Publications-Journal Articles
Article View/Open
Publication Export
Google ScholarTM
NCCU Library
Citation Infomation
Related Publications in TAIR
| Title | 關於『破戒』中“可能表現”之探討 |
| 其他題名 | The Exploration of "kanoo" Expression in 『hakai』 |
| Creator | 林綺雲 Lin, Chi-Ying |
| Contributor | 日文系 |
| Key Words | 可能表現;「」型;「」型;「可能動詞」;移轉 “kanoo”expression;“reru”;“rareru”;“kanoodoosi”;Evolution |
| Date | 1999-06 |
| Date Issued | 12-Dec-2016 16:42:58 (UTC+8) |
| Summary | 關於『破戒』中“可能表現”之探討本稿以夏目漱石之作品『坊』同時期所寫的島崎藤村之作品『破戒』為例，探討該作品中“可能表現”之「」型、「」型以及「可能動詞」型的使用狀況。本研究得到的結論，與先前筆者對夏目漱石之作品『坊』的研究，結論是一致的：發現了甚多足以啟示由使用“可能表現”之「」型，移轉到使用「可能動詞」型的例子，也發現了即使移轉確實在進行，但仍有少數的“可能表現”之「」型，照常的被使用。但是否這就足以推斷，明治末期的作品都顯示出相同的移轉趨勢呢？作品個性不同，其間必然會有差異性存在吧？此課題將留待日後探討。 The article uses Simazaki. tooson`s 『hakai』which was in the same period as Natsume, sooseki`s 『bocchan』as an example to deal with“rareru”and“kanoodoosi”.Theconclusion I`ve got is the same as what I`ve got in my research about Natsume. sooseki`s『bocchan』and I got a few examples that could show the evolution from“reru”to“kanoodoosi”. The evolution did happen but some of the“kanoo”expression`s type“reru”were still used as before.Does it mean all the worke in late Meiji show the same trend of evolution? As long as the novelists` characters are different, there will be differences between then. This will be explored in fuaure studies. |
| Relation | 國立政治大學學報,78,115-153 |
| Type | article |
| dc.contributor | 日文系 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 林綺雲 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Lin, Chi-Ying | |
| dc.date (日期) | 1999-06 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 12-Dec-2016 16:42:58 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 12-Dec-2016 16:42:58 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 12-Dec-2016 16:42:58 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/104802 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 關於『破戒』中“可能表現”之探討本稿以夏目漱石之作品『坊』同時期所寫的島崎藤村之作品『破戒』為例，探討該作品中“可能表現”之「」型、「」型以及「可能動詞」型的使用狀況。本研究得到的結論，與先前筆者對夏目漱石之作品『坊』的研究，結論是一致的：發現了甚多足以啟示由使用“可能表現”之「」型，移轉到使用「可能動詞」型的例子，也發現了即使移轉確實在進行，但仍有少數的“可能表現”之「」型，照常的被使用。但是否這就足以推斷，明治末期的作品都顯示出相同的移轉趨勢呢？作品個性不同，其間必然會有差異性存在吧？此課題將留待日後探討。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The article uses Simazaki. tooson`s 『hakai』which was in the same period as Natsume, sooseki`s 『bocchan』as an example to deal with“rareru”and“kanoodoosi”.Theconclusion I`ve got is the same as what I`ve got in my research about Natsume. sooseki`s『bocchan』and I got a few examples that could show the evolution from“reru”to“kanoodoosi”. The evolution did happen but some of the“kanoo”expression`s type“reru”were still used as before.Does it mean all the worke in late Meiji show the same trend of evolution? As long as the novelists` characters are different, there will be differences between then. This will be explored in fuaure studies. | |
| dc.format.extent | 2723546 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 國立政治大學學報,78,115-153 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 可能表現;「」型;「」型;「可能動詞」;移轉 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | “kanoo”expression;“reru”;“rareru”;“kanoodoosi”;Evolution | |
| dc.title (題名) | 關於『破戒』中“可能表現”之探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title.alternative (其他題名) | The Exploration of "kanoo" Expression in 『hakai』 | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article |