學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 以社會資本理論探討『時代基金會』對台灣經濟發展的連結與貢獻
The connection between Epoch Foundation, the creative social capital network, and Taiwan economy作者 王貞雅
Wang, Chen-Ya貢獻者 溫肇東
Wen, Chao-Tung
王貞雅
Wang, Chen-Ya關鍵詞 社會資本
資源與網絡關係
時代基金會
Social capital
Resource dependence
Epoch Foundation日期 2014 上傳時間 17-Oct-2018 11:38:14 (UTC+8) 摘要 2010年是時代基金會(Epoch Foundation)成立20周年，基金會舉辦了一系列活動慶祝其20歲生日，邀請了當時的麻省理工學院(MIT)校長Susan Hockfield、史隆管理學院(Sloan school)院長David C. Schmittlein 、10位頂尖科學家以及廣達電腦林百里董事長、台積電張忠謀董事長、朱敬一院士、舒維都院士(前MIT電腦暨人工智慧實驗室主任)以及賴聲川先生等人，與台灣各界菁英、青年學子共同探討2020年的願景。這場盛會背後代表的意義是，時代基金會無疑是台灣企業界與MIT交流最好的窗口之一，更重要的是，這樣的網絡關係隨著時間過去，不但沒有式微，反而愈發茁壯。因此我們不禁好奇，像時代基金會這樣的一個非營利組織(NPO)，是如何能達成這樣的里程碑呢？因此，本研究整理、歸納「社會資本」理論發展的背景，並以資源依賴理論與網絡關係的機制作為輔助理論，希望能探討時代基金會的社會資本具有什麼特性，為什麼能產生這些效益。本研究期盼藉由研究成果回答四點問題：(1) 時代基金會這樣一個能聚集社會資本，並且動員資源的平台組織，是如何從無到有，萌芽、建構乃至茁壯的？(2) 該組織有何創新之處，為什麼能與世界頂尖的大學或機構有這麼深入的互動與合作？(3) 會員企業透過時代基金會是否有獲取任何價值 ？(4) 時代基金會對台灣產業與社會有什麼貢獻？本研究所得到的初步結論：(1) 由個人社會資本透過內部及外部連結，移轉成組織的社會資本，進一步讓網絡平台能被建構與茁壯。(2) 多元化但又互相連結的會務發展，使其網絡中的資源能發揮最大的效益。(3) 有形價值與無形價值都能對企業產生貢獻，更多時候企業需要的是未來性。(4) 當時代基金會的平台口碑逐步建立後，就能吸引更多的企業或學校、或者對創業有興趣的團隊等新血加入這個平台，讓時代基金會的平台可發揮的影響力增長，這就是時代基金會所能持續為台灣產業及社會投入的新動力。
June 2010 marked the 20th anniversary of the Epoch Foundation. The foundation held a series of events to commemorate its 20th birthday, inviting the president of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), the dean of the MIT Sloan School of Management, and ten top scientists to Taiwan to discuss their vision for 2020, exploring global issues, the impact of science and technology, the power of social culture, and the future role of business with Taiwanese elites from various fields. These experts also gave suggestions for Taiwan’s scientific, technological, and industrial development. The significance of this event points to 20 years’ hard work: the Epoch Foundation has not only become one of the best platforms for Taiwanese businesses to initiate exchanges with MIT; but more importantly, these networks have not declined over time. Instead, they have grown even more robust. Thus, we cannot help but asking: How did this nonprofit organization (NPO) get its started? How was it built and has been going from strength to strength?The thesis will use social capital theory and resource dependence theory to figure out the network of Epoch Foundation. This framework of thesis attempts to answer the following questions: (1) As an organization that is able to accumulate social capital and mobilize resources, how did the Epoch Foundation grow into its current form in terms of social capital formation, building, and gain? (2) What are the innovative characteristics of the foundation, and why has it been able to forge in-depth interactions and cooperation with the world’s top universities and institutions? (3) What kind of value do relevant parties gain from joining the foundation? (4) What does the Epoch Foundation contribute to Taiwanese industry and society?The conclusions of this thesis are as following: (1) The social relationship netwowks could be build and grow by bridging tie and bonding tie from members to organization. (2) The diverse but continuous projects have maximized its benefits by transferring resources within the network. (3) The contribution to relevant parties is existed offered by tangible value, intangible value or the sight of future. (4) As the Epoch Foundation’s reputation spread, it attracted more people into its network, including schools, enterprises, and start-up team members, and gradually increased its influence. The new and constant energy will impact on Taiwan industries and society.參考文獻 參考文獻1. Adler, P.S. & Kwon, S.W., Social capital: Prospects for new concept. The Academy of Management Review, 27(1):17-40, 2002.2. Astone, Nan Marie, Constance A. Nathanson, Robert Schoen, and Young J. Kim. Family Demography, Social Theory, and Investment in Social Capital. Population and Development Review 25(1): 1-31., 19993. Batjargal, B. Social Capital and Entrepreneurial Performance In Russia: A Longitudinal Study. Organization Studies, 24, 535-556., 20034. Bian, Y. Bringing Strong Ties Back in: Indirect Ties, Network Bridges, and Job Searches in China. American Sociological Review, 62, 366-385., 19975. Bourdieu, P., The Forms of Social Capital: Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1986 Books6. Bourdieu, P., The social space and genesis of groups. Theory and society, 14(6) 723-744, 19857. Burt R., STRUCTURE, Version 4.2, 19918. Burt, R. S., Structural holes: The Social structure of Competition. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, 19929. Cohen, S. & Fields, G., Social capital and capital gains in Silicon Valley. California Management Review, 41(2), 199910. Coleman, James S. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology 94(supp.): S95-S120, 198811. Emerson, R. E. Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27: 31-41., 196212. Fukuyama, F. Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press., 199513. Galaskiewicz,JosephandKarlKrohn. Positions,Rolesand Dependencies in a Community Interorganization System. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25:527-550., 198414. Granovetter, Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510., 198515. Granovetter, M. S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1380., 197316. Levine, S., and P. E. White. Exchange as a conceptual framework for the study of interorganizational relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 5: 583-610., 196117. Li, P.P., Social tie, social capital, and social behavior: toward an integrative model of informal exchange. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. 24:227-246, 2007.18. Lin, N. Social Capital: a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge University Press., 200119. Loury, G. Why should we care about group inequality? Social Philosophy and Policy, (5): 249-271., 198720. Mizruchi, Mark S. and Joseph Galaskiewicz, Networks of Interorganizational Relations, Sociological Methods and Research, 22:46-70. , 199321. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23: 242-266., 199822. Payne, G.T., Moore, C.B., Griffis, S.E. & Autry, C.W. Multilevel challenges and opportunities in social capital research. Journal of Management, 37(2), 491-520, 201123. Peng, M.W.,& Luo, Y. Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy : The nature o a micro-macro link. Adademy of Management Journal,43(3),486-501., 200024. Podolny, J., & Page, K. Network Forms Of Organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 57-76, 199825. Portes, Alejandro., Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 1-24., 199826. Putnam, R. D., Turning in, turning out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America, Political Science and Politics, Vol. 28, No. 4, 199527. Tsai, W. and Ghoshal, S., Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks, Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464-476, 1998.28. Tsai, W. Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 925-940., 200029. 專書，Jacobs, J., The Death and Life of Great American Cities, London: Penguin , 196130. 專書，林南，《社會資本》，臺北：弘智文化，200531. 熊瑞梅，性別、個人網絡與社會資本，頁179-215，收錄於邊燕杰、涂肇慶、蘇耀昌編，華人社會的調查研究：方法與發現：Oxford University Press. 200132. 顧忠華／政大社會系教授，社會資本理論與非營利組織──研究構想與心得， 2004 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理與智慧財產研究所
99359031資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099359031 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 溫肇東 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Wen, Chao-Tung en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 王貞雅 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Wang, Chen-Ya en_US dc.creator (作者) 王貞雅 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Wang, Chen-Ya en_US dc.date (日期) 2014 en_US dc.date.accessioned 17-Oct-2018 11:38:14 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 17-Oct-2018 11:38:14 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-Oct-2018 11:38:14 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0099359031 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/120588 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 科技管理與智慧財產研究所 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 99359031 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 2010年是時代基金會(Epoch Foundation)成立20周年，基金會舉辦了一系列活動慶祝其20歲生日，邀請了當時的麻省理工學院(MIT)校長Susan Hockfield、史隆管理學院(Sloan school)院長David C. Schmittlein 、10位頂尖科學家以及廣達電腦林百里董事長、台積電張忠謀董事長、朱敬一院士、舒維都院士(前MIT電腦暨人工智慧實驗室主任)以及賴聲川先生等人，與台灣各界菁英、青年學子共同探討2020年的願景。這場盛會背後代表的意義是，時代基金會無疑是台灣企業界與MIT交流最好的窗口之一，更重要的是，這樣的網絡關係隨著時間過去，不但沒有式微，反而愈發茁壯。因此我們不禁好奇，像時代基金會這樣的一個非營利組織(NPO)，是如何能達成這樣的里程碑呢？因此，本研究整理、歸納「社會資本」理論發展的背景，並以資源依賴理論與網絡關係的機制作為輔助理論，希望能探討時代基金會的社會資本具有什麼特性，為什麼能產生這些效益。本研究期盼藉由研究成果回答四點問題：(1) 時代基金會這樣一個能聚集社會資本，並且動員資源的平台組織，是如何從無到有，萌芽、建構乃至茁壯的？(2) 該組織有何創新之處，為什麼能與世界頂尖的大學或機構有這麼深入的互動與合作？(3) 會員企業透過時代基金會是否有獲取任何價值 ？(4) 時代基金會對台灣產業與社會有什麼貢獻？本研究所得到的初步結論：(1) 由個人社會資本透過內部及外部連結，移轉成組織的社會資本，進一步讓網絡平台能被建構與茁壯。(2) 多元化但又互相連結的會務發展，使其網絡中的資源能發揮最大的效益。(3) 有形價值與無形價值都能對企業產生貢獻，更多時候企業需要的是未來性。(4) 當時代基金會的平台口碑逐步建立後，就能吸引更多的企業或學校、或者對創業有興趣的團隊等新血加入這個平台，讓時代基金會的平台可發揮的影響力增長，這就是時代基金會所能持續為台灣產業及社會投入的新動力。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) June 2010 marked the 20th anniversary of the Epoch Foundation. The foundation held a series of events to commemorate its 20th birthday, inviting the president of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), the dean of the MIT Sloan School of Management, and ten top scientists to Taiwan to discuss their vision for 2020, exploring global issues, the impact of science and technology, the power of social culture, and the future role of business with Taiwanese elites from various fields. These experts also gave suggestions for Taiwan’s scientific, technological, and industrial development. The significance of this event points to 20 years’ hard work: the Epoch Foundation has not only become one of the best platforms for Taiwanese businesses to initiate exchanges with MIT; but more importantly, these networks have not declined over time. Instead, they have grown even more robust. Thus, we cannot help but asking: How did this nonprofit organization (NPO) get its started? How was it built and has been going from strength to strength?The thesis will use social capital theory and resource dependence theory to figure out the network of Epoch Foundation. This framework of thesis attempts to answer the following questions: (1) As an organization that is able to accumulate social capital and mobilize resources, how did the Epoch Foundation grow into its current form in terms of social capital formation, building, and gain? (2) What are the innovative characteristics of the foundation, and why has it been able to forge in-depth interactions and cooperation with the world’s top universities and institutions? (3) What kind of value do relevant parties gain from joining the foundation? (4) What does the Epoch Foundation contribute to Taiwanese industry and society?The conclusions of this thesis are as following: (1) The social relationship netwowks could be build and grow by bridging tie and bonding tie from members to organization. (2) The diverse but continuous projects have maximized its benefits by transferring resources within the network. (3) The contribution to relevant parties is existed offered by tangible value, intangible value or the sight of future. (4) As the Epoch Foundation’s reputation spread, it attracted more people into its network, including schools, enterprises, and start-up team members, and gradually increased its influence. The new and constant energy will impact on Taiwan industries and society. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1第一節、研究動機： 1第二節、研究背景： 2第三節、研究目的與研究問題： 3第四節、研究流程： 4第二章 文獻探討 6第一節、社會資本論述： 6壹、社會資本的內涵與過程： 6貳、社會資本的增值： 9第二節、資源依賴理論之變化 11壹、資源依賴理論與組織發展： 11貳、網絡關係機制如何運作： 12第三節、文獻小結 13第三章 研究方法 16第一節、研究架構 16第二節、研究設計 17壹、研究方法 17貳、資料蒐集 18第三節、研究限制 20壹、個案資料 20貳、理論選取 21第四章 研究個案 22第一節、時代基金會簡介 22壹、第一個10年：萌芽與建構(1990~2000) 22貳、第二個10年：茁壯(2000~2010) 28第二節、時代基金會之會員企業服務(1990年~迄今)： 31第三節、時代基金會之人才教育與未來產業服務(1998年~迄今) 48第五章 時代基金會之個案分析與發現 57第一節、社會資本在時代基金會二十多年的變化 57壹、社會資本內涵在二十多年間如何轉變 57貳、社會資本過程在二十多年間如何成形 60參、社會資本累積在二十多年間如何增值 62第二節、時代基金會之社會資本對資源移轉與強化的影響 67第三節、研究發現 74第六章 研究結論與建議 84第一節、研究結論 84第二節、後續研究建議 86參考文獻 87附錄一 90 zh_TW dc.format.extent 2083488 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099359031 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 社會資本 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 資源與網絡關係 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 時代基金會 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Social capital en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Resource dependence en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Epoch Foundation en_US dc.title (題名) 以社會資本理論探討『時代基金會』對台灣經濟發展的連結與貢獻 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The connection between Epoch Foundation, the creative social capital network, and Taiwan economy en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 參考文獻1. Adler, P.S. & Kwon, S.W., Social capital: Prospects for new concept. The Academy of Management Review, 27(1):17-40, 2002.2. Astone, Nan Marie, Constance A. Nathanson, Robert Schoen, and Young J. Kim. Family Demography, Social Theory, and Investment in Social Capital. Population and Development Review 25(1): 1-31., 19993. Batjargal, B. Social Capital and Entrepreneurial Performance In Russia: A Longitudinal Study. Organization Studies, 24, 535-556., 20034. Bian, Y. Bringing Strong Ties Back in: Indirect Ties, Network Bridges, and Job Searches in China. American Sociological Review, 62, 366-385., 19975. Bourdieu, P., The Forms of Social Capital: Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1986 Books6. Bourdieu, P., The social space and genesis of groups. Theory and society, 14(6) 723-744, 19857. Burt R., STRUCTURE, Version 4.2, 19918. Burt, R. S., Structural holes: The Social structure of Competition. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, 19929. Cohen, S. & Fields, G., Social capital and capital gains in Silicon Valley. California Management Review, 41(2), 199910. Coleman, James S. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology 94(supp.): S95-S120, 198811. Emerson, R. E. Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27: 31-41., 196212. Fukuyama, F. Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press., 199513. Galaskiewicz,JosephandKarlKrohn. Positions,Rolesand Dependencies in a Community Interorganization System. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25:527-550., 198414. Granovetter, Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510., 198515. Granovetter, M. S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1380., 197316. Levine, S., and P. E. White. Exchange as a conceptual framework for the study of interorganizational relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 5: 583-610., 196117. Li, P.P., Social tie, social capital, and social behavior: toward an integrative model of informal exchange. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. 24:227-246, 2007.18. Lin, N. Social Capital: a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge University Press., 200119. Loury, G. Why should we care about group inequality? Social Philosophy and Policy, (5): 249-271., 198720. Mizruchi, Mark S. and Joseph Galaskiewicz, Networks of Interorganizational Relations, Sociological Methods and Research, 22:46-70. , 199321. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23: 242-266., 199822. Payne, G.T., Moore, C.B., Griffis, S.E. & Autry, C.W. Multilevel challenges and opportunities in social capital research. Journal of Management, 37(2), 491-520, 201123. Peng, M.W.,& Luo, Y. Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy : The nature o a micro-macro link. Adademy of Management Journal,43(3),486-501., 200024. Podolny, J., & Page, K. Network Forms Of Organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 57-76, 199825. Portes, Alejandro., Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 1-24., 199826. Putnam, R. D., Turning in, turning out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America, Political Science and Politics, Vol. 28, No. 4, 199527. Tsai, W. and Ghoshal, S., Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks, Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464-476, 1998.28. Tsai, W. Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 925-940., 200029. 專書，Jacobs, J., The Death and Life of Great American Cities, London: Penguin , 196130. 專書，林南，《社會資本》，臺北：弘智文化，200531. 熊瑞梅，性別、個人網絡與社會資本，頁179-215，收錄於邊燕杰、涂肇慶、蘇耀昌編，華人社會的調查研究：方法與發現：Oxford University Press. 200132. 顧忠華／政大社會系教授，社會資本理論與非營利組織──研究構想與心得， 2004 zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/THE.NCCU.TIIPM.029.2018.F08 en_US
