1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 研究中心
  4. 期刊論文
  5. Item

學術產出-期刊論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 The South China Sea Arbitration and Taiwan’s Claim: Legal and Political Implications
作者 Hsiao, Anne Hsiu-An
蕭琇安
貢獻者 國際關係研究中心
日期 2017
上傳時間 20-七月-2017 15:27:05 (UTC+8)
摘要 In early 2013, the Philippines initiated the compulsory arbitral procedure under Article 287 and Annex VII of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) against China, with regard to their disputes in the South China Sea. Three years later, the ad hoc Arbitral Tribunal rendered its award that declared China’s historic rights claim within the U-shaped line unlawful and that none of the Spratly Islands including Itu Aba (Taiping Island) are “islands” entitled to an EEZ. Although the ROC/Taiwan was not the Philippines’ intended party in the case, it was brought into the proceedings and became a de facto party. This paper will illustrate how Taiwan became relevant to the South China Sea arbitration and analyze possible legal and political implications for Taiwan. It is suggested that the Philippines-initiated arbitration may have more serious political implications for Taiwan’s future claim and position in the South China Sea dispute. In particular, Taiwan should carefully manage the One-China/South China Sea/cross-straits policy triangle after the South China Sea arbitration. © 2017, Journal of Chinese Political Science/Association of Chinese Political Studies.
關聯 Journal of Chinese Political Science, 22(2), 211-228
資料類型 article
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11366-017-9471-1
dc.contributor 國際關係研究中心
dc.creator (作者) Hsiao, Anne Hsiu-Anen-US
dc.creator (作者) 蕭琇安zh-tw
dc.date (日期) 2017
dc.date.accessioned 20-七月-2017 15:27:05 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 20-七月-2017 15:27:05 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 20-七月-2017 15:27:05 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/111265-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In early 2013, the Philippines initiated the compulsory arbitral procedure under Article 287 and Annex VII of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) against China, with regard to their disputes in the South China Sea. Three years later, the ad hoc Arbitral Tribunal rendered its award that declared China’s historic rights claim within the U-shaped line unlawful and that none of the Spratly Islands including Itu Aba (Taiping Island) are “islands” entitled to an EEZ. Although the ROC/Taiwan was not the Philippines’ intended party in the case, it was brought into the proceedings and became a de facto party. This paper will illustrate how Taiwan became relevant to the South China Sea arbitration and analyze possible legal and political implications for Taiwan. It is suggested that the Philippines-initiated arbitration may have more serious political implications for Taiwan’s future claim and position in the South China Sea dispute. In particular, Taiwan should carefully manage the One-China/South China Sea/cross-straits policy triangle after the South China Sea arbitration. © 2017, Journal of Chinese Political Science/Association of Chinese Political Studies.
dc.format.extent 425251 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) Journal of Chinese Political Science, 22(2), 211-228
dc.title (題名) The South China Sea Arbitration and Taiwan’s Claim: Legal and Political Implicationsen-US
dc.type (資料類型) article
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1007/s11366-017-9471-1
dc.doi.uri (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11366-017-9471-1