學術產出-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 A New Exploration of Theory about Qin People’s Origin in the East China -From the Perspective of "People of Shangyan" in "Xi-Nian" of Qing-Hua-Jian
秦人東來說新探──從清華簡《繫年》的「商奄之民」談起
作者 古育安
Ku, Yu-An
貢獻者 中文系
關鍵詞 清華簡 ; 繫年 ; 商奄之民 ; 秦人 ; 秦人東來說 ;
Qing-Hua-Jian ; Xi-Nian ; People of Shangyan ; Qin People ; Qin People`s Origin in the East China
日期 2018-06
上傳時間 27-Jul-2018 17:10:41 (UTC+8)
摘要 過去學者對秦人來源的研究有「東來說」與「西來說」兩種觀點,近年因清華簡《繫年》中出現了秦人東來的新材料,使相關問題重新受到重視。本文亦嘗試透過這些新材料對秦人東來的問題提出新的解釋,基本從以下三個問題切入:第一,《繫年》中的秦先人「商奄之民」其性質為何;第二,《繫年》的「東來說」是否能與過去的「東來說」調和;第三,《繫年》的「東來說」的敘述立場為何。本文認為,《繫年》的「商奄之民」可以理解為被「奠」於西方的異族服屬,身分為「僕」,而從周代「封建」的角度來看,這批「商奄之民」可能是周天子挑選賜給非子的同姓族群。最後,《繫年》此種只記族群淵源的敘述立場與《史記.秦本紀》明顯不同,保存了有別於大一統帝王世系的觀點。
Past scholars proposed two perspectives about the origin of Qin people - "Origin in the East China" and "Origin in the West China." In recent years, new materials about Qin people’s origin in the East China have been discovered from "Xi-Nian" of Qing-Hua-Jian, and relevant issues have attracted attention again. This study also attempted to propose a new explanation about Qin people’s origin in the East China according to these new materials. Basically, this study investigated the following three questions: Firstly, what is the nature of ancestors of Qin people, "people of Shangyan," in "Xi-Nian?" Secondly, is the "Origin in the East China" in "Xi-Nian" consistent with the past "Qin People’s Origin in the East China?" Thirdly, what is the descriptive standpoint of "Origin in the East A China" in "Xi-Nian?" This study suggested that "people of Shangyan" in "Xi-Nian" can be interpreted as "Dian" enslaved by different ethnic groups in the west and their identity was "slaves." From the perspective of "feudalism" in the Zhou Dynasty, these "people of Shangyan" might be the group with the same last name chosen by Emperor of Zhou as a gift to Feizi. The descriptive standpoint of "Xi-Nian" only focuses on the origin of ethnic groups, which is significantly different from that of "Basic Annals of Qin, Records of the Grand Historian" where the perspective of "all great emperors are from the same lineage" is preserved.
關聯 淡江中文學報, No.第38期, pp.181-216
資料類型 article
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.6187/tkujcl.201806_(38).0006
dc.contributor 中文系
dc.creator (作者) 古育安zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Ku, Yu-Anen_US
dc.date (日期) 2018-06
dc.date.accessioned 27-Jul-2018 17:10:41 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 27-Jul-2018 17:10:41 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 27-Jul-2018 17:10:41 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119010-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 過去學者對秦人來源的研究有「東來說」與「西來說」兩種觀點,近年因清華簡《繫年》中出現了秦人東來的新材料,使相關問題重新受到重視。本文亦嘗試透過這些新材料對秦人東來的問題提出新的解釋,基本從以下三個問題切入:第一,《繫年》中的秦先人「商奄之民」其性質為何;第二,《繫年》的「東來說」是否能與過去的「東來說」調和;第三,《繫年》的「東來說」的敘述立場為何。本文認為,《繫年》的「商奄之民」可以理解為被「奠」於西方的異族服屬,身分為「僕」,而從周代「封建」的角度來看,這批「商奄之民」可能是周天子挑選賜給非子的同姓族群。最後,《繫年》此種只記族群淵源的敘述立場與《史記.秦本紀》明顯不同,保存了有別於大一統帝王世系的觀點。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Past scholars proposed two perspectives about the origin of Qin people - "Origin in the East China" and "Origin in the West China." In recent years, new materials about Qin people’s origin in the East China have been discovered from "Xi-Nian" of Qing-Hua-Jian, and relevant issues have attracted attention again. This study also attempted to propose a new explanation about Qin people’s origin in the East China according to these new materials. Basically, this study investigated the following three questions: Firstly, what is the nature of ancestors of Qin people, "people of Shangyan," in "Xi-Nian?" Secondly, is the "Origin in the East China" in "Xi-Nian" consistent with the past "Qin People’s Origin in the East China?" Thirdly, what is the descriptive standpoint of "Origin in the East A China" in "Xi-Nian?" This study suggested that "people of Shangyan" in "Xi-Nian" can be interpreted as "Dian" enslaved by different ethnic groups in the west and their identity was "slaves." From the perspective of "feudalism" in the Zhou Dynasty, these "people of Shangyan" might be the group with the same last name chosen by Emperor of Zhou as a gift to Feizi. The descriptive standpoint of "Xi-Nian" only focuses on the origin of ethnic groups, which is significantly different from that of "Basic Annals of Qin, Records of the Grand Historian" where the perspective of "all great emperors are from the same lineage" is preserved.en_US
dc.relation (關聯) 淡江中文學報, No.第38期, pp.181-216
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 清華簡 ; 繫年 ; 商奄之民 ; 秦人 ; 秦人東來說 ;zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Qing-Hua-Jian ; Xi-Nian ; People of Shangyan ; Qin People ; Qin People`s Origin in the East Chinaen_US
dc.title (題名) A New Exploration of Theory about Qin People’s Origin in the East China -From the Perspective of "People of Shangyan" in "Xi-Nian" of Qing-Hua-Jianen_US
dc.title (題名) 秦人東來說新探──從清華簡《繫年》的「商奄之民」談起zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) article
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6187/tkujcl.201806_(38).0006
dc.doi.uri (DOI) http://dx.doi.org/10.6187/tkujcl.201806_(38).0006