| dc.contributor | 法律系 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 許恒達 | zh-TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Hsu, Heng-Da | en-US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2008-10 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 11-Oct-2017 15:48:08 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 11-Oct-2017 15:48:08 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 11-Oct-2017 15:48:08 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/113509 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本文探討與過失犯罪責要素相關的概念「超越承擔過失」，在刑法解釋學上應該如何處理其刑責之問題，筆者反對傳統學說透過「犯行前置」的方式解決超越承擔過失之問題，主張構成要件行為維持在後階段，但若在構成要件行為之前階段，行為人主觀上對其實施危險行為個人能力的欠缺有主觀之預見或預見可能性，則行為人不得再行享受該罪責要素欠缺的法律效果。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | This article aims to analyze the dogmatic structure of “activity-adoption negligence” (in German: Übernahmefahrlässigkeit) and intends to find a justifiable answer of its criminal liability. The author objects to the traditional viewpoint of “bringing forward the liability moment” and develops a new argument: As long as the negligent offender foresees or can foresee he lacks the ability to control possible risks caused by adopting a particular dangerous activity, he cannot assert that his criminal liability should be excused when he still adopts it and causes damages of others thereafter. | en_US |
| dc.format.extent | 885863 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 東吳法律學報, Vol.20, No.2, pp.97-138 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 超越承擔過失;超越承擔罪責;過失犯 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Activity-Adoption Negligence；Activity-Adoption Liability；Negligence Offense | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 「超越承擔過失」的刑法歸責 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | The Criminal Liability of "Activity-adoption Negligence" (Ubernahmefahrlassigkeit)） | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | |
