學術產出-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 Press Freedom and Privacy Invasion of Reporters: Proper Conduct Performed in the Course of Business as Justification
新聞自由與記者的侵犯隱私行為:以業務上正當行為的解釋為中心
作者 許恒達
Hsu, Heng-Da
貢獻者 法律系
關鍵詞 隱私權 ; 業務上正當行為 ; 新聞自由 ; 公共利益 ; 相當理由
Right to Privacy ; Proper Conduct Performed in the Course of Business ; Press Freedom ; Public Interest ; Probable Cause
日期 2017-06
上傳時間 22-Feb-2018 17:06:11 (UTC+8)
摘要 本文討論記者採訪與報導行為若侵害隱私法益時,得否阻卻違法。有別於最高法院近期判決直接引用新聞自由作為阻卻違法的判斷準據,筆者主張應優先適用業務上正當行為,其認定以事前標準決定行為人是否依憑具特別資格或知識之專門性活動的行為準則與倫理規範;由於我國迄今記者新聞活動相關規定尚不完備,除了倫理公約所揭櫫的公共利益理由之外,僅能透過個案性衡量予以判定,但僅限於重大公共利益的理由才能發動侵害隱私的記者取材行為,而發動前必須滿足客觀證據效果的相當理由要求;至於記者刊登侵害他人隱私的新聞素材,也必須以保護重大公益為前提。
This article aims to discuss whether a reporter who gathers information by invading other’s privacy and makes reports upon it could be justified. Taiwan’s Supreme Court found such conduct justified on account of reporter’s press freedom. Rather than this opinion, the author argues that, according to Article 22 of Taiwan’s Criminal Code, the justification ground employed preferentially should be "Proper Conduct Performed in the Course of Business". Therefore, in prior to conducting invasion of privacy for the sack of gathering news material, a reporter should collect some objective evidence inferring that the investigated event ought to be related to public interest. Such standard can also be applied to decide if reporter’s usage of materials gathered through privacy invasion could be lawful.
關聯 台大法學論叢, Vol.46, No.2, pp.589-664
資料類型 article
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.2017.46.02.05
dc.contributor 法律系
dc.creator (作者) 許恒達zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Hsu, Heng-Daen_US
dc.date (日期) 2017-06
dc.date.accessioned 22-Feb-2018 17:06:11 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 22-Feb-2018 17:06:11 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 22-Feb-2018 17:06:11 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/115977-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本文討論記者採訪與報導行為若侵害隱私法益時,得否阻卻違法。有別於最高法院近期判決直接引用新聞自由作為阻卻違法的判斷準據,筆者主張應優先適用業務上正當行為,其認定以事前標準決定行為人是否依憑具特別資格或知識之專門性活動的行為準則與倫理規範;由於我國迄今記者新聞活動相關規定尚不完備,除了倫理公約所揭櫫的公共利益理由之外,僅能透過個案性衡量予以判定,但僅限於重大公共利益的理由才能發動侵害隱私的記者取材行為,而發動前必須滿足客觀證據效果的相當理由要求;至於記者刊登侵害他人隱私的新聞素材,也必須以保護重大公益為前提。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This article aims to discuss whether a reporter who gathers information by invading other’s privacy and makes reports upon it could be justified. Taiwan’s Supreme Court found such conduct justified on account of reporter’s press freedom. Rather than this opinion, the author argues that, according to Article 22 of Taiwan’s Criminal Code, the justification ground employed preferentially should be "Proper Conduct Performed in the Course of Business". Therefore, in prior to conducting invasion of privacy for the sack of gathering news material, a reporter should collect some objective evidence inferring that the investigated event ought to be related to public interest. Such standard can also be applied to decide if reporter’s usage of materials gathered through privacy invasion could be lawful.en_US
dc.format.extent 1189079 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) 台大法學論叢, Vol.46, No.2, pp.589-664
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 隱私權 ; 業務上正當行為 ; 新聞自由 ; 公共利益 ; 相當理由zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Right to Privacy ; Proper Conduct Performed in the Course of Business ; Press Freedom ; Public Interest ; Probable Causeen_US
dc.title (題名) Press Freedom and Privacy Invasion of Reporters: Proper Conduct Performed in the Course of Business as Justificationen_US
dc.title (題名) 新聞自由與記者的侵犯隱私行為:以業務上正當行為的解釋為中心zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) article
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6199/NTULJ.2017.46.02.05
dc.doi.uri (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.2017.46.02.05