學術產出-學位論文
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 為什麼土地改革在台灣成功而在秘魯不成功? 1950-1975
Why did Land Reform Work in Taiwan, but not in Peru? 1950-1975作者 李娣雅
Quispe, Lidia貢獻者 陳永福
Alex Tan
李娣雅
Quispe, Lidia關鍵詞 土地改革
台灣
秘魯
制度
政府
權利
Land reform
Taiwan
Peru
Institutions
Government
Rights日期 2018 上傳時間 27-Aug-2018 15:05:13 (UTC+8) 摘要 這份研究的動機是希望能透過台灣與秘魯的案例比較，對土地改革文獻作出獨創性的貢獻。現存的土改文獻通常都強調相較於其他國家，台灣的土地改革較為成功。同時，台灣的土地改革也時常被拿來與其他亞洲國家做比較。然而，這項研究計畫，將台灣的土地改革政策與拉丁美洲相比，特別是對秘魯的土地改革政策進行比較，因為現有的許多文獻，都認為土地改革政策的實施在該地區是不成功的。本文的主要目的是解釋儘管秘魯與台灣之間存在顯著的相似之處，為什麼土地改革政策在台灣會成功，而在秘魯則不然。 兩者都是農業經濟，在土地改革政策，且實施過程中也有類似的一黨政治制度。這份論文採用比較分析方法探討可能影響土改結果的因素。結果表明，台灣的土地改革政策，實施地比秘魯更有效率，這主要歸功於三個因素：保障其權利和激勵措施，國家對投資和技術援助的支持，以及良善的制度，是台灣土地改革成功的關鍵因素，但在秘魯展現出。
The motivation of this research is to make an original contribution to land reform literature by comparing the cases of Taiwan and Peru. Existing literature on land reform usually emphasizes Taiwan’s success as an example for other countries, and Taiwanese land reform is frequently compared with other countries in the region of Asia. This research project, however, compares Taiwan’s land reforms to those conducted in Latin America, specifically Peru, since much of the existing literature considers the implementation of land reform as unsuccessful in this region. The main objective of this paper is to explain why land reform was successful in Taiwan, but not in Peru, despite notable similarities between the two countries. Both were agricultural economies and had similar one-party political systems during the land reform implementation. This research paper uses comparative analysis to explore possible explanatory factors for the different results seen in the two countries. The results suggest that land reform implementation in Taiwan was more effective than in Peru primarily due to three factors. Guaranteed rights and incentives, State support in investment & technical assistance, and institutions were the key factors identified for the success of land reform in Taiwan, but not presented in Peru.參考文獻 1.Abhijit, B. (1999, April). Land Reforms: Prospects and Strategies. Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, (pp. 1-19). Washington D.C.2.Atkins, F. (1988, August). Land Reform: A Failure of Neoclassical Theorization. World Development, 16(8), 935-946.3.Barraclough, S. L. (1999). Land Reform in Developing Countries: The Role of the State and Other Actors. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD).4.Besley, T., & Burgess, R. (2000, May). Land Reform, Poverty Reduction, and Growth: Evidence from India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(2), 389-430.5.Borras, S. M. (2007). Pro-Poor Land Reform: A Critique. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.6.Boyce, J. K., Rosset, P., & Stanton, E. A. (2005). Land Reform and Sustainable Development. Massachusetts: Political Economy Research Institute.7.Brodsky, J., & Oser, J. (1968, October). Land Tenure in Peru. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 27(4), 405-421.8.Burisch, M. (1969). Legislative and administrative aspects of land reform in Taiwan. Land Reform, Land Settlement and Co-operatives, 1, 16-28.9.Cant, A. (2012, February). Land for Those Who Work It: A Visual Analysis of Agrarian Reform Posters in Velasco`s Peru. Cambridge University Press, 44(1), 1-37.10.Carroll, T. F. (1961). Land Reform Issue in Latin America. New York: The Century Foundation.11.Carroll, T. F. (1970). Land Reform in Peru. Washington D.C.: U.S. Agency for International Development.12.Castillo, L. (2003). Reforma y Contrarreforma Agraria en el Perú. Seminario Internacional sobre Resultados y Perspectivas de las Reformas Agrarias y los Movimientos Campesinos e Indigenas en America Latina (pp. 255-284). La Paz: Universidad Mayor de San Andres. Retrieved from https://zh.scribd.com/document/294089330/Catillo-pinto-Laureano-2003-Reforma-y-contrarreforma-agraria-en-el-Peru-pdf13.Chang, Y.-T. (1965). Land Reform and Its Impact on Economic and Social Progress in Taiwan. Taipei: National Taiwan University.14.Chang, Y.-T. (1974). Land Reform and Agricultural Development: Taiwan`s Experience. Retrieved from http://ir.lib.nchu.edu.tw/bitstream/11455/79051/1/150121-4.pdf15.Chen. (1961). Land Reform in Taiwan. Taipei: China Publishing Company.16.Chen. (1994). The Effects of Land Reform on the Rice Sector and Economic Development in Taiwan. World Development, 22(11), 1759-1770.17.Chen, Y.-E., & Wang, Y.-T. (1980). Secular Trend of Output, Input and Productivity- A Quantitative Analysis of Agricultural Development in Taiwan". In C.-M. Hou, & T.-S. Yu (Ed.), Agricultural Development in China, Japan and Korea. Taipei: Academia Sinica.18.Chirinos, A. (1972). Percepción del Campesinado y los Cambios en el Area Rural Peruana. Lima: Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina.19.Chirinos, A. (1975). La Reforma Agraria Peruana. Nueva Sociedad(21), 47-64.20.Cornia, G. A. (1985). Farm Size, Land Yeilds and the Agricultural Production Function: An Analysis for Fifteen Developing Countries. World Development, 13(4), 513-534.21.Cotler, J. (1967, December). The Mechanics of Internal Domination and Social Change in Peru. Studies in Comparative International Development, 3(12), 229–246.22.Craig, W. W. (1969). Peru: The Peasant Movement of La Convencion. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.23.Eguren, F. (2009). La Reforma Agraria en el Peru. Debate Agrario(44), 63-100. Retrieved from http://www.cepes.org.pe/debate/debate44/debate44_03.pdf24.El-Ghonemy, M. R. (1990). The Political Economy of Rural Poverty: The Case for Land Reform. New York: Routledge.25.Fan, S., Ashok, G., & Sukhadeo, T. (2008, September). Investments, Subsidies and Pro-Poor Growth in Rural India. International Association of Agricultural Economics, 39(2), 163-170.26.FAO. (2004). The State of Food Insecurity in the World. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/a-y5650e.pdf27.Fei, J. C., Ranis, G., & Kuo, S. W. (1979). Growth with Equity: The Taiwan Case. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/289241468761968181/Growth-with-equity-the-Taiwan-case28.Fort, R. (2008). Assesing the Impact of Rural Land Titling in Peru: The Case of the PETT Program. World Bank Conference on New Challenges for Land Policy and Administration (pp. 1-30). Washington D.C.: Group of Analysis for Development.29.Gitlitz, J. S. (1971). Impresions of Peruvian Agrarian Reform. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 13(3-4), 456-474.30.Greenhalgh, S. (1989). Land Reform and Family Entrepreneurship in East Asia. Population and Development Review, 15, 77-118.31.Handelman, H. (1975). Struggle in the Andes: Peasant Political Mobilization in Peru. Austin: University of Texas Press.32.Handelman, H. (1981). Peasants, Landlords and Bureaucrats: The Politics of Agrarian Reform in Peru. American Universities Field Staff Reports(1), 1-23.33.Ho, S. (1987). Economics, Economic Bureaucracy, and Taiwan`s Economic Development. Pacific Affairs, 60(2), 226-247.34.Horton, D. (1973). Haciendas and Cooperatives: A Preliminary Study of Latifundist Agrculture and Agrarian Reform in Northen Peru. Land Tenure Center Research Paper 53. Madison: University of Wisconsin.35.Instituto Interamericano de Ciencias Agricolas de la OEA. (1972). Evoluvion de la Agricultura y de las Instituciones del Sector Agropecuario en el Peru. Lima: Direccion Regional para la Zona Andina.36.Janvry, A. D. (1981, May). The Role of Land Reform in Economic Development: Policies and Politics. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63(2), 384-392.37.Janvry, A. D., & Sadoulet, E. (2002, June 14). Land Reforms in Latin America: Ten Lessons toward a Contemporary Agenda. World Bank Latin America Land Policy Workshop. Pachuca, Mexico. Retrieved from http://are.berkeley.edu/~esadoulet/papers/Land_Reform_in_LA_10_lesson.pdf38.Jelic, M. A., Jasminka, M. D., Srecko, M. R., & Jugoslav, A. (2014). Reasons for Government Intervention in Agriculture. Annals of the University of Oradea, 3, 174-179.39.Jolly, M. (2003). Land Reform in Philippines and Taiwan in the First Half of the Twentieth Century. Toronto: Ryerson University.40.Kay, C. (2002). Reforma Agraria, Industrialización y Desarrollo ¿Porque Asia Oriental Superó a America Latina? Debate Agrario(34), 45-94.41.Kerekes, G. (1974). Reforma Agraria y Cooperativismo en Hungría. Lima: Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina.42.King, R. (1977). Land Reform: A World Survey. Boulder: Westview Press.43.Koo, A. (1966, March). Economic Consequences of Land Reform in Taiwan. Asian Survey, 6(3), 150-157.44.Koo, A. (1968). The Role of Land Reform in Economic Development: A Case Study of Taiwan. New York: Praeger.45.Ladejinsky, W. I. (1965). Land Reform. In D. Hapgood, Policies for Promoting Agricultural Development: Report of a Conference on Productivity and Innovation in Agriculture in the Underdeveloped Countries (p. 298). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for International Studies.46.Maya, G. (2016, September 13). El Tiempo. Retrieved from Reforma agraria y desarrollo: http://www.eltiempo.com/archivo/documento/CMS-1670109647.Medina, R. (1970). Agrarian Reform Legislation in Peru. Land Tenure Center Monograph No 73. Madison: Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin.48.MINAGRI. (2018, January 03). www.minagri.gob.pe. Retrieved from Ministerio de Agricultura y Riego: http://minagri.gob.pe/portal/publicaciones-y-prensa/noticias-2018/20660-sector-agricultura-se-consolido-el-2017-como-el-segundo-generador-de-mayores-divisas-para-el-peru-249.Mouton, J. (2001). How to succeed in your Master’s and Doctoral studies: A South African Guide and Resource Book. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.50.Narh, P., Lambini, C. K., Sabbi, M., Pham, V. D., & Nguyen, T. T. (2016). Land Sector Reforms in Ghana, Kenya and Vietnam: A Comparative Analysis of Their Effectiveness. Land, 5(2). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/land502000851.Nieswiadomy, M. S. (2003). Land reform and conflict resolution in Colombia. Monterrey: The NPS Institutional Archive. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10945/615852.North. (1995). The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development. In J. Harriss, J. Hunter, & C. M. Lewis, The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development (pp. 17-26). London: Routledge.53.North, L. (1997). Que paso en Taiwan: Un relato de la reforma agraria y de la industrializacion rural. In L. Martinez, El Desarrollo Sostenible en el Medio Rural (pp. 89-113). Quito: FLACSO.54.Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.55.Pintado, M. (2016, September). Evolución de la agricultura, antes y después de la reforma agraria. La Revista Agraria(182), 10-13. Retrieved from http://www.larevistaagraria.info/sites/default/files//revista/LRA182/LRA182_Evolucion.pdf56.Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley.57.Ribot, J. C., & Peluso, N. L. (2003). A Theory of Access. Rural Sociological Society, 68(2), 153-181.58.Robert, A. (1962, October). Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from Agrarian Reform in Latin America: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/south-america/1962-10-01/agrarian-reform-latin-america59.Saco, A. (1970). In Peru Land is Restored to the Indians. Land Reform, Land Settlement and Cooperatives, 1, 26-39.60.Schirmer, U. (1977). Reforma agraria y cooperativismo en el Peru: cambios estructurales y contradicciones de la nueva politica agraria del gobierno militar del Peru. Revista Mexicana de Sociologia, 39(3), 808.61.Sikor, T., & Muller, D. (2009). The Limits of State-Led Land Reform: An Introduction. World Development, 37(8), 1307–1316.62.Smith, T. R. (1973). Community Development and Agrarian Reform in the East Asian Setting. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 32(1), 73-86.63.Tai, H. C. (1974). Land Reform and Politics: A comparative Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.64.Talan, I. (2018, April). Redistributive Land Reform and Structural Change in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 100(3), 732-761.65.Tuma, E. H. (2013, October 03). Land Reform. Retrieved from Encyclopedia Britannica: https://www.britannica.com/topic/land-reform66.United Nations. (1962). Progress in Land Reform, Third Report. New York: United Nations.67.Vander Meer, C., & Vander Meer, P. (1968). Land Property Data on Taiwan. The Journal of Asian Studies, 28(1), 144-150.68.Warriner, D. (1969). Land Reform in Principle and Practice. Oxfort: Clarendon Press.69.Wetering, V. (1973). The Current State of Land Reform in Peru. Land Tenure Center Newsletter(40), 5-9.70.Widerman, M. (2006, March 23). Land Reform, Equity and Growth in South Africa: A Comparative Analysis. Retrieved from Wits Institutional Repository Environment on DSpace: http://hdl.handle.net/10539/27571.Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: Free Press.72.World Bank. (2017). Tomando impulso en la agricultura peruana: oportunidades para aumentar la productividad y mejorar la competitividad del sector. Washington D.C.: World Bank.73.Yu-Kang, M., & Schive, C. (1995). Agricultural and industrial development in Taiwan. In J. W. Mellor, Agriculture on the road to industrialization (pp. 23-66). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Retrieved from http://ebrary.ifpri.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15738coll2/id/129337 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)
105926016資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105926016 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 陳永福 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Alex Tan en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 李娣雅 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Quispe, Lidia en_US dc.creator (作者) 李娣雅 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Quispe, Lidia en_US dc.date (日期) 2018 en_US dc.date.accessioned 27-Aug-2018 15:05:13 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 27-Aug-2018 15:05:13 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 27-Aug-2018 15:05:13 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0105926016 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119612 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS) zh_TW dc.description (描述) 105926016 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 這份研究的動機是希望能透過台灣與秘魯的案例比較，對土地改革文獻作出獨創性的貢獻。現存的土改文獻通常都強調相較於其他國家，台灣的土地改革較為成功。同時，台灣的土地改革也時常被拿來與其他亞洲國家做比較。然而，這項研究計畫，將台灣的土地改革政策與拉丁美洲相比，特別是對秘魯的土地改革政策進行比較，因為現有的許多文獻，都認為土地改革政策的實施在該地區是不成功的。本文的主要目的是解釋儘管秘魯與台灣之間存在顯著的相似之處，為什麼土地改革政策在台灣會成功，而在秘魯則不然。 兩者都是農業經濟，在土地改革政策，且實施過程中也有類似的一黨政治制度。這份論文採用比較分析方法探討可能影響土改結果的因素。結果表明，台灣的土地改革政策，實施地比秘魯更有效率，這主要歸功於三個因素：保障其權利和激勵措施，國家對投資和技術援助的支持，以及良善的制度，是台灣土地改革成功的關鍵因素，但在秘魯展現出。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) The motivation of this research is to make an original contribution to land reform literature by comparing the cases of Taiwan and Peru. Existing literature on land reform usually emphasizes Taiwan’s success as an example for other countries, and Taiwanese land reform is frequently compared with other countries in the region of Asia. This research project, however, compares Taiwan’s land reforms to those conducted in Latin America, specifically Peru, since much of the existing literature considers the implementation of land reform as unsuccessful in this region. The main objective of this paper is to explain why land reform was successful in Taiwan, but not in Peru, despite notable similarities between the two countries. Both were agricultural economies and had similar one-party political systems during the land reform implementation. This research paper uses comparative analysis to explore possible explanatory factors for the different results seen in the two countries. The results suggest that land reform implementation in Taiwan was more effective than in Peru primarily due to three factors. Guaranteed rights and incentives, State support in investment & technical assistance, and institutions were the key factors identified for the success of land reform in Taiwan, but not presented in Peru. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents Chapter 1: Introduction 11.1. Background of the study 11.2. Research purposes 41.3. Research Method 51.4. Organization of the study 7Chapter 2: Theoretical Framework 82.1. Concept of Land Reform 82.2. Defining Success of Land Reform 92.2.1. Economic criteria 92.2.2. Social criteria 102.3. Literature Review 112.3.1. State support in investment & technical assistance 122.3.2. Institutions 132.3.3. Guaranteed rights and incentives 142.3.4. Type of Political System 152.3.5. NGO & International Organization 162.4. Theories on Land Reform 172.4.1. Economic Efficiency 172.4.2. The New Institutional Economics (NIE) 182.4.3. Access Theory 19Chapter 3: Land Reform in Taiwan 223.1. Background of the Land Reform in Taiwan 223.2. Process of the Land Reform in Taiwan 243.2.1. First Stage: Farmland Rent Reduction 243.2.2. Second Stage: Sale of Public Land 263.2.3. Third Stage: Land to the Tiller 28Chapter 4: Land Reform in Peru 304.1. Background of the Land Reform in Peru 304.2. Process of the Land Reform in Peru 324.2.1. Land Reform under Belaunde Government 324.2.1.1. First Stage: Public Land Distribution 324.2.1.2. Second Stage: Farmland Rent Reduction 334.2.2. The Land Reform under Velasco Government 344.2.2.1. Third Stage: Land Expropriation 344.2.2.2. Fourth Stage:Formation of CAPS & SAIS 37Chapter 5: Land Reform Comparison between Taiwan and Peru.415.1. First Phase of Evaluation: Land Reform Effects 415.1.1. Effects of the Land Reform in Taiwan 415.1.1.1. Economic Effects 415.1.1.2. Social Effects 455.1.2. Effects of the Land Reform in Peru 465.1.2.1. Economic Effects 475.1.2.2. Social Effects 525.2. Second Phase of Evaluation: Explanatory Factors 575.2.1. Explaining each indicator’s difference 575.2.2. Explanatory Factors 59Chapter 6: Conclusions 61Bibliography 64 zh_TW dc.format.extent 1237007 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105926016 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 土地改革 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 台灣 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 秘魯 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 制度 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 政府 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 權利 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Land reform en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Taiwan en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Peru en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Institutions en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Government en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Rights en_US dc.title (題名) 為什麼土地改革在台灣成功而在秘魯不成功? 1950-1975 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Why did Land Reform Work in Taiwan, but not in Peru? 1950-1975 en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.Abhijit, B. (1999, April). Land Reforms: Prospects and Strategies. Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, (pp. 1-19). Washington D.C.2.Atkins, F. (1988, August). Land Reform: A Failure of Neoclassical Theorization. World Development, 16(8), 935-946.3.Barraclough, S. L. (1999). Land Reform in Developing Countries: The Role of the State and Other Actors. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD).4.Besley, T., & Burgess, R. (2000, May). Land Reform, Poverty Reduction, and Growth: Evidence from India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(2), 389-430.5.Borras, S. M. (2007). Pro-Poor Land Reform: A Critique. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.6.Boyce, J. K., Rosset, P., & Stanton, E. A. (2005). Land Reform and Sustainable Development. Massachusetts: Political Economy Research Institute.7.Brodsky, J., & Oser, J. (1968, October). Land Tenure in Peru. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 27(4), 405-421.8.Burisch, M. (1969). Legislative and administrative aspects of land reform in Taiwan. Land Reform, Land Settlement and Co-operatives, 1, 16-28.9.Cant, A. (2012, February). Land for Those Who Work It: A Visual Analysis of Agrarian Reform Posters in Velasco`s Peru. Cambridge University Press, 44(1), 1-37.10.Carroll, T. F. (1961). Land Reform Issue in Latin America. New York: The Century Foundation.11.Carroll, T. F. (1970). Land Reform in Peru. Washington D.C.: U.S. Agency for International Development.12.Castillo, L. (2003). Reforma y Contrarreforma Agraria en el Perú. Seminario Internacional sobre Resultados y Perspectivas de las Reformas Agrarias y los Movimientos Campesinos e Indigenas en America Latina (pp. 255-284). La Paz: Universidad Mayor de San Andres. Retrieved from https://zh.scribd.com/document/294089330/Catillo-pinto-Laureano-2003-Reforma-y-contrarreforma-agraria-en-el-Peru-pdf13.Chang, Y.-T. (1965). Land Reform and Its Impact on Economic and Social Progress in Taiwan. Taipei: National Taiwan University.14.Chang, Y.-T. (1974). Land Reform and Agricultural Development: Taiwan`s Experience. Retrieved from http://ir.lib.nchu.edu.tw/bitstream/11455/79051/1/150121-4.pdf15.Chen. (1961). Land Reform in Taiwan. Taipei: China Publishing Company.16.Chen. (1994). The Effects of Land Reform on the Rice Sector and Economic Development in Taiwan. World Development, 22(11), 1759-1770.17.Chen, Y.-E., & Wang, Y.-T. (1980). Secular Trend of Output, Input and Productivity- A Quantitative Analysis of Agricultural Development in Taiwan". In C.-M. Hou, & T.-S. Yu (Ed.), Agricultural Development in China, Japan and Korea. Taipei: Academia Sinica.18.Chirinos, A. (1972). Percepción del Campesinado y los Cambios en el Area Rural Peruana. Lima: Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina.19.Chirinos, A. (1975). La Reforma Agraria Peruana. Nueva Sociedad(21), 47-64.20.Cornia, G. A. (1985). Farm Size, Land Yeilds and the Agricultural Production Function: An Analysis for Fifteen Developing Countries. World Development, 13(4), 513-534.21.Cotler, J. (1967, December). The Mechanics of Internal Domination and Social Change in Peru. Studies in Comparative International Development, 3(12), 229–246.22.Craig, W. W. (1969). Peru: The Peasant Movement of La Convencion. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.23.Eguren, F. (2009). La Reforma Agraria en el Peru. Debate Agrario(44), 63-100. Retrieved from http://www.cepes.org.pe/debate/debate44/debate44_03.pdf24.El-Ghonemy, M. R. (1990). The Political Economy of Rural Poverty: The Case for Land Reform. New York: Routledge.25.Fan, S., Ashok, G., & Sukhadeo, T. (2008, September). Investments, Subsidies and Pro-Poor Growth in Rural India. International Association of Agricultural Economics, 39(2), 163-170.26.FAO. (2004). The State of Food Insecurity in the World. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/a-y5650e.pdf27.Fei, J. C., Ranis, G., & Kuo, S. W. (1979). Growth with Equity: The Taiwan Case. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/289241468761968181/Growth-with-equity-the-Taiwan-case28.Fort, R. (2008). Assesing the Impact of Rural Land Titling in Peru: The Case of the PETT Program. World Bank Conference on New Challenges for Land Policy and Administration (pp. 1-30). Washington D.C.: Group of Analysis for Development.29.Gitlitz, J. S. (1971). Impresions of Peruvian Agrarian Reform. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 13(3-4), 456-474.30.Greenhalgh, S. (1989). Land Reform and Family Entrepreneurship in East Asia. Population and Development Review, 15, 77-118.31.Handelman, H. (1975). Struggle in the Andes: Peasant Political Mobilization in Peru. Austin: University of Texas Press.32.Handelman, H. (1981). Peasants, Landlords and Bureaucrats: The Politics of Agrarian Reform in Peru. American Universities Field Staff Reports(1), 1-23.33.Ho, S. (1987). Economics, Economic Bureaucracy, and Taiwan`s Economic Development. Pacific Affairs, 60(2), 226-247.34.Horton, D. (1973). Haciendas and Cooperatives: A Preliminary Study of Latifundist Agrculture and Agrarian Reform in Northen Peru. Land Tenure Center Research Paper 53. Madison: University of Wisconsin.35.Instituto Interamericano de Ciencias Agricolas de la OEA. (1972). Evoluvion de la Agricultura y de las Instituciones del Sector Agropecuario en el Peru. Lima: Direccion Regional para la Zona Andina.36.Janvry, A. D. (1981, May). The Role of Land Reform in Economic Development: Policies and Politics. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63(2), 384-392.37.Janvry, A. D., & Sadoulet, E. (2002, June 14). Land Reforms in Latin America: Ten Lessons toward a Contemporary Agenda. World Bank Latin America Land Policy Workshop. Pachuca, Mexico. Retrieved from http://are.berkeley.edu/~esadoulet/papers/Land_Reform_in_LA_10_lesson.pdf38.Jelic, M. A., Jasminka, M. D., Srecko, M. R., & Jugoslav, A. (2014). Reasons for Government Intervention in Agriculture. Annals of the University of Oradea, 3, 174-179.39.Jolly, M. (2003). Land Reform in Philippines and Taiwan in the First Half of the Twentieth Century. Toronto: Ryerson University.40.Kay, C. (2002). Reforma Agraria, Industrialización y Desarrollo ¿Porque Asia Oriental Superó a America Latina? Debate Agrario(34), 45-94.41.Kerekes, G. (1974). Reforma Agraria y Cooperativismo en Hungría. Lima: Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina.42.King, R. (1977). Land Reform: A World Survey. Boulder: Westview Press.43.Koo, A. (1966, March). Economic Consequences of Land Reform in Taiwan. Asian Survey, 6(3), 150-157.44.Koo, A. (1968). The Role of Land Reform in Economic Development: A Case Study of Taiwan. New York: Praeger.45.Ladejinsky, W. I. (1965). Land Reform. In D. Hapgood, Policies for Promoting Agricultural Development: Report of a Conference on Productivity and Innovation in Agriculture in the Underdeveloped Countries (p. 298). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for International Studies.46.Maya, G. (2016, September 13). El Tiempo. Retrieved from Reforma agraria y desarrollo: http://www.eltiempo.com/archivo/documento/CMS-1670109647.Medina, R. (1970). Agrarian Reform Legislation in Peru. Land Tenure Center Monograph No 73. Madison: Land Tenure Center, University of Wisconsin.48.MINAGRI. (2018, January 03). www.minagri.gob.pe. Retrieved from Ministerio de Agricultura y Riego: http://minagri.gob.pe/portal/publicaciones-y-prensa/noticias-2018/20660-sector-agricultura-se-consolido-el-2017-como-el-segundo-generador-de-mayores-divisas-para-el-peru-249.Mouton, J. (2001). How to succeed in your Master’s and Doctoral studies: A South African Guide and Resource Book. Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.50.Narh, P., Lambini, C. K., Sabbi, M., Pham, V. D., & Nguyen, T. T. (2016). Land Sector Reforms in Ghana, Kenya and Vietnam: A Comparative Analysis of Their Effectiveness. Land, 5(2). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/land502000851.Nieswiadomy, M. S. (2003). Land reform and conflict resolution in Colombia. Monterrey: The NPS Institutional Archive. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10945/615852.North. (1995). The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development. In J. Harriss, J. Hunter, & C. M. Lewis, The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development (pp. 17-26). London: Routledge.53.North, L. (1997). Que paso en Taiwan: Un relato de la reforma agraria y de la industrializacion rural. In L. Martinez, El Desarrollo Sostenible en el Medio Rural (pp. 89-113). Quito: FLACSO.54.Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.55.Pintado, M. (2016, September). Evolución de la agricultura, antes y después de la reforma agraria. La Revista Agraria(182), 10-13. Retrieved from http://www.larevistaagraria.info/sites/default/files//revista/LRA182/LRA182_Evolucion.pdf56.Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley.57.Ribot, J. C., & Peluso, N. L. (2003). A Theory of Access. Rural Sociological Society, 68(2), 153-181.58.Robert, A. (1962, October). Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from Agrarian Reform in Latin America: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/south-america/1962-10-01/agrarian-reform-latin-america59.Saco, A. (1970). In Peru Land is Restored to the Indians. Land Reform, Land Settlement and Cooperatives, 1, 26-39.60.Schirmer, U. (1977). Reforma agraria y cooperativismo en el Peru: cambios estructurales y contradicciones de la nueva politica agraria del gobierno militar del Peru. Revista Mexicana de Sociologia, 39(3), 808.61.Sikor, T., & Muller, D. (2009). The Limits of State-Led Land Reform: An Introduction. World Development, 37(8), 1307–1316.62.Smith, T. R. (1973). Community Development and Agrarian Reform in the East Asian Setting. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 32(1), 73-86.63.Tai, H. C. (1974). Land Reform and Politics: A comparative Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.64.Talan, I. (2018, April). Redistributive Land Reform and Structural Change in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 100(3), 732-761.65.Tuma, E. H. (2013, October 03). Land Reform. Retrieved from Encyclopedia Britannica: https://www.britannica.com/topic/land-reform66.United Nations. (1962). Progress in Land Reform, Third Report. New York: United Nations.67.Vander Meer, C., & Vander Meer, P. (1968). Land Property Data on Taiwan. The Journal of Asian Studies, 28(1), 144-150.68.Warriner, D. (1969). Land Reform in Principle and Practice. Oxfort: Clarendon Press.69.Wetering, V. (1973). The Current State of Land Reform in Peru. Land Tenure Center Newsletter(40), 5-9.70.Widerman, M. (2006, March 23). Land Reform, Equity and Growth in South Africa: A Comparative Analysis. Retrieved from Wits Institutional Repository Environment on DSpace: http://hdl.handle.net/10539/27571.Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: Free Press.72.World Bank. (2017). Tomando impulso en la agricultura peruana: oportunidades para aumentar la productividad y mejorar la competitividad del sector. Washington D.C.: World Bank.73.Yu-Kang, M., & Schive, C. (1995). Agricultural and industrial development in Taiwan. In J. W. Mellor, Agriculture on the road to industrialization (pp. 23-66). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Retrieved from http://ebrary.ifpri.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15738coll2/id/129337 zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/THE.NCCU.IMAS.010.2018.A07 -
