學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 路邊停車格的土地使用效率
Land Use Efficiency in Curb Parking作者 張毓庭
Chang, Yu-Ting貢獻者 林子欽
Lin, Tzu-Chin
張毓庭
Chang, Yu-Ting關鍵詞 路邊停車
土地使用效率
停車格
停車費率
On-street parking
Curb parking
Land use efficiency
Parking fee
Performance pricing日期 2018 上傳時間 27-Aug-2018 15:15:17 (UTC+8) 摘要 Ample debates about curb parking planning have taken place to examine how parking fees may eliminate the traffic congestion. However, seldom did they notice wrong pricing may further bring about the inefficient use of land. Curb spaces remain forever vacant, putting into no use anyway.The purpose of this study is to explore the current inefficiency in curb parking in Taipei. Eventually, we attempt to find out the potential solutions to improve land use efficiency. A descriptive analysis of existing curb parking indicates a total of 56,925 square meters of land remained all-time vacant in the years 2016 and 2017. It is unwise to put a tremendous amount of land in curb parking, earning merely 0.147 percent of the return. The empirical analysis in this study elucidated why the government should customize parking planning for different districts. Dynamic parking fee should be implemented in areas in which on-street parking is always fully occupied. Every dollar decrease in parking fees increases 1.246 cars parked on curb spaces on average. Meanwhile, for those areas filled with forever empty curb spaces, urban planners should cut the quantity supplied to improve land use efficiency at its root.In conclusion, this research offers an innovative land-use aspect to improve the current parking situation by tailor-made parking planning. We believe that this line of research may serve as a reference for government’s parking plan in the future. 參考文獻 Arnott, R., De Palma, A., & Lindsey, R. (1991). A temporal and spatial equilibrium analysis of commuter parking. Journal of public economics, 45(3), 301-335.Arnott, R., & Inci, E. (2006). An integrated model of downtown parking and traffic congestion. Journal of Urban Economics, 60(3), 418-442.Calthrop, E., & Proost, S. (2006). Regulating on-street parking. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36(1), 29-48.Evans, A. W. (1991). On monopoly rent. Land Economics, 67(1), 1-14.George, H. (1879). Progress and poverty: E.P. Dutton and CompanyGlazer, A., & Niskanen, E. (1992). Parking fees and congestion. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 22(1), 123-132.Goodwin, P. B. (2001). Traffic Reduction Handbook of Transport Systems and Traffic Control (pp. 21-32): Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Inci, E. (2015). A review of the economics of parking. Economics of Transportation, 4(1-2), 50-63.Marx, K. (1976). Capital: a Critique of Political Economy, 3 vols.Mussa, M., & Rosen, S. (1978). Monopoly and product quality. Journal of Economic theory, 18(2), 301-317.Pierce, G., & Shoup, D. (2013). Getting the prices right: an evaluation of pricing parking by demand in San Francisco. Journal of the American Planning Association, 79(1), 67-81.Qian, Z. S., Xiao, F. E., & Zhang, H. (2011). The economics of parking provision for the morning commute. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 17, 612-633.Senior, N. W. (1938). An Outline of the Theory of Political Economy: London: Kimble & Bradford.Shoup, D. (2017). The High Cost of Free Parking: Routledge.Smith, A. (1950). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations,(1776): Methuen.Verhoef, E., Nijkamp, P., & Rietveld, P. (1995). The economics of regulatory parking policies: the (im)possibilities of parking policies in traffic regulation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 29(2), 141-156. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
應用經濟與社會發展英語碩士學位學程(IMES)
105266001資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1052660011 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 林子欽 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Lin, Tzu-Chin en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 張毓庭 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chang, Yu-Ting en_US dc.creator (作者) 張毓庭 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Chang, Yu-Ting en_US dc.date (日期) 2018 en_US dc.date.accessioned 27-Aug-2018 15:15:17 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 27-Aug-2018 15:15:17 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 27-Aug-2018 15:15:17 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G1052660011 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119628 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 應用經濟與社會發展英語碩士學位學程(IMES) zh_TW dc.description (描述) 105266001 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) Ample debates about curb parking planning have taken place to examine how parking fees may eliminate the traffic congestion. However, seldom did they notice wrong pricing may further bring about the inefficient use of land. Curb spaces remain forever vacant, putting into no use anyway.The purpose of this study is to explore the current inefficiency in curb parking in Taipei. Eventually, we attempt to find out the potential solutions to improve land use efficiency. A descriptive analysis of existing curb parking indicates a total of 56,925 square meters of land remained all-time vacant in the years 2016 and 2017. It is unwise to put a tremendous amount of land in curb parking, earning merely 0.147 percent of the return. The empirical analysis in this study elucidated why the government should customize parking planning for different districts. Dynamic parking fee should be implemented in areas in which on-street parking is always fully occupied. Every dollar decrease in parking fees increases 1.246 cars parked on curb spaces on average. Meanwhile, for those areas filled with forever empty curb spaces, urban planners should cut the quantity supplied to improve land use efficiency at its root.In conclusion, this research offers an innovative land-use aspect to improve the current parking situation by tailor-made parking planning. We believe that this line of research may serve as a reference for government’s parking plan in the future. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents Chapter 1 Introduction 11.1 General Background Information 11.2 Purpose of Research 41.3 Research Questions 51.4 Research Methodology 61.5 Outline 7Chapter 2 Literature Review 92.1 Curb Parking 92.2 Pricing the Curb Parking 142.3 Summary 17Chapter 3 Current Conditions of Curb Parking in Taipei 193.1 Review of Curb Parking Standards 193.2 Land Use Efficiency in Curb Spaces 25Chapter 4 Research Methodology 354.1 Research Methods 364.2 Research Data 384.3 Research Design 57Chapter 5 Empirical Analysis 635.1 How Parking Fees Affect the Quantity Demanded of Curb Parking? 635.2 How Parking Fees Affect the Vacancy Rate of Curb Parking? 735.3 Summary 78Chapter 6 Conclusion 81References 84 zh_TW dc.format.extent 2524445 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1052660011 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 路邊停車 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 土地使用效率 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 停車格 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 停車費率 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) On-street parking en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Curb parking en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Land use efficiency en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Parking fee en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Performance pricing en_US dc.title (題名) 路邊停車格的土地使用效率 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Land Use Efficiency in Curb Parking en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Arnott, R., De Palma, A., & Lindsey, R. (1991). A temporal and spatial equilibrium analysis of commuter parking. Journal of public economics, 45(3), 301-335.Arnott, R., & Inci, E. (2006). An integrated model of downtown parking and traffic congestion. Journal of Urban Economics, 60(3), 418-442.Calthrop, E., & Proost, S. (2006). Regulating on-street parking. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36(1), 29-48.Evans, A. W. (1991). On monopoly rent. Land Economics, 67(1), 1-14.George, H. (1879). Progress and poverty: E.P. Dutton and CompanyGlazer, A., & Niskanen, E. (1992). Parking fees and congestion. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 22(1), 123-132.Goodwin, P. B. (2001). Traffic Reduction Handbook of Transport Systems and Traffic Control (pp. 21-32): Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Inci, E. (2015). A review of the economics of parking. Economics of Transportation, 4(1-2), 50-63.Marx, K. (1976). Capital: a Critique of Political Economy, 3 vols.Mussa, M., & Rosen, S. (1978). Monopoly and product quality. Journal of Economic theory, 18(2), 301-317.Pierce, G., & Shoup, D. (2013). Getting the prices right: an evaluation of pricing parking by demand in San Francisco. Journal of the American Planning Association, 79(1), 67-81.Qian, Z. S., Xiao, F. E., & Zhang, H. (2011). The economics of parking provision for the morning commute. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 17, 612-633.Senior, N. W. (1938). An Outline of the Theory of Political Economy: London: Kimble & Bradford.Shoup, D. (2017). The High Cost of Free Parking: Routledge.Smith, A. (1950). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations,(1776): Methuen.Verhoef, E., Nijkamp, P., & Rietveld, P. (1995). The economics of regulatory parking policies: the (im)possibilities of parking policies in traffic regulation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 29(2), 141-156. zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/THE.NCCU.IMES.006.2018.F06 -
