學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 臉書使用與科學公眾參與: 一般大眾與科學臉書粉絲專頁使用者之比較
Facebook use and public participation in science: a comparison between the general public and users of a science Facebook fan page作者 吳承穎
Wu, Cheng Ying貢獻者 施琮仁
Shih, Tsung Jen
吳承穎
Wu, Cheng Ying關鍵詞 臉書
公眾參與
社群網站
Facebook
Public participation
Social networking sites
Science communication
Self-efficacy日期 2017 上傳時間 13-Sep-2017 15:04:28 (UTC+8) 摘要 Social networking sites (SNSs) nowadays serve as important platforms forusers to engage in public affairs. This study applied the O-S-O-R model to examinethe relationship between Facebook and public participation in science and themediating role of users’ scientific knowledge and self-efficacy. Besides, this studyexamined the relationship mentioned above by utilizing data collected from twodifferent populations - the general public and the users of the Facebook fan page“Pansci.com,” the biggest scientific online group in Taiwan. Based on a total sample size of 1,960, the result showed that scientific use ofFacebook increased scientific knowledge only for “Pansci.com” users. Besides,scientific use of Facebook is positively associated with self-efficacy and publicparticipation in science in both samples. It is noteworthy that the effect of scientificuse of Facebook on self-efficacy is stronger for “Pansci.com” users but the effect ofself-efficacy on public participation in science is stronger for general users. Inaddition, self-efficacy serves as a significant mediator in the relationship betweenscientific use of Facebook and public participation in science in both samples. 參考文獻 Agha, S. (2003). The impact of a mass media campaign on personal risk perception,perceived self-efficacy and on other behavioural predictors. AIDS care, 15(6),749-762.Alhabash, S., Park, H., Kononova, A., Chiang, Y. H., & Wise, K. (2012). Exploringthe motivations of Facebook use in Taiwan. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(6), 304-311.Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press,1998).Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York, NY: Cambridge university press.Barker, V., Dozier, D. M., Weiss, A. S., & Borden, D. L. (2013). Facebook “friends”: Effects of social networking site intensity, social capital affinity, and flow on reported knowledge-gain. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 2(2).Bode, L. (2016). Political news in the news feed: Learning politics from social media. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 24-48.Bowen. R.M., Bassler. B., Bienenstock. A., David. R., …, Wilson. M.B. (2014). Science and engineering indicators 2014. NSB 14-01. National Science Foundation.Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/content/front/front.pdfCacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A., & Corley, E. A. (2014). Another (methodological) look at knowledge gaps and the Internet’s potential for closing them. Public Understanding of Science, 23(4), 376-394.Chiang, S.L., & Chang, Y.C. (2016). More democratic Science communication:Exploring the role of science museums engaging the public with science. Journal of Communication Research and Practices, 6(1), 199-227.Chou, W. Y. S., Hunt, Y. M., Beckjord, E. B., Moser, R. P., & Hesse, B. W. (2009). Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication. Journal of medical Internet research, 11(4), e48.Chopyak, J., & Levesque, P. (2002). Public participation in science and technology decision making: trends for the future. Technology in Society, 24(1), 155-166.Coleman, S., Morrison, D. E., & Svennevig, M. (2008). New media and political efficacy. International Journal of Communication, 2(21), 771-791.Do, M. P., & Kincaid, D. L. (2006). Impact of an entertainment-education television drama on health knowledge and behavior in Bangladesh: an application of propensity score matching. Journal of health communication, 11(3), 301-325.Eden, S. (1996). Public participation in environmental policy: considering scientific, counter-scientific and non-scientific contributions. Public understanding of science, 5(3), 183-204.Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:”Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.Eveland Jr, W. P., Shah, D. V., & Kwak, N. (2003). Assessing causality in the cognitive mediation model: A panel study of motivations, information processing, and learning during campaign 2000. Communication Research, 30(4), 359-386.Eveland Jr, W. P., & Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Connecting news media use with gaps in knowledge and participation. Political communication, 17(3), 215-237.Eveland, W. P., & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and “heterogeneity” of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 205-224.Facebook. (2017). Facebook Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2016 Results. Accessed March 13, 2017, fromhttps://s21.q4cdn.com/399680738/files/doc_financials/2016/Q4/Facebook-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2016-Results.pdf.Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals` social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319-336.Holbert, R. L. (2005). Intramedia mediation: The cumulative and complementary effects of news media use. Political Communication, 22(4), 447-461.Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Ho, S. S., Brossard, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2008). Effects of value predispositions, mass media use, and knowledge on public attitudes toward embryonic stem cellresearch. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(2), 171-192.InsightXplorer. (2016, July 15). Social Media Service Survey and Current Usageㄡ Retrieved from http://www.ixresearch.com/wpcontent/uploads/report/InsightXplorer%20Biweekly%20Report_20160715.pdfInsightXplorer. (2017, July 17). Social Media Service Survey and Current Usage.Retrieved fromhttp://www.ixresearch.com/wpcontent/uploads/report/InsightXplorer%20Biweekly%20Report_20170717.pdfJennings, M. K. (1996). Political knowledge over time and across generations. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60(2), 228-252.Joly, P. B., & Kaufmann, A. (2008). Lost in translation? The need for ‘upstreamengagement’with nanotechnology on trial. Science as Culture, 17(3), 225-247.Jung, N., Kim, Y., & de Zúniga, H. G. (2011). The mediating role of knowledge andefficacy in the effects of communication on political participation. Mass Communication and Society, 14(4), 407-430.Kellstedt, P. M., Zahran, S., & Vedlitz, A. (2008). Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States. Risk Analysis, 28(1), 113-126.Kroll, A., Neshkova, M. I., & Pandey, S. K. (2017). Spillover Effects From Customer to Citizen Orientation: How Performance Management Reforms Can Foster Public Participation. Administration & Society. Advance online publication.Kurath, M., & Gisler, P. (2009). Informing, involving or engaging? Science communication, in the ages of atom-, bio-and nanotechnology. Public Understanding of Science, 18(5), 559-573.Kenski, K., & Stroud, N. J. (2006). Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of broadcasting & electronicmedia, 50(2), 173-192.Kushin, M. J., & Yamamoto, M. (2010). Did social media really matter? College students` use of online media and political decision making in the 2008 election. Mass Communication and Society, 13(5), 608-630.Lanzerotti, L.J., Benbow, C.P., Bruer, J.T., Clough, G.W., …, Pomeroy. J.M. (2010).Science and engineering indicators 2010. NSB 10-01. National Science Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12/pdf/front.pdfLeiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., & Rosenthal, S. (2014). Americans’ actions to limit global warming, November 2013. Yale University andGeorge Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication.McLeod, J. M., Daily, K., Guo, Z., Eveland Jr, W. P., Bayer, J., Yang, S., & Wang, H.(1996). Community integration, local media use, and democratic processes. Communication Research, 23(2), 179-209.McLeod, J. M., Kosicki, G. M., & McLeod, D. M. (2002). Resurveying the boundaries of political communications effects. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 215–235). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.McLeod, J. M., & McDonald, D. G. (1985). Beyond simple exposure: Media orientations and their impact on political processes. Communication Research, 12(1), 3-33.McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political communication, 16(3), 315-336.Moeller, J., de Vreese, C., Esser, F., & Kunz, R. (2014). Pathway to political participation: The influence of online and offline news media on internal efficacy and turnout of first-time voters. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(5), 689-700.Nisbet, M. C., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany, 96(10), 1767-1778.Paek, H. J. (2008). Mechanisms through which adolescents attend and respond to antismoking media campaigns. Journal of Communication, 58(1), 84-105.Pi, S. M., Chou, C. H., & Liao, H. L. (2013). A study of Facebook Groups members`knowledge sharing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), 1971-1979.Pidgeon, N., & Rogers-Hayden, T. (2007). Opening up nanotechnology dialogue with the publics: risk communication or ‘upstream engagement’?. Health, Risk & Society, 9(2), 191-210.Pinkleton, B. E., Austin, E. W., & Fortman, K. K. (1998). Relationships of media use and political disaffection to political efficacy and voting behavior. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(1), 34-49.Powell, M. C., & Colin, M. (2008). Meaningful citizen engagement in science and technology: What would it really take?. Science Communication, 30(1), 126-136.Powell, M. C., & Colin, M. (2009). Participatory paradoxes: Facilitating citizen engagement in science and technology from the top-down?. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 29(4), 325-342.Raacke, J., & Bonds-Raacke, J. (2008). MySpace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. Cyberpsychology &behavior, 11(2), 169-174.Rainie, L., Smith, A., Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H., & Verba, S. (2012, October 19).Social media and political engagement. Retrieved fromhttp://www.pewinternet.org/2012/10/19/social-media-and-political-engagement/Robelia, B. A., Greenhow, C., & Burton, L. (2011). Environmental learning in online social networks: Adopting environmentally responsible behaviors. EnvironmentalEducation Research, 17(4), 553-575.Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, technology & human values, 25(1), 3-29.Scheufele, D. A., Nisbet, M. C., Brossard, D., & Nisbet, E. C. (2004). Social structure and citizenship: Examining the impacts of social setting, network heterogeneity, and informational variables on political participation. PoliticalCommunication,, 21(3), 315-338.Scherman, A., Arriagada, A., & Valenzuela, S. (2015). Student and environmental protests in Chile: The role of social media. Politics, 35(2), 151-171.Shah, D. V., Kwak, K, & Holbert, R. L. (2001). " Connecting" and" disconnecting" with civic life: Patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital. Political communication, 18(2), 141-162.Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Nah, S., Gotlieb, M. R., Hwang, H., Lee, N. J., ... & McLeod, D. M. (2007). Campaign ads, online messaging, and participation: Extendingthe communication mediation model. Journal of communication, 57(4),676-703.Shen, F., Wang, N., Guo, Z., & Guo, L. (2009). Online network size, efficacy, and opinion expression: Assessing the impacts of Internet use in China. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 21(4), 451-476.Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Nah, S., Gotlieb, M. R., Hwang, H., Lee, N. J., ... & McLeod, D. M. (2007). Campaign ads, online messaging, and participation: Extending the communication mediation model. Journal of communication, 57(4), 676-703.Shih, T.J. (2016). Social media and public participation: a uses and gratifications research on the Facebook of Pansci.tw. Journal of Communication Research and Practices, 6(2), 209-241Smock, A. D., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., & Wohn, D. Y. (2011). Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2322-2329.Taiwan Department of Statistics, Ministry of Education. (2017). The Number of Undergraduate Students: according to subject. Retrieved from https://stats.moe.gov.tw/result.aspx?qno=MQA5ADkA0Tait, J. (2009). Upstream engagement and the governance of science. EMBO reports, 10(1S), 18-22.Tian-Tzer, Jeng, Heng-Li, Yang, Li-Shya, Chen, Cheng-Wen, Hu, Qian-feng, Liu, & Min-An, Zheng. (2016, September 20). A Survey on Broadband Internet Usage in Taiwan. Retrieved from https://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/20160922d.pdfTedesco, J. C. (2007). Examining Internet interactivity effects on young adult political information efficacy. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(9), 1183-1194.Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students` life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875-901.Valenzuela, S., Arriagada, A., & Scherman, A. (2012). The social media basis of youth protest behavior: The case of Chile. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 299-314.Velasquez, A., & LaRose, R. (2015). Social media for social change: Social media political efficacy and activism in student activist groups. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(3), 456-474.Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C. T., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2011). It`s complicated: Facebook users` political participation in the 2008 election. CyberPsychology, behavior, and social networking, 14(3), 107-114.Vraga, E. K., Anderson, A. A., Kotcher, J. E., & Maibach, E. W. (2015). Issue-Specific Engagement: How Facebook Contributes to Opinion Leadership and Efficacy on Energy and Climate Issues. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(2), 200-218. Wang, S. I. (2007). Political use of the Internet, political attitudes and political participation. Asian Journal of Communication, 17(4), 381-395.Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal,16(4), 362-369.Wilsdon, J., & Willis, R. (2004). See-through science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream. London, England: Demos.Wohn, D. Y., Lampe, C., Vitak, J., & Ellison, N. B. (2011, February 08-11). Coordinating the ordinary: social information uses of Facebook by adults. Paper presented at the 2011 iConference. doi: 10.1145/1940761.1940808Zhang, W., Johnson, T. J., Seltzer, T., & Bichard, S. L. (2010). The revolution will be networked: The influence of social networking sites on political attitudes andbehavior. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 75-92 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
國際傳播英語碩士學位學程(IMICS)
102461006資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1024610061 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 施琮仁 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Shih, Tsung Jen en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 吳承穎 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Wu, Cheng Ying en_US dc.creator (作者) 吳承穎 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Wu, Cheng Ying en_US dc.date (日期) 2017 en_US dc.date.accessioned 13-Sep-2017 15:04:28 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 13-Sep-2017 15:04:28 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 13-Sep-2017 15:04:28 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G1024610061 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/112723 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國際傳播英語碩士學位學程(IMICS) zh_TW dc.description (描述) 102461006 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Social networking sites (SNSs) nowadays serve as important platforms forusers to engage in public affairs. This study applied the O-S-O-R model to examinethe relationship between Facebook and public participation in science and themediating role of users’ scientific knowledge and self-efficacy. Besides, this studyexamined the relationship mentioned above by utilizing data collected from twodifferent populations - the general public and the users of the Facebook fan page“Pansci.com,” the biggest scientific online group in Taiwan. Based on a total sample size of 1,960, the result showed that scientific use ofFacebook increased scientific knowledge only for “Pansci.com” users. Besides,scientific use of Facebook is positively associated with self-efficacy and publicparticipation in science in both samples. It is noteworthy that the effect of scientificuse of Facebook on self-efficacy is stronger for “Pansci.com” users but the effect ofself-efficacy on public participation in science is stronger for general users. Inaddition, self-efficacy serves as a significant mediator in the relationship betweenscientific use of Facebook and public participation in science in both samples. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents Acknowledgements iAbstract iiiContents ivLists of Tables vLists of Figures vChapter 1. Introduction 1Chapter 2. Literature Review 6Chapter 3. Method 24Chapter 4. Result 34Chapter 5. Discussion 48Chapter 6. Conclusion 57Reference 60 zh_TW dc.format.extent 600567 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1024610061 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 臉書 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公眾參與 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社群網站 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Facebook en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Public participation en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Social networking sites en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Science communication en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Self-efficacy en_US dc.title (題名) 臉書使用與科學公眾參與: 一般大眾與科學臉書粉絲專頁使用者之比較 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Facebook use and public participation in science: a comparison between the general public and users of a science Facebook fan page en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Agha, S. (2003). The impact of a mass media campaign on personal risk perception,perceived self-efficacy and on other behavioural predictors. AIDS care, 15(6),749-762.Alhabash, S., Park, H., Kononova, A., Chiang, Y. H., & Wise, K. (2012). Exploringthe motivations of Facebook use in Taiwan. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(6), 304-311.Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press,1998).Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York, NY: Cambridge university press.Barker, V., Dozier, D. M., Weiss, A. S., & Borden, D. L. (2013). Facebook “friends”: Effects of social networking site intensity, social capital affinity, and flow on reported knowledge-gain. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 2(2).Bode, L. (2016). Political news in the news feed: Learning politics from social media. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 24-48.Bowen. R.M., Bassler. B., Bienenstock. A., David. R., …, Wilson. M.B. (2014). Science and engineering indicators 2014. NSB 14-01. National Science Foundation.Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/content/front/front.pdfCacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A., & Corley, E. A. (2014). Another (methodological) look at knowledge gaps and the Internet’s potential for closing them. Public Understanding of Science, 23(4), 376-394.Chiang, S.L., & Chang, Y.C. (2016). More democratic Science communication:Exploring the role of science museums engaging the public with science. Journal of Communication Research and Practices, 6(1), 199-227.Chou, W. Y. S., Hunt, Y. M., Beckjord, E. B., Moser, R. P., & Hesse, B. W. (2009). Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication. Journal of medical Internet research, 11(4), e48.Chopyak, J., & Levesque, P. (2002). Public participation in science and technology decision making: trends for the future. Technology in Society, 24(1), 155-166.Coleman, S., Morrison, D. E., & Svennevig, M. (2008). New media and political efficacy. International Journal of Communication, 2(21), 771-791.Do, M. P., & Kincaid, D. L. (2006). Impact of an entertainment-education television drama on health knowledge and behavior in Bangladesh: an application of propensity score matching. Journal of health communication, 11(3), 301-325.Eden, S. (1996). Public participation in environmental policy: considering scientific, counter-scientific and non-scientific contributions. Public understanding of science, 5(3), 183-204.Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:”Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.Eveland Jr, W. P., Shah, D. V., & Kwak, N. (2003). Assessing causality in the cognitive mediation model: A panel study of motivations, information processing, and learning during campaign 2000. Communication Research, 30(4), 359-386.Eveland Jr, W. P., & Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Connecting news media use with gaps in knowledge and participation. Political communication, 17(3), 215-237.Eveland, W. P., & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and “heterogeneity” of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 205-224.Facebook. (2017). Facebook Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2016 Results. Accessed March 13, 2017, fromhttps://s21.q4cdn.com/399680738/files/doc_financials/2016/Q4/Facebook-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2016-Results.pdf.Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals` social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319-336.Holbert, R. L. (2005). Intramedia mediation: The cumulative and complementary effects of news media use. Political Communication, 22(4), 447-461.Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Ho, S. S., Brossard, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2008). Effects of value predispositions, mass media use, and knowledge on public attitudes toward embryonic stem cellresearch. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(2), 171-192.InsightXplorer. (2016, July 15). Social Media Service Survey and Current Usageㄡ Retrieved from http://www.ixresearch.com/wpcontent/uploads/report/InsightXplorer%20Biweekly%20Report_20160715.pdfInsightXplorer. (2017, July 17). Social Media Service Survey and Current Usage.Retrieved fromhttp://www.ixresearch.com/wpcontent/uploads/report/InsightXplorer%20Biweekly%20Report_20170717.pdfJennings, M. K. (1996). Political knowledge over time and across generations. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60(2), 228-252.Joly, P. B., & Kaufmann, A. (2008). Lost in translation? The need for ‘upstreamengagement’with nanotechnology on trial. Science as Culture, 17(3), 225-247.Jung, N., Kim, Y., & de Zúniga, H. G. (2011). The mediating role of knowledge andefficacy in the effects of communication on political participation. Mass Communication and Society, 14(4), 407-430.Kellstedt, P. M., Zahran, S., & Vedlitz, A. (2008). Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States. Risk Analysis, 28(1), 113-126.Kroll, A., Neshkova, M. I., & Pandey, S. K. (2017). Spillover Effects From Customer to Citizen Orientation: How Performance Management Reforms Can Foster Public Participation. Administration & Society. Advance online publication.Kurath, M., & Gisler, P. (2009). Informing, involving or engaging? Science communication, in the ages of atom-, bio-and nanotechnology. Public Understanding of Science, 18(5), 559-573.Kenski, K., & Stroud, N. J. (2006). Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of broadcasting & electronicmedia, 50(2), 173-192.Kushin, M. J., & Yamamoto, M. (2010). Did social media really matter? College students` use of online media and political decision making in the 2008 election. Mass Communication and Society, 13(5), 608-630.Lanzerotti, L.J., Benbow, C.P., Bruer, J.T., Clough, G.W., …, Pomeroy. J.M. (2010).Science and engineering indicators 2010. NSB 10-01. National Science Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12/pdf/front.pdfLeiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., & Rosenthal, S. (2014). Americans’ actions to limit global warming, November 2013. Yale University andGeorge Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication.McLeod, J. M., Daily, K., Guo, Z., Eveland Jr, W. P., Bayer, J., Yang, S., & Wang, H.(1996). Community integration, local media use, and democratic processes. Communication Research, 23(2), 179-209.McLeod, J. M., Kosicki, G. M., & McLeod, D. M. (2002). Resurveying the boundaries of political communications effects. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 215–235). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.McLeod, J. M., & McDonald, D. G. (1985). Beyond simple exposure: Media orientations and their impact on political processes. Communication Research, 12(1), 3-33.McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political communication, 16(3), 315-336.Moeller, J., de Vreese, C., Esser, F., & Kunz, R. (2014). Pathway to political participation: The influence of online and offline news media on internal efficacy and turnout of first-time voters. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(5), 689-700.Nisbet, M. C., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany, 96(10), 1767-1778.Paek, H. J. (2008). Mechanisms through which adolescents attend and respond to antismoking media campaigns. Journal of Communication, 58(1), 84-105.Pi, S. M., Chou, C. H., & Liao, H. L. (2013). A study of Facebook Groups members`knowledge sharing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), 1971-1979.Pidgeon, N., & Rogers-Hayden, T. (2007). Opening up nanotechnology dialogue with the publics: risk communication or ‘upstream engagement’?. Health, Risk & Society, 9(2), 191-210.Pinkleton, B. E., Austin, E. W., & Fortman, K. K. (1998). Relationships of media use and political disaffection to political efficacy and voting behavior. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(1), 34-49.Powell, M. C., & Colin, M. (2008). Meaningful citizen engagement in science and technology: What would it really take?. Science Communication, 30(1), 126-136.Powell, M. C., & Colin, M. (2009). Participatory paradoxes: Facilitating citizen engagement in science and technology from the top-down?. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 29(4), 325-342.Raacke, J., & Bonds-Raacke, J. (2008). MySpace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. Cyberpsychology &behavior, 11(2), 169-174.Rainie, L., Smith, A., Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H., & Verba, S. (2012, October 19).Social media and political engagement. Retrieved fromhttp://www.pewinternet.org/2012/10/19/social-media-and-political-engagement/Robelia, B. A., Greenhow, C., & Burton, L. (2011). Environmental learning in online social networks: Adopting environmentally responsible behaviors. EnvironmentalEducation Research, 17(4), 553-575.Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, technology & human values, 25(1), 3-29.Scheufele, D. A., Nisbet, M. C., Brossard, D., & Nisbet, E. C. (2004). Social structure and citizenship: Examining the impacts of social setting, network heterogeneity, and informational variables on political participation. PoliticalCommunication,, 21(3), 315-338.Scherman, A., Arriagada, A., & Valenzuela, S. (2015). Student and environmental protests in Chile: The role of social media. Politics, 35(2), 151-171.Shah, D. V., Kwak, K, & Holbert, R. L. (2001). " Connecting" and" disconnecting" with civic life: Patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital. Political communication, 18(2), 141-162.Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Nah, S., Gotlieb, M. R., Hwang, H., Lee, N. J., ... & McLeod, D. M. (2007). Campaign ads, online messaging, and participation: Extendingthe communication mediation model. Journal of communication, 57(4),676-703.Shen, F., Wang, N., Guo, Z., & Guo, L. (2009). Online network size, efficacy, and opinion expression: Assessing the impacts of Internet use in China. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 21(4), 451-476.Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Nah, S., Gotlieb, M. R., Hwang, H., Lee, N. J., ... & McLeod, D. M. (2007). Campaign ads, online messaging, and participation: Extending the communication mediation model. Journal of communication, 57(4), 676-703.Shih, T.J. (2016). Social media and public participation: a uses and gratifications research on the Facebook of Pansci.tw. Journal of Communication Research and Practices, 6(2), 209-241Smock, A. D., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., & Wohn, D. Y. (2011). Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2322-2329.Taiwan Department of Statistics, Ministry of Education. (2017). The Number of Undergraduate Students: according to subject. Retrieved from https://stats.moe.gov.tw/result.aspx?qno=MQA5ADkA0Tait, J. (2009). Upstream engagement and the governance of science. EMBO reports, 10(1S), 18-22.Tian-Tzer, Jeng, Heng-Li, Yang, Li-Shya, Chen, Cheng-Wen, Hu, Qian-feng, Liu, & Min-An, Zheng. (2016, September 20). A Survey on Broadband Internet Usage in Taiwan. Retrieved from https://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/20160922d.pdfTedesco, J. C. (2007). Examining Internet interactivity effects on young adult political information efficacy. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(9), 1183-1194.Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students` life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875-901.Valenzuela, S., Arriagada, A., & Scherman, A. (2012). The social media basis of youth protest behavior: The case of Chile. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 299-314.Velasquez, A., & LaRose, R. (2015). Social media for social change: Social media political efficacy and activism in student activist groups. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(3), 456-474.Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C. T., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2011). It`s complicated: Facebook users` political participation in the 2008 election. CyberPsychology, behavior, and social networking, 14(3), 107-114.Vraga, E. K., Anderson, A. A., Kotcher, J. E., & Maibach, E. W. (2015). Issue-Specific Engagement: How Facebook Contributes to Opinion Leadership and Efficacy on Energy and Climate Issues. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(2), 200-218. Wang, S. I. (2007). Political use of the Internet, political attitudes and political participation. Asian Journal of Communication, 17(4), 381-395.Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal,16(4), 362-369.Wilsdon, J., & Willis, R. (2004). See-through science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream. London, England: Demos.Wohn, D. Y., Lampe, C., Vitak, J., & Ellison, N. B. (2011, February 08-11). Coordinating the ordinary: social information uses of Facebook by adults. Paper presented at the 2011 iConference. doi: 10.1145/1940761.1940808Zhang, W., Johnson, T. J., Seltzer, T., & Bichard, S. L. (2010). The revolution will be networked: The influence of social networking sites on political attitudes andbehavior. Social Science Computer Review, 28(1), 75-92 zh_TW