學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 我國圖書資訊學碩士畢業生工作調查與碩士班評估
Study on alumni career tracking and Library and Information Science master programs evaluation作者 張靜瑜
Chang, Jing-Yu貢獻者 王梅玲
張靜瑜
Chang, Jing-Yu關鍵詞 工作調查
碩士班評估
工作滿意度
碩士班價值
Job survey
Master programs evaluation
Job satisfaction
Value in graduate institution日期 2018 上傳時間 6-Aug-2018 18:12:05 (UTC+8) 摘要 近年來，圖書館因為資訊時代的來臨而逐漸數位化，除了圖書館以外的工作類型也更加多元且廣泛，因此圖書資訊學系碩士班為了因應這些改變勢必要做出不同的調整。本研究以Marshall et al. (2010)提出的「圖書資訊學工作就業2」作為參考依據，希望能夠了解現今圖書資訊學碩士班畢業生在畢業之後尋找工作的方向以及出路，以及評估碩士班對畢業生的幫助及改變。本研究之研究目的為（1）探討我國圖書資訊學碩士班畢業校友的工作就業現況與就業滿意度。（2）探討圖書資訊學碩士班評估的方式。（3）由畢業校友評估圖書資訊學碩士班對其之價值。（4）探討影響畢業校友工作與碩士班滿意度的重要因素。（5）比較不同任職機構圖書資訊學碩士班評估與畢業校友工作就業表現的異同。本研究透過參考國內外相關文獻、訪談以及問卷調查，探討圖書資訊學碩士班校友在工作現況以及所需應用到的知能，建構出五構面27項指標，作為未來評估碩士班提供之知能參考。本研究提出之研究結論如下：（1）我國圖書資訊學碩士班畢業校友之就業多元化；（2）本研究提出之碩士班知能指標與構面具可行性（3）碩士班價值與碩士班滿意度、工作知能與工作滿意度息息相關；（4）碩士班評估的方式；（5）任職機構為圖書館類型者滿意度與同意程度都較高；（6）淡江之滿意度居各項之冠，中興與台大之滿意度普遍較低；（7）從事非圖書館相關行業之校友比例逐年提升。針對本研究之結論提出以下建議：（1）對碩士班建議課程多與實務結合並且更多元，並且安排長期實習。（2）碩士班應培養學生對資訊的敏銳度與辨識度，並增加不同類型圖書館的參訪或觀摩學習。（3）建議碩士班可加強基礎資訊能力與程式撰寫相關課程，並且開設可適時地與服務場域所需的技能配合之課程（4）對校友建議能與碩士班保持聯繫，對於校友相關調查能加以配合。
In recent years, libraries are being digitized in the information age. The types of work are more diverse and extensive. Therefore, the graduate institutes of Library and Information Science need to make different adjustments in response to these changes. This study uses Marshall et al. (2010)`s "Book Information Work Employment 2" as a reference, hoping to understand the types of work that master of LIS looking for after graduation, and to evaluate the graduate institute if it’s really gave the graduates good effect. The main purpose of this research are as follows:(1)To do a survey in master of LIS graduates about their employment status and job satisfication in Taiwan. (2) Exploring the way of evaluating the LIS graduate institute. (3) Evaluate the value of the LIS graduate institute by alumni. (4) Find the factors that affecting graduates’ job and master programs satisfaction. (5) Compare the similarities and differences between different work place in the evaluation of the LIS graduate institution and the job performance.Through reference, interviews and questionnaires, this study explores the current employment status and the work competencies of the LIS master graduates, and to build five dimensions including 27 indicators as a reference for master’s work competencies. The research results are as follows:(1) Employment diversification of graduated students in Taiwan’s LIS graduate institutions.(2) The job competencies of the graduate institutions in this research are feasibility.(3) The value and the satisfaction of graduate institutions, job competencies and satisfaction are closely related.(4)The way to evaluation graduate institutions.(5)Work in the library get higher number of satisfaction and agreement.(6)The satisfaction of Tamkang higher then the other schools.(7) Alumni engaged in non-library related industries has increased year by year.According to the conclusions, the study suggests as the follows: (1) Combine practice or more diversity courses in class, recommend a long-term internships to every student. (2) The graduate institution should cultivate students` recognition of information, and visit more different types of libraries. (3) It is recommended that the master`s degree program can strengthen the basic information ability and program writing related courses. Moreover, provide courses that compatibility with diversity service field. (4) Hope alumni to keep in touch with graduate institute after graduate.參考文獻 天主教輔仁大學圖書資訊學系（2017）。各學年課程架構表。檢自：http://web.lins.fju.edu.tw/chi/master-structure王梅玲（2005）。英美與亞太地區圖書資訊學教育。台北市：文華圖書館管理。王梅玲（2007）。美國I-Schools運動帶給臺灣圖書資訊學教育的省思。圖書情報工作，51(4)，10-15。王梅玲（2011）。臺灣圖書資訊學碩士教育回顧與展望。圖書館學與資訊科學，37(2)，20-40。王梅玲（2013）。圖書資訊學教育百年發展史。蔡明月（編），圖書資訊學教育（頁28-35）。臺北市 : 五南圖書。王梅玲、劉濟慈（2009）。從圖書館價值探討我國圖書館員基本專業能力。圖書資訊學研究，4(1)，27-68。王梅玲、蔡佳縈（2009）。臺灣圖書資訊學教育指南發展之研究，大學圖書館， 13(1)，58-84。王梅玲、藍翊瑄（2016）。圖書館成果評鑑意涵與相關研究。臺北市立圖書館館訊，33(4)，50-72。何逸溱（2000）。我國圖書館員社會形象之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。輔仁大學圖書資訊學系碩士班，新北市。吳美美、張淇龍（2017）。圖書資訊學教育（民國105年）。中華民國圖書館年鑑（頁209），臺北市：國家圖書館。吳清山、王湘栗（2004）。教育評鑑的概念與發展。教育資料集刊，29，1-25。林珊如（2016）。圖書資訊學教育（民國104年）。中華民國圖書館年鑑（頁201-226）。臺北市：國家圖書館。林素甘、柯皓仁、嚴鼎忠（2007）。圖書館館員專業知能與繼續教育。國家圖書館館刊，96(2)，31-63。林靜宜（2010）。圖書資訊學研究所學生就讀動機、學習需求與生涯發展之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立師範大學，臺北市。邱敏芳（2012）。圖書資訊專業知能在數位出版與典藏產業之表現（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中興大學，台中市。邱皓政（2002）。量化研究與統計分析。台北市：五南。邱慧瑩（2013）。以CVF與MSQ探討臺灣公共圖書館組織文化與館員工作滿意度之關係（未出版之碩士論文）。圖書中興大學，臺中市。侯永琪、林劭仁、池俊吉（2017）。 教育部停辦系所評鑑與各大學因應之道。評鑑雙月刊，67，7-10。柯君儀（2005）。臺灣圖書資訊學碩士班碩士生就業與教育供需之研究（碩士論文）。檢自政大博碩士論文全文影像系統。柯君儀、王梅玲（2007）。臺灣圖書資訊學碩士生就業與能力需求之研究。大學圖書館，11(1)，97-116。胡幼慧（2008）。質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例（二版）。臺北市 : 高雄市：巨流出版；麗文總經銷。胡歐蘭（1998）。我國圖書資訊人力資源現況之調查研究(I)(II)。臺北市 : 政大圖書資訊學研究所。唐佩瑾（2013）。從文獻回顧探究碩士論文創新書寫現象。Journal of Library and Information Science，39(2)，4-25。秦夢群、莊清寶（2010）。大專生求學經歷與就業力關係。教育資料與研究雙月刊，94，85-112。國立中興大學圖書資訊學研究所（2017）。課程規劃。檢自：http://www.gilis.nchu.edu.tw/index.php/2014-05-21-06-12-32/2014-10-28-07-56-27國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所（2017）。課程資訊。檢自：http://www.lias.nccu.edu.tw/course/pages.php?ID=course1國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學系（2017）。課程資訊。檢自：http://www.lis.ntu.edu.tw/?page_id=148國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊研究所（2017）。學期課表。檢自：http://www.glis.ntnu.edu.tw/course/recruit.php?class2=1&class=401國家圖書館編（2013）。我國公共圖書館工作人員專業知能研訂芻議。臺北市：國家圖書館。國家圖書館編（2016）。我國大學圖書館館員專業知能指標研訂芻議。臺北市：國家圖書館。張淳淳（2008）。輔仁大學圖書資訊學系畢業生就業情況探討。圖書資訊學刊， 67，39-50。教育部（2016）。第五條圖書館專業人員資格。圖書館設立及營運標準。淡江大學圖書資訊與圖書館學系（2017）。研究所課程。檢自：http://www.dils.tku.edu.tw/dilswordpress/%E7%B3%BB%E6%89%80%E4%BB%8B%E7%B4%B9/%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E6%89%80/曾芳代、胡均立&陳韻宇（2011）。人力資本或是信心資產？自我效能對大學畢業生的學習經驗與就業力間之中介效果。長庚人文社會學報， 4(2)，335-356。黃月桂、丁鉅河（2010）。臺灣地區大學及碩士準畢業生就業力自我認知。科技教育課程改革與發展學術研討會論文集（頁267-275）。台北：華藝。楊美華（1997）。高級圖書館人才的生涯發展與人力之運用研究（計畫編號NSC86-2417-H004-017）。臺北市：國立政治大學圖書資訊學研究所。葉立誠、葉至誠編（1999）。研究方法與論文寫作。台北：商鼎文化公司。American Library Association (2006).Standards for Accreditation of Master`s Programs in Library and Information Studies 1992. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ala.org/educationcareers/accreditedprograms/standards/standardsAmerican Library Association (2009). ALA’s Core Competences of Librarianship. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/educationcareers/sites/ala.org.educationcareers/files/content/careers/corecomp/corecompetences/finalcorecompstat09.pdf.American Library Association (2013). Directory of ALA-accredited master`s programs in library and information studies. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/accreditedprograms/directoryAmerican Library Association (2015). Standards for accreditation of master’s programs in library and information studies. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/accreditedprograms/sites/ala.org.accreditedprograms/files/content/standards/Standards_2015_adopted_02-02-15.pdfAmerican Library Association (2016).ALA Accredited Programs. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/accreditedprograms/American Library Association (2017). ACRL Proficiencies for Assessment Librarians and Coordinators. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/assessment_proficienciesAnnette Lamb (2016). Librarians Aren’t Born with Information Superpowers: Leveling the Playing Field for Incoming Library Science Graduate Students. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 11(2), 1-21.Cherry, J. M., Duff, W. M., Singh, N., & Freund,L.(2011). Students’ perceptions of the information professions and their master’s program in information studies. Library & Information Science Research, 33(2), 120-131.Cherry, J. M., Freund, L., & Duff, W. M.(2013). Students’ perceptions of information programs in Canada. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 54(3), 174-190Chu, H. (2012). iSchools and Non-iSchools in the USA: An Examination of Their Master`s Programs. Education For Information, 29(1), 1-17.CILIP (2013). CILIP accredited qualifications. Retrieved from http://www.cilip.org.uk/cilip/jobs-careers/starting-library-and-information-career/how-become-librarian-or-informationGraduate School of Library and Information Science Dominican University (2010). Public library summer reading programs close the reading gap. Retrieved from https://www.oregon.gov/osl/LD/youthsvcs/srp.certificates/dominicanstudy.pdfIMLS(2017). Outcome Based Evaluation Basics. Retrieved from https://www.imls.gov/grants/outcome-based-evaluation/basicsInternational Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (2012). Guidelines for professional library information educational programs-2012. Retrieved from http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/set/publications/guidelines/Guidelines%202012_revision_SET%20FINAL%202012.pdf.iSchools(2018). Directory. Retrieved from https://ischools.org/members/directory/Griffiths ,Jose-Marie & King, Donald W. (1986). New directions in library and information science education. Greenwood Press: American Society for Information Science.Hoppock, R. (1935). Job Satisfaction, Harper and Brothers, New York, p. 47Kirkpatrick, Donald L .& Kirkpatrick, James D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: the four levels (3rd ed.). San Francisco, Calif.: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Koltay, Zsuzsa, & Li, Xin(2010). SPEC KIT 318: Impact measures in research libraries. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries.Kyrillidou, M.(2002). From input and output measures to quality and outcome measures, or, from the user in the life of the library to the library in the life of the user. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 28(1), 42-46.Marshall, J. G., Morgan, J. C., Rathbun-grubb, S., Marshall, V. W., Barreau, D., Moran, B. B., Solomon, P., &Thompson, C. A. (2010). Toward a shared approach to program evaluation and alumni career tracking: Results from the workforce issues in Library and Information Science 2 study. Library Trends, 59(1-2), 30-42.Matthews, J. (2015). Assessing outcomes and value: it’s all a matter of perspective, performance. Measurement and Metrics, 16( 3), 211-233.Matthews, J. (2007). Evaluation: Process and models. In Joseph R (eds.), The evaluation and measurement of library services(pp.3-16). Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited.Mehdinezhad, V. (2011). Evaluation of teacher education program: case study. Criteria for educational program evaluation: the case of teacher education program. Germany : LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.Poll, R. (2014). Did you enjoy the library? Impact surveys in diverse settings. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 15(1/2), 4-12.Poll, R. & Payne, P. (2006) Impact measures for libraries and information services. LIBRARY HITECH, 24(4), 547-562.Roman, S., Carran, D. T. & Fiore, C. D.(2012). The Dominican study: Public library summer reading programs close the reading gap. Dominican University-Graduate School of Library &Information Science. Retrieved from http://gslis.dom.edu/sites/default/files/documents/IMLS_finalReport.pdfRubin, R. J.(2006). Demonstrating results: Using outcome measurement in your library. Chicago, Ill. : American Library Association.Sanders, C. (2015). Competency-Based Education Programs: A Library Perspective. Public Services Quarterly, 11(2), 151-162.Scriven, M. (1967).The methodology of evaluation. In R. E. Stake(Ed.). Curriculum evaluation. American education research association monograph series on evaluation, 1. Chicago: Rand McNally.U.S. Department of Education (2003). Accreditation in the U.S. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/admins/finaid/accred/accredus.htmlWarraich, N. F., & Ameen, K. (2010). Employment and learning outcomes of LIS graduates: A case of Pakistan. Education for Information, 28(2-4), 315-324. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊與檔案學研究所
105155015資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105155015 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 王梅玲 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) 張靜瑜 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chang, Jing-Yu en_US dc.creator (作者) 張靜瑜 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Chang, Jing-Yu en_US dc.date (日期) 2018 en_US dc.date.accessioned 6-Aug-2018 18:12:05 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 6-Aug-2018 18:12:05 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 6-Aug-2018 18:12:05 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0105155015 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119213 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 圖書資訊與檔案學研究所 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 105155015 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 近年來，圖書館因為資訊時代的來臨而逐漸數位化，除了圖書館以外的工作類型也更加多元且廣泛，因此圖書資訊學系碩士班為了因應這些改變勢必要做出不同的調整。本研究以Marshall et al. (2010)提出的「圖書資訊學工作就業2」作為參考依據，希望能夠了解現今圖書資訊學碩士班畢業生在畢業之後尋找工作的方向以及出路，以及評估碩士班對畢業生的幫助及改變。本研究之研究目的為（1）探討我國圖書資訊學碩士班畢業校友的工作就業現況與就業滿意度。（2）探討圖書資訊學碩士班評估的方式。（3）由畢業校友評估圖書資訊學碩士班對其之價值。（4）探討影響畢業校友工作與碩士班滿意度的重要因素。（5）比較不同任職機構圖書資訊學碩士班評估與畢業校友工作就業表現的異同。本研究透過參考國內外相關文獻、訪談以及問卷調查，探討圖書資訊學碩士班校友在工作現況以及所需應用到的知能，建構出五構面27項指標，作為未來評估碩士班提供之知能參考。本研究提出之研究結論如下：（1）我國圖書資訊學碩士班畢業校友之就業多元化；（2）本研究提出之碩士班知能指標與構面具可行性（3）碩士班價值與碩士班滿意度、工作知能與工作滿意度息息相關；（4）碩士班評估的方式；（5）任職機構為圖書館類型者滿意度與同意程度都較高；（6）淡江之滿意度居各項之冠，中興與台大之滿意度普遍較低；（7）從事非圖書館相關行業之校友比例逐年提升。針對本研究之結論提出以下建議：（1）對碩士班建議課程多與實務結合並且更多元，並且安排長期實習。（2）碩士班應培養學生對資訊的敏銳度與辨識度，並增加不同類型圖書館的參訪或觀摩學習。（3）建議碩士班可加強基礎資訊能力與程式撰寫相關課程，並且開設可適時地與服務場域所需的技能配合之課程（4）對校友建議能與碩士班保持聯繫，對於校友相關調查能加以配合。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) In recent years, libraries are being digitized in the information age. The types of work are more diverse and extensive. Therefore, the graduate institutes of Library and Information Science need to make different adjustments in response to these changes. This study uses Marshall et al. (2010)`s "Book Information Work Employment 2" as a reference, hoping to understand the types of work that master of LIS looking for after graduation, and to evaluate the graduate institute if it’s really gave the graduates good effect. The main purpose of this research are as follows:(1)To do a survey in master of LIS graduates about their employment status and job satisfication in Taiwan. (2) Exploring the way of evaluating the LIS graduate institute. (3) Evaluate the value of the LIS graduate institute by alumni. (4) Find the factors that affecting graduates’ job and master programs satisfaction. (5) Compare the similarities and differences between different work place in the evaluation of the LIS graduate institution and the job performance.Through reference, interviews and questionnaires, this study explores the current employment status and the work competencies of the LIS master graduates, and to build five dimensions including 27 indicators as a reference for master’s work competencies. The research results are as follows:(1) Employment diversification of graduated students in Taiwan’s LIS graduate institutions.(2) The job competencies of the graduate institutions in this research are feasibility.(3) The value and the satisfaction of graduate institutions, job competencies and satisfaction are closely related.(4)The way to evaluation graduate institutions.(5)Work in the library get higher number of satisfaction and agreement.(6)The satisfaction of Tamkang higher then the other schools.(7) Alumni engaged in non-library related industries has increased year by year.According to the conclusions, the study suggests as the follows: (1) Combine practice or more diversity courses in class, recommend a long-term internships to every student. (2) The graduate institution should cultivate students` recognition of information, and visit more different types of libraries. (3) It is recommended that the master`s degree program can strengthen the basic information ability and program writing related courses. Moreover, provide courses that compatibility with diversity service field. (4) Hope alumni to keep in touch with graduate institute after graduate. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究背景與動機 1第二節 研究目的 5第三節 研究問題 5第四節 研究範圍與限制 6第五節 名詞解釋 7第二章 文獻探討 9第一節 圖書資訊學碩士教育 9第二節 圖書資訊學畢業生工作市場與就業力 15第三節 圖書資訊學教育評估 21第三章 研究方法 27第一節 研究設計 27第二節 研究方法 28第三節 研究工具 30第四節 資料蒐集與分析 43第五節 研究實施步驟 46第四章 畢業生工作調查與碩士班評估深度訪談 49第一節 基本資料與工作現況 49第二節 工作所需能力 52第三節 畢業生對碩士班課程學用看法 53第四節 研究所課程之建議 55第五章 問卷調查與分析 57第一節 基本資料 58第二節 信度與效度分析 60第三節 碩士班畢業校友工作就業現況 61第四節 畢業生工作知能與滿意度 66第五節 碩士班品質滿意度與價值 80第六節 碩士班價值相關與不同背景畢業生差異 87第七節 綜合討論 91第六章 結論與建議 96第一節 結論 97第二節 建議 99參考文獻 100附錄一、圖書資訊學碩士畢業生工作調查與碩士班成果評估調查問卷 110附錄二、「我國圖書資訊學碩士畢業生工作就業調查與碩士班課程評估訪談」邀請函 116附錄三、「我國圖書資訊學碩士畢業生工作就業調查與碩士班課程評估訪談」大綱 117 zh_TW dc.format.extent 1852425 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105155015 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 工作調查 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 碩士班評估 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 工作滿意度 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 碩士班價值 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Job survey en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Master programs evaluation en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Job satisfaction en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Value in graduate institution en_US dc.title (題名) 我國圖書資訊學碩士畢業生工作調查與碩士班評估 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Study on alumni career tracking and Library and Information Science master programs evaluation en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 天主教輔仁大學圖書資訊學系（2017）。各學年課程架構表。檢自：http://web.lins.fju.edu.tw/chi/master-structure王梅玲（2005）。英美與亞太地區圖書資訊學教育。台北市：文華圖書館管理。王梅玲（2007）。美國I-Schools運動帶給臺灣圖書資訊學教育的省思。圖書情報工作，51(4)，10-15。王梅玲（2011）。臺灣圖書資訊學碩士教育回顧與展望。圖書館學與資訊科學，37(2)，20-40。王梅玲（2013）。圖書資訊學教育百年發展史。蔡明月（編），圖書資訊學教育（頁28-35）。臺北市 : 五南圖書。王梅玲、劉濟慈（2009）。從圖書館價值探討我國圖書館員基本專業能力。圖書資訊學研究，4(1)，27-68。王梅玲、蔡佳縈（2009）。臺灣圖書資訊學教育指南發展之研究，大學圖書館， 13(1)，58-84。王梅玲、藍翊瑄（2016）。圖書館成果評鑑意涵與相關研究。臺北市立圖書館館訊，33(4)，50-72。何逸溱（2000）。我國圖書館員社會形象之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。輔仁大學圖書資訊學系碩士班，新北市。吳美美、張淇龍（2017）。圖書資訊學教育（民國105年）。中華民國圖書館年鑑（頁209），臺北市：國家圖書館。吳清山、王湘栗（2004）。教育評鑑的概念與發展。教育資料集刊，29，1-25。林珊如（2016）。圖書資訊學教育（民國104年）。中華民國圖書館年鑑（頁201-226）。臺北市：國家圖書館。林素甘、柯皓仁、嚴鼎忠（2007）。圖書館館員專業知能與繼續教育。國家圖書館館刊，96(2)，31-63。林靜宜（2010）。圖書資訊學研究所學生就讀動機、學習需求與生涯發展之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立師範大學，臺北市。邱敏芳（2012）。圖書資訊專業知能在數位出版與典藏產業之表現（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中興大學，台中市。邱皓政（2002）。量化研究與統計分析。台北市：五南。邱慧瑩（2013）。以CVF與MSQ探討臺灣公共圖書館組織文化與館員工作滿意度之關係（未出版之碩士論文）。圖書中興大學，臺中市。侯永琪、林劭仁、池俊吉（2017）。 教育部停辦系所評鑑與各大學因應之道。評鑑雙月刊，67，7-10。柯君儀（2005）。臺灣圖書資訊學碩士班碩士生就業與教育供需之研究（碩士論文）。檢自政大博碩士論文全文影像系統。柯君儀、王梅玲（2007）。臺灣圖書資訊學碩士生就業與能力需求之研究。大學圖書館，11(1)，97-116。胡幼慧（2008）。質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例（二版）。臺北市 : 高雄市：巨流出版；麗文總經銷。胡歐蘭（1998）。我國圖書資訊人力資源現況之調查研究(I)(II)。臺北市 : 政大圖書資訊學研究所。唐佩瑾（2013）。從文獻回顧探究碩士論文創新書寫現象。Journal of Library and Information Science，39(2)，4-25。秦夢群、莊清寶（2010）。大專生求學經歷與就業力關係。教育資料與研究雙月刊，94，85-112。國立中興大學圖書資訊學研究所（2017）。課程規劃。檢自：http://www.gilis.nchu.edu.tw/index.php/2014-05-21-06-12-32/2014-10-28-07-56-27國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所（2017）。課程資訊。檢自：http://www.lias.nccu.edu.tw/course/pages.php?ID=course1國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學系（2017）。課程資訊。檢自：http://www.lis.ntu.edu.tw/?page_id=148國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊研究所（2017）。學期課表。檢自：http://www.glis.ntnu.edu.tw/course/recruit.php?class2=1&class=401國家圖書館編（2013）。我國公共圖書館工作人員專業知能研訂芻議。臺北市：國家圖書館。國家圖書館編（2016）。我國大學圖書館館員專業知能指標研訂芻議。臺北市：國家圖書館。張淳淳（2008）。輔仁大學圖書資訊學系畢業生就業情況探討。圖書資訊學刊， 67，39-50。教育部（2016）。第五條圖書館專業人員資格。圖書館設立及營運標準。淡江大學圖書資訊與圖書館學系（2017）。研究所課程。檢自：http://www.dils.tku.edu.tw/dilswordpress/%E7%B3%BB%E6%89%80%E4%BB%8B%E7%B4%B9/%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E6%89%80/曾芳代、胡均立&陳韻宇（2011）。人力資本或是信心資產？自我效能對大學畢業生的學習經驗與就業力間之中介效果。長庚人文社會學報， 4(2)，335-356。黃月桂、丁鉅河（2010）。臺灣地區大學及碩士準畢業生就業力自我認知。科技教育課程改革與發展學術研討會論文集（頁267-275）。台北：華藝。楊美華（1997）。高級圖書館人才的生涯發展與人力之運用研究（計畫編號NSC86-2417-H004-017）。臺北市：國立政治大學圖書資訊學研究所。葉立誠、葉至誠編（1999）。研究方法與論文寫作。台北：商鼎文化公司。American Library Association (2006).Standards for Accreditation of Master`s Programs in Library and Information Studies 1992. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ala.org/educationcareers/accreditedprograms/standards/standardsAmerican Library Association (2009). ALA’s Core Competences of Librarianship. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/educationcareers/sites/ala.org.educationcareers/files/content/careers/corecomp/corecompetences/finalcorecompstat09.pdf.American Library Association (2013). Directory of ALA-accredited master`s programs in library and information studies. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/accreditedprograms/directoryAmerican Library Association (2015). Standards for accreditation of master’s programs in library and information studies. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/accreditedprograms/sites/ala.org.accreditedprograms/files/content/standards/Standards_2015_adopted_02-02-15.pdfAmerican Library Association (2016).ALA Accredited Programs. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/accreditedprograms/American Library Association (2017). ACRL Proficiencies for Assessment Librarians and Coordinators. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/assessment_proficienciesAnnette Lamb (2016). Librarians Aren’t Born with Information Superpowers: Leveling the Playing Field for Incoming Library Science Graduate Students. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 11(2), 1-21.Cherry, J. M., Duff, W. M., Singh, N., & Freund,L.(2011). Students’ perceptions of the information professions and their master’s program in information studies. Library & Information Science Research, 33(2), 120-131.Cherry, J. M., Freund, L., & Duff, W. M.(2013). Students’ perceptions of information programs in Canada. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 54(3), 174-190Chu, H. (2012). iSchools and Non-iSchools in the USA: An Examination of Their Master`s Programs. Education For Information, 29(1), 1-17.CILIP (2013). CILIP accredited qualifications. Retrieved from http://www.cilip.org.uk/cilip/jobs-careers/starting-library-and-information-career/how-become-librarian-or-informationGraduate School of Library and Information Science Dominican University (2010). Public library summer reading programs close the reading gap. Retrieved from https://www.oregon.gov/osl/LD/youthsvcs/srp.certificates/dominicanstudy.pdfIMLS(2017). Outcome Based Evaluation Basics. Retrieved from https://www.imls.gov/grants/outcome-based-evaluation/basicsInternational Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (2012). Guidelines for professional library information educational programs-2012. Retrieved from http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/set/publications/guidelines/Guidelines%202012_revision_SET%20FINAL%202012.pdf.iSchools(2018). Directory. Retrieved from https://ischools.org/members/directory/Griffiths ,Jose-Marie & King, Donald W. (1986). New directions in library and information science education. Greenwood Press: American Society for Information Science.Hoppock, R. (1935). Job Satisfaction, Harper and Brothers, New York, p. 47Kirkpatrick, Donald L .& Kirkpatrick, James D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: the four levels (3rd ed.). San Francisco, Calif.: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Koltay, Zsuzsa, & Li, Xin(2010). SPEC KIT 318: Impact measures in research libraries. Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries.Kyrillidou, M.(2002). From input and output measures to quality and outcome measures, or, from the user in the life of the library to the library in the life of the user. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 28(1), 42-46.Marshall, J. G., Morgan, J. C., Rathbun-grubb, S., Marshall, V. W., Barreau, D., Moran, B. B., Solomon, P., &Thompson, C. A. (2010). Toward a shared approach to program evaluation and alumni career tracking: Results from the workforce issues in Library and Information Science 2 study. Library Trends, 59(1-2), 30-42.Matthews, J. (2015). Assessing outcomes and value: it’s all a matter of perspective, performance. Measurement and Metrics, 16( 3), 211-233.Matthews, J. (2007). Evaluation: Process and models. In Joseph R (eds.), The evaluation and measurement of library services(pp.3-16). Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited.Mehdinezhad, V. (2011). Evaluation of teacher education program: case study. Criteria for educational program evaluation: the case of teacher education program. Germany : LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.Poll, R. (2014). Did you enjoy the library? Impact surveys in diverse settings. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 15(1/2), 4-12.Poll, R. & Payne, P. (2006) Impact measures for libraries and information services. LIBRARY HITECH, 24(4), 547-562.Roman, S., Carran, D. T. & Fiore, C. D.(2012). The Dominican study: Public library summer reading programs close the reading gap. Dominican University-Graduate School of Library &Information Science. Retrieved from http://gslis.dom.edu/sites/default/files/documents/IMLS_finalReport.pdfRubin, R. J.(2006). Demonstrating results: Using outcome measurement in your library. Chicago, Ill. : American Library Association.Sanders, C. (2015). Competency-Based Education Programs: A Library Perspective. Public Services Quarterly, 11(2), 151-162.Scriven, M. (1967).The methodology of evaluation. In R. E. Stake(Ed.). Curriculum evaluation. American education research association monograph series on evaluation, 1. Chicago: Rand McNally.U.S. Department of Education (2003). Accreditation in the U.S. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/admins/finaid/accred/accredus.htmlWarraich, N. F., & Ameen, K. (2010). Employment and learning outcomes of LIS graduates: A case of Pakistan. Education for Information, 28(2-4), 315-324. zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/THE.NCCU.LIAS.007.2018.A01 -
