1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Commerce
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 新創企業創業團隊關係研究
A study of relationship of startup company partners
作者 吳梓川
Wu, Zi Chuan
貢獻者 葉匡時<br>蔡維奇
Yeh, Kuang shih<br>Tsai, Wei Chi Tsai
吳梓川
Wu, Zi Chuan
關鍵詞 新創企業
創業團隊
關係
異質性
信任
Startup
Partner
Relationship
Heterogeneity
Trust
日期 2017
上傳時間 10-Aug-2017 10:20:57 (UTC+8)
摘要 隨著全球越來越多人和資源投入到新創企業的活動中，創業活動逐漸成為一個國家發展的助力，不僅對經濟發展和社會成長有幫助，對提升就業力和國家創新能力也至關重要。創業過程中關鍵因素之一的創業團隊成員，也越來越受到世界各地學者的重視和研究。但作為一個新的研究領域，依然有很多的不足。如何讓創業者能準確挑選適合自己的創業團隊并維繫團隊成員之間的關係是創業過程中的核心問題。團隊成員關係直接影響了創業團隊的表現，而創業團隊的表現直接影響新創企業的績效。
本研究對已有研究和文獻進行了梳理，總結和評論，針對創業團隊成員的個人特質，挑選因素，成員間的異質性，團隊組成因素，創業團隊成員關係維持，特殊合夥人關係，股權分配以及退出策略八個層面，開展了探討台灣創業環境下創業者及創業團隊成員關係維繫為主題的研究。研究發現以下幾點對關係維繫是正向作用的：創業前確認彼此的信任關係，創業團隊成員具有優秀的特質，創業前明確職責和權利，團隊成員之間願景一致且能力互補，合理分配股權。未來，在本研究的基礎上，還可繼續探究優秀個人特質之間的關係，創業團隊成員的溝通方式，成員的異質性對彼此關係的影響，以及產業細分后的創業團隊成員關係。希望對創業團隊成員關係的研究，能補充現有創業研究的不足，擴大創業理論的研究範圍，給創業者和投資人更多的指導性建議。
With more and more startups around the globe, entrepreneurship has become a key to the national development, not only to economic development and social growth, also to improving the employment and national innovation capability. One of the key factors of entrepreneurship is the business partner matching. Partner matching has drawn more and more scholars’ attention and research around the world. But as an emerging research area, there are still some theoretical and practical questions worth investigating. How to make sure that an entrepreneur can accurately select a partner that is suitable for the business and how to maintain the relationship between the partners are the core issues in an entrepreneurial practice.
In this study, I conducted a comprehensive analysis of the existing literature related to the relationships of business partners. Drawn lights from the literature, this study discussed 8 key variables such as the individual characteristics of the partners, the selection of the partners, heterogeneity among the partners, the factors of the partnership team, the relationship maintenance of partners, the special partner relationship, the distribution of the shares and the withdrawal strategy of the partners. This research grounds itself on the relationship maintenance between entrepreneurs and partners in Taiwan`s entrepreneurial environment. The study found that the following aspects are positive for the maintenance of partner relationships: mutual trust among the partners before the partnership, the constructive characters of partners, the clear sense of liability and rights before the partnership, the accordant of the vision and the complementary ability, and the rational allocation of equity. In the future, we will continue exploring the relationship among individual characters, the communication among partners, the impact of partners’ heterogeneity on partnership, and the partnership after industry segmentation. By studying the partner relationship, this study casts light on supplementing the existing research of entrepreneurship, expanding the scope of research on entrepreneurial theory, and giving more practical guidance to entrepreneurs and investors.
參考文獻 壹、中文文獻
1. 王冰（2012）。創業團隊異質性，團隊氛圍與創業績效關係研究。未出版之博士論文，吉林大學，吉林。
2. 王強（2012）。新創企業界定標準研究。未出版之碩士論文，吉林大學，吉林。
3. 王會龍（2006）。創業過程研究綜述。商業時代，22，46。
4. 石磊（2008）。論創業團隊構成多元化的選擇模式與標準。外國經濟與管理，30，52-59。
5. 田莉，薛紅志（2009）。創業團隊先前經驗、承諾與新技術企業初期績效：一個交互效應模型及其啓示。研究與發展管理，21，1 -36。
6. 朱仁宏（2004）。創業研究前沿理論探討——定義，概念框架與研究邊界。管理科學，17（4），71-77。
7. 朱柔若（譯），（2000）。社會研究方法：質化與量化取向。台北：楊智。
8. 李天任、藍莘等（譯）（1995）。大眾媒體研究。台北：亞太圖書。
9. 李志能（2002）。新創企業：大企業的「小版本」？。南開管理評論，3，7。
10. 余永定，徐壽冠（譯）（1997）。商業性質概論。北京：商務印書館。
11. 林強，姜彥福，張健（2001）。創業理論及其架構分析。經濟研究，9，85-94。
12. 金泉（2010）。創業團隊構成特徵與創業績效關係研究：一個文獻綜述。國際商務研究，4，71-80。
13. 周俊（2008）。人口特征异质性对高管离职率的作用研究。 China Management Studies，3，4。
14. 郁義鴻，李志能，希斯瑞克（2000）。創業學。上海：復旦大學出版社。
15. 張玉利，李乾文，陳寒松（2004）。創業管理理論的最新評述及研究趨勢。預測，4，20-25。
16. 張玉利，李新春（2006）。創業管理。北京：清華大學出版社。
17. 張玉利，薛紅志，楊俊（2003）。企業家創業行為的理性分析。經濟與管理研究，5，9-13。
18. 張健，姜彥福，林強（2003）。創業理論研究與發展動態。經濟學動態，5，71-74。
19. 胡文郁（2012）。新創企業國際化理論研究。當代經濟，12，148-152。
20. 胡望斌，張玉利，牛芳（2009）。我國新企業創業導向，動態能力與企業成長關係實證研究。中國軟科學，4，107-118。
21. 曹之然（2008）。創業理論研究：共識，衝突，重構與觀察。現代經濟探討，9，39 - 43。
22. 鄧學軍（2009）。企業家社會網絡對企業績效的影響研究。未出版之博士論文，暨南大學，廣州。
23. 楊俊，（2004）。創業過程研究及其發展動態。外國經濟與管理，2004第9期，8。
24. 繆小明，李淼（2006）。科技型企業家人力資本與企業成長性研究。科學學與科學技術管理，2，126-131。


貳、英文文獻
1. Adizes, I. (1989). Corporate lifecycles how and why corporations grow and die and what to do about it prentice hall, NJ: Englewood Cliffs.
2. Amason, A.C., Shrader, R.C., Tompsonz, G.H. (2006). Newness and novelty: relating top management team composition to new venture performance, Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 125 - 148.
3. Amason, A.C., Shrader, R.C. & Tompson, G.H. (2006). Newness and novelty: relating top management team composition to new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(1), 125-148.
4. Bantel, K.A. & Jackson, S.E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking:does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10(S1), 107-124.
5. Beckman CM, Burton MD, O’Reilly (2007). Early teams: the impact of team demography on VC financing and going public, Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 147 - 173.
6. Biggadike, R. (1979). The risky business of diversification. Harvard Business Review, 57(3), 103-111.
7. Bird, B. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: the case for intention. Academy of management Review, 13(3), 442-453.
8. Bouncken, R.B. (2004) . Cultural diversity in entrepreneurial teams: findings of new ventures in Germany. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(4), 240-253.
9. Bruyat, C., Julien, P.A. (2000). Defining the field of research in entrepreneurship, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 16, No.2, 165-80.
10. Busenitz, L.W., West, G.P., Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G.N. & Zacharakis, A. (2003). Entrepreneurship research in emergence: past trends and future directions. Journal of management, 29(3), 285-308.
11. Chaganti, R.S., Watts, A.D., Chaganti, R., Zimmerman-Treichel, M.(2008). Ethnic-immigrants in founding teams: Effects on prospector strategy and performance in new Internet ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(1), 113-139.
12. Chandler, G.N. & Hanks, S.H. (1998). An investigation of new venture teams in emerging businesses. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, 10, 318-330.
13. Chatman, J.A., Polzer, J.T., Barsade, S.G. & Neale, M.A. (1998). Being different yet feeling similar: the influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 749-780.
14. Chowdhury S (2005). Demographic diversity for building an effective entrepreneurial team: is it important?, Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 727 - 746.
15. Ciavarella, M.A., Buchholtz, A.K., Riordan, C.M., Gatewood, R.D. & Stokes, G.S. (2004). The big five and venture survival: is there a linkage? Journal of Business Venturing, 19(4), 465-483.
16. Clement, D. E., & Schiereck, J. J. (1971). Scanning strategies and differential sensitivity in a visual signal detection task: intersubject consistency, Psychonomic Science, 23(6), 385-387.
17. Cooper, A.C., Folta, T., Gimeno-Gascon, J., & Woo, C.Y. (1992). Entrepreneurs` exit decisions: the role of threshold expectations. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol.1992, No.1, pp.75-79).
18. Covin, J.G. & Slevin, D.P. (1990). New venture strategic posture, structure, and performance: an industry life cycle analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(2), 123-135.
19. Dahlqvist, J., Davidsson, P. & Wiklund, J. (2000). Initial conditions as predictors of new venture performance: a replication and extension of the cooper et al. study. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 1(1), 1-17.
20. Drucker, P.F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: practice and principles, New York: Harper & Row.
21. Eisenhardt KM, Schoonhoven CB (1990). Organizational growth: linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among US semiconductor ventures, 1978 ~ 1988, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 504 - 529.
22. Ensley, M.D. & Banks, M.C. (1992). Raising questions about entrepreneurial teams. In The Proceedings of the 1992 Southern Management Association Meeting (pp.438-440).
23. Ensley, M.D., Carland, J.W. & Carland, J.A. (1998). The effect of entrepreneurial team skill heterogeneity and functional diversity on new venture performance. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 1-14.
24. Finkelstein, S. & Hambrick, D.C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: the moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 484-503.
25. Flynn, F.J., Chatman,J.A. & Spataro, S.E. (2001). Getting to know you: the influence of personality on impressions and performance of demographically different people in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 414-442.
26. Foo, M.D., Sin, H.P., Yiong LP (2006). Effects of team inputs and intrateam processes on perceptions of team viability and member satisfaction innascentventures, Strategic Management Journal, 27 (4), 389 - 399.
27. Frankea N, Gruberb M, Harhoff D, et al (2008). Venture capitalists` evaluations of Start-up teams: trade-off, Knock-Out criteria, and the impact of VC experience, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 459 - 483.
28. Gartner, W.B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of management review, 10(4), 696-706.
29. Gnyawali, D.R. & Fogel, D.S. (1994) Environments for Entrepreneurship Development: Key Dimensions and Research Implications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18, 43-62.
30. Hambrick, D.C.，Mason, P.A.(1984). Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers, Academy of Management Review, 9(2) ,193-206.
31. Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D., Camp, S.M. & Sexton, D.L. (2001). Strategic entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 479-491.
32. Hmieleski KM, Ensley MD (2007). A contextual examination of new venture performance: entrepreneur leadership behavior, top management team heterogeneity, and environmental dynamism, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(7), 865 - 889.
33. Jackson, S.E., Joshi, A. & Erhardt, N.L. (2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of management, 29(6), 801-830.
34. Combs, J.G., Ketchen, D.J. (2003). Why do firms use franchising as an entrepreneurial strategy, Journal of Management, 29(3), 443-465.
35. Jean Dubois (1980). Nouveau dictionnaire du français contemporain illustré, Paris: Larousse.
36. Jehn, K.A., Northcraft, G.B. & Neale, M.A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative science quarterly, 44(4), 741-763.
37. Kamm, J.B., Shuman, J.C., Seeger, J.A. & Nurick, A.J. (1990). Entrepreneurial teams in new venture creation: a research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(4), 7-17.
38. Kazanjian, R.K.& Drazin, R. (1990). A stage-contingent model of design and growth for technology based new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(3), 137-150.
39. Kelley, D.J., Singer, S.& Herrington, M.D. (2012). The Global Entrepreneurship monitor, 2011 Global Report, GEM 2011.
40. Kirzner, I.M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41. Knight, D., Pearce, C.L., Smith, K.G., Olian, J.D., Sims, H.P., Smith, K.A. & Flood, P. (1999). Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 445-465.
42. Knight, Frank H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profit, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
43. Kracke, B.A.E.R.B.E.L. & Schmitt-Rodermund, E. (2001). Adolescents` career exploration in the context of educational and occupational transitions, Navigating through adolescence: European perspectives.
44. Leitch, C. M. & Harrison, R. (2016). Identity, identity formation and identity work in entrepreneurship: conceptual developments and empirical applications, Entrepreneurship and regional development, 14, 177-190.
45. Low, M.B. & MacMillan, I.C. (1988). Entrepreneurship: past research and future challenges, Journal of management, 14(2), 139-161.
46. Macmillan, I.C., Zemann, L. & Subbanarasimha, P.N. (1987). Criteria distinguishing successful from unsuccessful ventures in the venture screening process, Journal of Business Venturing, 2(2), 123-137.
47. McDougall, P.P. & Oviatt, B.M. (2000). International entrepreneurship: the intersection of two research paths. Academy of management Journal, 43(5), 902-906.
48. Miller, A. & Camp, B. (1986). Exploring determinants of success in corporate ventures, Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 87-105.
49. Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms, Management science, 29(7), 770 - 791.
50. Milliken, F.J. & Martins, L.L. (1996). Searching for common threads: understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of management review, 21(2), 402-433.
51. Noam Wasserman(2013). The founder`s dilemmas: anticipating and avoiding the pitfalls that can sink a startup, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52. O`Reilly, C., Snyder, R. & Boothe, J. (1993). Effects of executive team demography on organizational change. Organizational change and redesign, 147-175.
53. Packalen KA (2007). Complementing capital: the role of status, demographic features, and social capital in founding teams` abilities to obtain resources, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 11, 873 - 891.
54. Poon, J.M., Ainuddin, R.A. & Junit, S.O.H. (2006). Effects of self-concept traits and entrepreneurial orientation on firm performance. International Small Business Journal, 24(1), 61-82.
55. Rajeswararao S., Allison D. Watts , Radha Chaganti & Monica Zimmerman-Treichel (2008). Ethnic-immigrants in founding teams: effects on prospector strategy and performance in new internet ventures, Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 113 - 139.
56. Reynolds, P.D., Camp, S.M., Bygrave, W.D., Autio, E. & Hay, M. (2002). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor GEM 2001 Summary Report. London Business School and Babson College.
57. Saxenian, A. (2000). Silicon Valley`s new immigrant entrepreneurs, San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
58. Schjoedt, L. & Kraus, S. (2009). Entrepreneurial teams: definition and performance factors. Management Research News, 32(6), 513-524.
59. Schumpeter J.A., (1934). The theory of economic development, an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle, New Brunswick, NJ, London: Transaction Publishers.
60. Shane, S. & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research, Academy of management review, 25(1), 217-226.
61. Shaver, K. G. & Scott, L. R. (1991). Person, process, choice: the psychology of new venture creation, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(2), 23-45.
62. Shrader R, Siegel D.S. (2007). Assessing the relationship between human capital and firm performance: evidence from technology-based new ventures, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(6), 893-908.
63. Simons, T., Pelled, L.H. & Smith, K.A. (1999). Making use of difference: diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of management journal, 42(6), 662-673.
64. Singh, R. (2001). A comment on developing the field of entrepreneurship through the study of opportunity recognition and exploitation, Academy of Management Review, 26, 20.
65. Stevenson, H.H., Roberts, M.J., Grousbeck, H.I. & Bhide, A.V. (1985). New business ventures and the entrepreneur, Sydney: Irwin.
66. Timmons, J.A. & Spinelli, S. (1994). New venture creation: entrepreneurship for the 21st century ( Vol.4 ). Boston: Irwin.
67. Williams, K.Y. & O`Reilly, C.A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: a review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77-140.
68. Woodward, W.J. (1988). A social network theory of entrepreneurship: an empirical study ( Doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill ).
69. Zahra, S.A. (1996). Goverance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: the moderating impact of industry technological opportunities, Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1713-1735.
70. Zenger, T.R. & Lawrence, B.S. (1989). Organizational demography: the differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 353-376.
71. Zimmerman M. A. (2008). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on the capital raised through an initial public offering, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(3), 391-414.

叁、網路資源
1. 維基百科, 路德維希•馮•米塞斯, 上網日期2017年3月9日，檢自：https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/路德維希•馮•米塞斯
2. AAMA，認識 AAMA 搖籃計劃，上網日期 2017年4月5日，檢自：http://www.aamataipei.com.tw
3. 科技新報，李開復創業的五問五答：來自上週和潘石屹的對話，上網日期 2017年4月15日，檢自https://technews.tw/2015/05/26/kai-fu-lee-talk-with-pan-shi-yi/
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)
104363134
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104363134
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 葉匡時<br>蔡維奇zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Yeh, Kuang shih<br>Tsai, Wei Chi Tsaien_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 吳梓川zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Wu, Zi Chuanen_US
dc.creator (作者) 吳梓川zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Wu, Zi Chuanen_US
dc.date (日期) 2017en_US
dc.date.accessioned 10-Aug-2017 10:20:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 10-Aug-2017 10:20:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 10-Aug-2017 10:20:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0104363134en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/111891-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 104363134zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 隨著全球越來越多人和資源投入到新創企業的活動中，創業活動逐漸成為一個國家發展的助力，不僅對經濟發展和社會成長有幫助，對提升就業力和國家創新能力也至關重要。創業過程中關鍵因素之一的創業團隊成員，也越來越受到世界各地學者的重視和研究。但作為一個新的研究領域，依然有很多的不足。如何讓創業者能準確挑選適合自己的創業團隊并維繫團隊成員之間的關係是創業過程中的核心問題。團隊成員關係直接影響了創業團隊的表現，而創業團隊的表現直接影響新創企業的績效。
本研究對已有研究和文獻進行了梳理，總結和評論，針對創業團隊成員的個人特質，挑選因素，成員間的異質性，團隊組成因素，創業團隊成員關係維持，特殊合夥人關係，股權分配以及退出策略八個層面，開展了探討台灣創業環境下創業者及創業團隊成員關係維繫為主題的研究。研究發現以下幾點對關係維繫是正向作用的：創業前確認彼此的信任關係，創業團隊成員具有優秀的特質，創業前明確職責和權利，團隊成員之間願景一致且能力互補，合理分配股權。未來，在本研究的基礎上，還可繼續探究優秀個人特質之間的關係，創業團隊成員的溝通方式，成員的異質性對彼此關係的影響，以及產業細分后的創業團隊成員關係。希望對創業團隊成員關係的研究，能補充現有創業研究的不足，擴大創業理論的研究範圍，給創業者和投資人更多的指導性建議。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) With more and more startups around the globe, entrepreneurship has become a key to the national development, not only to economic development and social growth, also to improving the employment and national innovation capability. One of the key factors of entrepreneurship is the business partner matching. Partner matching has drawn more and more scholars’ attention and research around the world. But as an emerging research area, there are still some theoretical and practical questions worth investigating. How to make sure that an entrepreneur can accurately select a partner that is suitable for the business and how to maintain the relationship between the partners are the core issues in an entrepreneurial practice.
In this study, I conducted a comprehensive analysis of the existing literature related to the relationships of business partners. Drawn lights from the literature, this study discussed 8 key variables such as the individual characteristics of the partners, the selection of the partners, heterogeneity among the partners, the factors of the partnership team, the relationship maintenance of partners, the special partner relationship, the distribution of the shares and the withdrawal strategy of the partners. This research grounds itself on the relationship maintenance between entrepreneurs and partners in Taiwan`s entrepreneurial environment. The study found that the following aspects are positive for the maintenance of partner relationships: mutual trust among the partners before the partnership, the constructive characters of partners, the clear sense of liability and rights before the partnership, the accordant of the vision and the complementary ability, and the rational allocation of equity. In the future, we will continue exploring the relationship among individual characters, the communication among partners, the impact of partners’ heterogeneity on partnership, and the partnership after industry segmentation. By studying the partner relationship, this study casts light on supplementing the existing research of entrepreneurship, expanding the scope of research on entrepreneurial theory, and giving more practical guidance to entrepreneurs and investors.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機與目的 3
第三節 研究問題 4
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 創業的定義 6
第二節 創業的理論共識 7
第三節 新創企業的定義 11
第四節 創業團隊的優勢和局限性 13
第五節 創業團隊對新創企業表現的影響 16
第六節 高層理論與正當性理論 18
第三章 研究方法及架構 22
第一節 文獻分析法 22
第二節 半結構訪談法 23
第三節 研究架構 25
第四章 台灣新創企業創業團隊關係研究探討 27
第一節 台灣創業環境 27
第二節 受訪者基本資料 29
第三節 新創團隊合作動機 33
第四節 影響團隊成員挑選之因素 35
第五節 特殊的新創團隊關係 41
第六節 創業團隊組成對「關係」的影響因素 43
第七節 創業團隊關係的變化與維繫 56
第八節 創業團隊股權分配 60
第九節 創業團隊退出策略 62
第五章 結論與建議 67
第一節 研究結論及啟發 67
第二節 研究的理論和實踐價值 71
第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議 73		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 6582961 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104363134en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 新創企業zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 創業團隊zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 關係zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 異質性zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 信任zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Startupen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Partneren_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Relationshipen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Heterogeneityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Trusten_US
dc.title (題名) 新創企業創業團隊關係研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) A study of relationship of startup company partnersen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 壹、中文文獻
1. 王冰（2012）。創業團隊異質性，團隊氛圍與創業績效關係研究。未出版之博士論文，吉林大學，吉林。
2. 王強（2012）。新創企業界定標準研究。未出版之碩士論文，吉林大學，吉林。
3. 王會龍（2006）。創業過程研究綜述。商業時代，22，46。
4. 石磊（2008）。論創業團隊構成多元化的選擇模式與標準。外國經濟與管理，30，52-59。
5. 田莉，薛紅志（2009）。創業團隊先前經驗、承諾與新技術企業初期績效：一個交互效應模型及其啓示。研究與發展管理，21，1 -36。
6. 朱仁宏（2004）。創業研究前沿理論探討——定義，概念框架與研究邊界。管理科學，17（4），71-77。
7. 朱柔若（譯），（2000）。社會研究方法：質化與量化取向。台北：楊智。
8. 李天任、藍莘等（譯）（1995）。大眾媒體研究。台北：亞太圖書。
9. 李志能（2002）。新創企業：大企業的「小版本」？。南開管理評論，3，7。
10. 余永定，徐壽冠（譯）（1997）。商業性質概論。北京：商務印書館。
11. 林強，姜彥福，張健（2001）。創業理論及其架構分析。經濟研究，9，85-94。
12. 金泉（2010）。創業團隊構成特徵與創業績效關係研究：一個文獻綜述。國際商務研究，4，71-80。
13. 周俊（2008）。人口特征异质性对高管离职率的作用研究。 China Management Studies，3，4。
14. 郁義鴻，李志能，希斯瑞克（2000）。創業學。上海：復旦大學出版社。
15. 張玉利，李乾文，陳寒松（2004）。創業管理理論的最新評述及研究趨勢。預測，4，20-25。
16. 張玉利，李新春（2006）。創業管理。北京：清華大學出版社。
17. 張玉利，薛紅志，楊俊（2003）。企業家創業行為的理性分析。經濟與管理研究，5，9-13。
18. 張健，姜彥福，林強（2003）。創業理論研究與發展動態。經濟學動態，5，71-74。
19. 胡文郁（2012）。新創企業國際化理論研究。當代經濟，12，148-152。
20. 胡望斌，張玉利，牛芳（2009）。我國新企業創業導向，動態能力與企業成長關係實證研究。中國軟科學，4，107-118。
21. 曹之然（2008）。創業理論研究：共識，衝突，重構與觀察。現代經濟探討，9，39 - 43。
22. 鄧學軍（2009）。企業家社會網絡對企業績效的影響研究。未出版之博士論文，暨南大學，廣州。
23. 楊俊，（2004）。創業過程研究及其發展動態。外國經濟與管理，2004第9期，8。
24. 繆小明，李淼（2006）。科技型企業家人力資本與企業成長性研究。科學學與科學技術管理，2，126-131。


貳、英文文獻
1. Adizes, I. (1989). Corporate lifecycles how and why corporations grow and die and what to do about it prentice hall, NJ: Englewood Cliffs.
2. Amason, A.C., Shrader, R.C., Tompsonz, G.H. (2006). Newness and novelty: relating top management team composition to new venture performance, Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 125 - 148.
3. Amason, A.C., Shrader, R.C. & Tompson, G.H. (2006). Newness and novelty: relating top management team composition to new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(1), 125-148.
4. Bantel, K.A. & Jackson, S.E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking:does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10(S1), 107-124.
5. Beckman CM, Burton MD, O’Reilly (2007). Early teams: the impact of team demography on VC financing and going public, Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 147 - 173.
6. Biggadike, R. (1979). The risky business of diversification. Harvard Business Review, 57(3), 103-111.
7. Bird, B. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: the case for intention. Academy of management Review, 13(3), 442-453.
8. Bouncken, R.B. (2004) . Cultural diversity in entrepreneurial teams: findings of new ventures in Germany. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(4), 240-253.
9. Bruyat, C., Julien, P.A. (2000). Defining the field of research in entrepreneurship, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 16, No.2, 165-80.
10. Busenitz, L.W., West, G.P., Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G.N. & Zacharakis, A. (2003). Entrepreneurship research in emergence: past trends and future directions. Journal of management, 29(3), 285-308.
11. Chaganti, R.S., Watts, A.D., Chaganti, R., Zimmerman-Treichel, M.(2008). Ethnic-immigrants in founding teams: Effects on prospector strategy and performance in new Internet ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(1), 113-139.
12. Chandler, G.N. & Hanks, S.H. (1998). An investigation of new venture teams in emerging businesses. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, 10, 318-330.
13. Chatman, J.A., Polzer, J.T., Barsade, S.G. & Neale, M.A. (1998). Being different yet feeling similar: the influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 749-780.
14. Chowdhury S (2005). Demographic diversity for building an effective entrepreneurial team: is it important?, Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 727 - 746.
15. Ciavarella, M.A., Buchholtz, A.K., Riordan, C.M., Gatewood, R.D. & Stokes, G.S. (2004). The big five and venture survival: is there a linkage? Journal of Business Venturing, 19(4), 465-483.
16. Clement, D. E., & Schiereck, J. J. (1971). Scanning strategies and differential sensitivity in a visual signal detection task: intersubject consistency, Psychonomic Science, 23(6), 385-387.
17. Cooper, A.C., Folta, T., Gimeno-Gascon, J., & Woo, C.Y. (1992). Entrepreneurs` exit decisions: the role of threshold expectations. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol.1992, No.1, pp.75-79).
18. Covin, J.G. & Slevin, D.P. (1990). New venture strategic posture, structure, and performance: an industry life cycle analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(2), 123-135.
19. Dahlqvist, J., Davidsson, P. & Wiklund, J. (2000). Initial conditions as predictors of new venture performance: a replication and extension of the cooper et al. study. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 1(1), 1-17.
20. Drucker, P.F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: practice and principles, New York: Harper & Row.
21. Eisenhardt KM, Schoonhoven CB (1990). Organizational growth: linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among US semiconductor ventures, 1978 ~ 1988, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 504 - 529.
22. Ensley, M.D. & Banks, M.C. (1992). Raising questions about entrepreneurial teams. In The Proceedings of the 1992 Southern Management Association Meeting (pp.438-440).
23. Ensley, M.D., Carland, J.W. & Carland, J.A. (1998). The effect of entrepreneurial team skill heterogeneity and functional diversity on new venture performance. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 1-14.
24. Finkelstein, S. & Hambrick, D.C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: the moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 484-503.
25. Flynn, F.J., Chatman,J.A. & Spataro, S.E. (2001). Getting to know you: the influence of personality on impressions and performance of demographically different people in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 414-442.
26. Foo, M.D., Sin, H.P., Yiong LP (2006). Effects of team inputs and intrateam processes on perceptions of team viability and member satisfaction innascentventures, Strategic Management Journal, 27 (4), 389 - 399.
27. Frankea N, Gruberb M, Harhoff D, et al (2008). Venture capitalists` evaluations of Start-up teams: trade-off, Knock-Out criteria, and the impact of VC experience, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 459 - 483.
28. Gartner, W.B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of management review, 10(4), 696-706.
29. Gnyawali, D.R. & Fogel, D.S. (1994) Environments for Entrepreneurship Development: Key Dimensions and Research Implications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18, 43-62.
30. Hambrick, D.C.，Mason, P.A.(1984). Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers, Academy of Management Review, 9(2) ,193-206.
31. Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D., Camp, S.M. & Sexton, D.L. (2001). Strategic entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 479-491.
32. Hmieleski KM, Ensley MD (2007). A contextual examination of new venture performance: entrepreneur leadership behavior, top management team heterogeneity, and environmental dynamism, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(7), 865 - 889.
33. Jackson, S.E., Joshi, A. & Erhardt, N.L. (2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of management, 29(6), 801-830.
34. Combs, J.G., Ketchen, D.J. (2003). Why do firms use franchising as an entrepreneurial strategy, Journal of Management, 29(3), 443-465.
35. Jean Dubois (1980). Nouveau dictionnaire du français contemporain illustré, Paris: Larousse.
36. Jehn, K.A., Northcraft, G.B. & Neale, M.A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative science quarterly, 44(4), 741-763.
37. Kamm, J.B., Shuman, J.C., Seeger, J.A. & Nurick, A.J. (1990). Entrepreneurial teams in new venture creation: a research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(4), 7-17.
38. Kazanjian, R.K.& Drazin, R. (1990). A stage-contingent model of design and growth for technology based new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(3), 137-150.
39. Kelley, D.J., Singer, S.& Herrington, M.D. (2012). The Global Entrepreneurship monitor, 2011 Global Report, GEM 2011.
40. Kirzner, I.M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41. Knight, D., Pearce, C.L., Smith, K.G., Olian, J.D., Sims, H.P., Smith, K.A. & Flood, P. (1999). Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 445-465.
42. Knight, Frank H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profit, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
43. Kracke, B.A.E.R.B.E.L. & Schmitt-Rodermund, E. (2001). Adolescents` career exploration in the context of educational and occupational transitions, Navigating through adolescence: European perspectives.
44. Leitch, C. M. & Harrison, R. (2016). Identity, identity formation and identity work in entrepreneurship: conceptual developments and empirical applications, Entrepreneurship and regional development, 14, 177-190.
45. Low, M.B. & MacMillan, I.C. (1988). Entrepreneurship: past research and future challenges, Journal of management, 14(2), 139-161.
46. Macmillan, I.C., Zemann, L. & Subbanarasimha, P.N. (1987). Criteria distinguishing successful from unsuccessful ventures in the venture screening process, Journal of Business Venturing, 2(2), 123-137.
47. McDougall, P.P. & Oviatt, B.M. (2000). International entrepreneurship: the intersection of two research paths. Academy of management Journal, 43(5), 902-906.
48. Miller, A. & Camp, B. (1986). Exploring determinants of success in corporate ventures, Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 87-105.
49. Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms, Management science, 29(7), 770 - 791.
50. Milliken, F.J. & Martins, L.L. (1996). Searching for common threads: understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of management review, 21(2), 402-433.
51. Noam Wasserman(2013). The founder`s dilemmas: anticipating and avoiding the pitfalls that can sink a startup, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52. O`Reilly, C., Snyder, R. & Boothe, J. (1993). Effects of executive team demography on organizational change. Organizational change and redesign, 147-175.
53. Packalen KA (2007). Complementing capital: the role of status, demographic features, and social capital in founding teams` abilities to obtain resources, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 11, 873 - 891.
54. Poon, J.M., Ainuddin, R.A. & Junit, S.O.H. (2006). Effects of self-concept traits and entrepreneurial orientation on firm performance. International Small Business Journal, 24(1), 61-82.
55. Rajeswararao S., Allison D. Watts , Radha Chaganti & Monica Zimmerman-Treichel (2008). Ethnic-immigrants in founding teams: effects on prospector strategy and performance in new internet ventures, Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 113 - 139.
56. Reynolds, P.D., Camp, S.M., Bygrave, W.D., Autio, E. & Hay, M. (2002). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor GEM 2001 Summary Report. London Business School and Babson College.
57. Saxenian, A. (2000). Silicon Valley`s new immigrant entrepreneurs, San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
58. Schjoedt, L. & Kraus, S. (2009). Entrepreneurial teams: definition and performance factors. Management Research News, 32(6), 513-524.
59. Schumpeter J.A., (1934). The theory of economic development, an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle, New Brunswick, NJ, London: Transaction Publishers.
60. Shane, S. & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research, Academy of management review, 25(1), 217-226.
61. Shaver, K. G. & Scott, L. R. (1991). Person, process, choice: the psychology of new venture creation, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(2), 23-45.
62. Shrader R, Siegel D.S. (2007). Assessing the relationship between human capital and firm performance: evidence from technology-based new ventures, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(6), 893-908.
63. Simons, T., Pelled, L.H. & Smith, K.A. (1999). Making use of difference: diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of management journal, 42(6), 662-673.
64. Singh, R. (2001). A comment on developing the field of entrepreneurship through the study of opportunity recognition and exploitation, Academy of Management Review, 26, 20.
65. Stevenson, H.H., Roberts, M.J., Grousbeck, H.I. & Bhide, A.V. (1985). New business ventures and the entrepreneur, Sydney: Irwin.
66. Timmons, J.A. & Spinelli, S. (1994). New venture creation: entrepreneurship for the 21st century ( Vol.4 ). Boston: Irwin.
67. Williams, K.Y. & O`Reilly, C.A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: a review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77-140.
68. Woodward, W.J. (1988). A social network theory of entrepreneurship: an empirical study ( Doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill ).
69. Zahra, S.A. (1996). Goverance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: the moderating impact of industry technological opportunities, Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1713-1735.
70. Zenger, T.R. & Lawrence, B.S. (1989). Organizational demography: the differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 353-376.
71. Zimmerman M. A. (2008). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on the capital raised through an initial public offering, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(3), 391-414.

叁、網路資源
1. 維基百科, 路德維希•馮•米塞斯, 上網日期2017年3月9日，檢自：https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/路德維希•馮•米塞斯
2. AAMA，認識 AAMA 搖籃計劃，上網日期 2017年4月5日，檢自：http://www.aamataipei.com.tw
3. 科技新報，李開復創業的五問五答：來自上週和潘石屹的對話，上網日期 2017年4月15日，檢自https://technews.tw/2015/05/26/kai-fu-lee-talk-with-pan-shi-yi/		zh_TW