學術產出-books

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

題名 Quality Assurance and Its Result Use in Taiwan Higher Education: Implication on Fully Accredited and Non-Fully Accredited Institutions.
作者 侯永琪
Hou, Angela Yung-Chi
貢獻者 教育學院
日期 2018-07
上傳時間 19-Dec-2018 11:14:49 (UTC+8)
摘要 Because Asian quality assurance agencies are either governmental institutions or affiliated with government, evaluation use and impact on accreditation outcomes in higher education institutions is an important concern in Asian society. Higher Education Accreditation & Evaluation Council in Taiwan (HEEACT), a leading national accreditor in Taiwan, carried out program and institutional accreditations over four-year universities and colleges since its establishment in 2005. Over the past decade, two cycles of program accreditations and one institutional review have been completed. Hence, the public demand to assess the impact of quality assurance on higher education institutions and to realize its use in quality policy making is getting stronger and stronger. The purpose of the chapter is to explore the impact and implication of accreditation on Taiwan higher education via a survey of academics and staff. There are several major findings in the study. First, accreditation outcomes greatly affected both fully accredited and partially accredited institutions, particularly on faculty recruitment and academic program development. Second, the respondents from the accredited institutions tended to be more satisfied with the current QA policy. Third, the attitude toward evaluation use as a requirement of the Excellence Project and application for self-accreditation differed between the respondents in the fully accredited and partially accredited institutions.
關聯 Research Handbook on Quality, Performance and Accountability in Higher Education., Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.394-404
資料類型 book/chapter
DOI https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785369759.00041
dc.contributor 教育學院
dc.creator (作者) 侯永琪zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Hou, Angela Yung-Chien_US
dc.date (日期) 2018-07
dc.date.accessioned 19-Dec-2018 11:14:49 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 19-Dec-2018 11:14:49 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 19-Dec-2018 11:14:49 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/121439-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Because Asian quality assurance agencies are either governmental institutions or affiliated with government, evaluation use and impact on accreditation outcomes in higher education institutions is an important concern in Asian society. Higher Education Accreditation & Evaluation Council in Taiwan (HEEACT), a leading national accreditor in Taiwan, carried out program and institutional accreditations over four-year universities and colleges since its establishment in 2005. Over the past decade, two cycles of program accreditations and one institutional review have been completed. Hence, the public demand to assess the impact of quality assurance on higher education institutions and to realize its use in quality policy making is getting stronger and stronger. The purpose of the chapter is to explore the impact and implication of accreditation on Taiwan higher education via a survey of academics and staff. There are several major findings in the study. First, accreditation outcomes greatly affected both fully accredited and partially accredited institutions, particularly on faculty recruitment and academic program development. Second, the respondents from the accredited institutions tended to be more satisfied with the current QA policy. Third, the attitude toward evaluation use as a requirement of the Excellence Project and application for self-accreditation differed between the respondents in the fully accredited and partially accredited institutions.en_US
dc.format.extent 141 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.relation (關聯) Research Handbook on Quality, Performance and Accountability in Higher Education., Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.394-404
dc.title (題名) Quality Assurance and Its Result Use in Taiwan Higher Education: Implication on Fully Accredited and Non-Fully Accredited Institutions.en_US
dc.type (資料類型) book/chapter
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.4337/9781785369759.00041
dc.doi.uri (DOI) https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785369759.00041