學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 大學圖書館館藏發展政策執行與評估之研究
Study on policy implementation and evaluation of collection development policies for university libraries作者 王雅蘭
Wang, Ya Lan貢獻者 王梅玲
Wang, Mei Ling
王雅蘭
Wang, Ya Lan關鍵詞 大學圖書館
館藏發展
館藏發展政策
政策執行
政策評估
館藏發展政策評估
University libraries
Collection development
Collection development policy
Policy implementation
Policy evaluation
Collection development policy evaluation日期 2017 上傳時間 10-Aug-2017 09:56:10 (UTC+8) 摘要 大學圖書館是一所大學的知識寶庫。在大學首要任務是教學與研究，其所需之圖書與資訊的提供途徑，則為大學圖書館館藏之首要使命。大學圖書館掌握教學的需求與研究使命，而館藏發展政策能提供大學圖書館館藏的服務及配合學校的課程、老師的研究及學生閱讀的需要。本研究以政策評估理論應用在大學圖書館館藏發展政策執行上，並採用個案分析法及深度訪談法做為研究工具，主要係檢視該政策，在政策執行前及政策執行過程中，乃至政策執行後，是否有達到政策在制定時與執行時所欲達成的目標效果。最終目的是避免不當的政策或無效益的政策在資源上的浪費，並適時發現修正政策的誤差。本研究之目的為：(一)探討大學圖書館館藏發展政策之內涵與現況。(二)探討大學圖書館館藏發展政策執行過程與影響因素。(三)探討大學圖書館館藏發展政策評估指標，並據以進行政策評估應用，以作為圖書館館藏政策未來發展建議。綜合研究結果與分析，歸納建議如下，期能供大學圖書館及未來之研究者做進一步研究之參考。一、決策管理層面：(一)各校應成立館藏發展政策工作小組(二)館藏資源應占全校年度總預算之一定比例(三)將館藏發展政策列入圖書館評鑑項目之一(四)制定數位資源館藏發展政策(五)因應各大學學術與文化特色應建立特色館藏(六)定期進行館藏評鑑與政策修訂(七) 圖書館學會應訂定館藏發展政策版本供參。二、行政執行層面： (一)加強館員的基本能力，持續在職教育訓練(二)館員應納入政策制定小組成員(三)加強各館合作關係，強化資源共享平台(四)館藏資源必須適時適當的加以維護(五)館藏發展政策書面文字化是必需的。
Library of a University is a treasure of knowledge of the University. The major missions of a university is teaching and research, and for those purposes, books and information required are rely on the library of the university, hence, library control the needs of teaching and mission of research and Library Collections Development Policy is to provide the service of collection of library of a university and working together with the programs of the school, research of teachers and the needs of students in reading. In this research, policy Evaluation theory is applied to the execution of collection policy execution of the library, and case analysis method and in-depth interview are employed as tool of research. The purpose to examine whether the policy accomplished the target effect as was set in establishment of policy and in execution of the policy, in the process of execution, before, during and after the execution of the policy. The final purpose is to avoid resource waste in ill established policy or ineffective policy, and timely identify the error to correct. The purposes of this research are: (1) Study the content and current situation of Collection Development Policy of University Library; (2) Study the execution process and affecting factors of Collection Development Policy of University Library; (3) Evaluation indices of Collection Development Policy of University Library; and base on them to apply on policy evaluation to come up with suggestion of Collection Development Policy of University Library.Concluding the results of research and analysis, we have come to following suggestion, in the hope of providing university library and future researchers for reference. 1. Decision making and Management Aspect1) University shall set up Collection Development Policy task force, 2) Collection resources shall account for certain percentage of annual budget of a university, 3) Incorporating Collection Development policy to be one of the library appraisal items, 4) Establishing digital resources collection development policy, 5) Establishing characteristic collection to echo the unique features of university in academy and in culture, 6)Regularly conducting collection evaluation and policy revision and 7) Library Association shall establish Collection Development Policy editions for reference. 2. Administration and Execution Aspect1) Increase the basic skill of staff and continue the on-the-job training; 2) Staff members shall be member of policy establishing team; 3) Intensify cooperation relationship between libraries and resource sharing; 4) Resources of collection must be maintained timely and properly; 5) It is necessary to document the Collection Development Policy.參考文獻 中文：王梅玲等(2003)。圖書館使用實務。臺北：空大。胡述兆、王梅玲(2005)。圖書館新定義。臺北：中華民國圖書館學會。王梅玲(2012) 。數位時代公共圖書館電子資源館藏發展與管理。臺北市立圖書館館訊5月29卷4 期：18-32。王梅玲等 (2016)。館藏發展與管理。新北：華藝。丘昌泰、李允傑 (2009)。政策執行與評估(第二版)。臺北市：元照。丘昌泰(2013)。公共政策基礎篇(第五版)。臺北市：巨流。伍啟元(1989) 。公共政策。商務印書館 (香港)。沈寶環(1992)。略論公共圖書館館藏發展政策-閱讀部分有關文獻後的初步認識。臺北市立圖書館館訊。9(3)，1-11。吳 定(1983)。公共政策影響評估標準之研究。第三次社會指標研討會。.吳 定(2009)。公共政策。台北：五南圖書公司。吳 定(2013)。公共政策辭典。台灣五南圖書出版股份有限公司。吳明德(1991)。館藏發展。台北：漢美。吳明德(1998)。從圖書館及教師的立場探討大學圖書館電子資源的館藏發展(國科會專題研究計畫成果報告，NSC 87-2411-H002-044）。台北：國立台灣大學圖書資訊學系暨研究所。87-2411-H002-044）。台北市：國立台灣大學圖書資訊學系暨研究所。吳明德(2006)。大學圖書館館藏發展的再省思。圖書與資訊學刊，(59)，1-15。林水波、張世賢 (2006)。公共政策(第四版)。台北：五南圖書公司。林巧敏(2008)。國家圖書館電子資源館藏發展之研究。國立台灣大學文學院圖書資訊學系博士論文，未出版，臺北市。林呈潢(2006)。館藏評鑑：館藏發展與管理的基礎。數位時代圖書館館藏發展研討會論文集，245-262。林呈潢(2014)。從館藏發展政策談圖書館館藏發展。新竹縣文化局演講簡報，6-7。林孟玲(2003)。館藏發展與管理的新思維。大學圖書館。7(2)，122-133。林鍾沂、江明修 (2000)。政策評估理論的方法論思考。法政學報，(10)，55-88.柯三吉(1991a)。公共政策與政治經濟論叢。台北：時英出版社。 (1991b)。政策執行：理論與台灣經驗。台北：時英出版社。 (1998)。公共政策：理論、方法與台灣經驗。台北：時英出版社。香港大學圖書館。館藏發展政策University of Hong Kong Libraries Collection Development Policy(2015)。檢自https://lib.hku.hk/cd/policies/cdp.html (2016.11.30)許秋芬(2001)。館藏發展面面觀。國立高雄師範大學學報。第 12 期。233-239。教育部(2008)。大學圖書館設立及營運基準。檢自http://nclfile.ncl.edu.tw/files/201608/ae4ad284-e64a-488b-8a92-715aa5dc7898.pdf (2016.11.30)黃昆輝、呂木琳(2000年12月) 。政策評估。教育大辭書，國家教育研究院。http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1307463/?index=3張瀞文(2015)。大學圖書館館藏發展政策執行成效之研究。逢甲大學公共政策研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺中市。楊美華(1994)。大學圖書館理論與實務。台北：五南。楊美華(1995)。大學圖書館。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典 (上冊, 頁 64-65). 楊美華(2006)。數位時代的學術傳播和館藏發展。大學圖書館。10(1)，140-156。陳亞寧(2015)。館藏發展的未來趨勢分析。臺北市立圖書館館訊，32卷4期，21-38。薛理桂(1998)。數位化館藏發展展望。國立中央圖書館台灣分館館刊。5(1)，7-17。國立臺灣師範大學圖書館。網址：http://www.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/ (2017.05.01)天主教輔仁大學圖書館。網址：http://web.lib.fju.edu.tw/chi/ (2017.05.01)國立中興大學圖書館。網址：http://www.lib.nchu.edu.tw/((2017.05.01)國立成功大學圖書館。網址：http://lib.ncku.edu.tw/bin/home.php(2017.05.01)西文：American Library Association (1996). Guide for written collection policy statements(2nd ed.),Chicago,IL:Author.American Library Association (1977). Guidelines for the formulation of collection development policies. Library Resources and Technical, 21(1), 40-47.Chen, H. T. (1990). Theory-driven evaluations. Sage.Dunn, W. N. (2008). Public Poling Analysis： An Introduction, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.： Prentice-Hall, Inc.Dunn, W.N. (1994).Public policy analysis: an Introduction, N.J.:Prentice-Hall Inc.Edwards, G. C. (1980). Implementing public policy. Congressional Quarterly Press.Edward III, G. C. (1980). Implementing Public Policy, Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Electronic Resources Collection Development Policy University of Hong Kong Libraries(2015)。檢自https://lib.hku.hk/cd/policies/erp.htmlElmore, R. F. (1978). Organizational models of social program implementation (pp. 186-271). Public.Evans, G. E.(2000)， ”Information Age-Information Society,” in Developing Library and Information Center Collections (Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited, Inc.,), pp. 19-20.Evans, G. E., & Saponaro, M. Z. (2012). Collection management basics(6th ed.). Santa Barbara, CA:Libraies Unlimited.Gardner, R. K. (1981). Library Collection: Their Origin, Selection and Development. (No. 025.172 G3).Goggin, Malcolm L., Ann. O’M, Bowman., James P. Lester & Laurence J., O’Toole, Jr. (1990). Implementation Theory and Practice: Toward a Third Generation. Glenview, Glenview Ill: Scott, Foresman and Company.Gregory, Vicki L.,“Chap. 3.Collection Development Policies,”Collection development and management for 21st century library collections : an introduction . New York : Neal-Schuman Publishers, 2011. Grindle, M. S. (Ed.). (1980). Politics and policy implementation in the Third World (Vol. 310). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage.Hanf, K. (1982). The implementation of regulatory policy: enforcement as bargaining. European Journal of Political Research, 10(2), 159-172.Hjern, B., & Porter, D. O. (1979). Implementation Structure: A New Unit of Administrative Analysis. Internat. Inst. of Management, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin.Hoffmann, F.W., & Wood,R.J. (2005). Library collection development policies : Academic, public, and special libraies. Lanham, MD.: Scarecrow Press.Hull, C. J., & Hjern, B. (1987). Helping small firms grow: An implementation approach. Croom Helm,.Johnson, P. (2009). Fundamentals of collection development and management (2nd ed.) Chicago, IL: ALA.Lane, J. E. (1987). Implementation, accountability and trust. European journal of political research, 15(5), 527-546.Lester, J. P., Bowman, A. O. M., Goggin, M. L., & O`Toole, L. J. (1987). Public policy implementation: Evolution of the field and agenda for future research. Review of Policy Research, 7(1), 200-216.Lijphart, A. (1971). “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method,” American Political Science Review, 65, pp.682-693.Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1987). A design perspective on policy implementation: The fallacies of misplaced prescription. Review of Policy Research, 6(3), 459-475.Michael, L. I. P. S. K. Y. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, Russel Sage Foundation.Nakamura, R. T., & Smallwood, F. (1980). The politics of policy implementation. St. Martin`s Press.Perkins, D. L. (1979). Guidelines for Collection Development. Chicago: Collection Development Committee, Resourses and Technical Services Devision, American Library Association.Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1973). How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland.Rametsteiner, E., & Weiss, G. (2006). Assessing policies from a systems perspecitve—Experiences with applied innovation systems analysis and implications for policy evaluation. Forest Policy and Economics, 8(5), 564-576.Ranganathan, S. R. (1931). The five laws of library science. Madras Library Association (Madras, India) and Edward Goldston (London, UK).Richard, E. (1980). Backward-mapping: Implementation research and policy decision. Political Science Quarterly, 94, 601-16.Rossi, P.H ., & E. Freeman (1993). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach,C.A: Sage.Sabatier, P., & Mazmanian, D. (1980). The implementation of public policy: A framework of analysis. Policy studies journal, 8(4), 538-560.Sabatier, P., & Mazmanian, D. (1983). Policy implementation. Encyclopedia of Policy Sciences. Marcel Dekker, New York.Sabatier, P. A. (1986). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: a critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of public policy, 6(01), 21-48.Stake, R. E. (2004). Standards-based and responsive evaluation. Sage.Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process a conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445-488.Wildavsky, A., & Majone, G. (1979). Implementation as evolution. Implementation, 103-180.Wood,R.J., & Hoffmann, F.W.(1996). Library collection development policies : A reference and writers` handbook. Lanham, MD.: Scarecrow Press.Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods . Beverly Hills. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班
104913020資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104913020 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 王梅玲 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Wang, Mei Ling en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 王雅蘭 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Wang, Ya Lan en_US dc.creator (作者) 王雅蘭 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Wang, Ya Lan en_US dc.date (日期) 2017 en_US dc.date.accessioned 10-Aug-2017 09:56:10 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 10-Aug-2017 09:56:10 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 10-Aug-2017 09:56:10 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0104913020 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/111776 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 104913020 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 大學圖書館是一所大學的知識寶庫。在大學首要任務是教學與研究，其所需之圖書與資訊的提供途徑，則為大學圖書館館藏之首要使命。大學圖書館掌握教學的需求與研究使命，而館藏發展政策能提供大學圖書館館藏的服務及配合學校的課程、老師的研究及學生閱讀的需要。本研究以政策評估理論應用在大學圖書館館藏發展政策執行上，並採用個案分析法及深度訪談法做為研究工具，主要係檢視該政策，在政策執行前及政策執行過程中，乃至政策執行後，是否有達到政策在制定時與執行時所欲達成的目標效果。最終目的是避免不當的政策或無效益的政策在資源上的浪費，並適時發現修正政策的誤差。本研究之目的為：(一)探討大學圖書館館藏發展政策之內涵與現況。(二)探討大學圖書館館藏發展政策執行過程與影響因素。(三)探討大學圖書館館藏發展政策評估指標，並據以進行政策評估應用，以作為圖書館館藏政策未來發展建議。綜合研究結果與分析，歸納建議如下，期能供大學圖書館及未來之研究者做進一步研究之參考。一、決策管理層面：(一)各校應成立館藏發展政策工作小組(二)館藏資源應占全校年度總預算之一定比例(三)將館藏發展政策列入圖書館評鑑項目之一(四)制定數位資源館藏發展政策(五)因應各大學學術與文化特色應建立特色館藏(六)定期進行館藏評鑑與政策修訂(七) 圖書館學會應訂定館藏發展政策版本供參。二、行政執行層面： (一)加強館員的基本能力，持續在職教育訓練(二)館員應納入政策制定小組成員(三)加強各館合作關係，強化資源共享平台(四)館藏資源必須適時適當的加以維護(五)館藏發展政策書面文字化是必需的。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Library of a University is a treasure of knowledge of the University. The major missions of a university is teaching and research, and for those purposes, books and information required are rely on the library of the university, hence, library control the needs of teaching and mission of research and Library Collections Development Policy is to provide the service of collection of library of a university and working together with the programs of the school, research of teachers and the needs of students in reading. In this research, policy Evaluation theory is applied to the execution of collection policy execution of the library, and case analysis method and in-depth interview are employed as tool of research. The purpose to examine whether the policy accomplished the target effect as was set in establishment of policy and in execution of the policy, in the process of execution, before, during and after the execution of the policy. The final purpose is to avoid resource waste in ill established policy or ineffective policy, and timely identify the error to correct. The purposes of this research are: (1) Study the content and current situation of Collection Development Policy of University Library; (2) Study the execution process and affecting factors of Collection Development Policy of University Library; (3) Evaluation indices of Collection Development Policy of University Library; and base on them to apply on policy evaluation to come up with suggestion of Collection Development Policy of University Library.Concluding the results of research and analysis, we have come to following suggestion, in the hope of providing university library and future researchers for reference. 1. Decision making and Management Aspect1) University shall set up Collection Development Policy task force, 2) Collection resources shall account for certain percentage of annual budget of a university, 3) Incorporating Collection Development policy to be one of the library appraisal items, 4) Establishing digital resources collection development policy, 5) Establishing characteristic collection to echo the unique features of university in academy and in culture, 6)Regularly conducting collection evaluation and policy revision and 7) Library Association shall establish Collection Development Policy editions for reference. 2. Administration and Execution Aspect1) Increase the basic skill of staff and continue the on-the-job training; 2) Staff members shall be member of policy establishing team; 3) Intensify cooperation relationship between libraries and resource sharing; 4) Resources of collection must be maintained timely and properly; 5) It is necessary to document the Collection Development Policy. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章、緒論 ……………………………………………………………1第一節、問題陳述與動機…………………………………………………1第二節、研究目的與問題…………………………………………………3第三節、名詞解釋…………………………………………………………5第二章、文獻探討 ………………………………………………………9第一節、館藏發展政策的意義與內涵 …………………………………9第二節、大學圖書館之館藏發展政策 …………………………………17第三節、政策執行理論 …………………………………………………21第四節、政策評估理論 …………………………………………………37第三章、研究方法 ………………………………………………………47第一節、研究範圍與限制 ………………………………………………47第二節、研究設計 ………………………………………………………49第三節、研究方法 ………………………………………………………51第四節、研究工具 ………………………………………………………52第五節、研究對象與館藏現況資料 ……………………………………54第六節、研究實施歩驟 …………………………………………………54第四章、研究個案之館藏發展政策分析 ………………………………57第一節、研究個案的圖書館背景與館藏現況 …………………………57第二節、館藏政策內容要項分析 ………………………………………71第三節、綜合討論 ………………………………………………………78第五章、研究個案之館藏發展政策執行與評估 ………………………81第一節、訪談基本資料…………………………………………………81第二節、館藏發展政策執行……………………………………………82第三節、館藏發展政策評估 …………………………………………100第四節、綜合討論 ……………………………………………………103第六章、結論與建議 …………………………………………………105第一節、研究結論 ……………………………………………………105第二節、建議 …………………………………………………………111第三節、後續研究建議 ………………………………………………114 zh_TW dc.format.extent 2630767 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104913020 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 大學圖書館 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 館藏發展 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 館藏發展政策 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 政策執行 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 政策評估 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 館藏發展政策評估 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) University libraries en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Collection development en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Collection development policy en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Policy implementation en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Policy evaluation en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Collection development policy evaluation en_US dc.title (題名) 大學圖書館館藏發展政策執行與評估之研究 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Study on policy implementation and evaluation of collection development policies for university libraries en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文：王梅玲等(2003)。圖書館使用實務。臺北：空大。胡述兆、王梅玲(2005)。圖書館新定義。臺北：中華民國圖書館學會。王梅玲(2012) 。數位時代公共圖書館電子資源館藏發展與管理。臺北市立圖書館館訊5月29卷4 期：18-32。王梅玲等 (2016)。館藏發展與管理。新北：華藝。丘昌泰、李允傑 (2009)。政策執行與評估(第二版)。臺北市：元照。丘昌泰(2013)。公共政策基礎篇(第五版)。臺北市：巨流。伍啟元(1989) 。公共政策。商務印書館 (香港)。沈寶環(1992)。略論公共圖書館館藏發展政策-閱讀部分有關文獻後的初步認識。臺北市立圖書館館訊。9(3)，1-11。吳 定(1983)。公共政策影響評估標準之研究。第三次社會指標研討會。.吳 定(2009)。公共政策。台北：五南圖書公司。吳 定(2013)。公共政策辭典。台灣五南圖書出版股份有限公司。吳明德(1991)。館藏發展。台北：漢美。吳明德(1998)。從圖書館及教師的立場探討大學圖書館電子資源的館藏發展(國科會專題研究計畫成果報告，NSC 87-2411-H002-044）。台北：國立台灣大學圖書資訊學系暨研究所。87-2411-H002-044）。台北市：國立台灣大學圖書資訊學系暨研究所。吳明德(2006)。大學圖書館館藏發展的再省思。圖書與資訊學刊，(59)，1-15。林水波、張世賢 (2006)。公共政策(第四版)。台北：五南圖書公司。林巧敏(2008)。國家圖書館電子資源館藏發展之研究。國立台灣大學文學院圖書資訊學系博士論文，未出版，臺北市。林呈潢(2006)。館藏評鑑：館藏發展與管理的基礎。數位時代圖書館館藏發展研討會論文集，245-262。林呈潢(2014)。從館藏發展政策談圖書館館藏發展。新竹縣文化局演講簡報，6-7。林孟玲(2003)。館藏發展與管理的新思維。大學圖書館。7(2)，122-133。林鍾沂、江明修 (2000)。政策評估理論的方法論思考。法政學報，(10)，55-88.柯三吉(1991a)。公共政策與政治經濟論叢。台北：時英出版社。 (1991b)。政策執行：理論與台灣經驗。台北：時英出版社。 (1998)。公共政策：理論、方法與台灣經驗。台北：時英出版社。香港大學圖書館。館藏發展政策University of Hong Kong Libraries Collection Development Policy(2015)。檢自https://lib.hku.hk/cd/policies/cdp.html (2016.11.30)許秋芬(2001)。館藏發展面面觀。國立高雄師範大學學報。第 12 期。233-239。教育部(2008)。大學圖書館設立及營運基準。檢自http://nclfile.ncl.edu.tw/files/201608/ae4ad284-e64a-488b-8a92-715aa5dc7898.pdf (2016.11.30)黃昆輝、呂木琳(2000年12月) 。政策評估。教育大辭書，國家教育研究院。http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1307463/?index=3張瀞文(2015)。大學圖書館館藏發展政策執行成效之研究。逢甲大學公共政策研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺中市。楊美華(1994)。大學圖書館理論與實務。台北：五南。楊美華(1995)。大學圖書館。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典 (上冊, 頁 64-65). 楊美華(2006)。數位時代的學術傳播和館藏發展。大學圖書館。10(1)，140-156。陳亞寧(2015)。館藏發展的未來趨勢分析。臺北市立圖書館館訊，32卷4期，21-38。薛理桂(1998)。數位化館藏發展展望。國立中央圖書館台灣分館館刊。5(1)，7-17。國立臺灣師範大學圖書館。網址：http://www.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/ (2017.05.01)天主教輔仁大學圖書館。網址：http://web.lib.fju.edu.tw/chi/ (2017.05.01)國立中興大學圖書館。網址：http://www.lib.nchu.edu.tw/((2017.05.01)國立成功大學圖書館。網址：http://lib.ncku.edu.tw/bin/home.php(2017.05.01)西文：American Library Association (1996). Guide for written collection policy statements(2nd ed.),Chicago,IL:Author.American Library Association (1977). Guidelines for the formulation of collection development policies. Library Resources and Technical, 21(1), 40-47.Chen, H. T. (1990). Theory-driven evaluations. Sage.Dunn, W. N. (2008). Public Poling Analysis： An Introduction, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.： Prentice-Hall, Inc.Dunn, W.N. (1994).Public policy analysis: an Introduction, N.J.:Prentice-Hall Inc.Edwards, G. C. (1980). Implementing public policy. Congressional Quarterly Press.Edward III, G. C. (1980). Implementing Public Policy, Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Electronic Resources Collection Development Policy University of Hong Kong Libraries(2015)。檢自https://lib.hku.hk/cd/policies/erp.htmlElmore, R. F. (1978). Organizational models of social program implementation (pp. 186-271). Public.Evans, G. E.(2000)， ”Information Age-Information Society,” in Developing Library and Information Center Collections (Englewood, Colorado: Libraries Unlimited, Inc.,), pp. 19-20.Evans, G. E., & Saponaro, M. Z. (2012). Collection management basics(6th ed.). Santa Barbara, CA:Libraies Unlimited.Gardner, R. K. (1981). Library Collection: Their Origin, Selection and Development. (No. 025.172 G3).Goggin, Malcolm L., Ann. O’M, Bowman., James P. Lester & Laurence J., O’Toole, Jr. (1990). Implementation Theory and Practice: Toward a Third Generation. Glenview, Glenview Ill: Scott, Foresman and Company.Gregory, Vicki L.,“Chap. 3.Collection Development Policies,”Collection development and management for 21st century library collections : an introduction . New York : Neal-Schuman Publishers, 2011. Grindle, M. S. (Ed.). (1980). Politics and policy implementation in the Third World (Vol. 310). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage.Hanf, K. (1982). The implementation of regulatory policy: enforcement as bargaining. European Journal of Political Research, 10(2), 159-172.Hjern, B., & Porter, D. O. (1979). Implementation Structure: A New Unit of Administrative Analysis. Internat. Inst. of Management, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin.Hoffmann, F.W., & Wood,R.J. (2005). Library collection development policies : Academic, public, and special libraies. Lanham, MD.: Scarecrow Press.Hull, C. J., & Hjern, B. (1987). Helping small firms grow: An implementation approach. Croom Helm,.Johnson, P. (2009). Fundamentals of collection development and management (2nd ed.) Chicago, IL: ALA.Lane, J. E. (1987). Implementation, accountability and trust. European journal of political research, 15(5), 527-546.Lester, J. P., Bowman, A. O. M., Goggin, M. L., & O`Toole, L. J. (1987). Public policy implementation: Evolution of the field and agenda for future research. Review of Policy Research, 7(1), 200-216.Lijphart, A. (1971). “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method,” American Political Science Review, 65, pp.682-693.Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1987). A design perspective on policy implementation: The fallacies of misplaced prescription. Review of Policy Research, 6(3), 459-475.Michael, L. I. P. S. K. Y. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, Russel Sage Foundation.Nakamura, R. T., & Smallwood, F. (1980). The politics of policy implementation. St. Martin`s Press.Perkins, D. L. (1979). Guidelines for Collection Development. Chicago: Collection Development Committee, Resourses and Technical Services Devision, American Library Association.Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1973). How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland.Rametsteiner, E., & Weiss, G. (2006). Assessing policies from a systems perspecitve—Experiences with applied innovation systems analysis and implications for policy evaluation. Forest Policy and Economics, 8(5), 564-576.Ranganathan, S. R. (1931). The five laws of library science. Madras Library Association (Madras, India) and Edward Goldston (London, UK).Richard, E. (1980). Backward-mapping: Implementation research and policy decision. Political Science Quarterly, 94, 601-16.Rossi, P.H ., & E. Freeman (1993). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach,C.A: Sage.Sabatier, P., & Mazmanian, D. (1980). The implementation of public policy: A framework of analysis. Policy studies journal, 8(4), 538-560.Sabatier, P., & Mazmanian, D. (1983). Policy implementation. Encyclopedia of Policy Sciences. Marcel Dekker, New York.Sabatier, P. A. (1986). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: a critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of public policy, 6(01), 21-48.Stake, R. E. (2004). Standards-based and responsive evaluation. Sage.Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process a conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445-488.Wildavsky, A., & Majone, G. (1979). Implementation as evolution. Implementation, 103-180.Wood,R.J., & Hoffmann, F.W.(1996). Library collection development policies : A reference and writers` handbook. Lanham, MD.: Scarecrow Press.Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods . Beverly Hills. zh_TW
