Publications-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 A microgenetic analysis of classroom discussion practices: How literacy processes intermingle in the negotiation of meaning in an online discussion
作者 江玥慧
Chiang, Yueh-hui Vanessa
Vogler, Jane S.;Schallert, Diane L.;Park, Yangjoo;Song, Kwangok;Chiang, Yueh-hui Vanessa;Jordan, Michelle E.;Lee, SoonAh;Cheng, An-Chih Janne;Lee, Ji-Eun;Park, Jeong-bin;Sanders, Anke J. Z.
貢獻者 資科系
關鍵詞 comprehension processes; discussion; online reading and writing; qualitative (general); adults
日期 2013-09
上傳時間 25-Jan-2019 12:41:16 (UTC+8)
摘要 Unlike previous research on computer-mediated discussions that has focused analysis on the final conversation as a completed product, this study was focused on the process by which the conversation was created. Using screen-capturing software, the on-screen actions of the nine participants in an online classroom discussion were recorded and analyzed for evidence of reading, writing, and thinking processes. Retrospective interviews were conducted with three of the student participants for additional insights into these processes. A triangulation of data sources revealed participants engaged in at least three distinct patterns of reading, writing, and thinking, with some participants fluidly moving between these patterns throughout the conversation. The three patterns were described as follows: (a) a methodical reading of most messages, and composing of responses occurring as the reader/writer thinks of it; (b) a coordination of reading, thinking, and writing, with careful revisiting of messages already read and deliberate crafting of responses; and (c) a complex orchestration of processes, with several reading resources consulted in addition to the conversation’s unfolding messages as well as composing processes that were interleaved with thinking and reading. This study provides clear evidence that the experiences of individuals in the same online conversation can vary considerably even as they contribute to a co-constructed publicly shared conversation.
關聯 Journal of Literacy Research, Volume: 45 issue: 3, pp.211-239
資料類型 article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1086296X13499846
dc.contributor 資科系
dc.creator (作者) 江玥慧
dc.creator (作者) Chiang, Yueh-hui Vanessa
dc.creator (作者) Vogler, Jane S.;Schallert, Diane L.;Park, Yangjoo;Song, Kwangok;Chiang, Yueh-hui Vanessa;Jordan, Michelle E.;Lee, SoonAh;Cheng, An-Chih Janne;Lee, Ji-Eun;Park, Jeong-bin;Sanders, Anke J. Z.
dc.date (日期) 2013-09
dc.date.accessioned 25-Jan-2019 12:41:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 25-Jan-2019 12:41:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 25-Jan-2019 12:41:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/122169-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Unlike previous research on computer-mediated discussions that has focused analysis on the final conversation as a completed product, this study was focused on the process by which the conversation was created. Using screen-capturing software, the on-screen actions of the nine participants in an online classroom discussion were recorded and analyzed for evidence of reading, writing, and thinking processes. Retrospective interviews were conducted with three of the student participants for additional insights into these processes. A triangulation of data sources revealed participants engaged in at least three distinct patterns of reading, writing, and thinking, with some participants fluidly moving between these patterns throughout the conversation. The three patterns were described as follows: (a) a methodical reading of most messages, and composing of responses occurring as the reader/writer thinks of it; (b) a coordination of reading, thinking, and writing, with careful revisiting of messages already read and deliberate crafting of responses; and (c) a complex orchestration of processes, with several reading resources consulted in addition to the conversation’s unfolding messages as well as composing processes that were interleaved with thinking and reading. This study provides clear evidence that the experiences of individuals in the same online conversation can vary considerably even as they contribute to a co-constructed publicly shared conversation.
dc.format.extent 662671 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) Journal of Literacy Research, Volume: 45 issue: 3, pp.211-239
dc.subject (關鍵詞) comprehension processes; discussion; online reading and writing; qualitative (general); adults
dc.title (題名) A microgenetic analysis of classroom discussion practices: How literacy processes intermingle in the negotiation of meaning in an online discussion
dc.type (資料類型) article
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1177/1086296X13499846
dc.doi.uri (DOI) https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1086296X13499846