學術產出-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 The Effect of Significant Other`s Advice on Forgiveness in Chinese Culture
重要他人意見對於寬恕決定之影響
作者 林佳苹
Lin, Chia-Ping
孫蒨如
Sun, Chien-Ru
貢獻者 心理系
關鍵詞 advice ; Chinese culture ; forgiveness ; hurt scenarios ; relationship ; the significant other
主導性影響 ; 傷害事件 ; 寬恕 ; 關係他人 ; 勸告
日期 2017-12
上傳時間 8-Oct-2018 14:42:51 (UTC+8)
摘要 We investigated the possible impact of significant others on Chinese people`s decision to forgive. Past research has mainly focused on the effect of the victim`s attributions regarding the offender`s motivation on the decision to forgive. We suggested that because Chinese people have an interdependent self-construal that emphasizes relationalism, a significant other`s opinion may play an important role in the decision to forgive. In Experiment 1, 113 participants were asked to imagine that they were victims in 3 types of hurt scenarios caused by their partner (i.e., money loss, relationship damage, and involving other people). They were then randomly assigned to one of the following advice situations: Advice from parents, from a good friend, or the no-advice control condition. The degree of forgiveness was submitted to an advice condition by hurt scenario ANOVA, with the hurt scenarios as a within-subjects variable. We found that advice from a good friend worked especially well in the relationship damage and involving other people situations. Participants reported a significantly higher level of forgiveness in those conditions than in the no-advice condition. Experiment 2 aimed at examining the nature of the advice from the significant other. A total of 88 participants were asked to write down the most harmful interaction they had previously experienced, and then were randomly assigned to a 3 (bogus forgiveness inclination feedback: already forgiven/not forgiven yet/control)×2 (advice condition: false forgiveness advice from a good friend/no advice) between-subjects design. The result indicated that instead of facilitating the decision to forgive, the significant other played a role in deciding whether or not to forgive. That is, the decision to forgive could be altered by the advice of the significant other.
本研究目的在探討關係他人在華人寬恕中扮演的角色。過往文獻在探討寬恕的影響因素上,未考量文化特色,也多聚焦在傷害者與被害者身上,我們認為,重視關係的華人,在探討寬恕時應考量傷害事件之外的關係他人影響。研究一主要從不同的關係他人與事件性質切入,探討個人在不同的傷害情境時,關係他人的影響力為何。113名實驗參與者隨機分派至3(事件性質:物質∕相處∕牽涉他者)×3(關係他人意見:好友∕長輩家人∕無意見)混合設計。以寬恕程度為依變項進行二因子分析,結果顯示關係他人意見與事件性質有交互作用,個人在面對具客觀判斷的物質性質事件時,較不會受關係他人的意見影響,但在有關情感傷害的相處事件及牽涉他者的事件上,個人則明顯受到好友意見的影響。我們認為這或許是因為好友與我們價值觀相近,因此他們的意見可能更具參考的價值。研究二以回憶自身傷害事件來增加實驗結果之合理性,並再深入釐清關係他人影響力的本質,88位實驗參與者隨機分派至3(寬恕傾向:已寬恕∕未寬恕∕無)×2(好友寬恕建議:有∕無意見)完全受試者間設計,交互作用效果顯示,關係他人在個人寬恕決定中扮演著主導性而非助長性的影響,原先寬恕傾向不同的個體,會順應關係他人的意見來調整原先的寬恕決定。
關聯 本土心理學研究, No.48, pp.3-55
資料類型 article
DOI https://doi.org/ 10.6254/2017.48.3
dc.contributor 心理系
dc.creator (作者) 林佳苹zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Lin, Chia-Pingen_US
dc.creator (作者) 孫蒨如zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Sun, Chien-Ruen_US
dc.date (日期) 2017-12
dc.date.accessioned 8-Oct-2018 14:42:51 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 8-Oct-2018 14:42:51 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 8-Oct-2018 14:42:51 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/120400-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) We investigated the possible impact of significant others on Chinese people`s decision to forgive. Past research has mainly focused on the effect of the victim`s attributions regarding the offender`s motivation on the decision to forgive. We suggested that because Chinese people have an interdependent self-construal that emphasizes relationalism, a significant other`s opinion may play an important role in the decision to forgive. In Experiment 1, 113 participants were asked to imagine that they were victims in 3 types of hurt scenarios caused by their partner (i.e., money loss, relationship damage, and involving other people). They were then randomly assigned to one of the following advice situations: Advice from parents, from a good friend, or the no-advice control condition. The degree of forgiveness was submitted to an advice condition by hurt scenario ANOVA, with the hurt scenarios as a within-subjects variable. We found that advice from a good friend worked especially well in the relationship damage and involving other people situations. Participants reported a significantly higher level of forgiveness in those conditions than in the no-advice condition. Experiment 2 aimed at examining the nature of the advice from the significant other. A total of 88 participants were asked to write down the most harmful interaction they had previously experienced, and then were randomly assigned to a 3 (bogus forgiveness inclination feedback: already forgiven/not forgiven yet/control)×2 (advice condition: false forgiveness advice from a good friend/no advice) between-subjects design. The result indicated that instead of facilitating the decision to forgive, the significant other played a role in deciding whether or not to forgive. That is, the decision to forgive could be altered by the advice of the significant other.en_US
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究目的在探討關係他人在華人寬恕中扮演的角色。過往文獻在探討寬恕的影響因素上,未考量文化特色,也多聚焦在傷害者與被害者身上,我們認為,重視關係的華人,在探討寬恕時應考量傷害事件之外的關係他人影響。研究一主要從不同的關係他人與事件性質切入,探討個人在不同的傷害情境時,關係他人的影響力為何。113名實驗參與者隨機分派至3(事件性質:物質∕相處∕牽涉他者)×3(關係他人意見:好友∕長輩家人∕無意見)混合設計。以寬恕程度為依變項進行二因子分析,結果顯示關係他人意見與事件性質有交互作用,個人在面對具客觀判斷的物質性質事件時,較不會受關係他人的意見影響,但在有關情感傷害的相處事件及牽涉他者的事件上,個人則明顯受到好友意見的影響。我們認為這或許是因為好友與我們價值觀相近,因此他們的意見可能更具參考的價值。研究二以回憶自身傷害事件來增加實驗結果之合理性,並再深入釐清關係他人影響力的本質,88位實驗參與者隨機分派至3(寬恕傾向:已寬恕∕未寬恕∕無)×2(好友寬恕建議:有∕無意見)完全受試者間設計,交互作用效果顯示,關係他人在個人寬恕決定中扮演著主導性而非助長性的影響,原先寬恕傾向不同的個體,會順應關係他人的意見來調整原先的寬恕決定。zh_TW
dc.format.extent 1906154 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) 本土心理學研究, No.48, pp.3-55
dc.subject (關鍵詞) advice ; Chinese culture ; forgiveness ; hurt scenarios ; relationship ; the significant otheren_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 主導性影響 ; 傷害事件 ; 寬恕 ; 關係他人 ; 勸告zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The Effect of Significant Other`s Advice on Forgiveness in Chinese Cultureen_US
dc.title (題名) 重要他人意見對於寬恕決定之影響zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) article
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6254/2017.48.3
dc.doi.uri (DOI) https://doi.org/ 10.6254/2017.48.3