學術產出-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 Is the Asian Quality Assurance System for Higher Education Going Glonacal? : Assessing the Impact of Three Types of Program Accreditation on Taiwanese Universities.
作者 侯永琪
Hou, Angela Yung-Chi
貢獻者 教育學院
關鍵詞 glonacal; quality assurance; accreditation
日期 2015
上傳時間 18-Dec-2018 09:02:13 (UTC+8)
摘要 Tertiary education institutions are currently learning to integrate and balance the needs of varying stakeholders, including local students, national governments, and the global market. These three dimensions combine into the concept of a ‘glonacal’ – global + national + local – region of higher education. At the same time, quality assurance influences higher education in terms of policy decisions and processes, putting more emphasis on teaching as a core function of universities, and leading to an increased bureaucratization and heavier administrative workload. Yet, there is little evidence of the consequences of the glonacal approach for the quality of teaching and learning within universities and colleges. The main purpose of this paper is to assess the impact of the glonacal quality assurance system of Asian higher education through a case study of the effects of three program accreditations on higher education institutions in Taiwan (Higher Education Evaluation & Accreditation Council of Taiwan [HEEACT], Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business International [AACSB International] and Institute of Engineering Education Taiwan [IEET]).
關聯 Studies in Higher Education, Vol.40, No.1, pp.83-105
資料類型 article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.818638
dc.contributor 教育學院
dc.creator (作者) 侯永琪zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Hou, Angela Yung-Chien_US
dc.date (日期) 2015
dc.date.accessioned 18-Dec-2018 09:02:13 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 18-Dec-2018 09:02:13 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 18-Dec-2018 09:02:13 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/121407-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Tertiary education institutions are currently learning to integrate and balance the needs of varying stakeholders, including local students, national governments, and the global market. These three dimensions combine into the concept of a ‘glonacal’ – global + national + local – region of higher education. At the same time, quality assurance influences higher education in terms of policy decisions and processes, putting more emphasis on teaching as a core function of universities, and leading to an increased bureaucratization and heavier administrative workload. Yet, there is little evidence of the consequences of the glonacal approach for the quality of teaching and learning within universities and colleges. The main purpose of this paper is to assess the impact of the glonacal quality assurance system of Asian higher education through a case study of the effects of three program accreditations on higher education institutions in Taiwan (Higher Education Evaluation & Accreditation Council of Taiwan [HEEACT], Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business International [AACSB International] and Institute of Engineering Education Taiwan [IEET]).en_US
dc.format.extent 128 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.relation (關聯) Studies in Higher Education, Vol.40, No.1, pp.83-105
dc.subject (關鍵詞) glonacal; quality assurance; accreditation
dc.title (題名) Is the Asian Quality Assurance System for Higher Education Going Glonacal? : Assessing the Impact of Three Types of Program Accreditation on Taiwanese Universities.en_US
dc.type (資料類型) article
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1080/03075079.2013.818638
dc.doi.uri (DOI) https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.818638