Publications-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 Strategic Motives Drive Proposers to Offer Fairly in Ultimatum Games: An fMRI Study
作者 Chen, Y.-H.;Chen, Y.-C.;Kuo, W.-J.;Kan, K.;Yang, C.C.;Yen, Nai Shing
顏乃欣
貢獻者 心腦中心
關鍵詞 cost benefit analysis; decision making; dorsal anterior cingulate cortex; executive function; functional magnetic resonance imaging; insula; reward; substantia nigra; theory of mind; ventral tegmentum
日期 2017-04
上傳時間 8-May-2017 14:31:04 (UTC+8)
摘要 The hypothesis of strategic motives postulates that offering fairly in the Ultimatum Game (UG) is to avoid rejection and receive money. In this fMRI study, we used a modified UG to elucidate how proposers reached decisions of offering fairly and to what extent they considered offering selfishly with different stakes. We had proposers choose between a fair and a selfish offer with different degrees of selfishness and stake sizes. Proposers were less likely and spent more time choosing the fair offer over a slightly-selfish offer than a very selfish offer independent of stakes. Such choices evoked greater activation in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortices that typically involve in allocation of cognitive control for cost/benefit decision making. Choosing a fair offer in higher stakes evoked greater activation in the anterior cingulate gyrus (ACCg) and the areas that previously have been implicated in reward and theory of mind. Furthermore, choosing a slightly selfish offer over a fair offer evoked greater activation in the anterior cingulate sulcus, ACCg, ventral tegmental area (or substantia nigra) and anterior insular cortex signalling the higher gain and implying higher rejection risk. In conclusion, our findings favoured the hypothesis that proposers offer fairly based on the strategic motives. © 2017 The Author(s).
關聯 Scientific Reports 7, Article number: 527
資料類型 article
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00608-8
dc.contributor 心腦中心
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Y.-H.;Chen, Y.-C.;Kuo, W.-J.;Kan, K.;Yang, C.C.;Yen, Nai Shing
dc.creator (作者) 顏乃欣zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2017-04
dc.date.accessioned 8-May-2017 14:31:04 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 8-May-2017 14:31:04 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 8-May-2017 14:31:04 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/109323-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The hypothesis of strategic motives postulates that offering fairly in the Ultimatum Game (UG) is to avoid rejection and receive money. In this fMRI study, we used a modified UG to elucidate how proposers reached decisions of offering fairly and to what extent they considered offering selfishly with different stakes. We had proposers choose between a fair and a selfish offer with different degrees of selfishness and stake sizes. Proposers were less likely and spent more time choosing the fair offer over a slightly-selfish offer than a very selfish offer independent of stakes. Such choices evoked greater activation in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortices that typically involve in allocation of cognitive control for cost/benefit decision making. Choosing a fair offer in higher stakes evoked greater activation in the anterior cingulate gyrus (ACCg) and the areas that previously have been implicated in reward and theory of mind. Furthermore, choosing a slightly selfish offer over a fair offer evoked greater activation in the anterior cingulate sulcus, ACCg, ventral tegmental area (or substantia nigra) and anterior insular cortex signalling the higher gain and implying higher rejection risk. In conclusion, our findings favoured the hypothesis that proposers offer fairly based on the strategic motives. © 2017 The Author(s).
dc.format.extent 210 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.relation (關聯) Scientific Reports 7, Article number: 527
dc.subject (關鍵詞) cost benefit analysis; decision making; dorsal anterior cingulate cortex; executive function; functional magnetic resonance imaging; insula; reward; substantia nigra; theory of mind; ventral tegmentum
dc.title (題名) Strategic Motives Drive Proposers to Offer Fairly in Ultimatum Games: An fMRI Study
dc.type (資料類型) article
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1038/s41598-017-00608-8
dc.doi.uri (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00608-8