Publications-Journal Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 建物瑕疵之侵權責任-商品自傷的損害賠償
Tort Liability for Defects of Buildings: Damages on Commodity Injury
作者 陳聰富
Chen, Tsung-Fu
關鍵詞 商品自傷 ; 商品責任 ; 商品瑕疵 ; 建物瑕疵 ; 純粹經濟上損失 ; 嚴格責任 ; 侵權責任 ; 損害賠償
Commodity Injury ; Pure Economic Loss ; Tort Law ; Product Liability ; Building Defects ; Consequential Loss ; Consumer Protection Law
日期 2015-12
上傳時間 7-Nov-2017 14:43:17 (UTC+8)
摘要 本文以商品自傷案件所生的侵權責任作為討論主題。關於建築物瑕疵所生的侵權責任,最高法院認為加害人應依民法第184條第2項規定,負損害賠償責任,高等法院更認為,被害人得依消保法第7條之規定,請求建物出售者負損害賠償責任。本文指出,各國產品責任法採取嚴格責任,其保護對象限於人身或其他財產受害,商品自傷之損害,並非產品責任法保護之客體。關於動產之商品自傷案件,既非消保法關於產品責任之保護範圍,亦非民法侵權責任保護之對象。而不動產瑕疵所生之損害,固非消保法嚴格責任之保護範圍,但基於保護房屋所有人之權利,房屋建造人應依民法侵權責任之規定負賠償責任。至於瑕疵房屋之所有人之請求權基礎,最高法院以民法第184條第2項為依據,本文則認為應以民法第184條第1項後段規定作為被害人之請求權基礎。
The Taiwan Supreme Court holds that the injured party is entitled to claim damages for losses suffered due to a defective building that results in the decrease in value of the building under Article 184 (2) of the Taiwan Civil Code. The high court further declares that the injured party is allowed to claim damages for the defective building based on Article 7 of the Taiwan Consumer Protection Act. These decisions are concerned with the intriguing issue of tort liability for the commodity injury. This paper undertakes a comparative study on the product liability and tort liability on the commodity injury, including US, UK, Germany and Canada laws. Comparative law indicates that the buyer of a product is not allowed to claim damages due to the defect of the products under the consumer protection act. Nonetheless, it is controversial as to whether a buyer of a defective building is entitled to claim compensation on the ground of the tort liability. It is submitted in this paper that the buyer should be allowed to claim damages for defective buildings under tort liability, especially in the event the buildings are destroyed in an earthquake. The ground for the injured party to make such a claim is based not on Article 184 (2) but on the second sentence of Article 184 (1) of the Taiwan Civil Code.
關聯 政大法學評論, 143, 61-122
資料類型 article
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.3966/102398202015120143002
dc.creator (作者) 陳聰富zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Tsung-Fuen_US
dc.date (日期) 2015-12
dc.date.accessioned 7-Nov-2017 14:43:17 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 7-Nov-2017 14:43:17 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 7-Nov-2017 14:43:17 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/114428-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本文以商品自傷案件所生的侵權責任作為討論主題。關於建築物瑕疵所生的侵權責任,最高法院認為加害人應依民法第184條第2項規定,負損害賠償責任,高等法院更認為,被害人得依消保法第7條之規定,請求建物出售者負損害賠償責任。本文指出,各國產品責任法採取嚴格責任,其保護對象限於人身或其他財產受害,商品自傷之損害,並非產品責任法保護之客體。關於動產之商品自傷案件,既非消保法關於產品責任之保護範圍,亦非民法侵權責任保護之對象。而不動產瑕疵所生之損害,固非消保法嚴格責任之保護範圍,但基於保護房屋所有人之權利,房屋建造人應依民法侵權責任之規定負賠償責任。至於瑕疵房屋之所有人之請求權基礎,最高法院以民法第184條第2項為依據,本文則認為應以民法第184條第1項後段規定作為被害人之請求權基礎。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The Taiwan Supreme Court holds that the injured party is entitled to claim damages for losses suffered due to a defective building that results in the decrease in value of the building under Article 184 (2) of the Taiwan Civil Code. The high court further declares that the injured party is allowed to claim damages for the defective building based on Article 7 of the Taiwan Consumer Protection Act. These decisions are concerned with the intriguing issue of tort liability for the commodity injury. This paper undertakes a comparative study on the product liability and tort liability on the commodity injury, including US, UK, Germany and Canada laws. Comparative law indicates that the buyer of a product is not allowed to claim damages due to the defect of the products under the consumer protection act. Nonetheless, it is controversial as to whether a buyer of a defective building is entitled to claim compensation on the ground of the tort liability. It is submitted in this paper that the buyer should be allowed to claim damages for defective buildings under tort liability, especially in the event the buildings are destroyed in an earthquake. The ground for the injured party to make such a claim is based not on Article 184 (2) but on the second sentence of Article 184 (1) of the Taiwan Civil Code.en_US
dc.format.extent 1864107 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) 政大法學評論, 143, 61-122zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 商品自傷 ; 商品責任 ; 商品瑕疵 ; 建物瑕疵 ; 純粹經濟上損失 ; 嚴格責任 ; 侵權責任 ; 損害賠償zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Commodity Injury ; Pure Economic Loss ; Tort Law ; Product Liability ; Building Defects ; Consequential Loss ; Consumer Protection Lawen_US
dc.title (題名) 建物瑕疵之侵權責任-商品自傷的損害賠償zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Tort Liability for Defects of Buildings: Damages on Commodity Injuryen_US
dc.type (資料類型) article
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.3966/102398202015120143002
dc.doi.uri (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.3966/102398202015120143002