較69
表 4－15：女生受兩性化男生與未分化男生人際吸引之強度比較69
表 4－16：全體受試者被選為受歡迎者之次數、人數及百分比70
表 4－17：不同性別、性別角色者在受歡迎程度上之平均數、標準差及人數71
表 4－18：不同性別、性別角色者在受歡迎程度上之變異數分析摘要表71
表 4－19：男、女生在目的性價值量表上平均數、標準差與 t考驗表73
表 4－20：男、女生在工具性價值量表上平均數、標準差與 t 考驗表74
表 4－21：不同性別角色者在目的性價值量表之綜合等級、單因子變異數分析與多重比較76
表 4－22 ：不同性別角色者在工具性價值量表之綜合等級、單因子變異數分析與多重比較77
表 4－23：不同社經地位者在目的性價值量表之綜合等級、單因子變異數分析與多重比較79
表 4－24：不同社經地位者在工具性價值量表之綜合等級、單因子變異數分析與多重比較80
表 4－25：不同人際吸引程度者在目的性價值量表之綜合等級與單因子變異數分析83
表 4－26：不同人際吸引程度者在工具性價值量表之綜合等級、單因子變異數分析與多重比較84
表 4－27：喜歡組與不喜歡組目的性價值觀念相似性之顯著性考驗85
表 4－28：喜歡組與不喜歡組工具性價值觀念相似性之顯著性考驗86
表 4－29：不同社經地位者人際吸引之人數與百分比88
表 5－1 ：社經地位組別在目的性價值之綜合等級相關係數96
表 5－2 ：社經地位組別在工具性價值之綜合等級相關係數96
參考文獻 一、中文部份
李月嬌：「影響大學生擇友行為的人格因素」，台大心理研究所碩士論文，民62年
李美枝、楊國樞合著；中國大學生的價值觀，載於李亦園、楊國樞編，「中國人的性格」，中央研究院民族學研究所，民61年，頁313-331。
李美枝：「社會心理學」。台北：大洋出版社，民69年，增訂版。
李美枝：「性別特質問卷的編製及男女大學生四種性別特質類型在成就動機、婚姻、事業及性態度上的比較」。中華心理學刊，民70年，23卷1期，頁23-37。
李默英：「性別、年級、數學學習態度、性別角色與數學成就之關係」，政大教育研究所碩士論文，民72年。
吳武典：社會計量法，載於楊國樞等編，「社會及行為科學研究法」下冊，台北：東華書局民70年，4版，頁678-719。
吳明清：「我國青少年價值觀念及其相關因素」師大教育研究所博士論文，民72年。
何英奇：「大學生性別角色與自我概念的關係」教育心理學報，民70年，14期，頁221-230。
何英奇：「大學生價值結構之研究」，教育心理學報，民71年，15期，頁205-214。
汪履維：「台北市國民中學學生價值觀念及其對學校疏離傾向的關係」，師大教育研究所碩士論文，民70年。
林邦傑：「性別角色與自我防衛、生活適應、認知能力的關係」，中華心理學刊，民70年，23卷，2期，頁107-129。
林清山：「心理與教育統計學」。台北：東華書局，民68年，4版。
林清江等：「我國中小學公民教育內涵及實施成效之研究」，行政院研究發展考核委員會，民69年。
林淑玲：「家庭社經地位與學前教育對學齡兒童學業成就之影饗」，政大教育研究所碩士論文，民71年。
林義男：「我國國中生價值取向之研究」，輔導學報，民67年，1期，頁291- 243。
林義男：「社經地位、價值取向與教育機會的關係」，輔導學報，民68年，2期，頁95-107。
康宗虎：「高中學生價值觀念及其與升學選科意願的關係」，師大教育研究所碩士論文，民69年。
祝咸仁：「性別隔離與異性交友 - 台灣大學生交友調查之分析」，民族社會學報，民67年，16期，頁147-168。
黃文瑛：「台北市國民中學學生人際關係之研究」，教育與心理研究，民66年，1 期，頁17-142。
張文哲：「合作與競爭對國中學生人際吸引、工作成果與攻擊行為的影響」，師大教育研究所碩士論文，民63年。
張文哲：「人際吸引測量的信度與效度問題」，測驗與輔導，民64年，3卷，3期，頁165-166。
張文哲：「態度相似度與態度刺激呈現順序對人際吸引的影響」，教育心理學報，民65年，9期，頁73-84。
張文哲：「態度相似度與態度社會期望性對人際吸引與交往意向的影響」，教育心理學報，民66年，10期，頁61-74。
張長芳：「大一學生的人際關係與其自我觀念及歸因特質的關係」，教育與心理研究，民71年，5期，頁1-46。
張春興：「從重要事項的價值取向分析我國現代社會中的代間差距問題」，教育心理學報，民69年，13期，頁1-12。
張春興：「心理學」。台北：東華書局，民70年修訂八版。
張素鳳：「人際交往模式、人際吸引與生活適應之關係」，台大心理研究所碩士論文。民67年。
郭為藩：「價值理論及其在教育學上的意義」，師大教育研究所集刊，民61年，14輯。頁39-64。
曹國雄：「性別、性別特質、內外控與管理動機之關係」，民72年，印行中。
賈馥茗：個人價值觀念的發展與形成，載於方炳林、賈馥茗主編，「教育論叢」。台北：文景出版社，民61年。
簡馨籬：「性別角色、社經地位與少年犯罪之關係研究」，政大教育研究所碩士論文，民71年。
二.西文部分
Abel, H.,& R. Sahikaya “Emetgence of sex and race friendship preference.”Child, Development. 1962, 33, 939-943.
Ajzen, I. “Effects of information on interpersonal attraction ; Similarity versus affective value.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1974, 29, 3, 374-380.
Allport, G, W., P. E. Vernon & G. Lindey A Study of Values. Houghton Mifflin Co. Boston, 1960.
Argyle, M. The Psychology of Interpersonal Behavior. Baltimore, Md.： Penguin Books, 1976.
Banta, T. J. & M. Hetherington “ Relations between needs of friends and fianc’e.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963, 66, 401-404.
Bankart C. P. & J. Wittenbraker “Sex-role orientation of perceivers and targets as variables in the person perception process.”The Psychological Record, 1980, 30, 143-153.
Baron, R. A., & D. Byrne Social Psychology : understanding human interaction (2nd. ).Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1977.
Beattie, J. Other Cultures. London : Routelidge & Kegan Paul, 1969.
Becker, G. “The complementary needs hypothesis：Authoritarianism, dominance and other Edwards Personal Preference Schedule scores.” Journal of Personality.1964, 32, 45-56.
Bem, S. L. “The measurement of psychological androgyny.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1974, 42, 155-162.
Bem, S. L. “Sex role adaptability : One consequence of psychological androgyny.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1975, 31, 634-643.
Bem, S. L. & E. Lenney “Sex typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1976, 33(1), 48-54.
Bern, S. L. “On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45,196-205.
Benson, L. Fatherhood : A Sociological Perspective. New York : Random House, 1968.
Berkowitz, L.,& R. C. Howard “Reactions to opinion deviates as affected by affiliation need and group member interdependence.” Sociometry. 1959, 22, 81-91.
Berscheid, E.,& E. H. Walster Interpersonal Attraction (2nd ed.). Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley, 1978.
Bezdek, W. “Sex identity, values and balance theory.”Sociometry 1976, 39(2), 142-153.
Biggar, J. C. Bibliography on the Sociology of Sex Roles, Charlottesville : Department of Sociology, University of Virginia, 1970.
Block, J. “Conceptions of sex role : Some cross-cultural and longitudinal perspectives.” American Psychologist. 1973, 28, 512-526.
Bonney, M. E. “A sociometric study of the relationship of factors to mutual friendships on the elementary and college levels.” Sociometry, 1946, 9, 21-47.
Bonney, M. E. “A study of friendship choices in college in relation to church affiliation, in-church preferences, family size, and length of enrollment in college.” Journal of Social Psychology 1949, 29, 153-166.
Bramel , D. Interpersonal attraction, hostility, and perception. In Judson Mills (ed.), Experimental Social Psychology. New York : Macmillan, 1969.
Bridges, J. S. “Sex-typed may be beautiful but androgynous is good. “Psychological Reports. 1981, 48, 267-272.
Bruemmer, L. “The condition of women in society today : Annotated bibliography- part Ⅱ.” Journal of the National Association of Women Deans and Counselors, 1970, 33, 89-95.
Byrne, D., & J. A. Buehler “A note on the influence of propinguity upon acquaintanceships. “Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1955, 51,147-148.
Byrne, D. “Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. “ Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961, 62, 713-715.
Byrne, D., & T. J. Wong “Racial prejudice, interpersonal attraction, and assumed dissimilarity of attitudes.”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962, 65, 246-253.
Byrne, D., & D. Nelson “Attraction as a linear function of proportion of positive reinforcement,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965, 1, 659-663.
Byrne, D,, & W. Griffitt “Similarity versus liking :A clarification.”Psychonomic Science, 1966, 6, 295-296.
Byrne, D., & O. London “Primacy-recency and the sequential presentation of attitudinal stimuli,” Psychonomic Science, 1966, 6, 193-194.
Byrne, D., G. L. Clore, &P. Worchel “The effect of economic similarity-dissimilarity on interpersonal attraction, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 4, 220-224.
Byrne, D. Attitudes and attraction, In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol 4, New York : Academic Press, 1969.
Byrne, D., C. R. Ervin, & J. Lamberth “Continuity between the experimental study of attraction and ‘real life’ computer dating,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 16, 157-165.
Caplow, T., & R. Forman “Neighborhood interaction in a homogeneous comrnunity.” American Social Review. 1950, 15, 357-366.
Cisler, L. “Women : A Bibliography,” 102 West 80th street , New York, 1972.
Clore, G. L., & D. Byrne, A reinforcement-affect model of attraction. In Ted L. Huston (ed.), Foundations of Interpersonal Attraction. New York : Academic Press, 1974, 143-165.
Coelho, G., D. Hamburg, R. Moos, & P. Randolph eds. Coping and Adaptation : A Behavioral Sciences Bibliography, Washington, D. C. : Government Printing Office, 1970.
Craft, M. T. Family values and education in Ireland In J. Eggleston (ed. ) Contemporary Research in the Sociology of Education, London : Methuen, 1974
Crissman, P. “Temporal change and sexual difference in moral judgements. “Journal of Social Psychology 1942, 16, 29-38
Curry, T. J., & R. M. Emerson “Balance theory : A theory of interpersonal attraction?” Sociometry 1970, 33, 216 -238
Curry, T. J., & D. A. A Kenny “The effects of perceived and actual similarity in values and personality in the process of interpersonal attractions “Quality and Quantity 1974, 8, 27-44.
Dahlke, H. 0. “Determinants of sociometric relations among children in the elementary school. “Sociometry. 1953, 16, 327-338
Deaux, K. “To err is humanizing, but sex makes a differences. “Representative Research in Social Psychology, 1972, 3, 20-28.
Deutsch, C. J. , & L, A Gilbert “Sex-role stereotypes : Effect on perceptions of self and others and on personal adjustment. “Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1976, 23, 273-279.
Doherty, P. A., & M. R. Schmidt “Sex typing and self-concept in college women. “Journal of College Student personnel, 1978, 19, 493-497.
Erdwins, C. S. Arnold & G. Ruth “The relationship sex role to self-concept.” Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1980, 36(1), 111-115.
Festinger, L. “Informal social communication, ” Psychological Review. 1950, 57, 271-282.
Festinger, L. “A theory of social comparison process.” Human Relationship. 1954, 7, 117-140.
Festinger, L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Standford: Standford University Press, 1957.
Festinger, L. “Behavioral support for opinion change.” Public Opinion Quarterly. 1964, 28, 404-417
Flaherty, J. F. & J. B. Dusek “An investigation of relationship between psychological androgyny and components of self-concept.” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. 1980, 38(6), 984-992.

Frithioff, P. A Selected Annotated Bibliography of Materials Related to Women in Science. Lund : Research Policy Program, 1967.
Gallagher, J. J. “Social status of children related to intelligence, propinguity, and social perception. ” Elementary School Journal, 1958, 59, 225-231.
Gorsuch, R. L. & R. A. Smith “Changes in college students’ evaluations of moral bahavior : 1969 versus 1939, 1949, and 1958.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1972, 24, 381-391.
Griffitt, W. Attitude similarity and attraction. In Ted L. Huston(ed. ), Foundations of Interpersonal Attraction. New York : Academic Press, 1974, 285-308.
Heider, F. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York :Wiley, 1958.
Hill, C. T., & D. E. Stull “Sex differences in effects of social and value similarity in same-sex friendship.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1981, 41(3), 488-502.
Hochschid, A. R. “A review of sex role research.” American Journal of Sociology. 1978, vol 78, 4, 1011-1029.
Hoffman, L. R., & N. R. F. Maier “An experimental reexamination of the similarity-attraction hypothesis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1966, 3, 145-152.
Hoffman, L. W. “Fear of success in males and females : 1965 and 1967. “Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1974, 42, 353-358.
Hoffman, M, L. “Sex differences in moral internalization.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1975, 32, 720-729.
Hoffman, D.M., & L. S. Fidell Characteristics of androgynous, undifferentiated, masculine, and feminine middle class woman, Paper presented at the Convention of the American Psychological Association. San Francisco, August, 1977.
Hogan, H. W., & H. N. Mookherjee “Values and selected antecedents.” The Journal of Social Psychology. 1981, 113(1), 29-35.
Hughes, M. M. The Sexual Barrier : Legal and Economic Aspects of Employment. San Francisco : 2422 Fox Plaza, 1970.
Hulfish, S. “Relationship of role identification, self-esteem and intelligence to sex differences in field independence.” Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1978, 47(3), 835-842.
Huston, T. L., & G. Levinger “Interpersonal attraction and relationships.” Annual Review of Psychology. 1978, 29, 115-156.
lckes, W., & R. Barnes “Boys and girls together-and alienated : On enacting stereotyped sex roles in mixed sex-dyads.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1978, 36, 669-683.
Ickes, W., B. Schermer, & J. Steeno “Sex and sex-role influences in same-sex dyads.” Social Psychological Quarterly. 1979, 42, 373-385.
Izard, C. E. “Personality similarity and friendship : A follow-up study.” Journal of Abnonnal and Social Psychology. 1963, 66, 598-600.
Jacob, L. “Psychological androgyny and male-female attraction.” paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, New York, September, 1979.
Jacob, L. “Psychological androgyny, sex-typing, and sex-role ideology as predictors of male-female interpersonal attraction.” Sex Roles : A Journal of Research. 1982, 8(10), 1057-1073.
Jacob, P. E., J. J. Flink, & H, L. Schuchman “Values and their function in decision making.” Study of Social Values and Public Policy, Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania, 1962.
Jayasuriya, D. L. A study of adolescent ambition, level of aspiration and achievement motivation, Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis, University of Londoh, (1960), cited in B. N. Sugarman, Social class and values as related to achievement and conduct in school. Sociological Review. 1966, 14, 287-301.
Jones, E. E., & B. N. Daugherty “Political orientation and the perceptual effects of an anticipated interaction. ”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1959, 59, 340-349.
Jones, W. H. M. E. Chernovetz & R. O. Hansson “The Enigma of and rogyny : Differential implications for males and females ? ” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1978, 45, 1101-1115.
Kahl, J. A. “Some measurement of achievement orientation,” American Journal of Sociology. 1965, LZZ, 669-681.
Kaplan, M. F., & P. V. Olczak “Attitudes similarity and direct reinforcement as determinants of attraction: ” Journal of Experimental Research in Personality. 1970, 4, 186-189.
Kaplan, M. F., & N. H. Anderson “Information integration theory and reinforcement theory as approaches to interpersonal attraction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1973, 28(3), 301-312.
Keiffer, M., & P. Warren Population Limitation and Women’s Status : A bibliography. princeton, N. J.：Edcecational Testing Service, 1970.
Kitwood, T. M., & A. G. Smithers “Measurement of human values : On Appraisal of the work of Milton Rokeach.” Educational Research. 1975, 17(3), 175-179.
Kluckhohn, C. Values and value orientations in the theory of action, In T. Passons, et al(eds.) Toward a General Theory of Action, Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press, 1951.
Kobett, L. A. “Relationship between home background, school achievement and adolescent values.” Educations. 1979, 100(2), 158-164.
Kuvlesky, W., & D. Reynolds Educational Aspirations and Expectations of Youth : A Bibliography of Research Literature Ⅱ. College Station : Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Texas A and M University, 1970.
Lamke, L. K. “Sex role orientation and relationship development in same-sex dyads.” Journal of Research in personality. 1982, 16, 343-354.
Levinger, G. “Little sandbox and big quarry : Comment on Byrne’s paradigmatic spade for research on interpersonal attraction.” Representative Research in Social Psychology, 1972, 3, 3-19.
Likert, R. “A technique for the measurement of attitudes.” Archives of Psychology. 1932, 140, 44-53.
Logan, D. D. & K. Ellyn “The relationship of sex, sex role and mental health.” Psychology of Women Quarterly. 1980, 4(4), 573-580.
Marecek, J. “Social change, positive mental health, and psychological androgyny.” Psychology of women Quarterly. 1979, 3(3), 241-247.
McDowell, E. E. & McDowell, C. E. “An investigation of sex roles, dimensions of interpersonal attraction and communication behavior in a small group communication exercise.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Antonio, November, 1979.
McKernan, J. & J. L. Russell “Differences of religion and sex in the value systems of Northern Ireland adolescents.” British Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology. 1980, 19(2), 115-118.
McLellan, D. D. Values, Value Systems, and The Developmental Structure of Moral Judgement. Unpublished M. A. thesis, Michigan State University Library, 1970.
McKinney, J. P. “The structure of values among college students : An examination of sex differences. ” Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 1980, 9, 289-297.
McWhirter, R. M., & J. D. Jecker, “Attitudinal similarity and inferred attraction. ” Psychonomic sciences. 1967, 7, 225-266.
Miller, N. etal. “Similarity, contrast, and complementarity. in friend choice.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1966, 3, 3-12.
Minnigerode, F. A. “Attitude toward woman, sex-role-stereotyping and locus of control. ” Psychological Reports. 1976, 38(3), pt2, 1301-1302.
Minor, L. A. “The effect of sexuality on causal attributions. ” Dissertation Abstracts International , 1976.
Morris, C. Varieties of human value, Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1956.
MueLler, D. J. “A test of the validity of two scales on Rokeach`s value survey.” The Journal of Social Psychology. 1974, 94, 289-290.
Newcomb, T. M. “An approach to the study of communicative acts.” Psychological Review. 1953, 60, 393-404.
Newcomb, T. M. “The prediction of interpersonal attraction. ” American Psychologist. 1956, 11, 575-586.
Newcomb, T. M. The acquaintance process. New York : Holt, 1961.
O’connor K., D. W. Mann & J. M. Bardwick “Androgyny and self-esteem in the upper-middle class : A replication of Spence.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1978, 46, 1168-1169.
Parsons, T. The Social System. Glencoe, Illinois : The Free Press, 1951.
Penner, L. A. “Interpersonal attraction toward a black person as a function of value importance.” Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, FIa., September 1970.
Perry, R. B. General Theory of Value. Longmans, Green & Company, 1967.
Peterson, C. “`Means` and `Ends` values in adulthood.” The Journal of Genetic Psychology. 1981, 139, 155-156.
Pursell, S. A. & P. G. Banikiotes “Androgyny and initial interpersonal attraction.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1978, 4, 235-239.
Reader, N., & H. B. English “Personality factors in adolescent female friendship.” Journal of Consulting Psychology. 1947, 11, 212-220.
Reddy, N. Y. et al. “Open and closed belief systems in students.” Psychological Studies. 1980, 25(1), 43-47.
Rescher, N. Introduction to Value Theory, Englewood Cliffs, N. J. : Prentice-Hall Inc., 1969.
Richard, Y. J. et al. “Campus values in mate selection : A replication and expansion. ” Paper presented at the Annual convention of the Southern Association for conselor Education and Supervision, FL., October, 1979.
Richardson, H. M. “Studies of mental resemblance between husbands and wives and between friends.” Psychological Bulletin. 1939, 36, 104-120.
Rogers, C. Freedom to Learn, Boston : Houghton Mifflin, 1969.
RoKeach, M. The Open and Closed mind, New York : Basic Books, 1960.
RoKeach, M. Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, 1968.
RoKeach, M. The Nature of Human Values New York : Free Press, 1973,
RoKeach, M. “On the validity of Spranger-Based measures of Value Similarity.”
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982, 42(1), 88-89.
Rosen, B. C. “The achievement syndrome: A psychocultural dimension of social stratification. ” American Sociological Review. 1956, ⅩⅩI , 203-211.
Sells, L. Current Research on Sex Roles, Published by author, 1978.
Seyfried, B. A., & C. Hendrick “When do opposites attract? when they are opposite in sex and sex-role attitudes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 25(1), 15-20.
Shaffer, D. R., & C. Wegley “Success orientation and sex-role congruence as determinants of the attractiveness of competent women. ” Journal of Personality, 1974, 42, 586-600.
Shaffer, D. R., & R. D, Johnson “Effects of occupational choice and sex-role preferences on the attractiveness of competent men and vomen.” Journal of Personality, 1980, 48(4), 505-519.
Silvern, L. E., & V. L. Ryan “Self-rated adjustment and sex-typing on the Bem Sex-Role Inventory : Is masculinity the primary predictor of adjustment ?” Sex-Roles, 1979, 5(6), 739-763.
Spence, J. J., R. Helmreich, & J. Stapp “Rating of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. ” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 29-39.
Spencè, J. T., & R. Helmreich The Psychological dimensions of masculinity and femininity : Their correlates and antecedents. Austin : University of Texas Press, 1978.
Spiegel, F. A Selected Annoted Bibliography : Working Mothers. Washington, D. C. : Business and Professional Women’s Foundations, 1970a.
Spiegel, J. A Selected Annoted Bibliography : Women Executives. Washington, D. C. : Business and Professional Women’s Foundations, 1970b.
Spoerl, T. D. “The values of postwar college students.” Journal of Social Psychology. 1952, 35, 217-225.
Steinmann, Ann. Bibliography on Male-Female Role Research. New York : Maferr Foundation, 1971.
Stroebe, W., C. A. Insko, V. D. Thompspn, & B. D. Layton “Effects of physical attractiveness, attitude similarity, and sex on various aspects of interpersonal attraction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1971, 18, 79-91.
Suelzle, Marijean. The Female Sex Role. Urbana : University of Illionis Press, 1971.
Thurstone, L. L. The measurement of Values. Chicago :University of Chicago Press, 1974(© 1959).
Venable , T. C. ”The relationship of selected factors to the social structure of a stable group. ” Sociometry. 1954, 17, 355-357.
Virk, J., Y. P. Aggarwal, & R. N. Bhan “Similarity versus complementarity in clique formation.” The Journal of Social Psychological, 1983, 120, 27-34.
Wells, K. “Gender role identity and psychological adjustment in adolescence.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 1980, 9, 59-73.
Wetter, R. E. “Levels of self-esteem associated with favor sex role categories,” Paper presented at the Convention of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, August, 1975.
Whaley, Sara Stauffer. Women Studies Abstracts, vol. 1, no 1. P.O. Box 1. Rush, New York 14543, 1972.
Whyte, K. J. “A study of the value orientation of people of the inuit and Eurocanadian cultures within a school setting in the Northwest territories.” Ph. D. Dissertation University of Oregon, 1976.
Winch, R. F. Mate Selection : A Study of Complementary Needs. N. Y. : Harper, 1958.
Worchel, P., & B. L. McCormick “Self-concept and dissonance reduction.” Journal of personality, 1963, 31, 588-588.
Wright, P. H. & A. C. Crawford “Agreement and friendship : A close look and some second thoughts.” Representative Research in Social Psychology. 1971, 2, 52-69.
關聯 國立政治大學
教育研究所
碩士
72
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 林邦傑
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 沈姍姍
dc.creator (作者) 沈姍姍zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 1984
dc.date.accessioned 8-Nov-2016 15:19:56 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 8-Nov-2016 15:19:56 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 8-Nov-2016 15:19:56 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/103544-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 論文提要
本研究之主要目的有五：一為探討性別角色與人際吸引之關係，欲瞭解不同性別角色者在交友時是否會受對方性別角色之影響，以及不同性別角色者在班級中受歡迎程度之差異；二為探討不同性別、性別角色與社經地位者在價值觀念上是否有差異；三為探討價值觀念與人際吸引之關係，欲瞭解不同人際吸引程度者在價值觀念上是否有差異，以及價值觀念相似性是否較易形成人際吸引；四為探討社經地位與人際吸引之關係，以瞭解是否彼此社經地位相似者易成為好友。五為根據研究結果，提出建議，以為增進與維繫人際關係之參考。
本研究以北部地區淡江、輔仁與政治三所大學八個系468位學生為研究對象。每位受試者填答「社經地位問卷」、「價值量表」、「性別角色量表」與「社會關係測量問卷」四項資料後，進行統計分析。採用X2檢定、 t 考驗、單因子變異數分析與等級相關考驗等統計方法針對各項研究假設而驗證之。
本研究結果發現：(1)不同性別角色者交友時並不受對方性別角色之影響，而不同性別角色者在受歡迎程度上也沒有顯著差異。(2)不同性別、性別角色與社經地位者在某些價值項目上確實有差異存在。(3)不同人際吸引程度者在「舒適的生活」、「心胸開潤」、「爽朗愉快」、「真誠」「負責」與「自制」價值項目上有顯著差異。(4)價值相似與人際吸引之關係僅是顯著之低相關，表示二者雖有關連，但關連不大。(5)不同社經地位者在所交朋友之社經地位上並未達顯著差異，但約略顯示社經地位過於懸殊者，較不易成為好友。
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 第一章 緒論1
第一節 研究緣起與目的1
第二節 研究問題與假設7
第三節 有關名詞之操作定義8
第二章 文獻探討11
第一節 人際吸引之概念與理論11
第二節 性別角色與人際吸引21
第三節 價值觀念29
第四節 價值觀念相似與人際吸引43
第三章 研究方法49
第一節 受試者49
第二節 研究工具50
第三節 實施程序58
第四節 研究設計與統計方法59
第四章 研究結果61
第一節 性別角色與人際吸引61
第二節 性別、性別角色、社經地位與價值觀念72
第三節 價值觀念與人際吸引82
第四節 社經地位與人際吸引87
第五章 討論與建議89
第一節 討論89
第二節 研究限制與建議100
參考書目103
附錄129
圖錄
圖2-1：社會情境人際關係圖12
圖2-2：Newcomb平衡關係圖15
表錄
表 3－1 ：受試者之校別、系級、班別及人數50
表 3－2 ：家庭社經地位之評分標準53
表 4－1 ：擇友者與被選者在各性別角色上之人數與百分比62
表 4－2 ：男生擇友者與被選者在各性別角色上之人數與百分比63
表 4－3 ：女生擇友者與被選者在各性別角色上之人數與百分比64
表 4－4 ：男生兩性化者間與男性化者間人際吸引強度之比較64
表 4－5 ：男生兩性化者間與未分化者間人際吸引強度之比較65
表 4－6 ：男生男性化者間與未分化者間人際吸引強度之比較65
表 4－7 ：女生兩性化者間與女性化者間人際吸引強度之比較65
表 4－8 ：女生兩性化者間與未分化者間人際吸引強度之比較66
表 4－9 ：女生女性化者間與未分化者間人際吸引強度之比較66
表 4－10：男生受女性化女生與兩性化女生人際吸引之強度比較67
表 4－11：男生受女性化女生與男性化女生人際吸引之強度比較67
表 4－12：男生受女性化女生與未分化女生人際吸引之強度比較68
表 4－13：女生受兩性化男生與男性化男生人際吸引之強度比較68
表 4－14：女生受兩性化男生與女性化男生人際吸引之強度比較69
表 4－15：女生受兩性化男生與未分化男生人際吸引之強度比較69
表 4－16：全體受試者被選為受歡迎者之次數、人數及百分比70
表 4－17：不同性別、性別角色者在受歡迎程度上之平均數、標準差及人數71
表 4－18：不同性別、性別角色者在受歡迎程度上之變異數分析摘要表71
表 4－19：男、女生在目的性價值量表上平均數、標準差與 t考驗表73
表 4－20：男、女生在工具性價值量表上平均數、標準差與 t 考驗表74
表 4－21：不同性別角色者在目的性價值量表之綜合等級、單因子變異數分析與多重比較76
表 4－22 ：不同性別角色者在工具性價值量表之綜合等級、單因子變異數分析與多重比較77
表 4－23：不同社經地位者在目的性價值量表之綜合等級、單因子變異數分析與多重比較79
表 4－24：不同社經地位者在工具性價值量表之綜合等級、單因子變異數分析與多重比較80
表 4－25：不同人際吸引程度者在目的性價值量表之綜合等級與單因子變異數分析83
表 4－26：不同人際吸引程度者在工具性價值量表之綜合等級、單因子變異數分析與多重比較84
表 4－27：喜歡組與不喜歡組目的性價值觀念相似性之顯著性考驗85
表 4－28：喜歡組與不喜歡組工具性價值觀念相似性之顯著性考驗86
表 4－29：不同社經地位者人際吸引之人數與百分比88
表 5－1 ：社經地位組別在目的性價值之綜合等級相關係數96
表 5－2 ：社經地位組別在工具性價值之綜合等級相關係數96
dc.format.extent 115 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.relation (關聯) 國立政治大學
dc.relation (關聯) 教育研究所
dc.relation (關聯) 碩士
dc.relation (關聯) 72
dc.title (題名) 性別角色.價值觀念與人際吸引之相關研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesis
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文部份
李月嬌：「影響大學生擇友行為的人格因素」，台大心理研究所碩士論文，民62年
李美枝、楊國樞合著；中國大學生的價值觀，載於李亦園、楊國樞編，「中國人的性格」，中央研究院民族學研究所，民61年，頁313-331。
李美枝：「社會心理學」。台北：大洋出版社，民69年，增訂版。
李美枝：「性別特質問卷的編製及男女大學生四種性別特質類型在成就動機、婚姻、事業及性態度上的比較」。中華心理學刊，民70年，23卷1期，頁23-37。
李默英：「性別、年級、數學學習態度、性別角色與數學成就之關係」，政大教育研究所碩士論文，民72年。
吳武典：社會計量法，載於楊國樞等編，「社會及行為科學研究法」下冊，台北：東華書局民70年，4版，頁678-719。
吳明清：「我國青少年價值觀念及其相關因素」師大教育研究所博士論文，民72年。
何英奇：「大學生性別角色與自我概念的關係」教育心理學報，民70年，14期，頁221-230。
何英奇：「大學生價值結構之研究」，教育心理學報，民71年，15期，頁205-214。
汪履維：「台北市國民中學學生價值觀念及其對學校疏離傾向的關係」，師大教育研究所碩士論文，民70年。
林邦傑：「性別角色與自我防衛、生活適應、認知能力的關係」，中華心理學刊，民70年，23卷，2期，頁107-129。
林清山：「心理與教育統計學」。台北：東華書局，民68年，4版。
林清江等：「我國中小學公民教育內涵及實施成效之研究」，行政院研究發展考核委員會，民69年。
林淑玲：「家庭社經地位與學前教育對學齡兒童學業成就之影饗」，政大教育研究所碩士論文，民71年。
林義男：「我國國中生價值取向之研究」，輔導學報，民67年，1期，頁291- 243。
林義男：「社經地位、價值取向與教育機會的關係」，輔導學報，民68年，2期，頁95-107。
康宗虎：「高中學生價值觀念及其與升學選科意願的關係」，師大教育研究所碩士論文，民69年。
祝咸仁：「性別隔離與異性交友 - 台灣大學生交友調查之分析」，民族社會學報，民67年，16期，頁147-168。
黃文瑛：「台北市國民中學學生人際關係之研究」，教育與心理研究，民66年，1 期，頁17-142。
張文哲：「合作與競爭對國中學生人際吸引、工作成果與攻擊行為的影響」，師大教育研究所碩士論文，民63年。
張文哲：「人際吸引測量的信度與效度問題」，測驗與輔導，民64年，3卷，3期，頁165-166。
張文哲：「態度相似度與態度刺激呈現順序對人際吸引的影響」，教育心理學報，民65年，9期，頁73-84。
張文哲：「態度相似度與態度社會期望性對人際吸引與交往意向的影響」，教育心理學報，民66年，10期，頁61-74。
張長芳：「大一學生的人際關係與其自我觀念及歸因特質的關係」，教育與心理研究，民71年，5期，頁1-46。
張春興：「從重要事項的價值取向分析我國現代社會中的代間差距問題」，教育心理學報，民69年，13期，頁1-12。
張春興：「心理學」。台北：東華書局，民70年修訂八版。
張素鳳：「人際交往模式、人際吸引與生活適應之關係」，台大心理研究所碩士論文。民67年。
郭為藩：「價值理論及其在教育學上的意義」，師大教育研究所集刊，民61年，14輯。頁39-64。
曹國雄：「性別、性別特質、內外控與管理動機之關係」，民72年，印行中。
賈馥茗：個人價值觀念的發展與形成，載於方炳林、賈馥茗主編，「教育論叢」。台北：文景出版社，民61年。
簡馨籬：「性別角色、社經地位與少年犯罪之關係研究」，政大教育研究所碩士論文，民71年。
二.西文部分
Abel, H.,& R. Sahikaya “Emetgence of sex and race friendship preference.”Child, Development. 1962, 33, 939-943.
Ajzen, I. “Effects of information on interpersonal attraction ; Similarity versus affective value.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1974, 29, 3, 374-380.
Allport, G, W., P. E. Vernon & G. Lindey A Study of Values. Houghton Mifflin Co. Boston, 1960.
Argyle, M. The Psychology of Interpersonal Behavior. Baltimore, Md.： Penguin Books, 1976.
Banta, T. J. & M. Hetherington “ Relations between needs of friends and fianc’e.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963, 66, 401-404.
Bankart C. P. & J. Wittenbraker “Sex-role orientation of perceivers and targets as variables in the person perception process.”The Psychological Record, 1980, 30, 143-153.
Baron, R. A., & D. Byrne Social Psychology : understanding human interaction (2nd. ).Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1977.
Beattie, J. Other Cultures. London : Routelidge & Kegan Paul, 1969.
Becker, G. “The complementary needs hypothesis：Authoritarianism, dominance and other Edwards Personal Preference Schedule scores.” Journal of Personality.1964, 32, 45-56.
Bem, S. L. “The measurement of psychological androgyny.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1974, 42, 155-162.
Bem, S. L. “Sex role adaptability : One consequence of psychological androgyny.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1975, 31, 634-643.
Bem, S. L. & E. Lenney “Sex typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1976, 33(1), 48-54.
Bern, S. L. “On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45,196-205.
Benson, L. Fatherhood : A Sociological Perspective. New York : Random House, 1968.
Berkowitz, L.,& R. C. Howard “Reactions to opinion deviates as affected by affiliation need and group member interdependence.” Sociometry. 1959, 22, 81-91.
Berscheid, E.,& E. H. Walster Interpersonal Attraction (2nd ed.). Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley, 1978.
Bezdek, W. “Sex identity, values and balance theory.”Sociometry 1976, 39(2), 142-153.
Biggar, J. C. Bibliography on the Sociology of Sex Roles, Charlottesville : Department of Sociology, University of Virginia, 1970.
Block, J. “Conceptions of sex role : Some cross-cultural and longitudinal perspectives.” American Psychologist. 1973, 28, 512-526.
Bonney, M. E. “A sociometric study of the relationship of factors to mutual friendships on the elementary and college levels.” Sociometry, 1946, 9, 21-47.
Bonney, M. E. “A study of friendship choices in college in relation to church affiliation, in-church preferences, family size, and length of enrollment in college.” Journal of Social Psychology 1949, 29, 153-166.
Bramel , D. Interpersonal attraction, hostility, and perception. In Judson Mills (ed.), Experimental Social Psychology. New York : Macmillan, 1969.
Bridges, J. S. “Sex-typed may be beautiful but androgynous is good. “Psychological Reports. 1981, 48, 267-272.
Bruemmer, L. “The condition of women in society today : Annotated bibliography- part Ⅱ.” Journal of the National Association of Women Deans and Counselors, 1970, 33, 89-95.
Byrne, D., & J. A. Buehler “A note on the influence of propinguity upon acquaintanceships. “Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1955, 51,147-148.
Byrne, D. “Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. “ Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961, 62, 713-715.
Byrne, D., & T. J. Wong “Racial prejudice, interpersonal attraction, and assumed dissimilarity of attitudes.”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962, 65, 246-253.
Byrne, D., & D. Nelson “Attraction as a linear function of proportion of positive reinforcement,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1965, 1, 659-663.
Byrne, D,, & W. Griffitt “Similarity versus liking :A clarification.”Psychonomic Science, 1966, 6, 295-296.
Byrne, D., & O. London “Primacy-recency and the sequential presentation of attitudinal stimuli,” Psychonomic Science, 1966, 6, 193-194.
Byrne, D., G. L. Clore, &P. Worchel “The effect of economic similarity-dissimilarity on interpersonal attraction, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 4, 220-224.
Byrne, D. Attitudes and attraction, In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol 4, New York : Academic Press, 1969.
Byrne, D., C. R. Ervin, & J. Lamberth “Continuity between the experimental study of attraction and ‘real life’ computer dating,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 16, 157-165.
Caplow, T., & R. Forman “Neighborhood interaction in a homogeneous comrnunity.” American Social Review. 1950, 15, 357-366.
Cisler, L. “Women : A Bibliography,” 102 West 80th street , New York, 1972.
Clore, G. L., & D. Byrne, A reinforcement-affect model of attraction. In Ted L. Huston (ed.), Foundations of Interpersonal Attraction. New York : Academic Press, 1974, 143-165.
Coelho, G., D. Hamburg, R. Moos, & P. Randolph eds. Coping and Adaptation : A Behavioral Sciences Bibliography, Washington, D. C. : Government Printing Office, 1970.
Craft, M. T. Family values and education in Ireland In J. Eggleston (ed. ) Contemporary Research in the Sociology of Education, London : Methuen, 1974
Crissman, P. “Temporal change and sexual difference in moral judgements. “Journal of Social Psychology 1942, 16, 29-38
Curry, T. J., & R. M. Emerson “Balance theory : A theory of interpersonal attraction?” Sociometry 1970, 33, 216 -238
Curry, T. J., & D. A. A Kenny “The effects of perceived and actual similarity in values and personality in the process of interpersonal attractions “Quality and Quantity 1974, 8, 27-44.
Dahlke, H. 0. “Determinants of sociometric relations among children in the elementary school. “Sociometry. 1953, 16, 327-338
Deaux, K. “To err is humanizing, but sex makes a differences. “Representative Research in Social Psychology, 1972, 3, 20-28.
Deutsch, C. J. , & L, A Gilbert “Sex-role stereotypes : Effect on perceptions of self and others and on personal adjustment. “Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1976, 23, 273-279.
Doherty, P. A., & M. R. Schmidt “Sex typing and self-concept in college women. “Journal of College Student personnel, 1978, 19, 493-497.
Erdwins, C. S. Arnold & G. Ruth “The relationship sex role to self-concept.” Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1980, 36(1), 111-115.
Festinger, L. “Informal social communication, ” Psychological Review. 1950, 57, 271-282.
Festinger, L. “A theory of social comparison process.” Human Relationship. 1954, 7, 117-140.
Festinger, L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Standford: Standford University Press, 1957.
Festinger, L. “Behavioral support for opinion change.” Public Opinion Quarterly. 1964, 28, 404-417
Flaherty, J. F. & J. B. Dusek “An investigation of relationship between psychological androgyny and components of self-concept.” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. 1980, 38(6), 984-992.

Frithioff, P. A Selected Annotated Bibliography of Materials Related to Women in Science. Lund : Research Policy Program, 1967.
Gallagher, J. J. “Social status of children related to intelligence, propinguity, and social perception. ” Elementary School Journal, 1958, 59, 225-231.
Gorsuch, R. L. & R. A. Smith “Changes in college students’ evaluations of moral bahavior : 1969 versus 1939, 1949, and 1958.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1972, 24, 381-391.
Griffitt, W. Attitude similarity and attraction. In Ted L. Huston(ed. ), Foundations of Interpersonal Attraction. New York : Academic Press, 1974, 285-308.
Heider, F. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York :Wiley, 1958.
Hill, C. T., & D. E. Stull “Sex differences in effects of social and value similarity in same-sex friendship.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1981, 41(3), 488-502.
Hochschid, A. R. “A review of sex role research.” American Journal of Sociology. 1978, vol 78, 4, 1011-1029.
Hoffman, L. R., & N. R. F. Maier “An experimental reexamination of the similarity-attraction hypothesis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1966, 3, 145-152.
Hoffman, L. W. “Fear of success in males and females : 1965 and 1967. “Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1974, 42, 353-358.
Hoffman, M, L. “Sex differences in moral internalization.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1975, 32, 720-729.
Hoffman, D.M., & L. S. Fidell Characteristics of androgynous, undifferentiated, masculine, and feminine middle class woman, Paper presented at the Convention of the American Psychological Association. San Francisco, August, 1977.
Hogan, H. W., & H. N. Mookherjee “Values and selected antecedents.” The Journal of Social Psychology. 1981, 113(1), 29-35.
Hughes, M. M. The Sexual Barrier : Legal and Economic Aspects of Employment. San Francisco : 2422 Fox Plaza, 1970.
Hulfish, S. “Relationship of role identification, self-esteem and intelligence to sex differences in field independence.” Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1978, 47(3), 835-842.
Huston, T. L., & G. Levinger “Interpersonal attraction and relationships.” Annual Review of Psychology. 1978, 29, 115-156.
lckes, W., & R. Barnes “Boys and girls together-and alienated : On enacting stereotyped sex roles in mixed sex-dyads.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1978, 36, 669-683.
Ickes, W., B. Schermer, & J. Steeno “Sex and sex-role influences in same-sex dyads.” Social Psychological Quarterly. 1979, 42, 373-385.
Izard, C. E. “Personality similarity and friendship : A follow-up study.” Journal of Abnonnal and Social Psychology. 1963, 66, 598-600.
Jacob, L. “Psychological androgyny and male-female attraction.” paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, New York, September, 1979.
Jacob, L. “Psychological androgyny, sex-typing, and sex-role ideology as predictors of male-female interpersonal attraction.” Sex Roles : A Journal of Research. 1982, 8(10), 1057-1073.
Jacob, P. E., J. J. Flink, & H, L. Schuchman “Values and their function in decision making.” Study of Social Values and Public Policy, Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania, 1962.
Jayasuriya, D. L. A study of adolescent ambition, level of aspiration and achievement motivation, Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis, University of Londoh, (1960), cited in B. N. Sugarman, Social class and values as related to achievement and conduct in school. Sociological Review. 1966, 14, 287-301.
Jones, E. E., & B. N. Daugherty “Political orientation and the perceptual effects of an anticipated interaction. ”Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1959, 59, 340-349.
Jones, W. H. M. E. Chernovetz & R. O. Hansson “The Enigma of and rogyny : Differential implications for males and females ? ” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1978, 45, 1101-1115.
Kahl, J. A. “Some measurement of achievement orientation,” American Journal of Sociology. 1965, LZZ, 669-681.
Kaplan, M. F., & P. V. Olczak “Attitudes similarity and direct reinforcement as determinants of attraction: ” Journal of Experimental Research in Personality. 1970, 4, 186-189.
Kaplan, M. F., & N. H. Anderson “Information integration theory and reinforcement theory as approaches to interpersonal attraction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1973, 28(3), 301-312.
Keiffer, M., & P. Warren Population Limitation and Women’s Status : A bibliography. princeton, N. J.：Edcecational Testing Service, 1970.
Kitwood, T. M., & A. G. Smithers “Measurement of human values : On Appraisal of the work of Milton Rokeach.” Educational Research. 1975, 17(3), 175-179.
Kluckhohn, C. Values and value orientations in the theory of action, In T. Passons, et al(eds.) Toward a General Theory of Action, Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press, 1951.
Kobett, L. A. “Relationship between home background, school achievement and adolescent values.” Educations. 1979, 100(2), 158-164.
Kuvlesky, W., & D. Reynolds Educational Aspirations and Expectations of Youth : A Bibliography of Research Literature Ⅱ. College Station : Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Texas A and M University, 1970.
Lamke, L. K. “Sex role orientation and relationship development in same-sex dyads.” Journal of Research in personality. 1982, 16, 343-354.
Levinger, G. “Little sandbox and big quarry : Comment on Byrne’s paradigmatic spade for research on interpersonal attraction.” Representative Research in Social Psychology, 1972, 3, 3-19.
Likert, R. “A technique for the measurement of attitudes.” Archives of Psychology. 1932, 140, 44-53.
Logan, D. D. & K. Ellyn “The relationship of sex, sex role and mental health.” Psychology of Women Quarterly. 1980, 4(4), 573-580.
Marecek, J. “Social change, positive mental health, and psychological androgyny.” Psychology of women Quarterly. 1979, 3(3), 241-247.
McDowell, E. E. & McDowell, C. E. “An investigation of sex roles, dimensions of interpersonal attraction and communication behavior in a small group communication exercise.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Antonio, November, 1979.
McKernan, J. & J. L. Russell “Differences of religion and sex in the value systems of Northern Ireland adolescents.” British Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology. 1980, 19(2), 115-118.
McLellan, D. D. Values, Value Systems, and The Developmental Structure of Moral Judgement. Unpublished M. A. thesis, Michigan State University Library, 1970.
McKinney, J. P. “The structure of values among college students : An examination of sex differences. ” Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 1980, 9, 289-297.
McWhirter, R. M., & J. D. Jecker, “Attitudinal similarity and inferred attraction. ” Psychonomic sciences. 1967, 7, 225-266.
Miller, N. etal. “Similarity, contrast, and complementarity. in friend choice.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1966, 3, 3-12.
Minnigerode, F. A. “Attitude toward woman, sex-role-stereotyping and locus of control. ” Psychological Reports. 1976, 38(3), pt2, 1301-1302.
Minor, L. A. “The effect of sexuality on causal attributions. ” Dissertation Abstracts International , 1976.
Morris, C. Varieties of human value, Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1956.
MueLler, D. J. “A test of the validity of two scales on Rokeach`s value survey.” The Journal of Social Psychology. 1974, 94, 289-290.
Newcomb, T. M. “An approach to the study of communicative acts.” Psychological Review. 1953, 60, 393-404.
Newcomb, T. M. “The prediction of interpersonal attraction. ” American Psychologist. 1956, 11, 575-586.
Newcomb, T. M. The acquaintance process. New York : Holt, 1961.
O’connor K., D. W. Mann & J. M. Bardwick “Androgyny and self-esteem in the upper-middle class : A replication of Spence.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1978, 46, 1168-1169.
Parsons, T. The Social System. Glencoe, Illinois : The Free Press, 1951.
Penner, L. A. “Interpersonal attraction toward a black person as a function of value importance.” Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, FIa., September 1970.
Perry, R. B. General Theory of Value. Longmans, Green & Company, 1967.
Peterson, C. “`Means` and `Ends` values in adulthood.” The Journal of Genetic Psychology. 1981, 139, 155-156.
Pursell, S. A. & P. G. Banikiotes “Androgyny and initial interpersonal attraction.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1978, 4, 235-239.
Reader, N., & H. B. English “Personality factors in adolescent female friendship.” Journal of Consulting Psychology. 1947, 11, 212-220.
Reddy, N. Y. et al. “Open and closed belief systems in students.” Psychological Studies. 1980, 25(1), 43-47.
Rescher, N. Introduction to Value Theory, Englewood Cliffs, N. J. : Prentice-Hall Inc., 1969.
Richard, Y. J. et al. “Campus values in mate selection : A replication and expansion. ” Paper presented at the Annual convention of the Southern Association for conselor Education and Supervision, FL., October, 1979.
Richardson, H. M. “Studies of mental resemblance between husbands and wives and between friends.” Psychological Bulletin. 1939, 36, 104-120.
Rogers, C. Freedom to Learn, Boston : Houghton Mifflin, 1969.
RoKeach, M. The Open and Closed mind, New York : Basic Books, 1960.
RoKeach, M. Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, 1968.
RoKeach, M. The Nature of Human Values New York : Free Press, 1973,
RoKeach, M. “On the validity of Spranger-Based measures of Value Similarity.”
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982, 42(1), 88-89.
Rosen, B. C. “The achievement syndrome: A psychocultural dimension of social stratification. ” American Sociological Review. 1956, ⅩⅩI , 203-211.
Sells, L. Current Research on Sex Roles, Published by author, 1978.
Seyfried, B. A., & C. Hendrick “When do opposites attract? when they are opposite in sex and sex-role attitudes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 25(1), 15-20.
Shaffer, D. R., & C. Wegley “Success orientation and sex-role congruence as determinants of the attractiveness of competent women. ” Journal of Personality, 1974, 42, 586-600.
Shaffer, D. R., & R. D, Johnson “Effects of occupational choice and sex-role preferences on the attractiveness of competent men and vomen.” Journal of Personality, 1980, 48(4), 505-519.
Silvern, L. E., & V. L. Ryan “Self-rated adjustment and sex-typing on the Bem Sex-Role Inventory : Is masculinity the primary predictor of adjustment ?” Sex-Roles, 1979, 5(6), 739-763.
Spence, J. J., R. Helmreich, & J. Stapp “Rating of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. ” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 29-39.
Spencè, J. T., & R. Helmreich The Psychological dimensions of masculinity and femininity : Their correlates and antecedents. Austin : University of Texas Press, 1978.
Spiegel, F. A Selected Annoted Bibliography : Working Mothers. Washington, D. C. : Business and Professional Women’s Foundations, 1970a.
Spiegel, J. A Selected Annoted Bibliography : Women Executives. Washington, D. C. : Business and Professional Women’s Foundations, 1970b.
Spoerl, T. D. “The values of postwar college students.” Journal of Social Psychology. 1952, 35, 217-225.
Steinmann, Ann. Bibliography on Male-Female Role Research. New York : Maferr Foundation, 1971.
Stroebe, W., C. A. Insko, V. D. Thompspn, & B. D. Layton “Effects of physical attractiveness, attitude similarity, and sex on various aspects of interpersonal attraction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1971, 18, 79-91.
Suelzle, Marijean. The Female Sex Role. Urbana : University of Illionis Press, 1971.
Thurstone, L. L. The measurement of Values. Chicago :University of Chicago Press, 1974(© 1959).
Venable , T. C. ”The relationship of selected factors to the social structure of a stable group. ” Sociometry. 1954, 17, 355-357.
Virk, J., Y. P. Aggarwal, & R. N. Bhan “Similarity versus complementarity in clique formation.” The Journal of Social Psychological, 1983, 120, 27-34.
Wells, K. “Gender role identity and psychological adjustment in adolescence.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 1980, 9, 59-73.
Wetter, R. E. “Levels of self-esteem associated with favor sex role categories,” Paper presented at the Convention of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, August, 1975.
Whaley, Sara Stauffer. Women Studies Abstracts, vol. 1, no 1. P.O. Box 1. Rush, New York 14543, 1972.
Whyte, K. J. “A study of the value orientation of people of the inuit and Eurocanadian cultures within a school setting in the Northwest territories.” Ph. D. Dissertation University of Oregon, 1976.
Winch, R. F. Mate Selection : A Study of Complementary Needs. N. Y. : Harper, 1958.
Worchel, P., & B. L. McCormick “Self-concept and dissonance reduction.” Journal of personality, 1963, 31, 588-588.
Wright, P. H. & A. C. Crawford “Agreement and friendship : A close look and some second thoughts.” Representative Research in Social Psychology. 1971, 2, 52-69.