Publications-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 The Ethics of False Belief
錯誤信念之倫理學
作者 藍亭
Lane, Timothy
貢獻者 神科所
關鍵詞 belief; procedural principle; positive illusions; depressive realism; and Moore’s paradox
日期 2010-09
上傳時間 18-Apr-2018 14:31:45 (UTC+8)
摘要 According to Allen Wood’s “procedural principle” we should believe only that which can be justified by evidence, and nothing more. He argues that holding beliefs which are not justified by evidence diminishes our self-respect and corrupts us, both individually and collectively. Wood’s normative and descriptive views as regards belief are of a piece with the received view which holds that beliefs aim at the truth. This view I refer to as the Truth-Tracking View (TTV). I first present a modest version of TTV, one which is sensitive to standard criticisms and one which is fully consistent with the procedural principle. I then raise some doubts about TTV by considering both anecdotal cases and empirical studies. These studies suggest that certain types of belief are designed to aim away from truth, in limited, carefully calibrated ways. Moreover, it seems to be the case that selectively aiming away from the truth is important for human well-being and performance. Beliefs that are designed to aim away I dub “Tertullian” beliefs (t-beliefs). I then limn the distinguishing characteristics of t-belief and proceed to evaluate the procedural principle in light of the evidence which suggests that t-belief plays an important role in our cognitive economy. Next I argue that t-beliefs might be essential to the maintenance of self-respect and that they do not corrupt in the way that Wood claims. Finally, I argue that the fate of Wood’s procedural principle will be determined by the results of further empirical research— sociological, psychological, and neuroscientific.
關聯 EurAmerica, 40 (3), 591-633
資料類型 article
dc.contributor 神科所zh_Tw
dc.creator (作者) 藍亭zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Lane, Timothyen_US
dc.date (日期) 2010-09-
dc.date.accessioned 18-Apr-2018 14:31:45 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-Apr-2018 14:31:45 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-Apr-2018 14:31:45 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/116891-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) According to Allen Wood’s “procedural principle” we should believe only that which can be justified by evidence, and nothing more. He argues that holding beliefs which are not justified by evidence diminishes our self-respect and corrupts us, both individually and collectively. Wood’s normative and descriptive views as regards belief are of a piece with the received view which holds that beliefs aim at the truth. This view I refer to as the Truth-Tracking View (TTV). I first present a modest version of TTV, one which is sensitive to standard criticisms and one which is fully consistent with the procedural principle. I then raise some doubts about TTV by considering both anecdotal cases and empirical studies. These studies suggest that certain types of belief are designed to aim away from truth, in limited, carefully calibrated ways. Moreover, it seems to be the case that selectively aiming away from the truth is important for human well-being and performance. Beliefs that are designed to aim away I dub “Tertullian” beliefs (t-beliefs). I then limn the distinguishing characteristics of t-belief and proceed to evaluate the procedural principle in light of the evidence which suggests that t-belief plays an important role in our cognitive economy. Next I argue that t-beliefs might be essential to the maintenance of self-respect and that they do not corrupt in the way that Wood claims. Finally, I argue that the fate of Wood’s procedural principle will be determined by the results of further empirical research— sociological, psychological, and neuroscientific.en_US
dc.format.extent 76 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.relation (關聯) EurAmerica, 40 (3), 591-633-
dc.subject (關鍵詞) belief; procedural principle; positive illusions; depressive realism; and Moore’s paradoxen_US
dc.title (題名) The Ethics of False Beliefen_US
dc.title (題名) 錯誤信念之倫理學_TW
dc.type (資料類型) article-