學術產出-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 Co-branding partner selection: The importance of belief revision
作者 李嘉林
Lee, Chia-Lin;Decker, Reinhold
貢獻者 企管系
關鍵詞 belief-revision;book-keeping;co-branding;M31;partner selection;stereotype change;sub-typing
日期 2016-08
上傳時間 17-Apr-2017 11:34:16 (UTC+8)
摘要 This paper applies the stereotype change theory to help bridge a major literature gap on co-branding partner selection: why both identical and highly different brand pairs often fail. We argue that, given that a primary goal of establishing a co-branding alliance is to positively revise consumers’ beliefs about important attributes of the allying brands, the case of no belief-revision can lead to a failure of the alliance. We show that both an identical and a highly incongruent partnership in terms of attribute-level difference can fail due to the lack of belief-revision. We report that a moderately incongruent brand pair is a promising decision on co-branding partner selection. In doing so, our research contributes to the explanation of why the two “extreme” types of co-branding alliances may fail from the perspective of consumer evaluation. For brand managers, we offer a normative guideline for co-branding partner selection.
關聯 Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(4), 546-563
資料類型 article
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2016.1197848
dc.contributor 企管系
dc.creator (作者) 李嘉林zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Lee, Chia-Lin;Decker, Reinhold
dc.date (日期) 2016-08
dc.date.accessioned 17-Apr-2017 11:34:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 17-Apr-2017 11:34:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-Apr-2017 11:34:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/108878-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This paper applies the stereotype change theory to help bridge a major literature gap on co-branding partner selection: why both identical and highly different brand pairs often fail. We argue that, given that a primary goal of establishing a co-branding alliance is to positively revise consumers’ beliefs about important attributes of the allying brands, the case of no belief-revision can lead to a failure of the alliance. We show that both an identical and a highly incongruent partnership in terms of attribute-level difference can fail due to the lack of belief-revision. We report that a moderately incongruent brand pair is a promising decision on co-branding partner selection. In doing so, our research contributes to the explanation of why the two “extreme” types of co-branding alliances may fail from the perspective of consumer evaluation. For brand managers, we offer a normative guideline for co-branding partner selection.
dc.format.extent 161 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.relation (關聯) Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(4), 546-563
dc.subject (關鍵詞) belief-revision;book-keeping;co-branding;M31;partner selection;stereotype change;sub-typing
dc.title (題名) Co-branding partner selection: The importance of belief revision
dc.type (資料類型) article
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.3846/16111699.2016.1197848
dc.doi.uri (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2016.1197848