1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Commerce
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 論英國脫歐後在世界貿易組織之法律關係演變
Change of British Legal Status under WTO after Brexit
作者 戴文祈
Tai, Wen-Chi
貢獻者 薛景文
Hsueh, Ching-Wen
戴文祈
Tai, Wen-Chi
關鍵詞 英國脫歐
貿易權限
歐盟東擴
WTO承諾
政府採購協定
Brexit
Trade competence
EU enlargemen
WTO commitment
GPA
日期 2017
上傳時間 2-Feb-2018 10:43:06 (UTC+8)
摘要 英國脫歐對國際社會投下一枚震撼彈，對於各方的影響甚鉅，尤其是英國和歐盟未來關係將牽動國際經貿板塊。儘管如此，其他會員更關心的是英國脫歐後，其在貿易場域之權利義務將如何改變，尤其是各國皆奉為圭臬之「世界貿易組織（World Trade Organization, WTO）」。

自GATT時代以降，當時之「歐盟共同體（European Community）」即代替其成員國行使部分權力，而隨著歐盟更加緊密，成員國交出更多的貿易「權責（competence）」予歐盟，歐盟於WTO成立後即取得正式的會籍，並幾乎於所有貿易領域完全代理其成員國。英國脫歐的主要原因之一即為自歐盟奪回主權，而貿易主權當然包括在內。在歐盟已代替英國行使權利義務多年的情況下，英國基本上沒有屬於自身的承諾，而多是與歐盟的承諾「綑綁（bundle）」在一起。是以，儘管英國脫歐後還是保有會籍，但其如何在WTO下「生存」，取決於英國能否盡早建立屬於自己的承諾。

對於英國如何建立自身的承諾，各方論者的看法天差地遠，有認為英國必須完全重新談判者，亦有認為英國得直接「複製、貼上（copy and paste）」歐盟之承諾者。本文參考諸多文獻後認為，英國應能複製、貼上多數不涉及「數量（quantum）」的承諾，並不會遭致太大的阻礙。惟一旦承諾涉及數量或配額，則情況將複雜許多，非英國和歐盟雙方能夠決定之事。此外，儘管英國擁有WTO會籍，但英國本身並非複邊協定的會員，如「政府採購協定（Agreement on Government Procurement, GPA）。英國脫歐後如何再次加入GPA並行使原有之權利義務，亦為待解決之問題。不過本文以為，以英國如此大之政府採購市場，再次加入GPA應不會受到太大之阻礙。
Brexit has caused a stir in international society, which affects variety of stakeholders. Among many things being concerned, the relationship between Britain and European Union (EU) after Brexit is one of the issues catch people’s attention. Relationship between two draws attention from all over the world; however, countries other than UK and EU are obviously more interested in how those rights and obligations of Britain will change in multilateral or plurilateral trade forum after Brexit.

Ever since GATT era, the European Community then has been represented its member states in several occasions of WTO, and with EU`s member states being tighter, EU itself has acquired membership of WTO and act on behalf of its member states in almost all forums in WTO. Therefore, UK cannot possibly has its own commitment. Even though UK will still be a WTO member after Brexit, how to `live` within it by establishing its own commitment as soon as possible is the real question.

There are plenty of conjecture as to how UK can create its own commitment. Some said UK can simply `copy and paste` EU`s schedules, while other mentioned UK have to start from scratch by negotiating with all WTO members as a newcomer. After reviewing a considerable amount of articles, I believe UK can create most of its commitment by `coping and pasting`, except for those that concern with `quantum`. For those particular commitments, the situation is so complex that require other WTO members to involve. In addition, UK is not a member of WTO plurilateral agreement－Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA), how will UK that has such a huge government procurement market re-enter GPA is also a question that need to be solved.
參考文獻 中文部分
1. 王泰銓，歐洲共同體法導論（1997）。
2. 中華經濟研究院（WTO及RTA中心），WTO及RTA電子報，第395期。
3. 周旭華，「歐洲共同體對外貿易關係的法律問題」，國立政治大學法律學研究所，（2000年）。
4. 莊亞婷，「試析歐盟對外貿易協定之締結程序－以里斯本條約後的『歐洲議會』監督機制為中心」，政治大學國際經貿組織暨法律研究中心經貿法訊，162期，頁8-12。
5. 羅昌發，國際貿易法（2010）。

英文部分
1. Arrowsmith Sue, The implications of Brexit for the law on public and utilities procurement, ACHILLES, at 12, available at https://www.achilles.com/images/locale/en-EN/buyer/pdf/UK/sue-arrowsmith-brexit-whitepaper.pdf.
2. Bartels Lorand, The UK`s Status in the WTO after Brexit, Sep. 23, 2016, available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2841747.
Bourgeois J.H.J., The Tokyo Round Agreements on Technical 3. Barriers and on Government Procurement, 19(5) CML REV. 5-33 (1982).
4. Brink Lars, UK Brexit and WTO farm support limits, CAP REFORM.EU, July 13, 2016, http://capreform.eu/uk-brexit-and-wto-farm-support-limits/.
5. Cremona Marise, A Policy of Bits and Pieces? The Common Commercial Policy after Nice, 4 CAMBRIDGE Y.B. EUR. LEGAL STUD. 61-91 (2001).
6. CRAIG PAUL & GRÁINNE DE BÚRCA, EU LAW－TEXT, CASES, AND MATERIALS (5th ed. 2011).
7. Dawar Kamala, Brexit and Government Procurement, UK Trade Policy Observatory Briefing Paper 8, Mar. 2017, at 2, available at http://blogs.sussex.ac.uk/uktpo/files/2016/11/Briefing-Paper-8.pdf.
8. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, The EEC as a GATT Member－Legal Conflicts between GATT Law and European Community Law, in THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND GATT 23-71 (Norbert et al. eds., 1986).
9. Everling Ulrich, EEC External Economic Relations, in THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND GATT 85-106 (Meinhard Hilf et al. eds., 1986).
10. Gstöhl Sieglinde, The European Union`s Trade Policy, 11 RITSUMEIKAN INTERNATIONAL AFFIRS 1-22 (2013)
11. Hilf Meinhard, The ECJ`s Opinion on the WTO－No Surprise, but Wise?, 6(2) EJIL 245-259 (1995).
12. JACKSON JOHN H., WORLD TRADE AND THE LAW OF GATT (1th ed. 1969).
13. Matthews Alan, WTO dimensions of a UK `Brexit` and agriculture trade, CAP REFORM.EU, Jan. 5 , 2016, http://capreform.eu/wto-dimensions-of-a-uk-brexit-and-agricultural-trade/.
14. Peter H. L. Van den Bossche, The EC and the Uruguay Round, in Implementing the Uruguay Round 23-102 (J. H. Jackson & A. O. Sykes eds., 1997).
15. Ungphakorn Peter, 12 years on, EU’s certified WTO goods commitments now up to date to 2004, TRADE Β BLOG, https://tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2017/02/04/after-12-years-eu-25-goods-commitments/.
16. Ungphakorn Peter, Brexit, agriculture, the WTO, and uncertainty, TRADE Β BLOG, https://tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2016/10/22/brexit-ag-wto-answers/.
17. Ungphakorn Peter, The limits of ‘possibility’: Splitting the lamb-mutton quota for the UK and EU–27, TRADE Β BLOG, Jan. 6, 2017, https://tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2017/01/06/limits-of-possibility/.
18. WTO, A HANDBOOK ON THE WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT SYSTEM 32 (1th ed. 2004).
19. Woods Michael, Trade Law: Non-Violation Complaints－"Legitimate Expectations" & "Good Faith", SLAW, Jan. 8, 2016, http://www.slaw.ca/2016/01/08/trade-law-non-violation-complaints-legitimate-expectations-good-faith/.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
國際經營與貿易學系
104351044
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104351044
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 薛景文zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Hsueh, Ching-Wenen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 戴文祈zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Tai, Wen-Chien_US
dc.creator (作者) 戴文祈zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Tai, Wen-Chien_US
dc.date (日期) 2017en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2-Feb-2018 10:43:06 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 2-Feb-2018 10:43:06 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-Feb-2018 10:43:06 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0104351044en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/115721-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國際經營與貿易學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 104351044zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 英國脫歐對國際社會投下一枚震撼彈，對於各方的影響甚鉅，尤其是英國和歐盟未來關係將牽動國際經貿板塊。儘管如此，其他會員更關心的是英國脫歐後，其在貿易場域之權利義務將如何改變，尤其是各國皆奉為圭臬之「世界貿易組織（World Trade Organization, WTO）」。

自GATT時代以降，當時之「歐盟共同體（European Community）」即代替其成員國行使部分權力，而隨著歐盟更加緊密，成員國交出更多的貿易「權責（competence）」予歐盟，歐盟於WTO成立後即取得正式的會籍，並幾乎於所有貿易領域完全代理其成員國。英國脫歐的主要原因之一即為自歐盟奪回主權，而貿易主權當然包括在內。在歐盟已代替英國行使權利義務多年的情況下，英國基本上沒有屬於自身的承諾，而多是與歐盟的承諾「綑綁（bundle）」在一起。是以，儘管英國脫歐後還是保有會籍，但其如何在WTO下「生存」，取決於英國能否盡早建立屬於自己的承諾。

對於英國如何建立自身的承諾，各方論者的看法天差地遠，有認為英國必須完全重新談判者，亦有認為英國得直接「複製、貼上（copy and paste）」歐盟之承諾者。本文參考諸多文獻後認為，英國應能複製、貼上多數不涉及「數量（quantum）」的承諾，並不會遭致太大的阻礙。惟一旦承諾涉及數量或配額，則情況將複雜許多，非英國和歐盟雙方能夠決定之事。此外，儘管英國擁有WTO會籍，但英國本身並非複邊協定的會員，如「政府採購協定（Agreement on Government Procurement, GPA）。英國脫歐後如何再次加入GPA並行使原有之權利義務，亦為待解決之問題。不過本文以為，以英國如此大之政府採購市場，再次加入GPA應不會受到太大之阻礙。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Brexit has caused a stir in international society, which affects variety of stakeholders. Among many things being concerned, the relationship between Britain and European Union (EU) after Brexit is one of the issues catch people’s attention. Relationship between two draws attention from all over the world; however, countries other than UK and EU are obviously more interested in how those rights and obligations of Britain will change in multilateral or plurilateral trade forum after Brexit.

Ever since GATT era, the European Community then has been represented its member states in several occasions of WTO, and with EU`s member states being tighter, EU itself has acquired membership of WTO and act on behalf of its member states in almost all forums in WTO. Therefore, UK cannot possibly has its own commitment. Even though UK will still be a WTO member after Brexit, how to `live` within it by establishing its own commitment as soon as possible is the real question.

There are plenty of conjecture as to how UK can create its own commitment. Some said UK can simply `copy and paste` EU`s schedules, while other mentioned UK have to start from scratch by negotiating with all WTO members as a newcomer. After reviewing a considerable amount of articles, I believe UK can create most of its commitment by `coping and pasting`, except for those that concern with `quantum`. For those particular commitments, the situation is so complex that require other WTO members to involve. In addition, UK is not a member of WTO plurilateral agreement－Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA), how will UK that has such a huge government procurement market re-enter GPA is also a question that need to be solved.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第壹章 緒論 7
第一節 研究目的與研究範圍 11
第二節 研究方法與研究架構 11
第貳章 歐盟及其成員國在WTO之法律地位 14
第一節 歐盟於世界貿易組織下會籍的由來 14
第參章 歐盟與各成員國貿易權限劃分之演進 21
第一節 羅馬條約及歐洲法院早期的諮詢意見 22
第二節 歐洲法院1/94諮詢意見 24
第三節 阿姆斯特丹與尼斯條約 29
第四節 里斯本條約 30
第五節 小結 33
第肆章 歐盟東擴與WTO之談判 34
第伍章 英國脫歐後於WTO下權利義務之改變 38
第一節 英國繼承歐盟代為行使之權利義務 39
第二節 承諾中有關「數量」之分配爭議 42
一、配額或關稅配額 43
二、農業補貼 54
第三節 服務承諾表 57
第四節 英國脫歐後參與政府採購協定 59
一、WTO複邊協定之由來 60
二、政府採購協定之內容及其會籍規定 61
第陸章 結論 67
參考文獻 74		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 1418866 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104351044en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 英國脫歐zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 貿易權限zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 歐盟東擴zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) WTO承諾zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 政府採購協定zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Brexiten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Trade competenceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) EU enlargemenen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) WTO commitmenten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) GPAen_US
dc.title (題名) 論英國脫歐後在世界貿易組織之法律關係演變zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Change of British Legal Status under WTO after Brexiten_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分
1. 王泰銓，歐洲共同體法導論（1997）。
2. 中華經濟研究院（WTO及RTA中心），WTO及RTA電子報，第395期。
3. 周旭華，「歐洲共同體對外貿易關係的法律問題」，國立政治大學法律學研究所，（2000年）。
4. 莊亞婷，「試析歐盟對外貿易協定之締結程序－以里斯本條約後的『歐洲議會』監督機制為中心」，政治大學國際經貿組織暨法律研究中心經貿法訊，162期，頁8-12。
5. 羅昌發，國際貿易法（2010）。

英文部分
1. Arrowsmith Sue, The implications of Brexit for the law on public and utilities procurement, ACHILLES, at 12, available at https://www.achilles.com/images/locale/en-EN/buyer/pdf/UK/sue-arrowsmith-brexit-whitepaper.pdf.
2. Bartels Lorand, The UK`s Status in the WTO after Brexit, Sep. 23, 2016, available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2841747.
Bourgeois J.H.J., The Tokyo Round Agreements on Technical 3. Barriers and on Government Procurement, 19(5) CML REV. 5-33 (1982).
4. Brink Lars, UK Brexit and WTO farm support limits, CAP REFORM.EU, July 13, 2016, http://capreform.eu/uk-brexit-and-wto-farm-support-limits/.
5. Cremona Marise, A Policy of Bits and Pieces? The Common Commercial Policy after Nice, 4 CAMBRIDGE Y.B. EUR. LEGAL STUD. 61-91 (2001).
6. CRAIG PAUL & GRÁINNE DE BÚRCA, EU LAW－TEXT, CASES, AND MATERIALS (5th ed. 2011).
7. Dawar Kamala, Brexit and Government Procurement, UK Trade Policy Observatory Briefing Paper 8, Mar. 2017, at 2, available at http://blogs.sussex.ac.uk/uktpo/files/2016/11/Briefing-Paper-8.pdf.
8. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, The EEC as a GATT Member－Legal Conflicts between GATT Law and European Community Law, in THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND GATT 23-71 (Norbert et al. eds., 1986).
9. Everling Ulrich, EEC External Economic Relations, in THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND GATT 85-106 (Meinhard Hilf et al. eds., 1986).
10. Gstöhl Sieglinde, The European Union`s Trade Policy, 11 RITSUMEIKAN INTERNATIONAL AFFIRS 1-22 (2013)
11. Hilf Meinhard, The ECJ`s Opinion on the WTO－No Surprise, but Wise?, 6(2) EJIL 245-259 (1995).
12. JACKSON JOHN H., WORLD TRADE AND THE LAW OF GATT (1th ed. 1969).
13. Matthews Alan, WTO dimensions of a UK `Brexit` and agriculture trade, CAP REFORM.EU, Jan. 5 , 2016, http://capreform.eu/wto-dimensions-of-a-uk-brexit-and-agricultural-trade/.
14. Peter H. L. Van den Bossche, The EC and the Uruguay Round, in Implementing the Uruguay Round 23-102 (J. H. Jackson & A. O. Sykes eds., 1997).
15. Ungphakorn Peter, 12 years on, EU’s certified WTO goods commitments now up to date to 2004, TRADE Β BLOG, https://tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2017/02/04/after-12-years-eu-25-goods-commitments/.
16. Ungphakorn Peter, Brexit, agriculture, the WTO, and uncertainty, TRADE Β BLOG, https://tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2016/10/22/brexit-ag-wto-answers/.
17. Ungphakorn Peter, The limits of ‘possibility’: Splitting the lamb-mutton quota for the UK and EU–27, TRADE Β BLOG, Jan. 6, 2017, https://tradebetablog.wordpress.com/2017/01/06/limits-of-possibility/.
18. WTO, A HANDBOOK ON THE WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT SYSTEM 32 (1th ed. 2004).
19. Woods Michael, Trade Law: Non-Violation Complaints－"Legitimate Expectations" & "Good Faith", SLAW, Jan. 8, 2016, http://www.slaw.ca/2016/01/08/trade-law-non-violation-complaints-legitimate-expectations-good-faith/.		zh_TW