Publications-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 不同產品生命週期下供應商遴選、發展活動與績效之關係:汽車業之個案研究
Relationship between supplier selection, development activities and performance under different product life cycles: a case study of the automotive industry作者 李明陽
Li, Ming-Yang貢獻者 王文英
Wang, Wen-Ying
李明陽
Li, Ming-Yang關鍵詞 供應商遴選項目
供應商發展活動
績效日期 2018 上傳時間 29-Aug-2018 15:47:26 (UTC+8) 摘要 本研究以汽車業為研究對象,透過個案研究法深入探討針對處於成長期與成熟期階段之產品所需的關鍵零組件,參與部門人員(1)所重視之供應商遴選項目;(2)所重視之供應商發展活動;(3)重視哪些供應商遴選項目有助於績效之提升及(4)供應商遴選與發展活動應如何搭配以有助於績效之提升。相關結論如下:(1) 不論在成長期抑或成熟期階段,個案公司皆重視供應商在品質、價格及交期方面之「生產核心能力」,而成長期階段另重視供應商之「技術能力」;成熟期階段重視供應商之「生產整合能力」。兩階段在「技術能力」及「生產核心能力」呈顯著差異。(2) 整體而言,個案公司皆重視對供應商的「生產支援」活動,其次為「技術交流與分享」,供應商發展活動方面主要係透過協力會組織來推動,以成員間意見之交換、資訊傳達及強化相互情報聯繫為宗旨,另外也有針對特定議題所舉辦之研究會。兩階段在「生產支援」活動方面呈顯著差異。(3) 在成長期階段下,「生產整合能力」會正向影響個人相關績效;成熟期階段下「生產核心能力」及「技術能力」則將正向影響供應商相關績效。(4) 在成長期階段下,「過去形象與表現*生產支援」及「技術能力*技術交流與分享」將影響相關績效;而成熟期階段下,「過去形象與表現*技術交流與分享」、「過去形象與表現*生產支援」、「生產整合能力*生產支援」、「技術能力*技術交流與分享」、「過去形象與表現*財務援助及策略性投資」及「企業經營體制*財務援助及策略性投資」則會影響相關績效。關鍵字:供應商遴選項目、供應商發展活動、績效 參考文獻 中文文獻王文英,2007,策略與目標成本制關係之探索性研究-透過國內兩企業之比較個案,交大管理學報,第27卷,第2期:203-248。加登豐,1993,成本規劃-戰略性成本管理,陳文光譯。台北:臺華工商圖書出版公司。吳念祺、陳彥豪,2011,電動車成本結構分析及對傳統汽車產業之影響,臺灣經濟研究月刊,第34卷,第11期:75-82。周文賢,2000,多變量統計分析:SAS/STAT使用方法,台北市:智勝文化。林冠亨,2011,產品專案創新類型與新產品開發關鍵成功因素及其管理之個案研究,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。張明益,2011,新產品開發專案策略與供應商管理制度之探討-以我國某汽車製造公司為對象,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。資誠聯合會計師事務所,2018,2018全球汽車產業未來趨勢報告:全球汽車產業 迎接五大轉型趨勢。蘇雄義,2016,供應鏈管理:原理、程序、實務(三版),台北市:智勝文化。英文文獻Aitken, J., P. Childerhouse, and D. Towill. 2003. The impact of product life cycle on supply chain strategy. International Journal of Production Economics 85: 127-140.Anderson, C. R., and C. P. Zeithaml. 1984. Stage of the product life cycle, business strategy, and business performance. Academy of Management Journal 27(1): 5-24.Chao, C. N., E. E. Scheuing, and W. A. Ruch. 1993. Purchasing performance evaluation: An investigation of different perspectives. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 29(3): 33-39.Cheraghi, S H., M. Dadashzadeh, and M. Subramanian. 2004. Critical success factors for supplier selection: An update. Journal of Applied Business Research, 20(2): 91-108.Clark, K. B., and T. Fujimoto. 1991. Product Development Performance. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Dickson, G. W. 1966. An analysis of supplier selection system and decision. Journal of Purchasing 2(1): 5-17.DiStefano, C., M. Zhu., and D. Mindrila. 2009. Understanding and using factor scores: Considerations for the applied researcher. Directory of Open Access Journals 14: 1-11.Ghodsypour, S. H., and C. O. Brien. 1998. A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. International Journal of Production Economics 56-57: 199-212.Giunipero, L. 1990. Motivating and monitoring JIT supplier performance. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 26(3): 19-24.Hahn, C. K., C. A. Watts, and K. Y. Kim. 1990. The supplier development program: A conceptual model. Journal of Purchasing and Material Management 26(2): 2-7.Harman, H. H. 1976. Modern Factor Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Hartley, J., and T. Choi. 1996. Supplier development: Customers as a catalyst of process change. Business Horizons 39(4): 37–40.Kaiser, H. F. 1974. An Index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39(9): 31-36.Kannan, V. R., and K. C. Tan. 2002. Supplier selection and assessment: Their impact on business performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management 38(4): 11-21.Karpak, B., E. Kumcu., and R. Kasuganti. 1999. An application of visual interactive goal programming: A case in vendor selection decisions. Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis 8(2): 93-105.Knight, K. E. 1967. A descriptive model of the intra-firm innovation process. Journal of Business 40(4): 478-496.Kotler, P., and K. L. Keller. 2006. Marketing Management. Pearson.Krause, D. R. 1997. Supplier development: Current practices and outcomes. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 33(2): 12-19.Krause, R. D., R. B. Handfield, and T. V. Scannell. 1998. An empirical investigation of supplier development: Reactive strategic processes. Journal of Operations Management 17:39-58.Krause, R. D., T. V. Scannell, and R. J. Calantone. 2000. A structural analysis of the effectiveness of buying firm’s strategic to improve supplier performance. Decision Sciences 31(1): 33-55.Lee, A. H., H. Y. Kang, C. F. Hsu, and H.C. Hung. 2009. A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry. Expert Systems of Application 36 (4): 7917-7927.Lehmann, D. R., and J. O’Shaughnessy. 1974. Difference in attribute importance for different industrial products. Journal of Marketing 38(2): 36-42.Martinez-Ros, E. 2000. Explaining the decisions to carry out product and process innovations: The Spanish case. Journal of High Technology Management Research 10: 223-242.Monczka, R. M., R. J. Trent, and T. J. Callahan. 1993. Supply base strategies to mazimize supplier performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 23(4): 42-54.Monczka, R. M., K. J. Petersen, and R. B. Handfield. 1998. Success factors in strategic supplier alliances: The buying company perspective. Journal of the Decision Science 29(3): 553-577.Onat, N. C., M. Kucukvar, and O. Tatari. 2015. Conventional, hybrid, plug-in hybrid or electric vehicles? State-based comparative carbon and energy footprint analysis in the United States. Apply Energy 150: 36-49.Pearson, J. N., and L. M. Ellram. 1995. Supplier selection and evaluation in small versus large electronics firms. Journal of Small Business Management 33(4): 53-65.Punniyamoorthy, M., P. Mathiyalagan, and P. Parthiban. 2011. A strategic model using structural equation modeling and fuzzy logic in supplier selection. Expert Systems with Applications 38: 458-474.Reed, P. 2002. Strategic Marketing Planning. Nelson, Australia: Thompson Publishing.Samaras, C., and K. Meisterling. 2008. Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from plug-in hybrid vehicles: implication for policy. Environment Science of Technology 42: 3170-3176.Schilling, M. A. 2005. Strategic Management of Technological Innovation. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.Seuring, S. 2010. Sustainability management beyond corporate boundaries. Journal of Cleaner Production 18: 1118-1119.Seuring, S., M Müller. 2008. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production 16: 1699-1710.Vernon, R. 1966. International investment and international trade in product cycle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 80(2): 190-207.Weber, C. A., J. R. Current., and W. C. Benton. 1991. Vendor selection criteria and methods. European Journal of Operational Research 50(1): 2-18.Yin, R. K. 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Method. 2nd ed. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.參考網站行政院主計總處:https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=33338&ctNode=3099&mp=1產業價值鏈資訊平台:http://ic.tpex.org.tw/introduce.php?ic=3000 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
會計學系
105353035資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105353035 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 王文英 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Wang, Wen-Ying en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 李明陽 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Li, Ming-Yang en_US dc.creator (作者) 李明陽 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Li, Ming-Yang en_US dc.date (日期) 2018 en_US dc.date.accessioned 29-Aug-2018 15:47:26 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 29-Aug-2018 15:47:26 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 29-Aug-2018 15:47:26 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0105353035 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119714 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 會計學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 105353035 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究以汽車業為研究對象,透過個案研究法深入探討針對處於成長期與成熟期階段之產品所需的關鍵零組件,參與部門人員(1)所重視之供應商遴選項目;(2)所重視之供應商發展活動;(3)重視哪些供應商遴選項目有助於績效之提升及(4)供應商遴選與發展活動應如何搭配以有助於績效之提升。相關結論如下:(1) 不論在成長期抑或成熟期階段,個案公司皆重視供應商在品質、價格及交期方面之「生產核心能力」,而成長期階段另重視供應商之「技術能力」;成熟期階段重視供應商之「生產整合能力」。兩階段在「技術能力」及「生產核心能力」呈顯著差異。(2) 整體而言,個案公司皆重視對供應商的「生產支援」活動,其次為「技術交流與分享」,供應商發展活動方面主要係透過協力會組織來推動,以成員間意見之交換、資訊傳達及強化相互情報聯繫為宗旨,另外也有針對特定議題所舉辦之研究會。兩階段在「生產支援」活動方面呈顯著差異。(3) 在成長期階段下,「生產整合能力」會正向影響個人相關績效;成熟期階段下「生產核心能力」及「技術能力」則將正向影響供應商相關績效。(4) 在成長期階段下,「過去形象與表現*生產支援」及「技術能力*技術交流與分享」將影響相關績效;而成熟期階段下,「過去形象與表現*技術交流與分享」、「過去形象與表現*生產支援」、「生產整合能力*生產支援」、「技術能力*技術交流與分享」、「過去形象與表現*財務援助及策略性投資」及「企業經營體制*財務援助及策略性投資」則會影響相關績效。關鍵字:供應商遴選項目、供應商發展活動、績效 zh_TW dc.description.tableofcontents 圖目錄 ii表目錄 iii第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究背景與動機 1第二節 研究目的與問題 3第三節 論文架構與研究流程 5第二章 文獻探討 7第一節 與產品生命週期相關之文獻 7第二節 與供應商之遴選相關之文獻 9第三節 與供應商發展活動相關之文獻 16第四節 與績效相關之文獻 23第三章 研究設計 25第一節 觀念性架構 25第二節 研究方法 26第三節 研究對象之選擇 26第四節 資料蒐集與分析方法 27第五節 實證模型 28第四章 實地訪談與問卷定稿 30第一節 汽車產業鏈概況 30第二節 個案公司概況 31第三節 問卷定稿 32第五章 問卷分析結果 36第一節 問卷發放及回收情況 36第二節 因素分析結果 37第三節 重視之供應商遴選項目 42第四節 重視之供應商發展活動 45第五節 複迴歸分析結果 48第六章 結論與建議 66第一節 研究結論 66第二節 研究建議 68第三節 研究限制 69參考文獻 71附錄 研究問卷 74 zh_TW dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105353035 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 供應商遴選項目 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 供應商發展活動 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 績效 zh_TW dc.title (題名) 不同產品生命週期下供應商遴選、發展活動與績效之關係:汽車業之個案研究 zh_TW dc.title (題名) Relationship between supplier selection, development activities and performance under different product life cycles: a case study of the automotive industry en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文文獻王文英,2007,策略與目標成本制關係之探索性研究-透過國內兩企業之比較個案,交大管理學報,第27卷,第2期:203-248。加登豐,1993,成本規劃-戰略性成本管理,陳文光譯。台北:臺華工商圖書出版公司。吳念祺、陳彥豪,2011,電動車成本結構分析及對傳統汽車產業之影響,臺灣經濟研究月刊,第34卷,第11期:75-82。周文賢,2000,多變量統計分析:SAS/STAT使用方法,台北市:智勝文化。林冠亨,2011,產品專案創新類型與新產品開發關鍵成功因素及其管理之個案研究,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。張明益,2011,新產品開發專案策略與供應商管理制度之探討-以我國某汽車製造公司為對象,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。資誠聯合會計師事務所,2018,2018全球汽車產業未來趨勢報告:全球汽車產業 迎接五大轉型趨勢。蘇雄義,2016,供應鏈管理:原理、程序、實務(三版),台北市:智勝文化。英文文獻Aitken, J., P. Childerhouse, and D. Towill. 2003. The impact of product life cycle on supply chain strategy. International Journal of Production Economics 85: 127-140.Anderson, C. R., and C. P. Zeithaml. 1984. Stage of the product life cycle, business strategy, and business performance. Academy of Management Journal 27(1): 5-24.Chao, C. N., E. E. Scheuing, and W. A. Ruch. 1993. Purchasing performance evaluation: An investigation of different perspectives. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 29(3): 33-39.Cheraghi, S H., M. Dadashzadeh, and M. Subramanian. 2004. Critical success factors for supplier selection: An update. Journal of Applied Business Research, 20(2): 91-108.Clark, K. B., and T. Fujimoto. 1991. Product Development Performance. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Dickson, G. W. 1966. An analysis of supplier selection system and decision. Journal of Purchasing 2(1): 5-17.DiStefano, C., M. Zhu., and D. Mindrila. 2009. Understanding and using factor scores: Considerations for the applied researcher. Directory of Open Access Journals 14: 1-11.Ghodsypour, S. H., and C. O. Brien. 1998. A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming. International Journal of Production Economics 56-57: 199-212.Giunipero, L. 1990. Motivating and monitoring JIT supplier performance. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 26(3): 19-24.Hahn, C. K., C. A. Watts, and K. Y. Kim. 1990. The supplier development program: A conceptual model. Journal of Purchasing and Material Management 26(2): 2-7.Harman, H. H. 1976. Modern Factor Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Hartley, J., and T. Choi. 1996. Supplier development: Customers as a catalyst of process change. Business Horizons 39(4): 37–40.Kaiser, H. F. 1974. An Index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39(9): 31-36.Kannan, V. R., and K. C. Tan. 2002. Supplier selection and assessment: Their impact on business performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management 38(4): 11-21.Karpak, B., E. Kumcu., and R. Kasuganti. 1999. An application of visual interactive goal programming: A case in vendor selection decisions. Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis 8(2): 93-105.Knight, K. E. 1967. A descriptive model of the intra-firm innovation process. Journal of Business 40(4): 478-496.Kotler, P., and K. L. Keller. 2006. Marketing Management. Pearson.Krause, D. R. 1997. Supplier development: Current practices and outcomes. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 33(2): 12-19.Krause, R. D., R. B. Handfield, and T. V. Scannell. 1998. An empirical investigation of supplier development: Reactive strategic processes. Journal of Operations Management 17:39-58.Krause, R. D., T. V. Scannell, and R. J. Calantone. 2000. A structural analysis of the effectiveness of buying firm’s strategic to improve supplier performance. Decision Sciences 31(1): 33-55.Lee, A. H., H. Y. Kang, C. F. Hsu, and H.C. Hung. 2009. A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry. Expert Systems of Application 36 (4): 7917-7927.Lehmann, D. R., and J. O’Shaughnessy. 1974. Difference in attribute importance for different industrial products. Journal of Marketing 38(2): 36-42.Martinez-Ros, E. 2000. Explaining the decisions to carry out product and process innovations: The Spanish case. Journal of High Technology Management Research 10: 223-242.Monczka, R. M., R. J. Trent, and T. J. Callahan. 1993. Supply base strategies to mazimize supplier performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 23(4): 42-54.Monczka, R. M., K. J. Petersen, and R. B. Handfield. 1998. Success factors in strategic supplier alliances: The buying company perspective. Journal of the Decision Science 29(3): 553-577.Onat, N. C., M. Kucukvar, and O. Tatari. 2015. Conventional, hybrid, plug-in hybrid or electric vehicles? State-based comparative carbon and energy footprint analysis in the United States. Apply Energy 150: 36-49.Pearson, J. N., and L. M. Ellram. 1995. Supplier selection and evaluation in small versus large electronics firms. Journal of Small Business Management 33(4): 53-65.Punniyamoorthy, M., P. Mathiyalagan, and P. Parthiban. 2011. A strategic model using structural equation modeling and fuzzy logic in supplier selection. Expert Systems with Applications 38: 458-474.Reed, P. 2002. Strategic Marketing Planning. Nelson, Australia: Thompson Publishing.Samaras, C., and K. Meisterling. 2008. Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from plug-in hybrid vehicles: implication for policy. Environment Science of Technology 42: 3170-3176.Schilling, M. A. 2005. Strategic Management of Technological Innovation. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.Seuring, S. 2010. Sustainability management beyond corporate boundaries. Journal of Cleaner Production 18: 1118-1119.Seuring, S., M Müller. 2008. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production 16: 1699-1710.Vernon, R. 1966. International investment and international trade in product cycle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 80(2): 190-207.Weber, C. A., J. R. Current., and W. C. Benton. 1991. Vendor selection criteria and methods. European Journal of Operational Research 50(1): 2-18.Yin, R. K. 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Method. 2nd ed. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.參考網站行政院主計總處:https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=33338&ctNode=3099&mp=1產業價值鏈資訊平台:http://ic.tpex.org.tw/introduce.php?ic=3000 zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/THE.NCCU.ACCT.041.2018.F07 -
