Publications-Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 東協成立政府間人權委員會之分析
An Analysis of ASEAN Establishing the Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights
作者 張子揚
Chang, Tzu-Yang
關鍵詞 東南亞國家協會 ; 東協政府間人權委員會 ; 理性論 ; 觀念論 ; 人權
ASEAN ; AICHR ; Rationality ; Ideation ; Human Rights
日期 2016-12
上傳時間 15-Dec-2017 11:42:02 (UTC+8)
摘要 東南亞國家協會(東協)於2009 年成立東協政府間人權委員會,一反其40 年來對聯合國倡議成立區域人權機制之漠視。究竟東協為何成立區域人權機構?現有的文獻已從理性論和觀念論兩種研究途徑探討過,但其解釋力各有不足。本文仍從理性論的觀點出發,但不同於文獻所強調的東協集體理性,本文強調個別會員國的理性,因為以往文獻在分析層次的選擇上採取了較宏觀的視角,但結果卻是無法完全解釋東權會的成立。本文仍採用理性論的研究途徑,但補充以較微觀的視角,主張東協成立東權會是東協個別會員國基於各自利益的考量、理性選擇的結果。本文運用過程追跡研究法,將東協人權機制的發展史分成三個重要里程碑,以便深入探討個別國家的理性排序和選擇。本文發現從個別國家的理性角度切入,可以具有一致性地解釋東協成立東權會的三大里程碑,即1993 年東協部長會議宣布考慮建立區域人權機制、2007 年東協憲章納入人權機構、2009 年印菲泰馬四國接受不符其共同立場之東權會章程。
The ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR)was created in 2009 by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations(ASEAN), a move contrary to its ignoring of the United Nations` forty-year advocacy. Why did ASEAN member states create the AICHR? A review of the literature found two types of arguments: rationalist and ideationalist, but neither of them is satisfactory enough to explain why the AICHR was created. This article adopts a rationalist perspective with the emphasis on ASEAN member states` individual rationality instead of ASEAN`s collective rationality, which the literature have focused. It is found that the employment of individual rationality can consistently explain three milestone events during ASEAN`s creation of AICHR.
關聯 問題與研究, 55(4),35-56
資料類型 article
dc.creator (作者) 張子揚zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chang, Tzu-Yangen_US
dc.date (日期) 2016-12-
dc.date.accessioned 15-Dec-2017 11:42:02 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 15-Dec-2017 11:42:02 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 15-Dec-2017 11:42:02 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/115136-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 東南亞國家協會(東協)於2009 年成立東協政府間人權委員會,一反其40 年來對聯合國倡議成立區域人權機制之漠視。究竟東協為何成立區域人權機構?現有的文獻已從理性論和觀念論兩種研究途徑探討過,但其解釋力各有不足。本文仍從理性論的觀點出發,但不同於文獻所強調的東協集體理性,本文強調個別會員國的理性,因為以往文獻在分析層次的選擇上採取了較宏觀的視角,但結果卻是無法完全解釋東權會的成立。本文仍採用理性論的研究途徑,但補充以較微觀的視角,主張東協成立東權會是東協個別會員國基於各自利益的考量、理性選擇的結果。本文運用過程追跡研究法,將東協人權機制的發展史分成三個重要里程碑,以便深入探討個別國家的理性排序和選擇。本文發現從個別國家的理性角度切入,可以具有一致性地解釋東協成立東權會的三大里程碑,即1993 年東協部長會議宣布考慮建立區域人權機制、2007 年東協憲章納入人權機構、2009 年印菲泰馬四國接受不符其共同立場之東權會章程。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR)was created in 2009 by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations(ASEAN), a move contrary to its ignoring of the United Nations` forty-year advocacy. Why did ASEAN member states create the AICHR? A review of the literature found two types of arguments: rationalist and ideationalist, but neither of them is satisfactory enough to explain why the AICHR was created. This article adopts a rationalist perspective with the emphasis on ASEAN member states` individual rationality instead of ASEAN`s collective rationality, which the literature have focused. It is found that the employment of individual rationality can consistently explain three milestone events during ASEAN`s creation of AICHR.en_US
dc.format.extent 1395256 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) 問題與研究, 55(4),35-56zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 東南亞國家協會 ; 東協政府間人權委員會 ; 理性論 ; 觀念論 ; 人權zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) ASEAN ; AICHR ; Rationality ; Ideation ; Human Rightsen_US
dc.title (題名) 東協成立政府間人權委員會之分析z_TW
dc.title (題名) An Analysis of ASEAN Establishing the Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rightsen_US
dc.type (資料類型) article-