| dc.contributor | 法學院 | zh_Tw |
| dc.creator (作者) | 王立達 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Wang, Richard Li-dar | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | Hong, Shao-ting | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2016-06 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 21-Mar-2018 17:31:34 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 21-Mar-2018 17:31:34 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 21-Mar-2018 17:31:34 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/116393 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | During 2000 to 2007, Taiwan courts gradually settled on negligence liability for damages from patent infringement, and required plaintiffs to bear the burden of proof. The Intellectual Property Court since 2008 ruled defendants with low duty of care of no fault and unliable for damages. This experience may be of help for strict-liability countries that suffer from abusive patent assertions. | en_US |
| dc.format.extent | 97 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/html | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | Journal of The Intellectual Property: Intellectual Property Forum, No.105, pp.60-64 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Patent Infringement; Negligence; Intent; Willfulness; Duty of Care | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | Mental Elements of Patent Infringement Compensation: Empirical Survey of Taiwan Judicial Decisions and Its Comparative Implications | zh_TW |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | |
