學術產出-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 從技藝與機運的對立關係來看公共領域中的政治自由—鄂蘭與海德格的比較
其他題名 On Political Freedom in Public Sphere in View of the Contrast between Téchne and Túche - A Comparison between Arendt and Heidegger
作者 汪文聖
Wang, Wen-Sheng
貢獻者 哲學系
關鍵詞 技藝 ; 機運 ; 公共領域 ; 漢娜鄂蘭 ; 馬丁海德格
Téchne ; Túche ; Public Sphere ; Hannah Arendt ; Martin Heidegger
日期 2017-02
上傳時間 12-Jul-2017 10:17:43 (UTC+8)
摘要 此文始於討論亞里斯多德理解政治為一種技藝,及其界定的技藝對反於機運。故政治學既非精確的科學,也非偶發的意見,它可稱為一種技藝之學,政治是以人為活動來面對機運的公共事務。其次本文探討漢娜.鄂蘭如何理解公共領域中的政治自由為多數公民的意志,以面對一個機運的、但可被化解的不確定未來。本文接著對馬丁.海德格基於「此-在」的意志與從「存有」的本有而來的思想,以理解公共領域中的政治自由,並詮釋政治對於海德格而言是如何面對機運的。最後我們可做介於鄂蘭與海德格之間的一個比較。
This paper begins with a discussion of the thesis that politics is a kind of téchne (art), as Aristotle states. He defines téchne to be the opposite of túche (chance). Hence, politics is neither an exact science nor an accidental opinion. It is, rather, a teachable art or skill (Kunstlehre). Politics is a public affair in the sense of human activity facing túche. Based on this theme, the paper investigates how Hannah Arendt interprets political freedom in public sphere as the will of the plural citizens, facing an uncertain future, which can be interpreted as túche, in an attempt to still the disquiet of the collective ego. We further investigate Heidegger`s understanding of political freedom in public sphere based on his comprehension of the will of Da-sein and the enowning (Ereignis) of Being. Hence we can also interpret how politics is for Heidegger to face túche. With this regard, a comparison between Arendt and Heidegger could be made.
關聯 東吳哲學學報, 35, 1-30
資料類型 article
dc.contributor 哲學系
dc.creator (作者) 汪文聖zh-tw
dc.creator (作者) Wang, Wen-Shengen-US
dc.date (日期) 2017-02
dc.date.accessioned 12-Jul-2017 10:17:43 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 12-Jul-2017 10:17:43 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 12-Jul-2017 10:17:43 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/110931-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 此文始於討論亞里斯多德理解政治為一種技藝,及其界定的技藝對反於機運。故政治學既非精確的科學,也非偶發的意見,它可稱為一種技藝之學,政治是以人為活動來面對機運的公共事務。其次本文探討漢娜.鄂蘭如何理解公共領域中的政治自由為多數公民的意志,以面對一個機運的、但可被化解的不確定未來。本文接著對馬丁.海德格基於「此-在」的意志與從「存有」的本有而來的思想,以理解公共領域中的政治自由,並詮釋政治對於海德格而言是如何面對機運的。最後我們可做介於鄂蘭與海德格之間的一個比較。
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This paper begins with a discussion of the thesis that politics is a kind of téchne (art), as Aristotle states. He defines téchne to be the opposite of túche (chance). Hence, politics is neither an exact science nor an accidental opinion. It is, rather, a teachable art or skill (Kunstlehre). Politics is a public affair in the sense of human activity facing túche. Based on this theme, the paper investigates how Hannah Arendt interprets political freedom in public sphere as the will of the plural citizens, facing an uncertain future, which can be interpreted as túche, in an attempt to still the disquiet of the collective ego. We further investigate Heidegger`s understanding of political freedom in public sphere based on his comprehension of the will of Da-sein and the enowning (Ereignis) of Being. Hence we can also interpret how politics is for Heidegger to face túche. With this regard, a comparison between Arendt and Heidegger could be made.
dc.format.extent 1223889 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) 東吳哲學學報, 35, 1-30
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 技藝 ; 機運 ; 公共領域 ; 漢娜鄂蘭 ; 馬丁海德格
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Téchne ; Túche ; Public Sphere ; Hannah Arendt ; Martin Heidegger
dc.title (題名) 從技藝與機運的對立關係來看公共領域中的政治自由—鄂蘭與海德格的比較zh_TW
dc.title.alternative (其他題名) On Political Freedom in Public Sphere in View of the Contrast between Téchne and Túche - A Comparison between Arendt and Heidegger
dc.type (資料類型) article