Publications-學位論文
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
Google ScholarTM
NCCU Library
Citation Infomation
Related Publications in TAIR
題名 日本核武政策
Japan’s nuclear weapons policy作者 宋寶雅
Sondova, Pavla貢獻者 姜家雄
Chiang, Alex
宋寶雅
Sondova, Pavla關鍵詞 日本
核武
反擴散政策
新古典現實主義
Japan
Nuclear weapons
Non-proliferation regime
Neoclassical realism日期 2017 上傳時間 24-Jul-2017 12:17:51 (UTC+8) 摘要 由於自身核能經驗的過去,日本在全球反核擴散體制中佔有特別的地位。日本是過去七十餘年來,全球唯一持有核武且也成為核攻擊目標的國家。鑑於此一事實,許多人認為日本的核武政策會是永遠強烈反對核擴散的。但若詳細觀察,有明顯的多重因素嚴重影響日本在核武方面的決策。新古典現實主義針對分析這些因素,提供了複雜的分析框架。外部和國內因素皆被考慮在內。這項研究分析日本核武決策的背景,顯示日本對於核武擴散的態度比起其因自身歷史經驗而受到期待的態度,更不直接。日本支持反擴散制度的動機並非被假定,且動機隨著區域安全環境和國內的政權更替以及民意改變而發展。
Japan’s position in the international nuclear non-proliferation system has always been very specific due to its own nuclear past. Japan has been the only state in more than seventy years of existence of nuclear weapons which was a target of the nuclear attack. Because of this fact, many thought that Japan’s nuclear weapons policy will always be strongly in favor of non-proliferation. After a closer look, it becomes obvious that there are multiple factors which have a serious impact on Japan’s nuclear weapons policy making. Neoclassical realism offers a complex analytical framework to analyze these factors. The external, as well as domestic factors, are taken into consideration. This work analyzes the background of Japan’s nuclear weapons policy making and reveals that Japan’s attitude towards nuclear weapons proliferation is much less straightforward than it would be expected from Japan’s historical experience. Japan’s motivation for support of the non-proliferation regime is not given and it develops in accordance with the security environment in the region as well as with domestic political changes and changes in public opinion.參考文獻 ReferencesBooksCampbell, M. K. & Sunohara, T. (2004). Japan: Thinking the Unthinkable. In: Campbell, M. K., Einhorn, J. R., & Reiss, B. M. (Eds.), The nuclear tipping point: why states reconsider their nuclear choices (218-253). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Brown, M. E., Lynn-Jones, S. M., & Miller, S. E. (Eds.). (1995). The Perils of Anarchy: Contemporary Realism and International Security. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Campbell, M. K. & Sunohara, T. (2004). Japan: thinking the unthinkable. In: Campbell, M. K., Einhorn, J. R., & Reiss, B. M. (Eds.), The Nuclear Tipping Point: Why States Reconsider Their Nuclear Choices (218-253). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Christensen, T. J. (1996). Useful Adversaries: Grand Strategy, Domestic Mobilization, and Sino-American Conflict, 1947-1958. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Cirincione, J. (2005). Deadly Arsenals: Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Threats. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Dreyer, J. T. (2012). Sino-Japanese Territorial and Maritime Disputes. In: Elleman, B., Kotkin, S., & Clive S. (Eds.), Beijing’s Power and China’s Neighbors: Twenty Neighbors in Asia (81-96). New York: Routledge.Drulák, P. (2003). Teorie mezinárodních vztahů. Praha: Portál.Fitzpatrick, M. (2016). Asia`s Latent Nuclear Powers: Japan, South Korea and Taiwan [Kindle DX version]. Retrieved from Amazon.comGilpin, R. (1981). War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Green, M. J. (2003). Japan’s Reluctant Realism, Palgrave: Macmillan.Green, M. J., & Furukawa, K. (2008). Japan: New Nuclear Realism. In Alagappa, M. (Ed), The Long Shadow: Nuclear Weapons and Security in 21st Century Asia (347-372). Standford: Standford University Press.Harrison, S. S. (1996). Japan and nuclear weapons. In Harrison, S. S. (Ed.), Japan’s Nuclear Future: The Plutonium Debate (3-44). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. Ikenberry, J. G. & Mastanduno, M. (Eds.). (2003). International Relations Theory and the Asia-Pacific. New York: Columbia University press.Kawashima, Y. (2003). Japanese Foreign Policy at the Crossroads: Challenges and Options for the Twenty-First Century. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Keohane, R. (1986). Realism, Neorealism and the Study of World Politics. In R. Keohane (Eds.), Neorealism and Its Critics (pp. 1-26). New York: Columbia University Press.Keohane, R. (1986). Theory of World Politics: Structural Realism and Beyond. In R. Keohane (Eds.), Neorealism and Its Critics (pp. 158-203). New York: Columbia University Press.Lobell, S. E., Ripsman, N. M., & Taliaferro, J. W. (2009). Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Makin, J. H. & Hellmann, D. C. (1989). Sharing World Leadership? A New Era for America & Japan. Washington D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.Maruyama, M. (1969). Thought and Behavior in Modern Japanese Politics, London: Oxford University Press.Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W. W. Norton.Nester, W. (1990). The Foundation of Japanese Power: Continuities, Changes, Challenges, New York: M.E. Sharpe.Oros, A. L. (2008). Normalizing Japan. Standford: Standford University Press.Pyle, K. J. (2007). Japan Rising: the Resurgence of Japanese Power and Purpose. A century foundation books, New York: Public Affairs.Rhodes, R. (1988). The Making of the Atomic Bomb. New York: Touchstone Book.Sagan, S. D. (2003). More Will Be Worse. In S. D. Sagan & K. N. Waltz (Eds.), The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate Renewed (47-91). New York: W. W. Norton.Samuels, R. J. (2007). Securing Japan. Tokyo’s Grand Strategy and the Future of East Asia. Ithaca and London: Cornell University press.Samuels, R. J., & Schoff, J. L. (2013). Japan’s Nuclear Hedge: Beyond" Allergy" and Breakout. In A. J. Tellis, A. M. Denmark, & T. Tanner (Eds.), Strategic Asia 2013-14: Asia in the Second Nuclear Age (pp. 233-266). Seattle: National Bureau of Asian Research.Schell, J. (2007). The Seventh Decade: The New Shape of Nuclear Danger. New York: Metropolitan Books.Schweller, R. L. (1998). Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler`s Strategy of World Conquest. New York: Columbia University Press.Schweller, R. L. (2003). The Progressiveness of Neoclassical Realism. In C. Elman, & M. F. Elaman (Eds.), Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field (pp. 311-347). Cambridge: MIT Press.Spykman, N. J. (1942). America’s Strategy in World Politics: The United States and the Balance of Power, New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Stockwin, J.A.A. (2003). Dictionary of Modern Politics of Japan, London: Routledge Curzon.Waltz, K. N. (2003). More May Be Better. In S. D. Sagan & K. N. Waltz (Eds.), The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate Renewed (pp. 3-45). New York: W. W. Norton. Waltz, N. K. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Wan, M. (2001). Japan between Asia and the West: Economic Power and Strategic Balance. New York: An East Gate Book.Wirtz, J. J. (2013). Weapons of Mass Destruction. In A. Collins (Ed.), Contemporary Security Studies (pp. 13-27). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Wohlforth, W. C. (1993). The elusive balance: power and perceptions during the Cold War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Zakaria, F. (1999). From wealth to power: The unusual origins of America`s world role. Princeton University Press. ArticlesArase, D. (2007). Japan, the Active State? Security Policy after 9/11. Asian Survey, 47(4), 560-583.Bisley, N. (2008). Securing the „Anchor of Regional Stability?” The Transformation of the US-Japan Alliance and East Asian Security. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 30(1), 73-98. Retrieved from http://muse.jhu.edu/login?uri=/journals/contemporary_southeast_asia_a_journal_of_international_and_strategic_affairs/v030/30.1.bisley.htmlBowen, R. W. (1992). Japan’s foreign policy. PS: Political Science and Politics, 25(1), 57-73.Brands Jr., H. W. (1986). The United States and the reemergence of independent Japan. Pacific Affairs, 59(3), 387-401.Choi, W. (2003). Persistence and change in Japan-China relationship. Journal of International and Area Studies, 10(1), 75-92.Deng, Y. (1997). Chinese relations with Japan: implications for Asia-Pacific regionalism. Pacific Affairs, 70(3), 373-391.Fouse, D. (2004). Japan’s post-Cold War North Korea policy: hedging towards autonomy? Asia Pacific Center for Security Studies, 1-14.Furukawa, K. (2010). Japan`s policy and views on nuclear weapon: a historical perspective2. Jebat: Malaysian Journal of History, Politics and Strategic Studies, 37, 1-30. Retrieved from http://journalarticle.ukm.my/341/1/1.pdfGlaser, C. L. (2013). Realism. In A. Collins (Eds.), Contemporary Security Studies (13-27). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Goldstein, L. J. (2003). When China was a “rogue state”: the impact of China’s nuclear weapons program on US-China relations during the 1960s. Journal of Contemporary China, 12(37), 739-764. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10670560320001177Gray, R. (1999). Nuclear Weapons Proliferation. In C. A. Snyder (Eds.), Contemporary Security and Strategy (171-193). New York: Routledge.Hagstrom, L. (2005). Relational power for foreign policy analysis: Issues in Japan’s China policy. European journal for international relations, 395-431.Hara, K. (2001). 50 Years from San Francisco: Re-Examining the Peace Treaty and Japan’s Territorial Problems. Pacific Affairs, 74(3), 361-382.Hirata, K. (2008) Who Shapes the National Security Debate? Divergent Interpretations of Japan’s Security Role. Asian Affairs: Heldref Publications, 123-151.Hoey, F. (2016). Japan and extended nuclear deterrence: security and non-proliferation. Journal of Strategic Studies, 39(4), 484-501. DOI:10.1080/01402390.2016.1168010Hughes, C. W. (2009) Japan’s response to China’s rise: regional engagement, global containment, dangers of collision, International Affairs, 85(4), 840-841. Retrieved from http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/people/hughes/researchandpublications/articles/japan_responds_to_china_rise_international_affairs_hughes.pdfHughes, C. W. (2009). "Super-Sizing" the DPRK Threat: Japan`s Evolving Military Posture and North Korea. Asian Survey, 49(2), 291-292. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/as.2009.49.2.291Hughes, L. (2007). Why Japan Will Not Go Nuclear (Yet): International and Domestic Constraints on the Nuclearization of Japan. International Security, 31(4), 67-96. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4137566Katahara, E. (1997). Japan`s Plutonium Policy: Consequences for Nonproliferation. The Nonproliferation Review, 5(1), 53-61. Retrieved from https://www.nonproliferation.org/wp-content/uploads/npr/kataha51.pdfKazi, R. (2010). Japan`s Nuclear Policy at Crossroads. Strategic Analysis, 34(3), 436-450. doi: 10.1080/09700161003661042Kitamura, M. (1996). Japan`s Plutonium Program: A Proliferation Threat? The Nonproliferation Review, 3(2), 1-16. Retrieved from https://www.nonproliferation.org/wp-content/uploads/npr/kitamu32.pdfKristensen, H. H., & Norris, R. S. (2013). Global nuclear weapons inventories, 1945-2013. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 65(5), 75-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00963402135013Kristensen, H. M. & Norris, R. S. (2016). Chinese nuclear forces, 2016. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 74(2), 205-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2016.11940Kurosawa, M. (2004b). Moving Beyond the Debate on a Nuclear Japan. The Nonproliferation Review, 11(3), 110-137. doi: 10.1080/10736700408436981Langdon, F. (1985). Security Debate in Japan. Pacific Affairs, 58(3), 397-410.Lavoy, P. R. (2006). Nuclear Proliferation Over the Next Decade: Causes, Warning Signs, and Policy Responses. Nonproliferation Review 13(3), 433-454. Retrieved from http://calhoun.nps.edu/bitstream/handle/10945/25427/NUCLEAR_PROLIFERATION_OVER_THE_NEXT_DECADE_Causes,_Warning_Signs,_and_Policy_Responses.pdf?sequence=1Levite, A. E. (2006). Never Say Never Again: Nuclear Reversal Revisited. International Security, 27(3), 59-88. doi:10.1162/01622880260553633Machida, S. (2014). Who Supports Nuclear Armament in Japan? Threat Perceptions and Japan`s Nuclear Armament. Asian Journal of Political Science, 22(2), 128-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2014.913492Mayer, J. D. (1996). International Relations Theory and Japanese Pacifism: Why Didn’t Tokyo Go Ballistic over Korean Nukes? Journal of northeast Asian studies, 50-62. Mochizuki, M. M. (2007). Japan Tests the Nuclear Taboo. Nonproliferation Review, 14(2), 303-328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10736700701379393Mueller, J. (1988). The Essential Irrelevance of Nuclear Weapons: Stability in the Postwar World. International Security, 13(2), 55-79.Pollack, J. D. (1972). Chinese Attitudes towards Nuclear Weapons, 1964-9. The China Quarterly, 50(1), 244-271. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/65190Purrington, C. (1992). Tokyo’s policy responses during the Gulf War and the impact of the “Iraqi shock” on Japan. Pacific affairs, Vol. 65(2), 161-181.Reed, S. R. & Scheiner, E. (2003). Electoral Incentives and Policy Preferences: Mixed Motives behind Party Defections in Japan. British Journal of Political Science, 33(3), 469-490.Rix, A. (1989-1990). Japan`s Foreign Aid Policy: A Capacity for Leadership? Pacific Affairs, 62(4), 461-475.Rose, G. (1998). Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy. World politics, 51(01), 144-172. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25054068Sagan, S. D. (1997). Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons? Three Models in Search of a Bomb. International Security 21(3): 54-86. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539273 Sagan, S. D. (2011). The Causes of Nuclear Weapons Proliferation. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 225-244. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-052209-131042Schweller, R. L. (2004). Unanswered Threats: A Neoclassical Realist Theory of Underbalancing. International security, 29(2), 159-201. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4137589Seth, S. P. (1994). Japan’s Constitutional Debate. Economic and Political Weekly, 904c.Taliaferro, J. W. (2000). Security Seeking under Anarchy: Defensive Realism Revisited. International Security, 25(3), 128-161. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/262670Waltz K. N. (2000). Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security, 25(1), 5-41. Retrieved from http://www.columbia.edu/itc/sipa/U6800/readings-sm/Waltz_Structural%20Realism.pdfYoda, T. (2006). Japan`s Host Nation Support Program for the U.S.-Japan Security Alliance: Past and Prospects. Asian Survey, 46(6).WebsitesAoki M., & Yoshida R. (2015, September 19). Diet Enacts Security Laws, Marking Japan’s Departure from Pacifism. The Japan Times. Retrieved from http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2015/09/19/national/politics-diplomacy/diet-enacts-security-laws-marking-japans-departure-from-pacifism-2/#.WOYm6KKkI2xArms Control Association. (2017, January). Nuclear Weapons: Who Has What at a Glance. Retrieved from https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/NuclearweaponswhohaswhatAtomic Archive. (n.d.). The Effects of Nuclear Weapons. Retrieved from http://www.atomicarchive.com/Effects/index.shtmlAtomic Energy Basic Act. (1955). Retrieved from http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=2233&vm=&re=02&new=1Bakanic, E. D. (2008). The end of Japan’s nuclear taboo. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist. Retrieved from http://www.thebulletin.org/web-edition/features/the-end-of-japans-nuclear-tabooBarnaby, F. & Burnie, S. (2005). Thinking the Unthinkable – Japanese nuclear power and proliferation in East Asia. Oxford Research Group a Citizens’ Nuclear Information Center. Retrieved from http://www.nautilus.org/napsnet/sr/2005/0573Barnaby_Burnia.pdfBBC. (2013). Japan government `reaches deal to buy` disputed islands. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-19485565Center of Non-Proliferation Studies. (2010). NPT Briefing Book. Available from:http://www.nonproliferation.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/npt_briefing_book_full-version.pdfChanlett-Avery, E. & Nikitin, M. B. (2008). CRS Report for Congress - Japan’s Nuclear Future: Policy Debate, Prospect and U.S. Interests. Congressional Research Service. Retrieved from http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/nuke/RL34487.pdfEisenhower, D. D. (1953). Atoms for Peace. Retrieved from http://www.atomicarchive.com/Docs/Deterrence/Atomsforpeace.shtmlEndo, T. (2007). How Realistic Is a Nuclear-Armed Japan? Policy Forum Online 07-063A. Retrieved from http://www.nautilus.org/fora/security/07063Endo.html#sect2Federation of American Scientists. (n. d.) Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty [NPT] – Backgroud. Retrieved from https://fas.org/nuke/control/npt/back.htmFederation of America Scientists. (2012). Nuclear Weapons Program. Retrieved from https://fas.org/nuke/guide/japan/nuke/index.htmlGallup Japan Poll on the Ownership of Nuclear Weapons and the Threat of Nuclear War. [Gallup]. (1999). Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/4456/gallup-japan-poll-ownership-nuclear-weapons-threat.aspxInternational Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons. (2016). Nuclear Weapons Timeline. Retrieved from http://www.icanw.org/the-facts/the-nuclear-age/Japan: Signature of Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) (1970). Retrieved from http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/npt/japan/sig/londonKristensen, H. M. (1999). Japan Under the US Nuclear Umbrella. Global Problem Solving nuke policy Supporting Documents. Retrieved from http://www.nautilus.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Japan-Under-the-US-Nuclear-Umbrella.pdfKurusawa, M. (2004a). East Asian Regional Security and Arguments for a Nuclear Japan. In Workshop" Prospects for East Asian Disarmament," Hiroshima Peace Institute, Hiroshima, Japan. 1-18. Maeda, H. (2004). Nuclear Energy in Japan – Current Status and Future. Japan Atomic Energy. Retrieved from http://www.aec.go.jp/jicst/NC/iinkai/teirei/siryo2004/kettei/speech040627.pdfMedeiros, E. (2003). Theater Missile Defense and Northeast Asian Security. Monterey: Center for Nonproliferation Studies. Retrieved from http://www.nti.org/e_research/e3_3a.htmlMiller, J.B. (2011). The Knotty Kuril Island Problem. Retrieved from http://www.asiasentinel.com/politics/the-knotty-kuril-island-problem/Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (1967). Three Non-Nuclear Principles. Retrieved from http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/un/disarmament/nnp/index.htmlNihonkoku Kenpō [Kenpō] [Constitution], art. 9 (1946).Nuclear weapon. (n.d.) In Encyclopædia Britannica online. Retrieved from https://global.britannica.com/technology/nuclear-weaponRafferty, K. (2016). Will Trump’s foreign policy push Japan to go nuclear? The Japan Times. Retrieved from http://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2016/12/25/commentary/japan-commentary/will-trumps-foreign-policy-push-japan-go-nuclear/#.WVsokoiLQ2wRoberts, B. (2013). Extended Deterrence and Strategic Stability in Northeast Asia. NIDS Visiting Scholar Paper Series, 1. Retrieved from http://www.nids.mod.go.jp/english/publication/visiting/pdf/01.pdfSahashi, R. (2010). New Thinking about Foreign Policy Strategy in Japan; East Asian Forum. Retrieved from http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2010/01/27/new-thinking-about-foreign-policy-strategy-in-japan/Schwarz, B. (2005). Japan moves to revise “peace constitution”; American Thinker. Retrieved from http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2005/10/japan_moves_to_revise_peace_co.htmlThe Maureen and Mike Mansfield Foundation. (2006). Yomiuri Shimbun Novemeber Opinion Polls. Retrieved from http://mansfieldfdn.org/program/research-education-and-communication/asian-opinion-poll-database/november-yomiuri-shimbun-opinion-poll-06-18/The State Council Information Office. (2010). China’s National Defense in 2010. Available from: http://eng.mod.gov.cn/Database/WhitePapers/2010.htmThe World Bank. (2016). Military expenditure (% of GDP). Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/MS.MIL.XPND.GD.ZS?end=2015&start=1989&view=chartToki, M. (2005). Sixty Years After the Nuclear Devastation, Japan`s Role in the NPT. Monterey: Center for Nonproliferation Studies. Retrieved from http://www.nti.org/e_research/e3_73.htmlUnited Nations. (2010). Ireland. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/conf/npt/2010/statements/pdf/ireland_en.pdfUnited Nations Atomic Energy Commission. (1946). The Baruch Plan. Available from: http://www.atomicarchive.com/Docs/Deterrence/BaruchPlan.shtmlUnited Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs. (1968). Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. Retrieved from http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/t/nptUnited Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs. (1996). Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty. Retrieved from http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/t/ctbtUnited Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs. (2016). Nuclear Weapons. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/disarmament/wmd/nuclear/Wakamiya, Y. (2003). The End of Kamikaze Pacifism? Terror and Japan’s Peace Constitution, Project Syndicate. Retrieved from http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/wakamiya2/EnglishZarate, R. (2014). America’s Allies and Nuclear Arms: Assessing the Geopolitics of Nonproliferation in Asia. Project 2049 Institute, 1-9. Retrieved from http://www.project2049.net/documents/Zarate_America_Allies_and_Nuclear_Arms_Geopolitics_Nonproliferation 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)
104926017資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104926017 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 姜家雄 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Chiang, Alex en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 宋寶雅 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Sondova, Pavla en_US dc.creator (作者) 宋寶雅 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Sondova, Pavla en_US dc.date (日期) 2017 en_US dc.date.accessioned 24-Jul-2017 12:17:51 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 24-Jul-2017 12:17:51 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 24-Jul-2017 12:17:51 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0104926017 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/111382 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS) zh_TW dc.description (描述) 104926017 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 由於自身核能經驗的過去,日本在全球反核擴散體制中佔有特別的地位。日本是過去七十餘年來,全球唯一持有核武且也成為核攻擊目標的國家。鑑於此一事實,許多人認為日本的核武政策會是永遠強烈反對核擴散的。但若詳細觀察,有明顯的多重因素嚴重影響日本在核武方面的決策。新古典現實主義針對分析這些因素,提供了複雜的分析框架。外部和國內因素皆被考慮在內。這項研究分析日本核武決策的背景,顯示日本對於核武擴散的態度比起其因自身歷史經驗而受到期待的態度,更不直接。日本支持反擴散制度的動機並非被假定,且動機隨著區域安全環境和國內的政權更替以及民意改變而發展。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Japan’s position in the international nuclear non-proliferation system has always been very specific due to its own nuclear past. Japan has been the only state in more than seventy years of existence of nuclear weapons which was a target of the nuclear attack. Because of this fact, many thought that Japan’s nuclear weapons policy will always be strongly in favor of non-proliferation. After a closer look, it becomes obvious that there are multiple factors which have a serious impact on Japan’s nuclear weapons policy making. Neoclassical realism offers a complex analytical framework to analyze these factors. The external, as well as domestic factors, are taken into consideration. This work analyzes the background of Japan’s nuclear weapons policy making and reveals that Japan’s attitude towards nuclear weapons proliferation is much less straightforward than it would be expected from Japan’s historical experience. Japan’s motivation for support of the non-proliferation regime is not given and it develops in accordance with the security environment in the region as well as with domestic political changes and changes in public opinion. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 1.INTRODUCTION 11.1 PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH 41.1.1 Hypotheses 51.2 LITERATURE REVIEW 61.2.1 Neoclassical Realism 61.2.2 Nuclear Proliferation 91.2.3. Research on Japan’s nuclear weapons policy 101.3 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 141.4 METHODOLOGY 162.NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND PROLIFERATION 182.1 TECHNOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE NUCLEAR BOMB AND ITS EFFECTS 182.2 HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION 212.3 TREATY ON THE NON-PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS 233. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF JAPAN’S NUCLEAR WEAPONS POLICY 263.1 THE SECOND WORLD WAR 263.2 AMERICAN OCCUPATION AND NEW JAPANESE CONSTITUTION 263.3 THE THREE NON-NUCLEAR PRINCIPLES 283.4 JAPAN AND NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY 304. SECURITY ENVIRONMENT IN EAST ASIA 334.1 NORTH KOREA’S NUCLEAR TESTS 334.2 CHINA’S RISE 364.3 JAPAN’S TERRITORIAL DISPUTES 394.4 NUCLEAR UMBRELLA AND THE PROMISE OF NON-PROLIFERATION 404.4.1 The United States and Japan’s Nuclear Weapons Policy 435.JAPAN’S NUCLEAR WEAPONS: DISCUSSION RENEWED 455.1 JAPAN’S MATERIAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL CAPABILITY 455.2 THE ARTICLE 9 AND NUCLEAR WEAPONS 465.3 PARTY POLITICS AND LEADERSHIP MOTIVATION 475.4 DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC OPINION ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS 495.5 JAPAN’S POSSIBLE NUCLEAR FUTURE 526. CONCLUSION 54REFERENCES 57 zh_TW dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104926017 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 日本 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 核武 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 反擴散政策 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 新古典現實主義 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Japan en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Nuclear weapons en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Non-proliferation regime en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Neoclassical realism en_US dc.title (題名) 日本核武政策 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Japan’s nuclear weapons policy en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ReferencesBooksCampbell, M. K. & Sunohara, T. (2004). Japan: Thinking the Unthinkable. In: Campbell, M. K., Einhorn, J. R., & Reiss, B. M. (Eds.), The nuclear tipping point: why states reconsider their nuclear choices (218-253). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Brown, M. E., Lynn-Jones, S. M., & Miller, S. E. (Eds.). (1995). The Perils of Anarchy: Contemporary Realism and International Security. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Campbell, M. K. & Sunohara, T. (2004). Japan: thinking the unthinkable. In: Campbell, M. K., Einhorn, J. R., & Reiss, B. M. (Eds.), The Nuclear Tipping Point: Why States Reconsider Their Nuclear Choices (218-253). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Christensen, T. J. (1996). Useful Adversaries: Grand Strategy, Domestic Mobilization, and Sino-American Conflict, 1947-1958. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Cirincione, J. (2005). Deadly Arsenals: Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Threats. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Dreyer, J. T. (2012). Sino-Japanese Territorial and Maritime Disputes. In: Elleman, B., Kotkin, S., & Clive S. (Eds.), Beijing’s Power and China’s Neighbors: Twenty Neighbors in Asia (81-96). New York: Routledge.Drulák, P. (2003). Teorie mezinárodních vztahů. Praha: Portál.Fitzpatrick, M. (2016). Asia`s Latent Nuclear Powers: Japan, South Korea and Taiwan [Kindle DX version]. Retrieved from Amazon.comGilpin, R. (1981). War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Green, M. J. (2003). Japan’s Reluctant Realism, Palgrave: Macmillan.Green, M. J., & Furukawa, K. (2008). Japan: New Nuclear Realism. In Alagappa, M. (Ed), The Long Shadow: Nuclear Weapons and Security in 21st Century Asia (347-372). Standford: Standford University Press.Harrison, S. S. (1996). Japan and nuclear weapons. In Harrison, S. S. (Ed.), Japan’s Nuclear Future: The Plutonium Debate (3-44). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. Ikenberry, J. G. & Mastanduno, M. (Eds.). (2003). International Relations Theory and the Asia-Pacific. New York: Columbia University press.Kawashima, Y. (2003). Japanese Foreign Policy at the Crossroads: Challenges and Options for the Twenty-First Century. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Keohane, R. (1986). Realism, Neorealism and the Study of World Politics. In R. Keohane (Eds.), Neorealism and Its Critics (pp. 1-26). New York: Columbia University Press.Keohane, R. (1986). Theory of World Politics: Structural Realism and Beyond. In R. Keohane (Eds.), Neorealism and Its Critics (pp. 158-203). New York: Columbia University Press.Lobell, S. E., Ripsman, N. M., & Taliaferro, J. W. (2009). Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Makin, J. H. & Hellmann, D. C. (1989). Sharing World Leadership? A New Era for America & Japan. Washington D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.Maruyama, M. (1969). Thought and Behavior in Modern Japanese Politics, London: Oxford University Press.Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W. W. Norton.Nester, W. (1990). The Foundation of Japanese Power: Continuities, Changes, Challenges, New York: M.E. Sharpe.Oros, A. L. (2008). Normalizing Japan. Standford: Standford University Press.Pyle, K. J. (2007). Japan Rising: the Resurgence of Japanese Power and Purpose. A century foundation books, New York: Public Affairs.Rhodes, R. (1988). The Making of the Atomic Bomb. New York: Touchstone Book.Sagan, S. D. (2003). More Will Be Worse. In S. D. Sagan & K. N. Waltz (Eds.), The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate Renewed (47-91). New York: W. W. Norton.Samuels, R. J. (2007). Securing Japan. Tokyo’s Grand Strategy and the Future of East Asia. Ithaca and London: Cornell University press.Samuels, R. J., & Schoff, J. L. (2013). Japan’s Nuclear Hedge: Beyond" Allergy" and Breakout. In A. J. Tellis, A. M. Denmark, & T. Tanner (Eds.), Strategic Asia 2013-14: Asia in the Second Nuclear Age (pp. 233-266). Seattle: National Bureau of Asian Research.Schell, J. (2007). The Seventh Decade: The New Shape of Nuclear Danger. New York: Metropolitan Books.Schweller, R. L. (1998). Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler`s Strategy of World Conquest. New York: Columbia University Press.Schweller, R. L. (2003). The Progressiveness of Neoclassical Realism. In C. Elman, & M. F. Elaman (Eds.), Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field (pp. 311-347). Cambridge: MIT Press.Spykman, N. J. (1942). America’s Strategy in World Politics: The United States and the Balance of Power, New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Stockwin, J.A.A. (2003). Dictionary of Modern Politics of Japan, London: Routledge Curzon.Waltz, K. N. (2003). More May Be Better. In S. D. Sagan & K. N. Waltz (Eds.), The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate Renewed (pp. 3-45). New York: W. W. Norton. Waltz, N. K. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Wan, M. (2001). Japan between Asia and the West: Economic Power and Strategic Balance. New York: An East Gate Book.Wirtz, J. J. (2013). Weapons of Mass Destruction. In A. Collins (Ed.), Contemporary Security Studies (pp. 13-27). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Wohlforth, W. C. (1993). The elusive balance: power and perceptions during the Cold War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Zakaria, F. (1999). From wealth to power: The unusual origins of America`s world role. Princeton University Press. ArticlesArase, D. (2007). Japan, the Active State? Security Policy after 9/11. Asian Survey, 47(4), 560-583.Bisley, N. (2008). Securing the „Anchor of Regional Stability?” The Transformation of the US-Japan Alliance and East Asian Security. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 30(1), 73-98. Retrieved from http://muse.jhu.edu/login?uri=/journals/contemporary_southeast_asia_a_journal_of_international_and_strategic_affairs/v030/30.1.bisley.htmlBowen, R. W. (1992). Japan’s foreign policy. PS: Political Science and Politics, 25(1), 57-73.Brands Jr., H. W. (1986). The United States and the reemergence of independent Japan. Pacific Affairs, 59(3), 387-401.Choi, W. (2003). Persistence and change in Japan-China relationship. Journal of International and Area Studies, 10(1), 75-92.Deng, Y. (1997). Chinese relations with Japan: implications for Asia-Pacific regionalism. Pacific Affairs, 70(3), 373-391.Fouse, D. (2004). Japan’s post-Cold War North Korea policy: hedging towards autonomy? Asia Pacific Center for Security Studies, 1-14.Furukawa, K. (2010). Japan`s policy and views on nuclear weapon: a historical perspective2. Jebat: Malaysian Journal of History, Politics and Strategic Studies, 37, 1-30. Retrieved from http://journalarticle.ukm.my/341/1/1.pdfGlaser, C. L. (2013). Realism. In A. Collins (Eds.), Contemporary Security Studies (13-27). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Goldstein, L. J. (2003). When China was a “rogue state”: the impact of China’s nuclear weapons program on US-China relations during the 1960s. Journal of Contemporary China, 12(37), 739-764. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10670560320001177Gray, R. (1999). Nuclear Weapons Proliferation. In C. A. Snyder (Eds.), Contemporary Security and Strategy (171-193). New York: Routledge.Hagstrom, L. (2005). Relational power for foreign policy analysis: Issues in Japan’s China policy. European journal for international relations, 395-431.Hara, K. (2001). 50 Years from San Francisco: Re-Examining the Peace Treaty and Japan’s Territorial Problems. Pacific Affairs, 74(3), 361-382.Hirata, K. (2008) Who Shapes the National Security Debate? Divergent Interpretations of Japan’s Security Role. Asian Affairs: Heldref Publications, 123-151.Hoey, F. (2016). Japan and extended nuclear deterrence: security and non-proliferation. Journal of Strategic Studies, 39(4), 484-501. DOI:10.1080/01402390.2016.1168010Hughes, C. W. (2009) Japan’s response to China’s rise: regional engagement, global containment, dangers of collision, International Affairs, 85(4), 840-841. Retrieved from http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/people/hughes/researchandpublications/articles/japan_responds_to_china_rise_international_affairs_hughes.pdfHughes, C. W. (2009). "Super-Sizing" the DPRK Threat: Japan`s Evolving Military Posture and North Korea. Asian Survey, 49(2), 291-292. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/as.2009.49.2.291Hughes, L. (2007). Why Japan Will Not Go Nuclear (Yet): International and Domestic Constraints on the Nuclearization of Japan. International Security, 31(4), 67-96. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4137566Katahara, E. (1997). Japan`s Plutonium Policy: Consequences for Nonproliferation. The Nonproliferation Review, 5(1), 53-61. Retrieved from https://www.nonproliferation.org/wp-content/uploads/npr/kataha51.pdfKazi, R. (2010). Japan`s Nuclear Policy at Crossroads. Strategic Analysis, 34(3), 436-450. doi: 10.1080/09700161003661042Kitamura, M. (1996). Japan`s Plutonium Program: A Proliferation Threat? The Nonproliferation Review, 3(2), 1-16. Retrieved from https://www.nonproliferation.org/wp-content/uploads/npr/kitamu32.pdfKristensen, H. H., & Norris, R. S. (2013). Global nuclear weapons inventories, 1945-2013. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 65(5), 75-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00963402135013Kristensen, H. M. & Norris, R. S. (2016). Chinese nuclear forces, 2016. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 74(2), 205-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2016.11940Kurosawa, M. (2004b). Moving Beyond the Debate on a Nuclear Japan. The Nonproliferation Review, 11(3), 110-137. doi: 10.1080/10736700408436981Langdon, F. (1985). Security Debate in Japan. Pacific Affairs, 58(3), 397-410.Lavoy, P. R. (2006). Nuclear Proliferation Over the Next Decade: Causes, Warning Signs, and Policy Responses. Nonproliferation Review 13(3), 433-454. Retrieved from http://calhoun.nps.edu/bitstream/handle/10945/25427/NUCLEAR_PROLIFERATION_OVER_THE_NEXT_DECADE_Causes,_Warning_Signs,_and_Policy_Responses.pdf?sequence=1Levite, A. E. (2006). Never Say Never Again: Nuclear Reversal Revisited. International Security, 27(3), 59-88. doi:10.1162/01622880260553633Machida, S. (2014). Who Supports Nuclear Armament in Japan? Threat Perceptions and Japan`s Nuclear Armament. Asian Journal of Political Science, 22(2), 128-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2014.913492Mayer, J. D. (1996). International Relations Theory and Japanese Pacifism: Why Didn’t Tokyo Go Ballistic over Korean Nukes? Journal of northeast Asian studies, 50-62. Mochizuki, M. M. (2007). Japan Tests the Nuclear Taboo. Nonproliferation Review, 14(2), 303-328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10736700701379393Mueller, J. (1988). The Essential Irrelevance of Nuclear Weapons: Stability in the Postwar World. International Security, 13(2), 55-79.Pollack, J. D. (1972). Chinese Attitudes towards Nuclear Weapons, 1964-9. The China Quarterly, 50(1), 244-271. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/65190Purrington, C. (1992). Tokyo’s policy responses during the Gulf War and the impact of the “Iraqi shock” on Japan. Pacific affairs, Vol. 65(2), 161-181.Reed, S. R. & Scheiner, E. (2003). Electoral Incentives and Policy Preferences: Mixed Motives behind Party Defections in Japan. British Journal of Political Science, 33(3), 469-490.Rix, A. (1989-1990). Japan`s Foreign Aid Policy: A Capacity for Leadership? Pacific Affairs, 62(4), 461-475.Rose, G. (1998). Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy. World politics, 51(01), 144-172. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25054068Sagan, S. D. (1997). Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons? Three Models in Search of a Bomb. International Security 21(3): 54-86. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539273 Sagan, S. D. (2011). The Causes of Nuclear Weapons Proliferation. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 225-244. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-052209-131042Schweller, R. L. (2004). Unanswered Threats: A Neoclassical Realist Theory of Underbalancing. International security, 29(2), 159-201. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4137589Seth, S. P. (1994). Japan’s Constitutional Debate. Economic and Political Weekly, 904c.Taliaferro, J. W. (2000). Security Seeking under Anarchy: Defensive Realism Revisited. International Security, 25(3), 128-161. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/262670Waltz K. N. (2000). Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security, 25(1), 5-41. Retrieved from http://www.columbia.edu/itc/sipa/U6800/readings-sm/Waltz_Structural%20Realism.pdfYoda, T. (2006). Japan`s Host Nation Support Program for the U.S.-Japan Security Alliance: Past and Prospects. Asian Survey, 46(6).WebsitesAoki M., & Yoshida R. (2015, September 19). Diet Enacts Security Laws, Marking Japan’s Departure from Pacifism. The Japan Times. Retrieved from http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2015/09/19/national/politics-diplomacy/diet-enacts-security-laws-marking-japans-departure-from-pacifism-2/#.WOYm6KKkI2xArms Control Association. (2017, January). Nuclear Weapons: Who Has What at a Glance. Retrieved from https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/NuclearweaponswhohaswhatAtomic Archive. (n.d.). The Effects of Nuclear Weapons. Retrieved from http://www.atomicarchive.com/Effects/index.shtmlAtomic Energy Basic Act. (1955). Retrieved from http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=2233&vm=&re=02&new=1Bakanic, E. D. (2008). The end of Japan’s nuclear taboo. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist. Retrieved from http://www.thebulletin.org/web-edition/features/the-end-of-japans-nuclear-tabooBarnaby, F. & Burnie, S. (2005). Thinking the Unthinkable – Japanese nuclear power and proliferation in East Asia. Oxford Research Group a Citizens’ Nuclear Information Center. Retrieved from http://www.nautilus.org/napsnet/sr/2005/0573Barnaby_Burnia.pdfBBC. (2013). Japan government `reaches deal to buy` disputed islands. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-19485565Center of Non-Proliferation Studies. (2010). NPT Briefing Book. Available from:http://www.nonproliferation.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/npt_briefing_book_full-version.pdfChanlett-Avery, E. & Nikitin, M. B. (2008). CRS Report for Congress - Japan’s Nuclear Future: Policy Debate, Prospect and U.S. Interests. Congressional Research Service. Retrieved from http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/nuke/RL34487.pdfEisenhower, D. D. (1953). Atoms for Peace. Retrieved from http://www.atomicarchive.com/Docs/Deterrence/Atomsforpeace.shtmlEndo, T. (2007). How Realistic Is a Nuclear-Armed Japan? Policy Forum Online 07-063A. Retrieved from http://www.nautilus.org/fora/security/07063Endo.html#sect2Federation of American Scientists. (n. d.) Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty [NPT] – Backgroud. Retrieved from https://fas.org/nuke/control/npt/back.htmFederation of America Scientists. (2012). Nuclear Weapons Program. Retrieved from https://fas.org/nuke/guide/japan/nuke/index.htmlGallup Japan Poll on the Ownership of Nuclear Weapons and the Threat of Nuclear War. [Gallup]. (1999). Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/4456/gallup-japan-poll-ownership-nuclear-weapons-threat.aspxInternational Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons. (2016). Nuclear Weapons Timeline. Retrieved from http://www.icanw.org/the-facts/the-nuclear-age/Japan: Signature of Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) (1970). Retrieved from http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/npt/japan/sig/londonKristensen, H. M. (1999). Japan Under the US Nuclear Umbrella. Global Problem Solving nuke policy Supporting Documents. Retrieved from http://www.nautilus.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Japan-Under-the-US-Nuclear-Umbrella.pdfKurusawa, M. (2004a). East Asian Regional Security and Arguments for a Nuclear Japan. In Workshop" Prospects for East Asian Disarmament," Hiroshima Peace Institute, Hiroshima, Japan. 1-18. Maeda, H. (2004). Nuclear Energy in Japan – Current Status and Future. Japan Atomic Energy. Retrieved from http://www.aec.go.jp/jicst/NC/iinkai/teirei/siryo2004/kettei/speech040627.pdfMedeiros, E. (2003). Theater Missile Defense and Northeast Asian Security. Monterey: Center for Nonproliferation Studies. Retrieved from http://www.nti.org/e_research/e3_3a.htmlMiller, J.B. (2011). The Knotty Kuril Island Problem. Retrieved from http://www.asiasentinel.com/politics/the-knotty-kuril-island-problem/Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (1967). Three Non-Nuclear Principles. Retrieved from http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/un/disarmament/nnp/index.htmlNihonkoku Kenpō [Kenpō] [Constitution], art. 9 (1946).Nuclear weapon. (n.d.) In Encyclopædia Britannica online. Retrieved from https://global.britannica.com/technology/nuclear-weaponRafferty, K. (2016). Will Trump’s foreign policy push Japan to go nuclear? The Japan Times. Retrieved from http://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2016/12/25/commentary/japan-commentary/will-trumps-foreign-policy-push-japan-go-nuclear/#.WVsokoiLQ2wRoberts, B. (2013). Extended Deterrence and Strategic Stability in Northeast Asia. NIDS Visiting Scholar Paper Series, 1. Retrieved from http://www.nids.mod.go.jp/english/publication/visiting/pdf/01.pdfSahashi, R. (2010). New Thinking about Foreign Policy Strategy in Japan; East Asian Forum. Retrieved from http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2010/01/27/new-thinking-about-foreign-policy-strategy-in-japan/Schwarz, B. (2005). Japan moves to revise “peace constitution”; American Thinker. Retrieved from http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2005/10/japan_moves_to_revise_peace_co.htmlThe Maureen and Mike Mansfield Foundation. (2006). Yomiuri Shimbun Novemeber Opinion Polls. Retrieved from http://mansfieldfdn.org/program/research-education-and-communication/asian-opinion-poll-database/november-yomiuri-shimbun-opinion-poll-06-18/The State Council Information Office. (2010). China’s National Defense in 2010. Available from: http://eng.mod.gov.cn/Database/WhitePapers/2010.htmThe World Bank. (2016). Military expenditure (% of GDP). Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/MS.MIL.XPND.GD.ZS?end=2015&start=1989&view=chartToki, M. (2005). Sixty Years After the Nuclear Devastation, Japan`s Role in the NPT. Monterey: Center for Nonproliferation Studies. Retrieved from http://www.nti.org/e_research/e3_73.htmlUnited Nations. (2010). Ireland. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/conf/npt/2010/statements/pdf/ireland_en.pdfUnited Nations Atomic Energy Commission. (1946). The Baruch Plan. Available from: http://www.atomicarchive.com/Docs/Deterrence/BaruchPlan.shtmlUnited Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs. (1968). Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. Retrieved from http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/t/nptUnited Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs. (1996). Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty. Retrieved from http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/t/ctbtUnited Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs. (2016). Nuclear Weapons. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/disarmament/wmd/nuclear/Wakamiya, Y. (2003). The End of Kamikaze Pacifism? Terror and Japan’s Peace Constitution, Project Syndicate. Retrieved from http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/wakamiya2/EnglishZarate, R. (2014). America’s Allies and Nuclear Arms: Assessing the Geopolitics of Nonproliferation in Asia. Project 2049 Institute, 1-9. Retrieved from http://www.project2049.net/documents/Zarate_America_Allies_and_Nuclear_Arms_Geopolitics_Nonproliferation zh_TW