Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 讓自由主義合情理:Bernard Williams論合法性與現代性
Making Sense of Liberalism: Bernard Williams on Legitimation and Modernity
作者 王雲飛
貢獻者 葉浩
王雲飛
關鍵詞 Bernard Williams
政治現實主義
政治道德主義
基本合法化要求
恐懼的自由主義
現代性
Bernard Williams
Political Realism
Political Moralism
Basic Legitimation Demand
Liberalism of Fear
Modernity
日期 2016
上傳時間 14-Nov-2016 16:20:10 (UTC+8)
摘要 Bernard Williams是當代政治哲學中現實主義思潮的代表人物。他批判將道德優先於政治的政治道德主義,主張應該給予政治本身更多的自主性。他提出「基本合法化要求」作為政治中的規範性來源,並結合現代性作為條件,開創了一條新的通往自由主義的道路。本文通過梳理Williams的理論,來檢視其對於合法性與現代性兩個概念的論述,並從中窺探Williams對於政治理論的方法論的見解。本文雖贊同並欣賞Williams的相關主張,並承認其方法論上之關懷的獨特性,但仍提出以下批評。首先,Williams對於「政治」的理解已經蘊含道德上的關懷。其次,「基本合法化要求」存在已經蘊含最朴素的自由主義的嫌疑。第三,恐懼的自由主義與基本合法化要求之間存在一種微妙的關係,可能會使Williams的理論出現漏洞。第四,政治道德主義書寫的對象為當下多元社會中的讀者,其所使用的方法可以被視為一種修辭。
Bernard Williams is one of the most representative scholars among the trend of political realism in contemporary political philosophy. He criticized political moralism for it makes moral prior to the political, advocated the political should be given more autonomy. He proposed the "Basic Legitimation Demand" as the normative source in politics, combined with modernity as a condition, to create a new approach toward liberalism. This thesis reviews Williams`s ideas of legitimation and modernity by examining his theory, and explores his insights on the methodology of political theory. While endorsing and appreciating Williams`s claims and acknowledging the uniqueness of his methodological concern, the following criticisms remain. First of all, Williams’s understanding of "the political" already contains moral concern. Second, "Basic Legitimation Demand" implies an elementary view of liberalism. Third, there is a subtle relationship between the liberalism of fear and Basic Legitimation Demand that could make Williams`s theory flawed. Fourth, political moralism is written for the readers of contemporary pluralistic society, and the methods used can be regarded as a kind of rhetoric.
參考文獻 英文部分
Baderin, A. (2013). Two Forms of Realism in Political Theory. European Journal of Political Theory,0(0), 1-22.
Bavister‐Gould, A. (2013). Bernard Williams: Political Realism and the Limits of Legitimacy. European Journal of Philosophy, 21(4), 593-610.
Bellamy, R. (2010). Dirty Hands and Clean Gloves: Liberal Ideals and Real Politics. European Journal of Political Theory, 9(4), 412-430.
Chappell, Sophie Grace, "Bernard Williams", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = .
Erman, E and Möller, N. (2015). Political Legitimacy in the Real Normative World: The Priority of Morality and the Autonomy of the Political. British Journal of Political Science, 45(01), 215-233.
Flathman, R. (2010). In and Out of the Ethical: The Realist Liberalism of Bernard Williams. Contemporary Political Theory, 9(1), 77-98.
Floyd, J and Stears, M. (Eds.). (2011). Political Philosophy versus History?: Contextualism and Real Politics in Contemporary Political Thought. Cambridge University Press
Freeden, M. (2012). Interpretative Realism and Prescriptive Realism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 17(1), 1-11.
Forrester, K. (2012). Judith Shklar, Bernard Williams and Political Realism. European Journal of Political Theory, 11(3), 247-272.
Galston, W. A. (2010). Realism in Political Theory. European journal of political theory, 9(4), 385-411.
Geuss, R. (2001). History and Illusion in Politics. Cambridge University Press.
-----------. (2008). Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton University Press.
Gray, J. (1995). Liberalism, 2nd.ed, University of Minnesota Press.
---------. (2002). Two Faces of Liberalism. The New Press.
Hall, E. (2015). Bernard Williams and the Basic Legitimation Demand: a Defence. Political Studies, 63(2), 466-480.
---------. (2013). The Limits of Bernard Williams`s Critique of Political Moralism. Ethical perspectives, 20(2), 217-243.
Hawthorn, G. (2005). Introduction. In the Beginning Was the Deed, by Bernard Williams, i-xx. Princeton University Press.
Honig, B and Stears, M. (2011). The New Realism: From Modus Vivendi to Justice. Political Philosophy versus History, 177-205. Cambridge University Press.
Hobbes, T. (1998). Leviathan, Oxford University Press.
Larmore, C. (2012). What Is Political Philosophy?. Journal of Moral Philosophy. DOI 10.1163/174552412X628896.
Leopold, D and Stears, M. (2008). Political Theory: Methods and Approaches. Oxford University Press.
List, Christian, and Laura Valentini.(2016) .The Methodology of Political Theory. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology. Oxford University Press.
North, R. (2010). Political Realism: Introduction. European Journal of Political Theory, 9(4), 381-384.
Philp, M. (2007). Political Conduct. London: Harvard University Press.
Pippin, R. B. (2007). Review of the book In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument, by Bernard Williams. The Journal of Philosophy, 104(10), 533-539.
Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice, rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 5.
----------. (2005). Political Liberalism, expanded edition. Columbia University Press.
Ross, S. (2009). Review of the book In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument, by Bernard Williams. Essays in Philosophy, 10(2), 3.
Rossi, E. (2015). Can Realism Move Beyond a Methodenstreit?. Political Theory, 1-11.
----------. and Sleat, M. (2014). Realism in Normative Political Theory. Philosophy Compass, forthcoming.
Sagar, P. (2015). From Scepticism to Liberalism? Bernard Williams, the Foundations of Liberalism and Political Realism. Political Studies, 1467-9248.
Schmitt, C. (1996). The Concept of Political, The University of Chicago Press.
Shklar, J. (1989). The Liberalism of Fear. Political Liberalism: Variations on a Theme, 149-166.
Sigwart, H. J. (2013). The Logic of Legitimacy: Ethics in political realism. The Review of Politics, 75(03), 407-432.
Sleat, M. (2010). Bernard Williams and the Possibility of a Realist Political Theory. European Journal of Political Theory, 9(4), 485-503.
----------. (2014). Legitimacy in Realist Thought: Between Moralism and Realpolitik. Political Theory, 0090591714522250.
----------. (2015). Justice and Legitimacy in Contemporary Liberal Thought. Social theory and practice, 41(2), 230-252.
Smart, J.J.C and Williams, B. (1973). Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge University Press.
Stemplowska, Z. (2008). What`s Ideal about Ideal Theory?. Social Theory and Practice, 34(3), 319-340.
Valentini, L. (2012). Ideal vs. Non‐ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map. Philosophy Compass, 7(9), 654-664.
Williams, B. (2011). Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Taylor & Francis.
--------------- & Hawthorn, G. (2005). In the Beginning was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Princeton University Press.
---------------. (1981). Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973-1980. Cambridge University Press.
----------------. (1993). Shame and Necessity. University of California Press.
----------------. (2002). Truth & Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy. Princeton University Press.
Wolff, J. (2006). An Introduction to Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Yack, B. (2006). Review of the book In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument, by Bernard Williams. Ethics, 116(3), 615-618.

中文部分
卡爾・施密特 著,劉小楓 編,劉宗坤等 譯,《政治的概念》,上海人民出版社,2004
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
政治學系
102252030
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102252030
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 葉浩zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 王雲飛zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 王雲飛zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2016en_US
dc.date.accessioned 14-Nov-2016 16:20:10 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 14-Nov-2016 16:20:10 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 14-Nov-2016 16:20:10 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0102252030en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/104004-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 政治學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 102252030zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Bernard Williams是當代政治哲學中現實主義思潮的代表人物。他批判將道德優先於政治的政治道德主義,主張應該給予政治本身更多的自主性。他提出「基本合法化要求」作為政治中的規範性來源,並結合現代性作為條件,開創了一條新的通往自由主義的道路。本文通過梳理Williams的理論,來檢視其對於合法性與現代性兩個概念的論述,並從中窺探Williams對於政治理論的方法論的見解。本文雖贊同並欣賞Williams的相關主張,並承認其方法論上之關懷的獨特性,但仍提出以下批評。首先,Williams對於「政治」的理解已經蘊含道德上的關懷。其次,「基本合法化要求」存在已經蘊含最朴素的自由主義的嫌疑。第三,恐懼的自由主義與基本合法化要求之間存在一種微妙的關係,可能會使Williams的理論出現漏洞。第四,政治道德主義書寫的對象為當下多元社會中的讀者,其所使用的方法可以被視為一種修辭。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Bernard Williams is one of the most representative scholars among the trend of political realism in contemporary political philosophy. He criticized political moralism for it makes moral prior to the political, advocated the political should be given more autonomy. He proposed the "Basic Legitimation Demand" as the normative source in politics, combined with modernity as a condition, to create a new approach toward liberalism. This thesis reviews Williams`s ideas of legitimation and modernity by examining his theory, and explores his insights on the methodology of political theory. While endorsing and appreciating Williams`s claims and acknowledging the uniqueness of his methodological concern, the following criticisms remain. First of all, Williams’s understanding of "the political" already contains moral concern. Second, "Basic Legitimation Demand" implies an elementary view of liberalism. Third, there is a subtle relationship between the liberalism of fear and Basic Legitimation Demand that could make Williams`s theory flawed. Fourth, political moralism is written for the readers of contemporary pluralistic society, and the methods used can be regarded as a kind of rhetoric.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
第一節、前言 1
第二節、從現實主義到自由主義:Williams現實主義式的自由哲學 5
第三節、文獻回顧 8
第四節、問題意識與文章主旨 11
第五節、章節安排 13
第二章 Williams對「政治性」的理解:兼談其對政治道德主義的批判 17
第一節 「政治性」(the political)的概念: 18
第二節 Bernard Williams論政治與「政治性」 23
一、Williams與Schmitt的異同 23
二、「政治分歧」的概念 24
三、「對手」的概念:政治行為者的想像 27
四、「物始於行」:政治理論與實踐之關聯 29
第三節 政治中的職業倫理 32
一、政治中的職業倫理 32
二、政治家、政治行為與政治責任 33
三、政治理由與道德例外 34
四、政治中的道德主張 36
五、專業主義與政治體系 37
第四節 政治道德主義及其批判 40
一、政治理論中的「制定」模式 40
二、「制定模式」之批判 41
三、政治理論中的「建構」模式 43
四、「建構模式」之批判 46
五、方法與規範:回應Hall對Williams的批評 48
第五節、小結:政治現實主義 50
第三章 政治內的普遍規範:Williams論合法性的概念 53
合法概念的對立面:普遍的不正義與非理性 54
一、作為普遍理性的自由主義的問題 54
二、「強權本身不是公理」作為一條政治底線 58
第二節 基本合法化要求 61
一、政治從何而來?從「原始的自由」談起 61
二、首要政治問題 63
三、基本合法化要求 65
第三節 批判理論原則 68
第四節 兩個懸而未決的問題 73
第四章 基本合法化要求、現代性與自由主義 77
第一節 恐懼的自由主義:Shklar與Williams 78
一、恐懼的自由主義:Shklar的觀點 78
二、「聽眾」與「觀眾」 85
第二節 合法性+現代性=自由主義 89
一、讓⋯⋯合情理 89
二、現代性與自由主義 93
第三節 辯護現代性 98
第五章 結論 107
參考文獻 113
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 6896950 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102252030en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Bernard Williamszh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 政治現實主義zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 政治道德主義zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 基本合法化要求zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 恐懼的自由主義zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 現代性zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Bernard Williamsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Political Realismen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Political Moralismen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Basic Legitimation Demanden_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Liberalism of Fearen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Modernityen_US
dc.title (題名) 讓自由主義合情理:Bernard Williams論合法性與現代性zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Making Sense of Liberalism: Bernard Williams on Legitimation and Modernityen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 英文部分
Baderin, A. (2013). Two Forms of Realism in Political Theory. European Journal of Political Theory,0(0), 1-22.
Bavister‐Gould, A. (2013). Bernard Williams: Political Realism and the Limits of Legitimacy. European Journal of Philosophy, 21(4), 593-610.
Bellamy, R. (2010). Dirty Hands and Clean Gloves: Liberal Ideals and Real Politics. European Journal of Political Theory, 9(4), 412-430.
Chappell, Sophie Grace, "Bernard Williams", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = .
Erman, E and Möller, N. (2015). Political Legitimacy in the Real Normative World: The Priority of Morality and the Autonomy of the Political. British Journal of Political Science, 45(01), 215-233.
Flathman, R. (2010). In and Out of the Ethical: The Realist Liberalism of Bernard Williams. Contemporary Political Theory, 9(1), 77-98.
Floyd, J and Stears, M. (Eds.). (2011). Political Philosophy versus History?: Contextualism and Real Politics in Contemporary Political Thought. Cambridge University Press
Freeden, M. (2012). Interpretative Realism and Prescriptive Realism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 17(1), 1-11.
Forrester, K. (2012). Judith Shklar, Bernard Williams and Political Realism. European Journal of Political Theory, 11(3), 247-272.
Galston, W. A. (2010). Realism in Political Theory. European journal of political theory, 9(4), 385-411.
Geuss, R. (2001). History and Illusion in Politics. Cambridge University Press.
-----------. (2008). Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton University Press.
Gray, J. (1995). Liberalism, 2nd.ed, University of Minnesota Press.
---------. (2002). Two Faces of Liberalism. The New Press.
Hall, E. (2015). Bernard Williams and the Basic Legitimation Demand: a Defence. Political Studies, 63(2), 466-480.
---------. (2013). The Limits of Bernard Williams`s Critique of Political Moralism. Ethical perspectives, 20(2), 217-243.
Hawthorn, G. (2005). Introduction. In the Beginning Was the Deed, by Bernard Williams, i-xx. Princeton University Press.
Honig, B and Stears, M. (2011). The New Realism: From Modus Vivendi to Justice. Political Philosophy versus History, 177-205. Cambridge University Press.
Hobbes, T. (1998). Leviathan, Oxford University Press.
Larmore, C. (2012). What Is Political Philosophy?. Journal of Moral Philosophy. DOI 10.1163/174552412X628896.
Leopold, D and Stears, M. (2008). Political Theory: Methods and Approaches. Oxford University Press.
List, Christian, and Laura Valentini.(2016) .The Methodology of Political Theory. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology. Oxford University Press.
North, R. (2010). Political Realism: Introduction. European Journal of Political Theory, 9(4), 381-384.
Philp, M. (2007). Political Conduct. London: Harvard University Press.
Pippin, R. B. (2007). Review of the book In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument, by Bernard Williams. The Journal of Philosophy, 104(10), 533-539.
Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice, rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 5.
----------. (2005). Political Liberalism, expanded edition. Columbia University Press.
Ross, S. (2009). Review of the book In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument, by Bernard Williams. Essays in Philosophy, 10(2), 3.
Rossi, E. (2015). Can Realism Move Beyond a Methodenstreit?. Political Theory, 1-11.
----------. and Sleat, M. (2014). Realism in Normative Political Theory. Philosophy Compass, forthcoming.
Sagar, P. (2015). From Scepticism to Liberalism? Bernard Williams, the Foundations of Liberalism and Political Realism. Political Studies, 1467-9248.
Schmitt, C. (1996). The Concept of Political, The University of Chicago Press.
Shklar, J. (1989). The Liberalism of Fear. Political Liberalism: Variations on a Theme, 149-166.
Sigwart, H. J. (2013). The Logic of Legitimacy: Ethics in political realism. The Review of Politics, 75(03), 407-432.
Sleat, M. (2010). Bernard Williams and the Possibility of a Realist Political Theory. European Journal of Political Theory, 9(4), 485-503.
----------. (2014). Legitimacy in Realist Thought: Between Moralism and Realpolitik. Political Theory, 0090591714522250.
----------. (2015). Justice and Legitimacy in Contemporary Liberal Thought. Social theory and practice, 41(2), 230-252.
Smart, J.J.C and Williams, B. (1973). Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge University Press.
Stemplowska, Z. (2008). What`s Ideal about Ideal Theory?. Social Theory and Practice, 34(3), 319-340.
Valentini, L. (2012). Ideal vs. Non‐ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map. Philosophy Compass, 7(9), 654-664.
Williams, B. (2011). Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Taylor & Francis.
--------------- & Hawthorn, G. (2005). In the Beginning was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Princeton University Press.
---------------. (1981). Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973-1980. Cambridge University Press.
----------------. (1993). Shame and Necessity. University of California Press.
----------------. (2002). Truth & Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy. Princeton University Press.
Wolff, J. (2006). An Introduction to Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Yack, B. (2006). Review of the book In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument, by Bernard Williams. Ethics, 116(3), 615-618.

中文部分
卡爾・施密特 著,劉小楓 編,劉宗坤等 譯,《政治的概念》,上海人民出版社,2004
zh_TW