| dc.contributor | 政治學系 | zh_Tw |
| dc.creator (作者) | 張其賢 | zh_TW |
| dc.date (日期) | 2013 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 8-Dec-2017 14:47:13 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 8-Dec-2017 14:47:13 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 8-Dec-2017 14:47:13 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/115065 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 對於禮樂的重視，是春秋時期「諸夏」集團之文化特點，也是此集團之文化認同的核心。然而在春秋史料中，卻存在長期被忽略的材料，顯示春秋時期「戎狄」的思想家（如由余）對於「諸夏」的禮樂觀，曾經提出批判性的看法。這些批判性看法，個人稱之為「反諸夏文化」思想。學界過去的研究一般認為：以批判禮樂為要點的「反諸夏文化」思想，其起源是內生的（endogenous），是起於「諸夏」思想家對於「諸夏」思想的反省與自我批判，墨子和老子可作為代表。本計畫無意質疑內生說，但嘗試指出另一種可能性：以批判禮樂為要點的「反諸夏文化」思想，其起源亦有可能是外生的（exogenous），是起於「戎狄」思想家對於「諸夏文化」的否定與質疑。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | This research project aims to investigate the possible Yi-Di origins of cultural Counter-Zhuxiaism which emerged at the later part of the Spring and Autumn period. By cultural Counter-Zhuxiaism I mean the strands of thought which were critical to the view that the rituals (li) were the fundamental means for achieving good political life. Cultural Counter-Zhuxiaism could be found in the thought of Mozi and Laozi. The widely accepted academic view regards their thought as originating from self-criticism of Zhuxia’s thinkers. In contrast to this view, I argue for the possibility that the Cultural Counter-Zhuxiaism of Mozi and Laozi might originated from thinkers of Man, Yi, Rong and Di. In other words, it was not endogenous but rather exogenous. | en_US |
| dc.format.extent | 779556 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 執行起迄：2013/08/01~2015/01/31 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 102-2410-H-004-134 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 禮樂；反諸夏文化；「戎」;「狄」；由余；墨子；老子 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | rituals (li); Counter-Zhuxiaism; Rong; Di; Yu-yu; Mozi; Laozi | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 先秦「反諸夏文化」思想之夷狄起源蠡測 | _TW |
| dc.type (資料類型) | report | |
