Publications-學位論文
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
Google ScholarTM
NCCU Library
Citation Infomation
Related Publications in TAIR
題名 遲來正義不是正義？台韓轉型正義方法的比較
Justice delayed or justice denied? a comparison of transitional justice approaches in Taiwan and South Korea作者 歐嘉仁
Olivier, Jeremy貢獻者 魏玫娟
Wei, Mei-Chuan
歐嘉仁
Jeremy Olivier關鍵詞 台灣
南韓
轉型正義
民主化
真相委員會
Taiwan
South Korea
Transitional justice
Democratization
Truth commission日期 2017 上傳時間 31-Jul-2017 11:25:19 (UTC+8) 摘要 由於台灣與南韓近期的政權與溝通的更迭，兩國國內的政治焦點\n又再次轉向正義，尤其是針對在獨裁政權統治下，受到迫害的人民而\n言的歷史正義。雖然台灣與南韓在二十世紀時，都經歷了相似的政治\n進程，但兩國在處理政治轉型前的人權迫害問題，即所謂的轉型正義\n的方法卻不盡相同。在南韓，轉型後的政府開始推行一系列的政策，\n包括成立真相委員會、審判兩名前任總統、為國家暴力的受害者建立\n多重補償法案。相對的，台灣政府的作法則較為零碎，使用相對消極\n的方法尋找真相、提供戒嚴時期的受害者賠償、目前則處理長久以來\n具有爭議性的國民黨黨產問題。本論文將檢視此兩個東亞「第三波」\n民主國家，在處理轉型正義的問題上（亦即尋求真相與責任歸屬）為\n何會採用兩種徹底不同的解決之道，並對不同解決方式背後的環境、\n歷史、制度下的原因提出疑問；接著探討南韓政府這看似合理的做法\n為何僅是紙上談兵，究竟有何欠缺。針對兩國的轉型正義議題，本論\n文試著提出一項溫和的轉型正義推動政策，以滿足受害者對於真相、\n對於平復的渴望，以促進兩國內部對立團體的和解。 參考文獻 Baik, T.U. (2012). Fairness in transitional justice narratives: the case of South Korea.\nBuffalo Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 19, pp. 169-191.\n\nBaron, J. (2015, July). Book review: Turning devils into men. Taipei Times. Retrieved at\nhttp://www.taipeitimes.com/News/feat/archives/2015/07/09/2003622592/2\n\nChang, Y.H. (2009). Qianyan. In Chang, Y.H. & Chen, M.J. (Eds.), Jieyan shiqi baise kongbu yu zhuanxing zhengyi lunwenji (pp. 2-13). Taipei City, Taiwan: Wu Sanlien\nFoundation.\n\nChao, L. & Myers, R.L. (2000). How elections promoted democracy in Taiwan under martial law. The China Quarterly, Special Issue: Elections and Democracy in\nGreater China 162, pp. 387-409.\n\nChiu, H. (1993). Constitutional development and reform in the Republic of China on Taiwan (with documents). Occasional Papers/Reprint Series in Contemporary\nAsian Studies, No. 2(115), pp. 1-61.\n\nChiu, Y.L. (2017, March). DPP to push transitional justice act. Taipei Times. Retrieved\nfrom http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2017/04/04/2003668039\n\nCheng, T.J. (1989). Democratizing the quasi-Leninist regime in Taiwan. World Politics, 41(4), pp. 471-499.\nCho, K. (2007). Transitional justice in Korea: legally coping with past wrongs after democratization. Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal Association, 16(3), pp. 579-610.\n\nChoi, J. (2017, April). The victim cosplay of a former dictator. Korea Exposé. Retrieved from https://koreaexpose.com/south-korea-former-dictator-victim-cosplay/\n\nCole, J.M. (2015, July). Taiwanese students occupy ministry over textbook controversy. The Diplomat. Retrieved from http://thediplomat.com/2015/07/taiwanesestudents-occupy-education-ministry-over-textbook-controversy/\n\nThe Constitution of the Republic of China and the Additional Articles, English Version. Retrieved from\nhttp://www.ey.gov.tw/pda_en/Upload/WebArchive/4697/Constitution.pdf\n\nDancy, G., Marchesi, B., Olsen T., Payne, L., Reiter, A., & Sikkink, K. (2013, August). Stopping state agents of violence or promoting political compromise? The\npowerful role of transitional justice mechanisms. Paper presented at the 2013 American Political Science Association Conference Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.\n\nDe Greiff, P. (2012). Theorizing transitional justice. In Williams, M.S., Nagy, R., & Elster, J. (Eds.), Transitional Justice (pp. 31-77). New York, NY: New York\nUniversity Press.\n\nDenney, S. (2015, August). Taiwan’s collective memory of Japan: Around the horn. Sino-NK. Retrieved from http://sinonk.com/2015/08/31/collective-memory-ofjapan-in-taiwan/\n\nDickson, B.J. (1993). The lessons of defeat: the reorganization of the Kuomintang on Taiwan, 1950-1952. The China Quarterly, No, 133, pp. 56-84.\n\nExecutive Yuan. (2016, August). Press Releases: Executive Yuan launches committee to settle ill-gotten party assets. Retrieved from http://english.ey.gov.tw/News_Content2.aspx?n=8262ED7A25916ABF&sms=D\nD07AA2ECD4290A6&s=ECFDB4C0B28C2559\n\nGerber, A. (2017, June). Aboriginal protest site on Ketagalan Blvd cleared. Taipei Times. Retrieved from\nhttp://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2017/06/03/2003671820\n\nGibson, J.L. (2004). Does truth lead to reconciliation? Testing the causal assumptions of the South African truth and reconciliation process. American Journal of Political\nScience, 48(2), pp. 201-217.\n\nGreitens, S.C. (2016). Dictators and their secret police: coercive institutions and state violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\n\nHan, I.S. (2005). Kwangju and beyond: coping with past state atrocities in South Korea. Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 27, pp. 998-1045.\n\nHanley, P. (2014). Transitional justice in South Korea: One country’s search for truth and reconciliation. University of Pennsylvania East Asia Law Review, Vol. 9, pp. 138-166.\n\nHayner, P. (2011). Unspeakable truths: transitional justice and the challenge of truth commissions (second edition). New York, NY: Routledge.\n\nHuntingdon, S. P. (1991). The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.\n\nHwang, J.Y. (2016). Transitional justice in postwar Taiwan. In Schubert, G. (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Modern Taiwan (pp. 169-183). New York, NY: Routledge.\nIll-gotten Party Assets Settlement Committee. (2016). Zuzhi jieshao. Retrieved from http://www.cipas.gov.tw/organize.action\n\nJacobs, J.B. (2005). “Taiwanization” in Taiwan politics. In Makeham, J. & Hsiau, A.C. (Eds.), Cultural, Ethnic, and Political Nationalism in Contemporary Taiwan: Bentuhua (pp. 17-55). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.\n\nJacobs, J.B. (2007). Taiwan and South Korea: comparing East Asia’s two “third wave” democracies. Issues and Studies, 43(4), pp. 227-260.\n\nJacobs, J.B. (2012). Democratizing Taiwan. Boston, MA: Brill Publishers.\n\nJudicial Yuan Interpretation No. 272 (January 1991). Retrieved from\nhttp://www.judicial.gov.tw/constitutionalcourt/EN/p03_01.asp?expno=272\n\nJung, K.S. (2015). Hanguo de minzhuhua, zhuanxing zhengyi yu guoqu qingsuan. Bulletin of Taiwan Historical Research NTNU, No. 8, pp. 3-26.\n\nKim, D.C. (2012). Korea’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission: An overview and assessment. Buffalo Human Rights Law Review, 19(2), pp. 1-25.\n\nKim, H.J. (2013). What is transitional justice and why is it relevant to South Korea? SSK Human Rights Brief, 1(4), pp. 28-34.\n\nKim, H.J. (2013, December). Truth Commissions in South Korea: Lessons Learned. Middle East Institute. Retrieved from: http://www.mei.edu/content/truthcommissions-south-korea-lessons-learned\n\nKim, J.C. (2016). On forgiveness and reconciliation: Korean “collaborators” of Japanese colonialism. In Kim, M. (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Memory and Reconciliation in East Asia (pp. 159-171). New York, NY: Routledge.\n\nKim, H.M., Choi, J.Y., and Cho, J. (2006, July). Changing cleavage structure in new democratic Korea: an empirical analysis of regionalism in Korea. Paper presented\nat the World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Fukuoka, Japan. \n\nKim, S. (1997). State and civil society in South Korea’s democratic consolidation: is the battle really over? Asian Survey, 37(12), pp. 1135-1144.\n\nKim, T.J. (2007, August). State to confiscate land of pro-Japanese collaborators. The Korea Times. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20070927191442/http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/\nnews/nation/nation_view.asp?newsIdx=8259&categoryCode=117\n\nKo, S.L. (2002, September). Cabinet hails passing of political party law bills. Taipei Times. Retrieved from\nhttp://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2002/09/12/0000167725\n\nKritz, N.J. (1996). Accountability for international crimes and serious violations of human rights: coming to terms with atrocities: a review of accountability\nmechanisms for mass violations of human rights. Law and Contemporary Problems, 59(4), pp. 127-152.\n\nKushner, B. (2015). Men to devils, devils to men: Japanese war crimes and Chinese justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.\n\nLai, T.H. (1994). Ererba shijian yanjiu baogao (Research Report on the 2-28 Incident). Taipei, Taiwan: Shibao Chubanshe.\n\nLee, J. (2002). Primary causes of Asian democratization: dispelling conventional myths. Asian Survey, 42(6), pp. 821-837.\n\nLee, Y. (2005). Law, politics, and impeachment: the impeachment of Roh Moo-hyun from a comparative perspective. The American Journal of Comparative Law,\n53(2), pp. 403-432.\n\nLi, F.C. (2008). Weiquan tizhi xia de guomindang dangying qiye. Guoshiguan Xueshu Jikan, No. 18, pp. 189-220.\n\nLin, C.L. (2007). Transition without justice: on challenges of KMT’s party asset for consolidating democracy in Taiwan. Paper presented at the International\nConference on the Comparative Studies of Transitional Justice, Taipei Taiwan.\n\nMatsumoto, M. (2002). Political democratization and KMT party-owned enterprises in Taiwan. The Developing Economies, XL-3, pp. 359-380.\n\nMemorial Foundation of 228. (2006). Research report on responsibility for the 228 Massacre: a brief introduction. Retrieved from\nhttp://www.228.org.tw/ResponsibilityReport/eng/\n\nMendeloff, D. (2004). Truth-seeking, truth-telling, and postconflict: curb the enthusiasm? International Studies Review, 6(3), pp. 355-380.\n\nMendez, J. E. (1997). Accountability for past abuses. Human Rights Quarterly, 19(2), pp. 255-282\n\nMosler, H.B. (2015). The deterioration of South Korean democracy. In Howe, B. (Ed.), Democratic governance in Northeast Asia: A human-centered approach to evaluating democracy (pp. 1-24). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.\n\nNational Security Act, English Version. Retrieved from\nhttp://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=A0030028\n\nOlsen, T. D., Payne, L.A., & Reiter, A.G. (2010). The justice balance: when transitional justice improves human rights and democracy. Human Rights Quarterly, 32(4),\npp. 980-1007.\n\nOrentlicher, D. Settling accounts: the duty to prosecute human rights violations of a prior regime. The Yale Law Journal, 100(8), pp. 2537-2615.\n\nPan, J. & Hsiao, A. (2016, November). Court rules against KMT account freeze. Taipei Times. Retrieved from\nhttp://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2016/11/05/2003658598\n\nPayne, L.A., Olsen, T.D., & Reiter, A.G. (2008, March). Does transitional justice work? Paper presented at the 49th International Studies Association Convention, San\nFrancisco, CA.\n\nPeté, S. & du Plessis, M. (2007). Reparations for gross violations of human rights in context. In du Plessis, M & Peté, S. (Eds.), Repairing the past? International\nperspective on reparations for gross human rights abuses (pp. 3-28). Antwerp, Belgium: Intersentia.\n\nPhilpott, D. (2012). Just and unjust peace: an ethic of political reconciliation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.\n\nRhee, W.Y. (2016, December). The role of the constitution and the constitutional adjudication in the process of democratization and the implementation of\ntransitional justice in the Republic of Korea. Paper presented at Constitutionalizing Transitional Justice: International Symposium on Post-Atrocity Constitution-making and Constitutional Courts, Taipei, Taiwan.\n\nRobinson, M.E. (2007). Korea’s twentieth century odyssey: a short history. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.\n\nRoehrig, T. (2001). The prosecution of former military leaders in newly democratic nations: the cases of Argentina, Greece, and South Korea. Jefferson, NC:\nMcFarland and Company.\n\nRoy, D. (2003). Taiwan: a political history. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.\n\nSchafferer, C. (2010). Consolidation of democracy and historical legacies: a case study of Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 9(1), pp. 23-41.\n\nShih, C.F. & Chen, M. (2010). Taiwanese identity and the memories of 2-28: A case for political reconciliation. Asian Perspective, 34(4), pp. 85-113.\n\nShih, F.L. (2014). Transition to democracy at the expense of justice: the 2-28 Incident and the White Terror in Taiwan. Middle East Institute, March 4, 2014. Retrieved\nfrom http://www.mei.edu/content/transition-democracy-expense-justice-2-28-incident-and-white-terror-taiwan\n\nShih, H.C. (2006). DPP to submit petition for referendum on KMT assets. Taipei Times. Retrieved from\nhttp://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2006/08/23/2003324449\n\nSlater, D. & Wong, J. (2013). The Strength to concede: ruling parties and democratization in development Asia. Perspectives on Politics, 11(3), pp. 717-733\n\nSnyder, J. & Vinjamuri, L. (2003). Trials and errors: principle and pragmatism in strategies of international justice. International Security, 28(3), pp. 5-44.\n\nSu, S.X. Ping Hou Kunhong “Yanjiu ererba.” Taiwan Historica Bulletin, No. 38, p. 119-126.\n\nTaiwan chengwei zhenzheng minzhu guojia de zuihou yi li lu. (2016, March). Business Today. Retrieved from http://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article-content-80392-\n台灣成爲真正民主國家最後的一哩路\n\nTeitel, R. (2000). Transitional Justice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.\n\nTeitel, R. (2003). Transitional Justice Genealogy. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 13(69), pp. 69-94.\n\nTien, H.M. (1992). Transformation of an authoritarian party state: Taiwan’s development experience. In Cheng, T.J. & Haggard, S. (Eds.), Political change in Taiwan (pp. 33-55). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.\n\nTruth and Reconciliation Commission, Republic of Korea (2009). Truth and Reconciliation: Activities of the Past Three Years (TRCK Report, English Translation). Retrieved from: http://www.dhnet.org.br/verdade/mundo/coreia/cv_11_coreia_do_sul.pdf\n\nWachman, A. (1994). Taiwan: national identity and democratization. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.\n\nWang, F. (1994). The political economy of authoritarian clientelism in Taiwan. In Roniger, L. & Gunes-Ayata, A. (Eds.) Democracy, clientelism, and civil society\n(pp. 181-206). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.\n\nWaters, D.M. (1996). Korean constitutionalism and the “Special Act” to prosecute former presidents Chun Doo-hwan and Roh Tae-woo. Columbia Journal of Asian Law,\n10(2), pp. 461-488.\n\nWest, J.M. (1997). Martial lawlessness: the legal aftermath of Kwangju. Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal, 6(1), pp. 85-168.\n\nWest, J.M. & Yoon, D.K. (1992). The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Korea: Transforming the Jurisprudence of the Vortex? The American Journal of Comparative Law, 40(1), pp. 73-119.\n\nWolman, A. Looking back while moving forward: the evolution of truth commissions in Korea. Asia-Pacific Law and Policy Journal, 14(3), pp. 27-56.\n\nWuDunn, S. (1995, December). Ex-president of South Korea goes on trial on bribery charges. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/1995/12/18/world/ex-president-of-south-korea-goes-ontrial-on-bribery-charges.html\n\nWu, N.T. (2005). Transition without justice, or justice without history: transitional justice in Taiwan. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 1(1), pp.77-102.\n\nYang, C.H. (2016, July). Ill-gotten Assets Act: Reporter’s Notebook: Assets mission completed after long haul. Taipei Times. Retrieved from\nhttp://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2016/07/27/2003651888\n\nYeh, H. (2017). Cong guoqu de zhiniu diyin dao jinri de zhu xuanlu – guanyu Taiwan zhuanxing zhengyi lunshu de zexie. 21st Century Magazine, No. 159, pp. 24-38.\n\nZhu, L.X. (2016, May). Cong hanguo de “guoqu qingsuan” dao Taiwan de zhuanxing zhengyi. Rick Chu’s Perspectives on Korea and Media. Retrieved from\nhttp://www.rickchu.net/detail.php?rc_id=1708&rc_stid=1 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)
104926030資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104926030 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 魏玫娟 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Wei, Mei-Chuan en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 歐嘉仁 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Jeremy Olivier en_US dc.creator (作者) 歐嘉仁 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Olivier, Jeremy en_US dc.date (日期) 2017 en_US dc.date.accessioned 31-Jul-2017 11:25:19 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 31-Jul-2017 11:25:19 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 31-Jul-2017 11:25:19 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0104926030 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/item?item_id=128408 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS) zh_TW dc.description (描述) 104926030 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 由於台灣與南韓近期的政權與溝通的更迭，兩國國內的政治焦點\n又再次轉向正義，尤其是針對在獨裁政權統治下，受到迫害的人民而\n言的歷史正義。雖然台灣與南韓在二十世紀時，都經歷了相似的政治\n進程，但兩國在處理政治轉型前的人權迫害問題，即所謂的轉型正義\n的方法卻不盡相同。在南韓，轉型後的政府開始推行一系列的政策，\n包括成立真相委員會、審判兩名前任總統、為國家暴力的受害者建立\n多重補償法案。相對的，台灣政府的作法則較為零碎，使用相對消極\n的方法尋找真相、提供戒嚴時期的受害者賠償、目前則處理長久以來\n具有爭議性的國民黨黨產問題。本論文將檢視此兩個東亞「第三波」\n民主國家，在處理轉型正義的問題上（亦即尋求真相與責任歸屬）為\n何會採用兩種徹底不同的解決之道，並對不同解決方式背後的環境、\n歷史、制度下的原因提出疑問；接著探討南韓政府這看似合理的做法\n為何僅是紙上談兵，究竟有何欠缺。針對兩國的轉型正義議題，本論\n文試著提出一項溫和的轉型正義推動政策，以滿足受害者對於真相、\n對於平復的渴望，以促進兩國內部對立團體的和解。 zh_TW dc.description.tableofcontents Chapter 1 – Introduction 1\n1.1 Research Background 1\n1.2 Research Purpose and Questions 6\n1.3 Research Method 7\n1.4 Limitations 7\n1.5 Organization of the Thesis 8\nChapter Two – Literature Review and Theoretical Framework 9\n2.1 Literature Review 9\n2.1.1 Theories of transitional justice 9\n2.1.2 Transitional Justice Mechanisms 10\n2.2 Theoretical Perspectives 14\nChapter 3 – Truth-finding and Criminal Accountability in Taiwan and South Korea 16\n3.1 Korea’s Search for Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation 16\n3.1.1 The Presidential Commission on Suspicious Deaths (2000-2004) 17\n3.1.2 The Commission on the Confiscation of Properties of Pro-Japanese\nCollaborators (2005-2010) 19\n3.1.3 The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Korea (TRCK) (2005-2010) 21\n3.2 Taiwan’s Official Attempts at Truth-Finding 23\n3.2.1 Research Report on the 228 Incident (Ererba shijian yanjiu baogao, 二二八事\n件研究報告) (1992) 25\n3.2.2 Research Report on Responsibility for the 228 Massacre (Ererba shijian zeren\nguishu yanjiu baogao, 二二八事件責任歸屬研究報告) (2006) 26\n3.2.3 Settling Party Assets under Chen Shui-bian and Tsai Ing-wen 28\n3.2.4 Postwar Justice under the KMT 31\n3.3 Criminal Accountability and Punishment 32\n3.3.1 South Korea – Criminal Trials, Subsequent Amnesty 32\n3.3.2 Taiwan – A Total Lack of Accountability? 36\nChapter 4 – What Lies Behind the Different Approaches 39\n4.1 Key Contributing Factors 39\n4.1.1 The KMT’s Continued Grip on Power 40\n4.1.2 South Korea’s Liberal Presidents 43\n4.1.3 Disparate Cleavage Structures 47\n4.1.4 The Constitutional Courts 51\n4.1.5 A Matter of Time 53\n4.2 What Was Missing? 58\nChapter 5 – Conclusion 63\nReferences 71\nAppendix 79 zh_TW dc.format.extent 1384028 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104926030 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 台灣 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 南韓 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 轉型正義 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 民主化 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 真相委員會 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Taiwan en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) South Korea en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Transitional justice en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Democratization en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Truth commission en_US dc.title (題名) 遲來正義不是正義？台韓轉型正義方法的比較 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Justice delayed or justice denied? a comparison of transitional justice approaches in Taiwan and South Korea en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baik, T.U. (2012). Fairness in transitional justice narratives: the case of South Korea.\nBuffalo Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 19, pp. 169-191.\n\nBaron, J. (2015, July). Book review: Turning devils into men. Taipei Times. Retrieved at\nhttp://www.taipeitimes.com/News/feat/archives/2015/07/09/2003622592/2\n\nChang, Y.H. (2009). Qianyan. In Chang, Y.H. & Chen, M.J. (Eds.), Jieyan shiqi baise kongbu yu zhuanxing zhengyi lunwenji (pp. 2-13). Taipei City, Taiwan: Wu Sanlien\nFoundation.\n\nChao, L. & Myers, R.L. (2000). How elections promoted democracy in Taiwan under martial law. The China Quarterly, Special Issue: Elections and Democracy in\nGreater China 162, pp. 387-409.\n\nChiu, H. (1993). Constitutional development and reform in the Republic of China on Taiwan (with documents). Occasional Papers/Reprint Series in Contemporary\nAsian Studies, No. 2(115), pp. 1-61.\n\nChiu, Y.L. (2017, March). DPP to push transitional justice act. Taipei Times. Retrieved\nfrom http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2017/04/04/2003668039\n\nCheng, T.J. (1989). Democratizing the quasi-Leninist regime in Taiwan. World Politics, 41(4), pp. 471-499.\nCho, K. (2007). Transitional justice in Korea: legally coping with past wrongs after democratization. Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal Association, 16(3), pp. 579-610.\n\nChoi, J. (2017, April). The victim cosplay of a former dictator. Korea Exposé. Retrieved from https://koreaexpose.com/south-korea-former-dictator-victim-cosplay/\n\nCole, J.M. (2015, July). Taiwanese students occupy ministry over textbook controversy. The Diplomat. Retrieved from http://thediplomat.com/2015/07/taiwanesestudents-occupy-education-ministry-over-textbook-controversy/\n\nThe Constitution of the Republic of China and the Additional Articles, English Version. Retrieved from\nhttp://www.ey.gov.tw/pda_en/Upload/WebArchive/4697/Constitution.pdf\n\nDancy, G., Marchesi, B., Olsen T., Payne, L., Reiter, A., & Sikkink, K. (2013, August). Stopping state agents of violence or promoting political compromise? The\npowerful role of transitional justice mechanisms. Paper presented at the 2013 American Political Science Association Conference Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.\n\nDe Greiff, P. (2012). Theorizing transitional justice. In Williams, M.S., Nagy, R., & Elster, J. (Eds.), Transitional Justice (pp. 31-77). New York, NY: New York\nUniversity Press.\n\nDenney, S. (2015, August). Taiwan’s collective memory of Japan: Around the horn. Sino-NK. Retrieved from http://sinonk.com/2015/08/31/collective-memory-ofjapan-in-taiwan/\n\nDickson, B.J. (1993). The lessons of defeat: the reorganization of the Kuomintang on Taiwan, 1950-1952. The China Quarterly, No, 133, pp. 56-84.\n\nExecutive Yuan. (2016, August). Press Releases: Executive Yuan launches committee to settle ill-gotten party assets. Retrieved from http://english.ey.gov.tw/News_Content2.aspx?n=8262ED7A25916ABF&sms=D\nD07AA2ECD4290A6&s=ECFDB4C0B28C2559\n\nGerber, A. (2017, June). Aboriginal protest site on Ketagalan Blvd cleared. Taipei Times. Retrieved from\nhttp://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2017/06/03/2003671820\n\nGibson, J.L. (2004). Does truth lead to reconciliation? Testing the causal assumptions of the South African truth and reconciliation process. American Journal of Political\nScience, 48(2), pp. 201-217.\n\nGreitens, S.C. (2016). Dictators and their secret police: coercive institutions and state violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\n\nHan, I.S. (2005). Kwangju and beyond: coping with past state atrocities in South Korea. Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 27, pp. 998-1045.\n\nHanley, P. (2014). Transitional justice in South Korea: One country’s search for truth and reconciliation. University of Pennsylvania East Asia Law Review, Vol. 9, pp. 138-166.\n\nHayner, P. (2011). Unspeakable truths: transitional justice and the challenge of truth commissions (second edition). New York, NY: Routledge.\n\nHuntingdon, S. P. (1991). The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.\n\nHwang, J.Y. (2016). Transitional justice in postwar Taiwan. In Schubert, G. (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Modern Taiwan (pp. 169-183). New York, NY: Routledge.\nIll-gotten Party Assets Settlement Committee. (2016). Zuzhi jieshao. Retrieved from http://www.cipas.gov.tw/organize.action\n\nJacobs, J.B. (2005). “Taiwanization” in Taiwan politics. In Makeham, J. & Hsiau, A.C. (Eds.), Cultural, Ethnic, and Political Nationalism in Contemporary Taiwan: Bentuhua (pp. 17-55). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.\n\nJacobs, J.B. (2007). Taiwan and South Korea: comparing East Asia’s two “third wave” democracies. Issues and Studies, 43(4), pp. 227-260.\n\nJacobs, J.B. (2012). Democratizing Taiwan. Boston, MA: Brill Publishers.\n\nJudicial Yuan Interpretation No. 272 (January 1991). Retrieved from\nhttp://www.judicial.gov.tw/constitutionalcourt/EN/p03_01.asp?expno=272\n\nJung, K.S. (2015). Hanguo de minzhuhua, zhuanxing zhengyi yu guoqu qingsuan. Bulletin of Taiwan Historical Research NTNU, No. 8, pp. 3-26.\n\nKim, D.C. (2012). Korea’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission: An overview and assessment. Buffalo Human Rights Law Review, 19(2), pp. 1-25.\n\nKim, H.J. (2013). What is transitional justice and why is it relevant to South Korea? SSK Human Rights Brief, 1(4), pp. 28-34.\n\nKim, H.J. (2013, December). Truth Commissions in South Korea: Lessons Learned. Middle East Institute. Retrieved from: http://www.mei.edu/content/truthcommissions-south-korea-lessons-learned\n\nKim, J.C. (2016). On forgiveness and reconciliation: Korean “collaborators” of Japanese colonialism. In Kim, M. (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Memory and Reconciliation in East Asia (pp. 159-171). New York, NY: Routledge.\n\nKim, H.M., Choi, J.Y., and Cho, J. (2006, July). Changing cleavage structure in new democratic Korea: an empirical analysis of regionalism in Korea. Paper presented\nat the World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Fukuoka, Japan. \n\nKim, S. (1997). State and civil society in South Korea’s democratic consolidation: is the battle really over? Asian Survey, 37(12), pp. 1135-1144.\n\nKim, T.J. (2007, August). State to confiscate land of pro-Japanese collaborators. The Korea Times. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20070927191442/http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/\nnews/nation/nation_view.asp?newsIdx=8259&categoryCode=117\n\nKo, S.L. (2002, September). Cabinet hails passing of political party law bills. Taipei Times. Retrieved from\nhttp://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2002/09/12/0000167725\n\nKritz, N.J. (1996). Accountability for international crimes and serious violations of human rights: coming to terms with atrocities: a review of accountability\nmechanisms for mass violations of human rights. Law and Contemporary Problems, 59(4), pp. 127-152.\n\nKushner, B. (2015). Men to devils, devils to men: Japanese war crimes and Chinese justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.\n\nLai, T.H. (1994). Ererba shijian yanjiu baogao (Research Report on the 2-28 Incident). Taipei, Taiwan: Shibao Chubanshe.\n\nLee, J. (2002). Primary causes of Asian democratization: dispelling conventional myths. Asian Survey, 42(6), pp. 821-837.\n\nLee, Y. (2005). Law, politics, and impeachment: the impeachment of Roh Moo-hyun from a comparative perspective. The American Journal of Comparative Law,\n53(2), pp. 403-432.\n\nLi, F.C. (2008). Weiquan tizhi xia de guomindang dangying qiye. Guoshiguan Xueshu Jikan, No. 18, pp. 189-220.\n\nLin, C.L. (2007). Transition without justice: on challenges of KMT’s party asset for consolidating democracy in Taiwan. Paper presented at the International\nConference on the Comparative Studies of Transitional Justice, Taipei Taiwan.\n\nMatsumoto, M. (2002). Political democratization and KMT party-owned enterprises in Taiwan. The Developing Economies, XL-3, pp. 359-380.\n\nMemorial Foundation of 228. (2006). Research report on responsibility for the 228 Massacre: a brief introduction. Retrieved from\nhttp://www.228.org.tw/ResponsibilityReport/eng/\n\nMendeloff, D. (2004). Truth-seeking, truth-telling, and postconflict: curb the enthusiasm? International Studies Review, 6(3), pp. 355-380.\n\nMendez, J. E. (1997). Accountability for past abuses. Human Rights Quarterly, 19(2), pp. 255-282\n\nMosler, H.B. (2015). The deterioration of South Korean democracy. In Howe, B. (Ed.), Democratic governance in Northeast Asia: A human-centered approach to evaluating democracy (pp. 1-24). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.\n\nNational Security Act, English Version. Retrieved from\nhttp://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=A0030028\n\nOlsen, T. D., Payne, L.A., & Reiter, A.G. (2010). The justice balance: when transitional justice improves human rights and democracy. Human Rights Quarterly, 32(4),\npp. 980-1007.\n\nOrentlicher, D. Settling accounts: the duty to prosecute human rights violations of a prior regime. The Yale Law Journal, 100(8), pp. 2537-2615.\n\nPan, J. & Hsiao, A. (2016, November). Court rules against KMT account freeze. Taipei Times. Retrieved from\nhttp://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2016/11/05/2003658598\n\nPayne, L.A., Olsen, T.D., & Reiter, A.G. (2008, March). Does transitional justice work? Paper presented at the 49th International Studies Association Convention, San\nFrancisco, CA.\n\nPeté, S. & du Plessis, M. (2007). Reparations for gross violations of human rights in context. In du Plessis, M & Peté, S. (Eds.), Repairing the past? International\nperspective on reparations for gross human rights abuses (pp. 3-28). Antwerp, Belgium: Intersentia.\n\nPhilpott, D. (2012). Just and unjust peace: an ethic of political reconciliation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.\n\nRhee, W.Y. (2016, December). The role of the constitution and the constitutional adjudication in the process of democratization and the implementation of\ntransitional justice in the Republic of Korea. Paper presented at Constitutionalizing Transitional Justice: International Symposium on Post-Atrocity Constitution-making and Constitutional Courts, Taipei, Taiwan.\n\nRobinson, M.E. (2007). Korea’s twentieth century odyssey: a short history. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.\n\nRoehrig, T. (2001). The prosecution of former military leaders in newly democratic nations: the cases of Argentina, Greece, and South Korea. Jefferson, NC:\nMcFarland and Company.\n\nRoy, D. (2003). Taiwan: a political history. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.\n\nSchafferer, C. (2010). Consolidation of democracy and historical legacies: a case study of Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 9(1), pp. 23-41.\n\nShih, C.F. & Chen, M. (2010). Taiwanese identity and the memories of 2-28: A case for political reconciliation. Asian Perspective, 34(4), pp. 85-113.\n\nShih, F.L. (2014). Transition to democracy at the expense of justice: the 2-28 Incident and the White Terror in Taiwan. Middle East Institute, March 4, 2014. Retrieved\nfrom http://www.mei.edu/content/transition-democracy-expense-justice-2-28-incident-and-white-terror-taiwan\n\nShih, H.C. (2006). DPP to submit petition for referendum on KMT assets. Taipei Times. Retrieved from\nhttp://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2006/08/23/2003324449\n\nSlater, D. & Wong, J. (2013). The Strength to concede: ruling parties and democratization in development Asia. Perspectives on Politics, 11(3), pp. 717-733\n\nSnyder, J. & Vinjamuri, L. (2003). Trials and errors: principle and pragmatism in strategies of international justice. International Security, 28(3), pp. 5-44.\n\nSu, S.X. Ping Hou Kunhong “Yanjiu ererba.” Taiwan Historica Bulletin, No. 38, p. 119-126.\n\nTaiwan chengwei zhenzheng minzhu guojia de zuihou yi li lu. (2016, March). Business Today. Retrieved from http://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article-content-80392-\n台灣成爲真正民主國家最後的一哩路\n\nTeitel, R. (2000). Transitional Justice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.\n\nTeitel, R. (2003). Transitional Justice Genealogy. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 13(69), pp. 69-94.\n\nTien, H.M. (1992). Transformation of an authoritarian party state: Taiwan’s development experience. In Cheng, T.J. & Haggard, S. (Eds.), Political change in Taiwan (pp. 33-55). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.\n\nTruth and Reconciliation Commission, Republic of Korea (2009). Truth and Reconciliation: Activities of the Past Three Years (TRCK Report, English Translation). Retrieved from: http://www.dhnet.org.br/verdade/mundo/coreia/cv_11_coreia_do_sul.pdf\n\nWachman, A. (1994). Taiwan: national identity and democratization. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.\n\nWang, F. (1994). The political economy of authoritarian clientelism in Taiwan. In Roniger, L. & Gunes-Ayata, A. (Eds.) Democracy, clientelism, and civil society\n(pp. 181-206). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.\n\nWaters, D.M. (1996). Korean constitutionalism and the “Special Act” to prosecute former presidents Chun Doo-hwan and Roh Tae-woo. Columbia Journal of Asian Law,\n10(2), pp. 461-488.\n\nWest, J.M. (1997). Martial lawlessness: the legal aftermath of Kwangju. Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal, 6(1), pp. 85-168.\n\nWest, J.M. & Yoon, D.K. (1992). The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Korea: Transforming the Jurisprudence of the Vortex? The American Journal of Comparative Law, 40(1), pp. 73-119.\n\nWolman, A. Looking back while moving forward: the evolution of truth commissions in Korea. Asia-Pacific Law and Policy Journal, 14(3), pp. 27-56.\n\nWuDunn, S. (1995, December). Ex-president of South Korea goes on trial on bribery charges. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/1995/12/18/world/ex-president-of-south-korea-goes-ontrial-on-bribery-charges.html\n\nWu, N.T. (2005). Transition without justice, or justice without history: transitional justice in Taiwan. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 1(1), pp.77-102.\n\nYang, C.H. (2016, July). Ill-gotten Assets Act: Reporter’s Notebook: Assets mission completed after long haul. Taipei Times. Retrieved from\nhttp://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2016/07/27/2003651888\n\nYeh, H. (2017). Cong guoqu de zhiniu diyin dao jinri de zhu xuanlu – guanyu Taiwan zhuanxing zhengyi lunshu de zexie. 21st Century Magazine, No. 159, pp. 24-38.\n\nZhu, L.X. (2016, May). Cong hanguo de “guoqu qingsuan” dao Taiwan de zhuanxing zhengyi. Rick Chu’s Perspectives on Korea and Media. Retrieved from\nhttp://www.rickchu.net/detail.php?rc_id=1708&rc_stid=1 zh_TW
