1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of Commerce
  4. Periodical Articles
  5. Item

Publications-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 A Fake Right of Priority Under the Cross-Strait Agreement on Intellectual Property Right Protection and Cooperation
作者 陳秉訓
Chen, Ping-Hsun
貢獻者 科管智財所
關鍵詞 TRIPS Agreement; Right of Priority; Paris Convention; Taiwan; China
日期 2016
上傳時間 13-Jul-2018 17:00:13 (UTC+8)
摘要 On June 26, 2010, Taiwan and China entered into a Cross-Strait Agreement on Intellectual Property Rights Cooperation and Protection (Cross-Strait IP Agreement). This Cross-Strait IP Agreement was renowned for China’s admission of a right of priority of Taiwanese patent applications or trademark applications. Under the TRIPS Agreement, China is obligated to admit a right of priority of Taiwanese applications, but it has never fulfilled such obligation. China’s particular concern is that a right of priority is rooted from the Paris Convention which only allows a state to join, so by admitting a right of priority of Taiwanese applications it may admit the statehood of Taiwan. This article is intended to argue that China provides a fake right of priority and still violates its duty to the TRIPS Agreement. First, the Agreement does not recite the TRIPS Agreement or Paris Convention. Second, the signing representatives are not regular representatives for international affairs or trade affairs in both countries. Third, China has not changed its IP laws to comply with the treaty requirements while Taiwan did so. Though, China promulgates regulations regarding a right of priority claimed by Taiwanese applicants. Those regulations are only applicable to Taiwanese applicants not to Taiwanese applications filed by a non-Taiwanese entity. Last, China does not treat the ECPA as a free trade agreement.
關聯 Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 213-239
資料類型 article
dc.contributor 科管智財所-
dc.creator (作者) 陳秉訓zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chen, Ping-Hsunen_US
dc.date (日期) 2016-
dc.date.accessioned 13-Jul-2018 17:00:13 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 13-Jul-2018 17:00:13 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 13-Jul-2018 17:00:13 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/118663-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) On June 26, 2010, Taiwan and China entered into a Cross-Strait Agreement on Intellectual Property Rights Cooperation and Protection (Cross-Strait IP Agreement). This Cross-Strait IP Agreement was renowned for China’s admission of a right of priority of Taiwanese patent applications or trademark applications. Under the TRIPS Agreement, China is obligated to admit a right of priority of Taiwanese applications, but it has never fulfilled such obligation. China’s particular concern is that a right of priority is rooted from the Paris Convention which only allows a state to join, so by admitting a right of priority of Taiwanese applications it may admit the statehood of Taiwan. This article is intended to argue that China provides a fake right of priority and still violates its duty to the TRIPS Agreement. First, the Agreement does not recite the TRIPS Agreement or Paris Convention. Second, the signing representatives are not regular representatives for international affairs or trade affairs in both countries. Third, China has not changed its IP laws to comply with the treaty requirements while Taiwan did so. Though, China promulgates regulations regarding a right of priority claimed by Taiwanese applicants. Those regulations are only applicable to Taiwanese applicants not to Taiwanese applications filed by a non-Taiwanese entity. Last, China does not treat the ECPA as a free trade agreement.en_US
dc.format.extent 97 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.relation (關聯) Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 213-239-
dc.subject (關鍵詞) TRIPS Agreement; Right of Priority; Paris Convention; Taiwan; Chinaen_US
dc.title (題名) A Fake Right of Priority Under the Cross-Strait Agreement on Intellectual Property Right Protection and Cooperationen_US
dc.type (資料類型) article-