Publications-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 To Obtain a Patent Non-Infringement Opinion, Or Not to Obtain It. That is the Question!
作者 陳秉訓
Chen, Ping-Hsun
貢獻者 科管智財所
關鍵詞 willful infringement; patent; non-infringement opinion
日期 2017-06
上傳時間 17-Oct-2017 15:50:40 (UTC+8)
摘要 This paper aims at analyzing the risk of whether to acquire a patent non-infringement opinion. After Seagate, there have been many decisions of either district courts or Federal Circuit involving willful infringement. This paper discusses some observations from those decisions. The observations give a basis for thinking of whether to acquire a patent non-infringement opinion. The analysis is presented in view of a potential or accused infringer, Company T. Company T could be accused of direct or indirect infringement. By discussing either Federal Circuit’s or district courts’ cases after Seagate, this paper suggests that though there is no duty to get a patent non-infringement opinion, the best strategy for an accused infringer would still be to have such opinion letter.
關聯 Iuris Dictio, Vol.19, pp.27-42
資料類型 article
dc.contributor 科管智財所zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 陳秉訓zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Ping-Hsunen_US
dc.date (日期) 2017-06
dc.date.accessioned 17-Oct-2017 15:50:40 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 17-Oct-2017 15:50:40 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-Oct-2017 15:50:40 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/113709-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This paper aims at analyzing the risk of whether to acquire a patent non-infringement opinion. After Seagate, there have been many decisions of either district courts or Federal Circuit involving willful infringement. This paper discusses some observations from those decisions. The observations give a basis for thinking of whether to acquire a patent non-infringement opinion. The analysis is presented in view of a potential or accused infringer, Company T. Company T could be accused of direct or indirect infringement. By discussing either Federal Circuit’s or district courts’ cases after Seagate, this paper suggests that though there is no duty to get a patent non-infringement opinion, the best strategy for an accused infringer would still be to have such opinion letter.en_US
dc.format.extent 309689 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) Iuris Dictio, Vol.19, pp.27-42zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) willful infringement; patent; non-infringement opinionen_US
dc.title (題名) To Obtain a Patent Non-Infringement Opinion, Or Not to Obtain It. That is the Question!zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) article