學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 現行立委選區劃分與立委問政取向的關聯性
Electoral districting and legislators` representative orientations作者 吳家坤
Wu, Chia Kun貢獻者 盛杏湲
Sheng, Shing Yuan
吳家坤
Wu, Chia Kun關鍵詞 選區
地方化
立委
代表行為
選舉制度
Electoral district
Localization
Legislator
Representative behavior
Electoral system日期 2017 上傳時間 1-Mar-2017 17:19:39 (UTC+8) 摘要 我國於2005年修憲案通過後,區域立委產生的方式由複數選區改為單一選區,每選區選出一名代表,選舉制度的改變、單一選區的設計及其劃分方式,造成某些立委選區幅員變小,有些甚至比地方公職人員的選區小或者與地方公職人員選區相同,但絕大多數選區仍較地方公職人員來得大,就這兩種類型立委而言,面臨選區內潛在的挑戰者時,其行為模式會有何不同?本研究以代表理論為基礎,將第七、八屆立委分為兩種類型(選區大與小),以量化分析與深入訪談並重的方式探究立委代表行為的差異。本研究發現,控制其他的因素之後,在選區服務行為方面,相較於選區較地方公職人員大之立委,選區較地方公職人員小的立委於選區工作時間比例較高並達到顯著差異,而選民個案服務及紅白帖較為踴躍,從深度訪談結果得知,選區較小的立委確實從事更多的選區服務,也出現明顯地方化的現象。在立法問政行為方面,選區較小的立委在法律提案以及施政質詢行為上與選區較大的立委無差別,可能原因為選舉競爭激烈,每位區域立委需要展現自己,積極於國會中問政、提出法案等,而選區較小的立委由於在選區工作上投入大量時間,相對而言,無法分出更多的精力於立法問政,以至於立法問政的分析結果中,選區大與小的立委之間相差無幾。 參考文獻 I. 中文部分中央選舉委員會網站,2016,〈選舉資料庫〉,http://db.cec.gov.tw/,檢索日期:2016年4月27日。中華民國統計資訊網,2016,http://www.stat.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=4,檢索日期:2016年5月3日。王郁中,2007,〈立委單一選區劃分之政策分析與影響評估-雲林縣個案研究〉,國立暨南國際大學公共行政與政策學系碩士學位論文。王靖興,2009,〈立法委員的立法問政與選區服務之分析:2000年政黨輪替前後的持續與變遷〉,《臺灣政治學刊》,13(2): 113-169。立法院全球資訊網,2016,〈立委名單〉,http://www.ly.gov.tw/03_leg/0301_main/legList.action,檢索日期:2016年3月15日。立法院國會圖書館,2016,〈立委問政專輯〉,http://lis.ly.gov.tw/lylegismc/lylegismemkmout?!!FUNC400,檢索日期:2016年4月16日。江政諭,2006,〈政治平等、代表性與我國立委選區劃分制度之研究-以美、日、德經驗為借鏡〉,東海大學政治學系碩士學位論文。吳宜侃,2003,〈立法委員連任因素之探討-以第四屆立委為例〉,國立政治大學政治學系碩士學位論文。李鴻典,2006,〈時程逼近仍未解,選區劃分變數多〉,新臺灣新聞周刊:http://www.newtaiwan.com.tw/bulletinview.jsp?bulletinid=62766,檢索日期:2014年5月15日。林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花,2005,〈質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析〉,《身心障礙研究》,3(2)。林理裕,2008,〈單一選區兩票制對臺灣地方政治的影響:從選區劃分原則談起〉,「地方自治與民主發展:2008年選後臺灣地方政治」2008年學術研討會,6月15日,臺中:東海大學。韋洪武,1994,〈立法院審查預算角色的分析〉,「國立政治大學政治學研究所四十週年」學術研討會,臺北:政治大學政治學研究所暨所友會。徐仁輝,2002,《公共財務管理》,臺北:智勝。高世垣,2001,〈選區服務與個人選票之建立〉,國立政治大學政治學系碩士學位論文。張正蒓,2013,〈立法委員選區服務之持續與變遷:第三屆至第八屆之分析〉,國立政治大學政治學系碩士學位論文。張福建,1998,〈議會及議員的權責:愛德蒙.柏克(E. Burke)代表理念的可能貢獻及其限制〉,《行政學報》,29: 133-150。張福建、劉義周,2002,〈代表的理論與實際:規範與經驗的對話〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》,1: 117-149。盛杏湲,1997a,〈立法委員的立法參與:概念、本質與測量〉,《問題與研究》,36(3): 1-25。盛杏湲,1997b,〈國會議員的代表行為:研究方法的探討〉,《問題與研究》,36(9): 37-58。盛杏湲,2000a,〈政黨或選區?立法委員的代表取向與行為〉,《選舉研究》,7(2): 37-73。盛杏湲,2000b,〈立法委員為什麼遊走在不同的委員會?〉,林繼文主編,《政治制度》,361-399,臺北:中央研究院。盛杏湲,2000c,〈立法問政與選區服務:第三屆立法委員代表行為的探討〉,《選舉研究》,6(2): 89-120。盛杏湲,2001,〈立法委員正式與非正式立法參與之研究:以第三屆立法院為例〉,《問題與研究》,40(5): 81-104。盛杏湲,2005a,〈選區代表與集體代表:立法委員的代表角色〉,《東吳政治學報》,21: 1-40。盛杏湲,2005b,〈立法委員的立法提案:第五屆立法院的分析〉,臺灣政治學會年會暨「臺灣民主的挑戰與前景」2005年學術研討會,12月10-11日,臺北:政治大學。盛杏湲,2006-2008,〈選區、政黨與立法委員的三角關係〉,《國家科學委員會研究計畫報告(NSC95-2414-H-046-MY3)》,臺北:行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫報告。 盛杏湲,2008,〈如何評估選制變遷對國會議員角色行為的影響:研究方法的探討〉,載於《如何評估選制變遷:方法論的探討》,黃紀、游清鑫編,臺北:五南。盛杏湲,2011-2012,〈選區服務與立法問政:選制變遷前後的比較〉,《國家科學委員會研究計畫報告(NSC100-2410-H-004-096-MY2)》,臺北:行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫報告。盛杏湲,2014a,〈再探選區服務與立法問政:選制改革前後的比較〉,《東吳政治學報》,32(2): 65-116。盛杏湲,2014b,〈選制變革前後立委提案的持續與變遷:一個探索性的研究〉,《臺灣政治學刊》,18(1): 73-127。許志鴻,1986,〈選區選民影響力對議員角色行為的作用之探討-第四屆臺北市議員之研究〉,國立政治大學政治學系碩士學位論文。連勝然,2012,〈選區服務:立法委員選舉制度變革前後之觀察〉,東吳大學政治學系碩士學位論文。游清鑫、劉義周、王業立,2005,〈修憲後選區劃分法制問題之研究〉,《內政部委託研究報告(PG9405-0422 09000000AU601003)》,臺北:內政部。黃秀端,1994,《選區服務》,臺北:唐山。黃秀端,1996,〈選區服務與專業問政的兩難〉,《理論與政策》,10(4): 20-36。黃忠榮,2005,〈同縣市選區人口差額擬限15%內〉,自由電子報:http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2005/new/jul/5/today-p1.htm,檢索日期:2014年4月10日。楊日青,1994,〈立法院施政總質詢制度之探討〉,「國立政治大學政治學研究所四十週年」學術研討會,臺北:政治大學政治學研究所暨所友會。楊婉瑩,2001,〈性別差異下的立法院〉,《政治科學論叢》,15:135-170。蔡佳泓,1996,〈立法委員的選民服務之個案研究〉,國立政治大學政治學系碩士學位論文。蔡佳泓,1996,〈立法委員的選民服務之個案研究〉,國立政治大學政治學系碩士學位論文。蔡學儀,2009,《單一選區兩票制新解》,臺北:五南。蕭怡靖,2003,〈我國立法委員選擇常設委員會之研究-以第四屆立法委員為例〉,國立政治大學政治學系碩士學位論文。賴映潔,2011,〈臺灣立法委員選舉制度改變對補助分配款之影響〉,國立臺灣大學政治學系碩士學位論文。謝相慶,2008,〈我國第7屆立法委員新選舉制度及其可能效應〉,國政研究報告:http://www.npf.org.tw/post/2/3887,檢索日期:2013年12月8日。羅清俊,2002,〈立法院常設委員會審查功能之實證研究:資深程度與不分區立委角色對於審查功能的影響〉,《月旦法學雜誌》,86:36-61。羅清俊,2008,〈小規模立法委員選區的分配政治-選民對於補助利益的期待〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,5(4): 47-85。羅清俊、廖建良,2009,〈選制改變前選區規模對立委分配政策提案行為的影響〉,《臺灣政治學刊》,13(1): 3-53。 II. 外文部分Aberbach, Joel D. 1979. “Changes in Congressional Oversight.” American Behavioral Scientist 22(5): 493-515.Anderson, William D., Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier, and Valeria Sinclair-Chapman. 2003. “The keys to legislative success in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28: 357-386.Barnello, Michelle and Kathleen A. Bratton. 2007. “Bridging the Gender Gap in Bill Sponsorship.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32(3): 449-474.Born, Richard. 1982. “Perquisite Employment in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1960-1976.” American Politics Quarterly 10: 347-362.Bratton, Kathleen A. and Kerry L. Haynie. 1999. “Agenda-Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race.” Journal of Politics 61(3): 658-679.Burke, Edmund. 1969. “The Representative as Trustee.” In The Concept of Representation, ed. Hanna F. Pitkin. New York: Atherton Press.Burke, Edmund. 1987. “The Political Philosophy of Edmund Burke.” ed. Lain Hampsher-Monk. London: Longman Press.Cain, Bruce E. 1987. “Redistribution” In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Political Institutions, ed. Vernon Bogdanor. New York: Basil Blackwell.Cain, Bruce E., John A. Ferejohn, and Morris P. Fiorina. 1984. “The Constituency Service Basis of the Personal Vote for U.S. Representatives and British Members of Parliament.” The American Political Science Review 78(1): 110-125.Cain, Bruce E., John A. Ferejohn, and Morris P. Fiorina. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge: Harvard University.Carey, John M and Matthew S. Shugart. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14(4): 417-439.Chou, Bih-er, Cal Clark, and Janet Clark. 1990. Women in Taiwan Politics: Overcoming Barriers to Women`s Participation in a Modernizing Society. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.Davidson, Roger H., and Walter J. Oleszek. 2002. Congress and Its Members. 8th ed. Washington, D. C.: A Division of Congressional Quarterly Inc.Dodd, Richard. 1977. “Congress and the Quest of Power.” In Congress Reconsidered, eds. Lawrence Dodd and Brnce Openheimer. New York: Preger Publishers.Eulau, Heinz. 1978. “The Role of the Representative: Some Empirical Observation on the Theory of Edmund Burke.” In The Politics of Representation: Continuities in Theory and Research, eds. Heinz Eulau and John C. Wahlke. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Fenno, Richard. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little Brown Press.Fenno, Richard. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little Brown Press.Fiorina, Morris. 1989. Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Freeman, Patricia K., and Lilliard E. Richardson, Jr. 1996. “Explaining Variation in Casework among State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 21(1): 41-56.Hall, Richard L. 1987. “Participation and Purpose in Committee Decision Making.” American Political Science Review 81(1): 105-128.Hall, Richard L. 1996. Participation in Congress. New Haven: Yale University Press.Harris, Joseph P. 1964. Congressional control of administration. Washington: Brookings Institution.Heitshusen, Valerie et al. 2005. “Electoral Context and MP Constituency Focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom.” American Journal of Political Science 49(1): 32-45.Herrick, Rebekah and Michael K. Moore. 1993. “Political Ambition’s Effect on Legislative Behavior: Schlesinger’s Typology Reconsidered and Revisited.” The Journal of Politics 55(3): 765-776.Johannes, John R. 1983. “Explaining Congressional Casework Styles.” American Journal of Political Science 27(3): 530-547.Johannes, John R. 1984. To Serve the People: Congress and Constituency Service. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Kerevel, Yann. 2010. “The Legislative Consequences of Mexico’s Mixed-Member Electoral System, 2000-2009.” Electoral Studies 29: 691-703.Kingdon, John. 1977. “Models of Legislative Voting.” Journal of Politics 39: 563-595.Lancaster, Thomas. 1986. “Electoral Structures and Pork Barrel Politics.” International Political Science Review 7(1): 67-81. Lijphart, Arend, and Bernard Grofman. 1984. Choosing an Electoral System. USA: Praeger Publisher Press.Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Meller, Norman. 1960. “Legislative Behavior Research.” The Western Political Quarterly 13(1): 131-153.Mezey, Michael. 1983. “The Function of Legislatures in the Third World.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 8(4): 511-550.Miller, Warren, and Donald Stokes. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” The American Political Science Review 56(1): 43-56.Norris, Pippa. 2004. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. UK: Cambridge University Press.Ogul Morris S. 1976. Congress Oversee the Bureaucracy: Studies in Legislative Supervision. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Parker, Glenn R. 1980. “The Advantage of Incumbency in House Elections.” American Politics Quarterly 8: 449-464.Parker, Glenn R. 1986. Homeward Bound: Explaining Changes in Congressional Behavior. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Platt, Matthew B and Valeria Sinclair-Chapman. 2008. “Legislative Problem-Solving: Exploring Bill Sponsorship in Post-War America.” Paper presented at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association. New Orleans. Louisiana.Razin, E., and Lindsey, G. 2004. “Municipal Boundary Change Procedure: Local Democracy versus Central Control.” In New Challenges in Local and Regional Administration, ed. M. Barlow and D. Wastl-Water. Burlington VT: Ashgate Publishing Company Press.Rocca, Michael S. and Juan Pablo Micozzi. 2012. “Explaining Simple Resolution in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Presented at the Midwest Political Association Annual Meeting. Chicago.Schiff, Steven H. and Steven S. Smith. 1983. “Generational Change and the Allocation of Staff in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 8(3): 457-467.Scholl, Edward L. 1986. “The Electoral System and Constituency-Oriented Activity in the European Parliament.” International Studies Quarterly 30(3): 315-332.Searing, Donald D. 1991. “Roles, Rules, and Rationality in the New Institutionalism.” American Political Science Review 85(5): 1239-1260.Sheng, Shing-yuan. 2006. “The Personal Vote-Seeking and the Initiation of Particularistic Benefit Bills in the Taiwanese Legislature.” Paper presented at the Legislatures and Parliaments in the 21th Century Conference, Soochow University, Taiwan.Silverman, D. 2010. Doing qualitative research. 3rd ed. Sage, London.Stratmann, Thomas and Martin Baur. 2002. “Plurality Rule, Proportional Representation, and the German Bundestag. How Incentives to Pork-Barrel Differ across Electoral.” American Journal of Political Science 46(3).Swers, Michelle L. 1998. “Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women’s Issue Bills than Their Male Colleagues?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 23(3): 435-448.Swers, Michelle L. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Taylor, S. J., and Bogdan, R. 1984. Introduction to qualitative research methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Vega, Arturo and Juanita M. Firestone. 1995. “The Effects of Gender on Congressional Behavior and the Substantive Representation of Women.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20(2): 213-222.Wahlke, John C., Eulau, H., Buchanan,W., and Ferguson, LeRoy C. 1962. Legislative System: Explorative in Legislative Behavior. New York: Wiley.Western, T. Edward. 1973. “The Constituent Needs Help: Casework in the House of Representatives.” In To Be A Congressman: The Promise and the Power, eds. Sven Groennings and Jonathan P. Hawley. Washington, DC: Acropolis Books 53-72.Wildavsky, A. 1988. The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Glenview, Scott Foresman and Company. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
國家發展研究所
102261004資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102261004 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 盛杏湲 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Sheng, Shing Yuan en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 吳家坤 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Wu, Chia Kun en_US dc.creator (作者) 吳家坤 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Wu, Chia Kun en_US dc.date (日期) 2017 en_US dc.date.accessioned 1-Mar-2017 17:19:39 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 1-Mar-2017 17:19:39 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Mar-2017 17:19:39 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0102261004 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/106909 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國家發展研究所 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 102261004 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 我國於2005年修憲案通過後,區域立委產生的方式由複數選區改為單一選區,每選區選出一名代表,選舉制度的改變、單一選區的設計及其劃分方式,造成某些立委選區幅員變小,有些甚至比地方公職人員的選區小或者與地方公職人員選區相同,但絕大多數選區仍較地方公職人員來得大,就這兩種類型立委而言,面臨選區內潛在的挑戰者時,其行為模式會有何不同?本研究以代表理論為基礎,將第七、八屆立委分為兩種類型(選區大與小),以量化分析與深入訪談並重的方式探究立委代表行為的差異。本研究發現,控制其他的因素之後,在選區服務行為方面,相較於選區較地方公職人員大之立委,選區較地方公職人員小的立委於選區工作時間比例較高並達到顯著差異,而選民個案服務及紅白帖較為踴躍,從深度訪談結果得知,選區較小的立委確實從事更多的選區服務,也出現明顯地方化的現象。在立法問政行為方面,選區較小的立委在法律提案以及施政質詢行為上與選區較大的立委無差別,可能原因為選舉競爭激烈,每位區域立委需要展現自己,積極於國會中問政、提出法案等,而選區較小的立委由於在選區工作上投入大量時間,相對而言,無法分出更多的精力於立法問政,以至於立法問政的分析結果中,選區大與小的立委之間相差無幾。 zh_TW dc.description.tableofcontents 謝 辭 ii摘 要 iv第壹章 緒論 1第一節 研究背景與目的 1第二節 章節安排 5第貳章 文獻檢閱 7第一節 代表角色 7第二節 選區服務 10第三節 立法問政 22第四節 選區劃分 29第參章 研究架構與方法 33第一節 研究架構 33第二節 研究設計 38第肆章 選區大小與立委選區服務行為的關聯性 53第一節 選區服務的差異 53第二節 小結 78第伍章 選區大小與立委立法問政行為的關聯性 79第一節 立法提案的差異 79第二節 行政監督的差異 86第三節 小結 91第陸章 結論 93第一節 研究發現 93第二節 檢討與建議 97參考文獻 101I.中文部分 101II.外文部分 105附 錄 111 zh_TW dc.format.extent 1446863 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102261004 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 選區 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 地方化 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 立委 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 代表行為 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 選舉制度 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Electoral district en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Localization en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Legislator en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Representative behavior en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Electoral system en_US dc.title (題名) 現行立委選區劃分與立委問政取向的關聯性 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Electoral districting and legislators` representative orientations en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) I. 中文部分中央選舉委員會網站,2016,〈選舉資料庫〉,http://db.cec.gov.tw/,檢索日期:2016年4月27日。中華民國統計資訊網,2016,http://www.stat.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=4,檢索日期:2016年5月3日。王郁中,2007,〈立委單一選區劃分之政策分析與影響評估-雲林縣個案研究〉,國立暨南國際大學公共行政與政策學系碩士學位論文。王靖興,2009,〈立法委員的立法問政與選區服務之分析:2000年政黨輪替前後的持續與變遷〉,《臺灣政治學刊》,13(2): 113-169。立法院全球資訊網,2016,〈立委名單〉,http://www.ly.gov.tw/03_leg/0301_main/legList.action,檢索日期:2016年3月15日。立法院國會圖書館,2016,〈立委問政專輯〉,http://lis.ly.gov.tw/lylegismc/lylegismemkmout?!!FUNC400,檢索日期:2016年4月16日。江政諭,2006,〈政治平等、代表性與我國立委選區劃分制度之研究-以美、日、德經驗為借鏡〉,東海大學政治學系碩士學位論文。吳宜侃,2003,〈立法委員連任因素之探討-以第四屆立委為例〉,國立政治大學政治學系碩士學位論文。李鴻典,2006,〈時程逼近仍未解,選區劃分變數多〉,新臺灣新聞周刊:http://www.newtaiwan.com.tw/bulletinview.jsp?bulletinid=62766,檢索日期:2014年5月15日。林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花,2005,〈質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析〉,《身心障礙研究》,3(2)。林理裕,2008,〈單一選區兩票制對臺灣地方政治的影響:從選區劃分原則談起〉,「地方自治與民主發展:2008年選後臺灣地方政治」2008年學術研討會,6月15日,臺中:東海大學。韋洪武,1994,〈立法院審查預算角色的分析〉,「國立政治大學政治學研究所四十週年」學術研討會,臺北:政治大學政治學研究所暨所友會。徐仁輝,2002,《公共財務管理》,臺北:智勝。高世垣,2001,〈選區服務與個人選票之建立〉,國立政治大學政治學系碩士學位論文。張正蒓,2013,〈立法委員選區服務之持續與變遷:第三屆至第八屆之分析〉,國立政治大學政治學系碩士學位論文。張福建,1998,〈議會及議員的權責:愛德蒙.柏克(E. Burke)代表理念的可能貢獻及其限制〉,《行政學報》,29: 133-150。張福建、劉義周,2002,〈代表的理論與實際:規範與經驗的對話〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》,1: 117-149。盛杏湲,1997a,〈立法委員的立法參與:概念、本質與測量〉,《問題與研究》,36(3): 1-25。盛杏湲,1997b,〈國會議員的代表行為:研究方法的探討〉,《問題與研究》,36(9): 37-58。盛杏湲,2000a,〈政黨或選區?立法委員的代表取向與行為〉,《選舉研究》,7(2): 37-73。盛杏湲,2000b,〈立法委員為什麼遊走在不同的委員會?〉,林繼文主編,《政治制度》,361-399,臺北:中央研究院。盛杏湲,2000c,〈立法問政與選區服務:第三屆立法委員代表行為的探討〉,《選舉研究》,6(2): 89-120。盛杏湲,2001,〈立法委員正式與非正式立法參與之研究:以第三屆立法院為例〉,《問題與研究》,40(5): 81-104。盛杏湲,2005a,〈選區代表與集體代表:立法委員的代表角色〉,《東吳政治學報》,21: 1-40。盛杏湲,2005b,〈立法委員的立法提案:第五屆立法院的分析〉,臺灣政治學會年會暨「臺灣民主的挑戰與前景」2005年學術研討會,12月10-11日,臺北:政治大學。盛杏湲,2006-2008,〈選區、政黨與立法委員的三角關係〉,《國家科學委員會研究計畫報告(NSC95-2414-H-046-MY3)》,臺北:行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫報告。 盛杏湲,2008,〈如何評估選制變遷對國會議員角色行為的影響:研究方法的探討〉,載於《如何評估選制變遷:方法論的探討》,黃紀、游清鑫編,臺北:五南。盛杏湲,2011-2012,〈選區服務與立法問政:選制變遷前後的比較〉,《國家科學委員會研究計畫報告(NSC100-2410-H-004-096-MY2)》,臺北:行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫報告。盛杏湲,2014a,〈再探選區服務與立法問政:選制改革前後的比較〉,《東吳政治學報》,32(2): 65-116。盛杏湲,2014b,〈選制變革前後立委提案的持續與變遷:一個探索性的研究〉,《臺灣政治學刊》,18(1): 73-127。許志鴻,1986,〈選區選民影響力對議員角色行為的作用之探討-第四屆臺北市議員之研究〉,國立政治大學政治學系碩士學位論文。連勝然,2012,〈選區服務:立法委員選舉制度變革前後之觀察〉,東吳大學政治學系碩士學位論文。游清鑫、劉義周、王業立,2005,〈修憲後選區劃分法制問題之研究〉,《內政部委託研究報告(PG9405-0422 09000000AU601003)》,臺北:內政部。黃秀端,1994,《選區服務》,臺北:唐山。黃秀端,1996,〈選區服務與專業問政的兩難〉,《理論與政策》,10(4): 20-36。黃忠榮,2005,〈同縣市選區人口差額擬限15%內〉,自由電子報:http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2005/new/jul/5/today-p1.htm,檢索日期:2014年4月10日。楊日青,1994,〈立法院施政總質詢制度之探討〉,「國立政治大學政治學研究所四十週年」學術研討會,臺北:政治大學政治學研究所暨所友會。楊婉瑩,2001,〈性別差異下的立法院〉,《政治科學論叢》,15:135-170。蔡佳泓,1996,〈立法委員的選民服務之個案研究〉,國立政治大學政治學系碩士學位論文。蔡佳泓,1996,〈立法委員的選民服務之個案研究〉,國立政治大學政治學系碩士學位論文。蔡學儀,2009,《單一選區兩票制新解》,臺北:五南。蕭怡靖,2003,〈我國立法委員選擇常設委員會之研究-以第四屆立法委員為例〉,國立政治大學政治學系碩士學位論文。賴映潔,2011,〈臺灣立法委員選舉制度改變對補助分配款之影響〉,國立臺灣大學政治學系碩士學位論文。謝相慶,2008,〈我國第7屆立法委員新選舉制度及其可能效應〉,國政研究報告:http://www.npf.org.tw/post/2/3887,檢索日期:2013年12月8日。羅清俊,2002,〈立法院常設委員會審查功能之實證研究:資深程度與不分區立委角色對於審查功能的影響〉,《月旦法學雜誌》,86:36-61。羅清俊,2008,〈小規模立法委員選區的分配政治-選民對於補助利益的期待〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,5(4): 47-85。羅清俊、廖建良,2009,〈選制改變前選區規模對立委分配政策提案行為的影響〉,《臺灣政治學刊》,13(1): 3-53。 II. 外文部分Aberbach, Joel D. 1979. “Changes in Congressional Oversight.” American Behavioral Scientist 22(5): 493-515.Anderson, William D., Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier, and Valeria Sinclair-Chapman. 2003. “The keys to legislative success in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28: 357-386.Barnello, Michelle and Kathleen A. Bratton. 2007. “Bridging the Gender Gap in Bill Sponsorship.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32(3): 449-474.Born, Richard. 1982. “Perquisite Employment in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1960-1976.” American Politics Quarterly 10: 347-362.Bratton, Kathleen A. and Kerry L. Haynie. 1999. “Agenda-Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race.” Journal of Politics 61(3): 658-679.Burke, Edmund. 1969. “The Representative as Trustee.” In The Concept of Representation, ed. Hanna F. Pitkin. New York: Atherton Press.Burke, Edmund. 1987. “The Political Philosophy of Edmund Burke.” ed. Lain Hampsher-Monk. London: Longman Press.Cain, Bruce E. 1987. “Redistribution” In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Political Institutions, ed. Vernon Bogdanor. New York: Basil Blackwell.Cain, Bruce E., John A. Ferejohn, and Morris P. Fiorina. 1984. “The Constituency Service Basis of the Personal Vote for U.S. Representatives and British Members of Parliament.” The American Political Science Review 78(1): 110-125.Cain, Bruce E., John A. Ferejohn, and Morris P. Fiorina. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge: Harvard University.Carey, John M and Matthew S. Shugart. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14(4): 417-439.Chou, Bih-er, Cal Clark, and Janet Clark. 1990. Women in Taiwan Politics: Overcoming Barriers to Women`s Participation in a Modernizing Society. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.Davidson, Roger H., and Walter J. Oleszek. 2002. Congress and Its Members. 8th ed. Washington, D. C.: A Division of Congressional Quarterly Inc.Dodd, Richard. 1977. “Congress and the Quest of Power.” In Congress Reconsidered, eds. Lawrence Dodd and Brnce Openheimer. New York: Preger Publishers.Eulau, Heinz. 1978. “The Role of the Representative: Some Empirical Observation on the Theory of Edmund Burke.” In The Politics of Representation: Continuities in Theory and Research, eds. Heinz Eulau and John C. Wahlke. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Fenno, Richard. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little Brown Press.Fenno, Richard. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little Brown Press.Fiorina, Morris. 1989. Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Freeman, Patricia K., and Lilliard E. Richardson, Jr. 1996. “Explaining Variation in Casework among State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 21(1): 41-56.Hall, Richard L. 1987. “Participation and Purpose in Committee Decision Making.” American Political Science Review 81(1): 105-128.Hall, Richard L. 1996. Participation in Congress. New Haven: Yale University Press.Harris, Joseph P. 1964. Congressional control of administration. Washington: Brookings Institution.Heitshusen, Valerie et al. 2005. “Electoral Context and MP Constituency Focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom.” American Journal of Political Science 49(1): 32-45.Herrick, Rebekah and Michael K. Moore. 1993. “Political Ambition’s Effect on Legislative Behavior: Schlesinger’s Typology Reconsidered and Revisited.” The Journal of Politics 55(3): 765-776.Johannes, John R. 1983. “Explaining Congressional Casework Styles.” American Journal of Political Science 27(3): 530-547.Johannes, John R. 1984. To Serve the People: Congress and Constituency Service. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Kerevel, Yann. 2010. “The Legislative Consequences of Mexico’s Mixed-Member Electoral System, 2000-2009.” Electoral Studies 29: 691-703.Kingdon, John. 1977. “Models of Legislative Voting.” Journal of Politics 39: 563-595.Lancaster, Thomas. 1986. “Electoral Structures and Pork Barrel Politics.” International Political Science Review 7(1): 67-81. Lijphart, Arend, and Bernard Grofman. 1984. Choosing an Electoral System. USA: Praeger Publisher Press.Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Meller, Norman. 1960. “Legislative Behavior Research.” The Western Political Quarterly 13(1): 131-153.Mezey, Michael. 1983. “The Function of Legislatures in the Third World.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 8(4): 511-550.Miller, Warren, and Donald Stokes. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” The American Political Science Review 56(1): 43-56.Norris, Pippa. 2004. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. UK: Cambridge University Press.Ogul Morris S. 1976. Congress Oversee the Bureaucracy: Studies in Legislative Supervision. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Parker, Glenn R. 1980. “The Advantage of Incumbency in House Elections.” American Politics Quarterly 8: 449-464.Parker, Glenn R. 1986. Homeward Bound: Explaining Changes in Congressional Behavior. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Platt, Matthew B and Valeria Sinclair-Chapman. 2008. “Legislative Problem-Solving: Exploring Bill Sponsorship in Post-War America.” Paper presented at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association. New Orleans. Louisiana.Razin, E., and Lindsey, G. 2004. “Municipal Boundary Change Procedure: Local Democracy versus Central Control.” In New Challenges in Local and Regional Administration, ed. M. Barlow and D. Wastl-Water. Burlington VT: Ashgate Publishing Company Press.Rocca, Michael S. and Juan Pablo Micozzi. 2012. “Explaining Simple Resolution in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Presented at the Midwest Political Association Annual Meeting. Chicago.Schiff, Steven H. and Steven S. Smith. 1983. “Generational Change and the Allocation of Staff in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 8(3): 457-467.Scholl, Edward L. 1986. “The Electoral System and Constituency-Oriented Activity in the European Parliament.” International Studies Quarterly 30(3): 315-332.Searing, Donald D. 1991. “Roles, Rules, and Rationality in the New Institutionalism.” American Political Science Review 85(5): 1239-1260.Sheng, Shing-yuan. 2006. “The Personal Vote-Seeking and the Initiation of Particularistic Benefit Bills in the Taiwanese Legislature.” Paper presented at the Legislatures and Parliaments in the 21th Century Conference, Soochow University, Taiwan.Silverman, D. 2010. Doing qualitative research. 3rd ed. Sage, London.Stratmann, Thomas and Martin Baur. 2002. “Plurality Rule, Proportional Representation, and the German Bundestag. How Incentives to Pork-Barrel Differ across Electoral.” American Journal of Political Science 46(3).Swers, Michelle L. 1998. “Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women’s Issue Bills than Their Male Colleagues?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 23(3): 435-448.Swers, Michelle L. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Taylor, S. J., and Bogdan, R. 1984. Introduction to qualitative research methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Vega, Arturo and Juanita M. Firestone. 1995. “The Effects of Gender on Congressional Behavior and the Substantive Representation of Women.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20(2): 213-222.Wahlke, John C., Eulau, H., Buchanan,W., and Ferguson, LeRoy C. 1962. Legislative System: Explorative in Legislative Behavior. New York: Wiley.Western, T. Edward. 1973. “The Constituent Needs Help: Casework in the House of Representatives.” In To Be A Congressman: The Promise and the Power, eds. Sven Groennings and Jonathan P. Hawley. Washington, DC: Acropolis Books 53-72.Wildavsky, A. 1988. The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Glenview, Scott Foresman and Company. zh_TW