Publications-Journal Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 核閱方式與核閱者立場對查核績效之影響
The Effect of Review Mode and Reviewer Preference on Auditors` Performance
作者 杜榮瑞
林靖傑
廖容翎
Duh, Rong-Ruey
Lin, Ching-Chieh
關鍵詞 解釋責任 ; 核閱方式 ; 核閱者立場 ; 查核績效
Accountability ; Review mode ; Reviewer preference ; Auditor performance
日期 2016-07
上傳時間 15-Nov-2017 16:00:57 (UTC+8)
摘要 本文探討查核過程中,核閱方式與核閱者立場等兩種解釋責任對查核績效的聯合影響,是否查核人員在電子核閱下能減少其策略性行為。經以78 位查核人員實驗後發現,在面對面核閱下,若受試者主管傾向懷疑客戶解釋,相對於主管傾向信任客戶,受試者對於應收帳款餘額評以較低程度允當表達,此種策略性態度移轉在電子核閱下並未減輕。此外,在面對面核閱下,懷疑組的受試者比信任組搜尋更多反向(更少正向)的查核證據,在電子核閱下,正向與反向證據量差距縮小。本文認為,核閱方式在查核人員傾向主管立場的行為中,具調節效果,但此調節效果僅存在於過程而非結果的解釋責任。
This study examines the joint effect on auditor performance of two accountability features in the audit review process: review mode and reviewer preference. It investigates whether the auditors` strategic behavior can be mitigated under the e-mail review mode. Seventy-eight auditors participated in an experiment. Results suggest that, under the face-to-face review mode, auditors whose supervisors are known to be skeptical about client-provided explanations make lower likelihood assessment that the explanations can substantially account for the fluctuation of accounts receivable balance than auditors whose supervisors are known to trust the client-provided explanations. Such attitudinal shift is not reduced under the e-mail review mode. In addition, under the face-to-face review mode, auditors in the skeptical condition search for more opposing (less supporting) audit evidence than those in the credence condition. However, such differences diminish under the e-mail review mode. Our finding suggests that auditors` conformity to the reviewer preference can be moderated by review mode for process accountability but not outcome accountability.
關聯 會計評論, 63, 47-76
資料類型 article
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.6552/JOAR.2016.63.2
dc.creator (作者) 杜榮瑞zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 林靖傑zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 廖容翎zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Duh, Rong-Rueyen_US
dc.creator (作者) Lin, Ching-Chiehen_US
dc.date (日期) 2016-07-
dc.date.accessioned 15-Nov-2017 16:00:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 15-Nov-2017 16:00:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 15-Nov-2017 16:00:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/114779-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本文探討查核過程中,核閱方式與核閱者立場等兩種解釋責任對查核績效的聯合影響,是否查核人員在電子核閱下能減少其策略性行為。經以78 位查核人員實驗後發現,在面對面核閱下,若受試者主管傾向懷疑客戶解釋,相對於主管傾向信任客戶,受試者對於應收帳款餘額評以較低程度允當表達,此種策略性態度移轉在電子核閱下並未減輕。此外,在面對面核閱下,懷疑組的受試者比信任組搜尋更多反向(更少正向)的查核證據,在電子核閱下,正向與反向證據量差距縮小。本文認為,核閱方式在查核人員傾向主管立場的行為中,具調節效果,但此調節效果僅存在於過程而非結果的解釋責任。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This study examines the joint effect on auditor performance of two accountability features in the audit review process: review mode and reviewer preference. It investigates whether the auditors` strategic behavior can be mitigated under the e-mail review mode. Seventy-eight auditors participated in an experiment. Results suggest that, under the face-to-face review mode, auditors whose supervisors are known to be skeptical about client-provided explanations make lower likelihood assessment that the explanations can substantially account for the fluctuation of accounts receivable balance than auditors whose supervisors are known to trust the client-provided explanations. Such attitudinal shift is not reduced under the e-mail review mode. In addition, under the face-to-face review mode, auditors in the skeptical condition search for more opposing (less supporting) audit evidence than those in the credence condition. However, such differences diminish under the e-mail review mode. Our finding suggests that auditors` conformity to the reviewer preference can be moderated by review mode for process accountability but not outcome accountability.en_US
dc.format.extent 485182 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) 會計評論, 63, 47-76zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 解釋責任 ; 核閱方式 ; 核閱者立場 ; 查核績效zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Accountability ; Review mode ; Reviewer preference ; Auditor performanceen_US
dc.title (題名) 核閱方式與核閱者立場對查核績效之影響zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The Effect of Review Mode and Reviewer Preference on Auditors` Performanceen_US
dc.type (資料類型) article-
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6552/JOAR.2016.63.2-
dc.doi.uri (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.6552/JOAR.2016.63.2-