| dc.contributor | 法律系 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 陳洸岳 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | Chen, Guang-Yueh | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2017-06 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 10-Jan-2019 15:44:23 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 10-Jan-2019 15:44:23 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 10-Jan-2019 15:44:23 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/121842 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | It is an important but rarely discussed issue whether the gratuitous right of way, which based on Civil Code section 789, has binding force for the succeeded parties. By analyzing domestic views, it is found that affirmative opinions are predominant. However, in Japan, which has the same provision, various compromise suggestions had been presented. Considering the reasonableness of those suggestions, the balance with other mechanisms concerning neighboring land and the characteristic of material burden, the gratuitous right of way will be lapsed, if it has not been openly, notoriously revealed. Yet while re-judging the right of way for the surrounded land, particularly the necessity to pass through former surrounding land still is important to consider the details between original parties. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 民法第789 條之無償通行權的法律關係是否拘束特定繼受人，為一重要但較欠缺探討的課題。本文分析國內實務及學說見解，確認整體傾向於採當然拘束特定繼受人為前提；但經比較與我國有相同規定之日本法的發展，得知無論是以當然拘束或當然不拘束為前提，均兼採各種考量而有互相趨近之傾向。經此比較，本文認為，鑑於與其他相鄰關係之均衡及物之負擔的特性，無償通行權如欠缺適當顯現通行關係存在之狀態，則應失其效力，但在重新決定袋地之通行權時，過往造成袋地之經過應為判斷是否仍可通行原圍繞地之重要考量。 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 173 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/html | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 法令月刊, Vol.68, No.6, pp.56-71 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 無償通行權 ; 特定繼受人 ; 袋地 ; 相鄰關係 ; 物之負擔 ; Gratuitous Right of Way ; Succession ; Surrounded Land ; Neighboring Land ; Material Burden | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | 無償通行權之特定繼受 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | Succession Referring to Gratuitous Right of Way | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | article | |
| dc.identifier.doi (DOI) | 10.6509/TLM.2017.6806.03 | |
| dc.doi.uri (DOI) | http://dx.doi.org/10.6509/TLM.2017.6806.03 | |
