Publications-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
Google ScholarTM
NCCU Library
Citation Infomation
Related Publications in TAIR
題名 精實思維、產品開發流程與專案績效關係之研究-以B公司為例
The Research on the Relationships between Lean Thinking, New Product Development and Project Performance: A Case study of Company B作者 胡智偉 貢獻者 李易諭
胡智偉關鍵詞 精實思維
產品開發流程
專案績效日期 2017 上傳時間 28-Aug-2017 11:29:53 (UTC+8) 摘要 條碼印表機及自動識別產業在台灣發展僅20多年,然而台灣在豐沛的研發資源挹注下,國內各條碼印表機品牌產品在過去10數年間於全球市場上有相當亮眼之表現。條碼印表機需使用於工商業場所,產品特性要求品質穩定度高,生命週期長,產品生產須靈活且快速以滿足少量多樣之供貨,產品應用方面常須與系統業者調適後搭載供貨給專案或是企業用戶。業者於此客製、穩定、多樣化出貨之產品特性下,需要以不斷優化之精實系統完善產品開發流程以達成各種專案績效。精實思維提供企業如何以最小化的投資,提升企業營運效率,創造客戶價值的作法。本研究透過書籍、文獻、報告等理論研讀後,說明精實思維對創造客戶價值之重要性,然後藉由個案分析法,從產業環境、SWOT分析、與個案公司高階主管訪談整理方式,瞭解個案公司之精實產品開發過程與績效表現之關係。從研究發現,從產品開發流程便導入精實思維及納入績效評估作法,可以讓產品開發由流程開始優化,讓企業內遵循精實原則進行產品設計、生產管理和出貨管理進而創造客戶價值達成專案及企業經營績效。 參考文獻 中文部分(依作者姓氏筆劃排序)1. 王孝文(2011)。知識管理對於營建專案績效之影響(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號099NCU05718013)2. 王明妤(2000)。新產品開發流程中功能性價值之選擇研究—以數位電視機與經營資訊服務為例(博士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號089NCTU0031005)3. 安蔓雅(2016)。創新導向與新產品開發績效:團隊創新、團隊訊息處理集團對反思連結之迷思(博士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號105PCCU0321005)4. 吳思華(1998)。知識流通對產業創新的影響。第七屆產業管理研討會張貼之論文,國立政治大所科技管理研究所,臺北市。5. 李中揚(2009)。精實生產與連續流關係之研究(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號097NKIT5457024)6. 李裕昆(譯)(1990)。改變世界的企業經營體制:臨界生產方式(原作者: J.P. Womack, D.T. Jones, and D. Roos.)。台北:中華企業管理發展中心。7. 林怜岑(2007)。影響績效之知識管理要素(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號095NSYS5636030)8. 林貞言(2012)。精實工具於新產品開發之應用研究(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號100NCKU5031034)9. 洪士峰(2011)。精實生產對製造業營運績效影響之研究(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號099NSYS5121082)10. 孫俊吉(2012)。電廠導入精實生產關鍵成功因素之研究(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號100NSYS5121041)11. 張聖麟(1998)。卓越化生產管理。台北市:華泰。12. 張權贏(2014)。專案人員屬性、自我效能及工作特性對專案績效影響之研究-以伺服器製造業為例(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號103SHU05121016)13. 郭俊男(2002)。運籌能力、競爭策略與經營績效關係之研究(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號090NSYS5007083)14. 陳姿伶(2004)。個案研究法(Case Study)。國立中興大學農業推廣教育研究所研究報告,未出版。15. 陳彥如(2009)。專案經理領導能力、團隊承諾與專案績效之關聯性研究:以高科技產業為例(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號097TKU05121033)16. 彭鈺棠(2014)。精實思維、夥伴關係與流程創新之研究-以A公司營業所為例(碩士論文)。取自http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/5890817. 楊順兆(2007)。應用平衡計分卡觀點探討營造產業之經營績效-以某營造廠為例(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號096CHPI5230016)18. 楊耀川、成玉山(譯)(1988)。豐田生產方式與現場管理(原作者:大野耐一)。初版。台北市:中華企業管理發展中心。19. 劉仁傑(1998)。企業改造:台中精機製程合理化及事業轉型。台北市:中衛發展中心。20. 蔣維理(2001)。成功的新產品開發模式研究(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號090NCTU0627007)21. 鄭丞庭(2006)。委外策略選擇對組織效益之影響—企業與派遣服務業之觀點(碩士論文)。取自http://ir.lib.nsysu.edu.tw:8080/handle/987654321/3284222. 賴美豆(2009)。運動鞋產業運用精實新產品開發模式之個案研究(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號097YUNT5794006)23. 戴志真(2011)。以精實管理手法改善訂單允諾程序之績效研究—以IC載板廠為例(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號100NTHU5031147)24. 謝正鵬(2007)。結合精實生產與交易成本理論以改善台灣企業的成本競爭力-以台灣品牌液晶電視製造商為例(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號095NCKU5457039)25. 謝安田(1989)。企業研究方法。台北市:華泰。26. 鍾漢清(譯)(1996)。精實革命:消除浪費、創造獲利的有效方法(原作者:J.P. Womack & D.T. Jones.)。臺北市:中華企業管理發展中心。27. 鍾漢清(譯)(1998)。精實系統革命(原作者: J.P. Womack & D.T. Jones)。台北:華人戴明。28. 鍾漢清(譯)(2015)。精實革命:消除浪費、創造獲利的有效方法(原作者: James P. Womack,Daniel T. Jones)。經濟新潮社。29. 簡定華(2014)。新產品開發專案模糊性與專案績效關係之研究-知識分享與領導能力之干擾效果(博士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號102YUNT5121023)30. 蘇文鈺(1997)。新產品開發流程之管理架構-IDEF0造模、QFD方法及VSM價值溪流分析之統合應用(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號095FCU05457020)英文部分1. Ahire, S. L., Golhar, D. Y., & Waller, M. A. (1996). Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs. Decision Sciences, 27(1), 23-56. 2. Ahire, S. L., Landeros, R., & Golhar, D. Y. (1995). Total quality management: a literature review and an agenda for future research. Production and Operations Management, 4(3), 277-306. 3. Balachandra, R., & Friar, J. H. (1997). Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: a contextual framework. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44(3), 276-287. 4. Booz, Allen, & Hamilton. (1982). New products management for the 1980s. New York, NY: Booz, Allen & Hamilton.5. Clark, K. B., Chew, W. B., Fujimoto, T., Meyer, J., & Scherer, F. (1987). Product development in the world auto industry. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987(3), 729-781. 6. Cochran, B. and Thompson, G. C. (1964) Why new products fail, Conf. Board Rec., Nov., pp. 11-18.7. Cooper, R. G. (1981). An empirically derived new product project selection model. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management(3), 54-61. 8. Cooper, R. G. (2001). Winning at New Products: Accelerating the Process from Idea to Launch. New York, NY: Perseus Books Group.9. Cusumano, M. A. (1988). Manufacturing innovation: Lessons from the Japanese auto industry. MIT Sloan Management Review, 30(1), 29. 10. Davila, A. (2003). Short-term economic incentives in new product development. Research policy, 32(8), 1397-1420. 11. Devaraj, S., Krajewski, L., & Wei, J. C. (2007). Impact of e-business technologies on operational performance: the role of production information integration in the supply chain. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1199-1216. 12. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. 13. Freeman, M., & Beale, P. (1992). Measuring project success. Project Management Journal, 23(1), 8-17.14. Frohman, A. L. (1982). Technology as a competitive weapon. Harvard Business Review, 60(1). 15. Fujimoto, T. (1999). The evolution of a manufacturing system at Toyota. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.16. Garrison, R. H., Noreen, E. W., Brewer, P. C., & McGowan, A. (2010). Managerial accounting. Issues in Accounting Education, 25(4), 792-793. 17. Hauptman, O. (1990). The different roles of communication in software development and hardware R&D: Phenomenologic paradox or atheoretical empiricism? Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 7(1), 49-71. 18. Ho, Y. C., & Tsai, C. T. (2011). Front end of innovation of high technology industries: The moderating effect of front-end fuzziness. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 22(1), 47-58. 19. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.20. Karlsson, C., & Ahlström, P. (1996). The difficult path to lean product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(4), 283-295. 21. Karlsson, C., & Åhlström, P. (1996). Assessing changes towards lean production. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(2), 24-41. 22. Krafcik, J. F. (1988). Triumph of the lean production system. MIT Sloan Management Review, 30(1), 41. 23. Larson, E. W., & Gobeli, D. H. (1988). Organizing for product development projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 5(3), 180-190. 24. Liker, J. (2004). The Toyota Way (2004). 14 Management Principles from the World’s Greatest Manufacturer. New York, NY: McGrall-Hill Professional. 25. Liker, J., & Meier D. (2006). The Toyota way fieldbook. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.26. Link, P. L. (1987). Keys to new product success and failure. Industrial Marketing Management, 16(2), 109-118. 27. Luine, J., Bulman, J., Burch, J., Daly, K., Lee, A., Pettiette‐Hall, C., . . . Miller, D. (1992). Characteristics of high performance YBa2Cu3O7 step-edge junctions. Applied physics letters, 61(9), 1128-1130. 28. Maidique, M. A., & Zirger, B. J. (1984). A study of success and failure in product innovation: the case of the US electronics industry. IEEE Transactions on engineering management(4), 192-203. 29. Mansfield, E., & Wagner, S. (1975). Organizational and strategic factors associated with probabilities of success in industrial R & D. the Journal of Business, 48(2), 179-198. 30. Marquis, D. G. (1969). The anatomy of successful innovations. Innovation, 1(7), 28-37. 31. Millard, R. L. (2001). Value stream analysis and mapping for product development (Master`s thesis). Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA39511932. Muffatto, M. (1998). Reorganizing for product development: Evidence from Japanese automobile firms. International journal of production economics, 56, 483-493. 33. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.34. Olson, E. M., Walker, O. C., Jr. & Ruekert, R. W. (1995). Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness. The Journal of Marketing, 48-62. 35. Pinto, J. K., & Mantel, S. J. (1990). The causes of project failure. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 37(4), 269-276. 36. Pinto, J. K., & Slevin, D. P. (1987). Critical factors in successful project implementation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management(1), 22-27. 37. Rich, N., Bateman, N., Esain, A., Massey, L., & Samuel, D. (2006). Lean evolution: lessons from the workplace. Cambrige, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.38. Robbins S. P. (1994).Organizational Behavior (pp. 976-982). London, United Kingdom: Pearson Education.39. Rothwell, R., Freeman, C., Horlsey, A., Jervis, V., Robertson, A., & Townsend, J. (1974). SAPPHO updated-project SAPPHO phase II. Research Policy, 3(3), 258-291. 40. Saren, M. A. (1984). A classification and review of models of the intra-firm innovation process. R&D Management, 14(1), 11-24. 41. Sbragia, R. (1984). Clarity of manager roles and performance of R&D multidisciplinary projects in matrix structures. R&D Management, 14(2), 113-126. 42. Shankar, R., Frapaise, X., & Brown, B. (2006). Lean drug development in R&D. Drug Discovery & Development, 9(5), 57-60. 43. Sherman, J. D., Berkowitz, D., & Souder, W. E. (2005). New product development performance and the interaction of cross‐functional integration and knowledge management. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(5), 399-411. 44. Shrnhur, A. J., Levy, O., & Dvir, D. (1997). Mapping the dimensions of project success. Project Management Journal, 28(2), 5-13. 45. Song, M., & Montoya-Weiss, M. M. (2001). The effect of perceived technological uncertainty on Japanese new product development. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 61-80. 46. Souder, W. E. (1987). Managing new product innovations. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.47. Skinner, C. E., & Asher, J. R. (1969). Effects of storage contention on system performance. IBM Systems Journal, 8(4), 319-333. 48. Tatikonda, M. V., & Montoya-Weiss, M. M. (2001). Integrating operations and marketing perspectives of product innovation: The influence of organizational process factors and capabilities on development performance. Management Science, 47(1), 151-172. 49. Tatikonda, M. V., & Rosenthal, S. R. (2000). Technology novelty, project complexity, and product development project execution success: a deeper look at task uncertainty in product innovation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47(1), 74-87. 50. Trott, P. (1998) Innovation Management & New Product Development. Harlow, United Kingdom: Pearson Education.51. Tzortzopoulos P., & Kagioglou, M. (2003). Appliciation of lean construction principles in product development process modeling, Proceedings of the International Group of Lean Contruction 11th Annual Conference, Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA.52. Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801-814. 53. Verworn, B. (2006). How German measurement and control firms integrate market and technological knowledge into the front end of new product development. International Journal of Technology Management, 34(3-4), 379-389. 54. Womack, J. P. (1996). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.55. Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1990). The machine that changed the world: Based on the MIT 5-million-dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile. New York, NY: Rawson Associates. 56. Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1991). The machine that changed the world: The story of lean production (1st ed.). New York, NY: Harper Perennial. 57. Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1994). From lean production to the lean enterprise. Harvard Business Review, 72(2), 93-103. 58. Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1996). Beyond Toyota: how to root out waste and pursue perfection. Harvard business review, 74(5), 140-158. 59. Womack, J. P. & Jones, D. T. (2003). Seeing the whole: Mapping the Extended value Stream. Brookline, MA: The Lean Enterprise Institute.60. Warnecke, H.J. & Hüser, M. (1995). Lean production. International Journal of Production Economics. 14(41), 37-43.61. Ward, P. T., McCreery, J. K., Ritzman, L. P., & Sharma, D. (1998). Competitive priorities in operations management. Decision Sciences, 29(4), 1035-1046. 62. Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage publishing.63. Yoon, E., & Lilien, G. L. (1985). New industrial product performance: The effects of market characteristics and strategy. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2(3), 134-144. 網站部分1. Grand View Research. (2016). Barcode printers market size by technology (Laser, ink-jet, impact, direct thermal, thermal transfer), By Product (Desktop, Mobile, Tabletop/Industrial), By Application (Retail, Manufacturing, Shipping, Government, Healthcare), Industry Analysis Report, Regional Outlook, Application Potential, Competitive Market Share & Forecast, 2015 – 2022. Retrieved from: https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/barcode-printers-market-size?utm_source=globenewswire.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=Paid_Globnewswire2. Husain, S. (2016). New report: 2016 Global mobile thermal printing solutions market. Natik, MA: VDC Research. Retrieved from: http://www.vdcresearch.com/News-events/autoid-blog/Global-Mobile-Thermal-Printing-Solutions-Market.html 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
103932056資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103932056 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 李易諭 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) 胡智偉 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) 胡智偉 zh_TW dc.date (日期) 2017 en_US dc.date.accessioned 28-Aug-2017 11:29:53 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 28-Aug-2017 11:29:53 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 28-Aug-2017 11:29:53 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0103932056 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/112169 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 經營管理碩士學程(EMBA) zh_TW dc.description (描述) 103932056 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 條碼印表機及自動識別產業在台灣發展僅20多年,然而台灣在豐沛的研發資源挹注下,國內各條碼印表機品牌產品在過去10數年間於全球市場上有相當亮眼之表現。條碼印表機需使用於工商業場所,產品特性要求品質穩定度高,生命週期長,產品生產須靈活且快速以滿足少量多樣之供貨,產品應用方面常須與系統業者調適後搭載供貨給專案或是企業用戶。業者於此客製、穩定、多樣化出貨之產品特性下,需要以不斷優化之精實系統完善產品開發流程以達成各種專案績效。精實思維提供企業如何以最小化的投資,提升企業營運效率,創造客戶價值的作法。本研究透過書籍、文獻、報告等理論研讀後,說明精實思維對創造客戶價值之重要性,然後藉由個案分析法,從產業環境、SWOT分析、與個案公司高階主管訪談整理方式,瞭解個案公司之精實產品開發過程與績效表現之關係。從研究發現,從產品開發流程便導入精實思維及納入績效評估作法,可以讓產品開發由流程開始優化,讓企業內遵循精實原則進行產品設計、生產管理和出貨管理進而創造客戶價值達成專案及企業經營績效。 zh_TW dc.description.tableofcontents 第壹章 緒論 1第一節 研究背景與動機 1第二節 研究目的 3第三節 研究範圍 4第四節 研究流程 5第五節 論文結構 6第貳章 文獻探討 7第一節 精實思維之相關理論 7第二節 產品開發流程 14第三節 專案績效之相關理論 20第四節 研究構面關聯性之理論探討 23第參章 研究設計 29第一節 研究架構 29第二節 研究方法 30第四章 個案分析 33第一節 個案公司之外部環境分析 33第二節 個案公司簡介 36第三節 個案公司於產業中之競爭分析 39第四節 個案公司營運概況 41第五節 個案公司精實思維與產品開發流程結合分析 46第六節 個案公司開發流程與專案績效分析 50第七節 個案公司採精實思維對專案績效之影響 52第伍章 結論與建議 54第一節 研究結論 54第二節 研究限制 55第三節 研究建議 56參考文獻 57附錄一 訪談大綱 64 zh_TW dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103932056 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 精實思維 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 產品開發流程 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 專案績效 zh_TW dc.title (題名) 精實思維、產品開發流程與專案績效關係之研究-以B公司為例 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The Research on the Relationships between Lean Thinking, New Product Development and Project Performance: A Case study of Company B en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分(依作者姓氏筆劃排序)1. 王孝文(2011)。知識管理對於營建專案績效之影響(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號099NCU05718013)2. 王明妤(2000)。新產品開發流程中功能性價值之選擇研究—以數位電視機與經營資訊服務為例(博士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號089NCTU0031005)3. 安蔓雅(2016)。創新導向與新產品開發績效:團隊創新、團隊訊息處理集團對反思連結之迷思(博士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號105PCCU0321005)4. 吳思華(1998)。知識流通對產業創新的影響。第七屆產業管理研討會張貼之論文,國立政治大所科技管理研究所,臺北市。5. 李中揚(2009)。精實生產與連續流關係之研究(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號097NKIT5457024)6. 李裕昆(譯)(1990)。改變世界的企業經營體制:臨界生產方式(原作者: J.P. Womack, D.T. Jones, and D. Roos.)。台北:中華企業管理發展中心。7. 林怜岑(2007)。影響績效之知識管理要素(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號095NSYS5636030)8. 林貞言(2012)。精實工具於新產品開發之應用研究(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號100NCKU5031034)9. 洪士峰(2011)。精實生產對製造業營運績效影響之研究(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號099NSYS5121082)10. 孫俊吉(2012)。電廠導入精實生產關鍵成功因素之研究(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號100NSYS5121041)11. 張聖麟(1998)。卓越化生產管理。台北市:華泰。12. 張權贏(2014)。專案人員屬性、自我效能及工作特性對專案績效影響之研究-以伺服器製造業為例(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號103SHU05121016)13. 郭俊男(2002)。運籌能力、競爭策略與經營績效關係之研究(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號090NSYS5007083)14. 陳姿伶(2004)。個案研究法(Case Study)。國立中興大學農業推廣教育研究所研究報告,未出版。15. 陳彥如(2009)。專案經理領導能力、團隊承諾與專案績效之關聯性研究:以高科技產業為例(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號097TKU05121033)16. 彭鈺棠(2014)。精實思維、夥伴關係與流程創新之研究-以A公司營業所為例(碩士論文)。取自http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/5890817. 楊順兆(2007)。應用平衡計分卡觀點探討營造產業之經營績效-以某營造廠為例(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號096CHPI5230016)18. 楊耀川、成玉山(譯)(1988)。豐田生產方式與現場管理(原作者:大野耐一)。初版。台北市:中華企業管理發展中心。19. 劉仁傑(1998)。企業改造:台中精機製程合理化及事業轉型。台北市:中衛發展中心。20. 蔣維理(2001)。成功的新產品開發模式研究(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號090NCTU0627007)21. 鄭丞庭(2006)。委外策略選擇對組織效益之影響—企業與派遣服務業之觀點(碩士論文)。取自http://ir.lib.nsysu.edu.tw:8080/handle/987654321/3284222. 賴美豆(2009)。運動鞋產業運用精實新產品開發模式之個案研究(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號097YUNT5794006)23. 戴志真(2011)。以精實管理手法改善訂單允諾程序之績效研究—以IC載板廠為例(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號100NTHU5031147)24. 謝正鵬(2007)。結合精實生產與交易成本理論以改善台灣企業的成本競爭力-以台灣品牌液晶電視製造商為例(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號095NCKU5457039)25. 謝安田(1989)。企業研究方法。台北市:華泰。26. 鍾漢清(譯)(1996)。精實革命:消除浪費、創造獲利的有效方法(原作者:J.P. Womack & D.T. Jones.)。臺北市:中華企業管理發展中心。27. 鍾漢清(譯)(1998)。精實系統革命(原作者: J.P. Womack & D.T. Jones)。台北:華人戴明。28. 鍾漢清(譯)(2015)。精實革命:消除浪費、創造獲利的有效方法(原作者: James P. Womack,Daniel T. Jones)。經濟新潮社。29. 簡定華(2014)。新產品開發專案模糊性與專案績效關係之研究-知識分享與領導能力之干擾效果(博士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號102YUNT5121023)30. 蘇文鈺(1997)。新產品開發流程之管理架構-IDEF0造模、QFD方法及VSM價值溪流分析之統合應用(碩士論文)。取自台灣碩博士論文系統。(系統編號095FCU05457020)英文部分1. Ahire, S. L., Golhar, D. Y., & Waller, M. A. (1996). Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs. Decision Sciences, 27(1), 23-56. 2. Ahire, S. L., Landeros, R., & Golhar, D. Y. (1995). Total quality management: a literature review and an agenda for future research. Production and Operations Management, 4(3), 277-306. 3. Balachandra, R., & Friar, J. H. (1997). Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: a contextual framework. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44(3), 276-287. 4. Booz, Allen, & Hamilton. (1982). New products management for the 1980s. New York, NY: Booz, Allen & Hamilton.5. Clark, K. B., Chew, W. B., Fujimoto, T., Meyer, J., & Scherer, F. (1987). Product development in the world auto industry. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987(3), 729-781. 6. Cochran, B. and Thompson, G. C. (1964) Why new products fail, Conf. Board Rec., Nov., pp. 11-18.7. Cooper, R. G. (1981). An empirically derived new product project selection model. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management(3), 54-61. 8. Cooper, R. G. (2001). Winning at New Products: Accelerating the Process from Idea to Launch. New York, NY: Perseus Books Group.9. Cusumano, M. A. (1988). Manufacturing innovation: Lessons from the Japanese auto industry. MIT Sloan Management Review, 30(1), 29. 10. Davila, A. (2003). Short-term economic incentives in new product development. Research policy, 32(8), 1397-1420. 11. Devaraj, S., Krajewski, L., & Wei, J. C. (2007). Impact of e-business technologies on operational performance: the role of production information integration in the supply chain. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1199-1216. 12. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. 13. Freeman, M., & Beale, P. (1992). Measuring project success. Project Management Journal, 23(1), 8-17.14. Frohman, A. L. (1982). Technology as a competitive weapon. Harvard Business Review, 60(1). 15. Fujimoto, T. (1999). The evolution of a manufacturing system at Toyota. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.16. Garrison, R. H., Noreen, E. W., Brewer, P. C., & McGowan, A. (2010). Managerial accounting. Issues in Accounting Education, 25(4), 792-793. 17. Hauptman, O. (1990). The different roles of communication in software development and hardware R&D: Phenomenologic paradox or atheoretical empiricism? Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 7(1), 49-71. 18. Ho, Y. C., & Tsai, C. T. (2011). Front end of innovation of high technology industries: The moderating effect of front-end fuzziness. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 22(1), 47-58. 19. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.20. Karlsson, C., & Ahlström, P. (1996). The difficult path to lean product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(4), 283-295. 21. Karlsson, C., & Åhlström, P. (1996). Assessing changes towards lean production. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(2), 24-41. 22. Krafcik, J. F. (1988). Triumph of the lean production system. MIT Sloan Management Review, 30(1), 41. 23. Larson, E. W., & Gobeli, D. H. (1988). Organizing for product development projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 5(3), 180-190. 24. Liker, J. (2004). The Toyota Way (2004). 14 Management Principles from the World’s Greatest Manufacturer. New York, NY: McGrall-Hill Professional. 25. Liker, J., & Meier D. (2006). The Toyota way fieldbook. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.26. Link, P. L. (1987). Keys to new product success and failure. Industrial Marketing Management, 16(2), 109-118. 27. Luine, J., Bulman, J., Burch, J., Daly, K., Lee, A., Pettiette‐Hall, C., . . . Miller, D. (1992). Characteristics of high performance YBa2Cu3O7 step-edge junctions. Applied physics letters, 61(9), 1128-1130. 28. Maidique, M. A., & Zirger, B. J. (1984). A study of success and failure in product innovation: the case of the US electronics industry. IEEE Transactions on engineering management(4), 192-203. 29. Mansfield, E., & Wagner, S. (1975). Organizational and strategic factors associated with probabilities of success in industrial R & D. the Journal of Business, 48(2), 179-198. 30. Marquis, D. G. (1969). The anatomy of successful innovations. Innovation, 1(7), 28-37. 31. Millard, R. L. (2001). Value stream analysis and mapping for product development (Master`s thesis). Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA39511932. Muffatto, M. (1998). Reorganizing for product development: Evidence from Japanese automobile firms. International journal of production economics, 56, 483-493. 33. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.34. Olson, E. M., Walker, O. C., Jr. & Ruekert, R. W. (1995). Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness. The Journal of Marketing, 48-62. 35. Pinto, J. K., & Mantel, S. J. (1990). The causes of project failure. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 37(4), 269-276. 36. Pinto, J. K., & Slevin, D. P. (1987). Critical factors in successful project implementation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management(1), 22-27. 37. Rich, N., Bateman, N., Esain, A., Massey, L., & Samuel, D. (2006). Lean evolution: lessons from the workplace. Cambrige, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.38. Robbins S. P. (1994).Organizational Behavior (pp. 976-982). London, United Kingdom: Pearson Education.39. Rothwell, R., Freeman, C., Horlsey, A., Jervis, V., Robertson, A., & Townsend, J. (1974). SAPPHO updated-project SAPPHO phase II. Research Policy, 3(3), 258-291. 40. Saren, M. A. (1984). A classification and review of models of the intra-firm innovation process. R&D Management, 14(1), 11-24. 41. Sbragia, R. (1984). Clarity of manager roles and performance of R&D multidisciplinary projects in matrix structures. R&D Management, 14(2), 113-126. 42. Shankar, R., Frapaise, X., & Brown, B. (2006). Lean drug development in R&D. Drug Discovery & Development, 9(5), 57-60. 43. Sherman, J. D., Berkowitz, D., & Souder, W. E. (2005). New product development performance and the interaction of cross‐functional integration and knowledge management. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(5), 399-411. 44. Shrnhur, A. J., Levy, O., & Dvir, D. (1997). Mapping the dimensions of project success. Project Management Journal, 28(2), 5-13. 45. Song, M., & Montoya-Weiss, M. M. (2001). The effect of perceived technological uncertainty on Japanese new product development. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 61-80. 46. Souder, W. E. (1987). Managing new product innovations. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.47. Skinner, C. E., & Asher, J. R. (1969). Effects of storage contention on system performance. IBM Systems Journal, 8(4), 319-333. 48. Tatikonda, M. V., & Montoya-Weiss, M. M. (2001). Integrating operations and marketing perspectives of product innovation: The influence of organizational process factors and capabilities on development performance. Management Science, 47(1), 151-172. 49. Tatikonda, M. V., & Rosenthal, S. R. (2000). Technology novelty, project complexity, and product development project execution success: a deeper look at task uncertainty in product innovation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47(1), 74-87. 50. Trott, P. (1998) Innovation Management & New Product Development. Harlow, United Kingdom: Pearson Education.51. Tzortzopoulos P., & Kagioglou, M. (2003). Appliciation of lean construction principles in product development process modeling, Proceedings of the International Group of Lean Contruction 11th Annual Conference, Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA.52. Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801-814. 53. Verworn, B. (2006). How German measurement and control firms integrate market and technological knowledge into the front end of new product development. International Journal of Technology Management, 34(3-4), 379-389. 54. Womack, J. P. (1996). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.55. Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1990). The machine that changed the world: Based on the MIT 5-million-dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile. New York, NY: Rawson Associates. 56. Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1991). The machine that changed the world: The story of lean production (1st ed.). New York, NY: Harper Perennial. 57. Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1994). From lean production to the lean enterprise. Harvard Business Review, 72(2), 93-103. 58. Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1996). Beyond Toyota: how to root out waste and pursue perfection. Harvard business review, 74(5), 140-158. 59. Womack, J. P. & Jones, D. T. (2003). Seeing the whole: Mapping the Extended value Stream. Brookline, MA: The Lean Enterprise Institute.60. Warnecke, H.J. & Hüser, M. (1995). Lean production. International Journal of Production Economics. 14(41), 37-43.61. Ward, P. T., McCreery, J. K., Ritzman, L. P., & Sharma, D. (1998). Competitive priorities in operations management. Decision Sciences, 29(4), 1035-1046. 62. Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage publishing.63. Yoon, E., & Lilien, G. L. (1985). New industrial product performance: The effects of market characteristics and strategy. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2(3), 134-144. 網站部分1. Grand View Research. (2016). Barcode printers market size by technology (Laser, ink-jet, impact, direct thermal, thermal transfer), By Product (Desktop, Mobile, Tabletop/Industrial), By Application (Retail, Manufacturing, Shipping, Government, Healthcare), Industry Analysis Report, Regional Outlook, Application Potential, Competitive Market Share & Forecast, 2015 – 2022. Retrieved from: https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/barcode-printers-market-size?utm_source=globenewswire.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=Paid_Globnewswire2. Husain, S. (2016). New report: 2016 Global mobile thermal printing solutions market. Natik, MA: VDC Research. Retrieved from: http://www.vdcresearch.com/News-events/autoid-blog/Global-Mobile-Thermal-Printing-Solutions-Market.html zh_TW
