dc.contributor | 法學院 | zh_Tw |
dc.creator (作者) | 沈宗倫 | zh_TW |
dc.creator (作者) | 李治安 | zh_TW |
dc.creator (作者) | Shen, Chung-Lun | en_US |
dc.creator (作者) | Lee, Jyh-An | en_US |
dc.date (日期) | 2014-12 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 28-May-2018 14:41:47 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.available | 28-May-2018 14:41:47 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 28-May-2018 14:41:47 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/117324 | - |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | In our opinion, “a normal exploitation” and “the legitimate interests” of the patent should be subject to the substitution effects of the products made under compulsory licence, and the legitimate interests of third parties should be measured by whether such interests benefit the ultimate goal of patent law. When the infringing acts have no substitution effects, “a normal exploitation” and “the legitimate interests” of the patent are not negatively impacted, and such acts may justifiably be named as exceptions and limitations. The granting of a compulsory licence functions through the waiver of specific exclusive rights, to an extent. Therefore, the granting of a compulsory licence is among the exceptions and limitations under patent law. Based on our arguments about the exceptions and limitations, the granting of a compulsory licence should be tested by the criteria of Art. 30 TRIPS Agreement to secure its justification. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 206667 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.relation (關聯) | Compulsory Licensing:Practical Experiences and Ways Forward, Springer, pp.292-308 | |
dc.relation (關聯) | 國際標準書號 9783642547041 | |
dc.title (題名) | Review of Granted Compulsory Licenses | en_US |
dc.type (資料類型) | book/chapter | |