學術產出-Theses
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
題名 臺北市違章建築類型及其影響因素
The patterns and determinants of illegal buildings in Taipei City作者 朱永恩
Chu, Yung-En貢獻者 林子欽
Lin, Tzu-Chin
朱永恩
Chu, Yung-En關鍵詞 違章建築
違章建築類型
違章建築處理
追蹤資料迴歸模型
羅吉特模型
Illegal building
The patterns of illegal buildings
The handling of illegal buildings
Panel data regression model
Logit model日期 2018 上傳時間 1-Apr-2019 15:04:28 (UTC+8) 摘要 「違章建築」一詞往往令人聯想到落後國家。但臺灣是個已開發國家，立有建管法規規範以及相關政府機關管理。於此之下，違章建築現象仍是遍布各地區，甚至因長久的存在而形成特殊街道景觀，此可謂都市發展上的問題。在近年多起嚴重的公共安全事件發生下，也引起政府與民眾逐漸重視此議題。本研究以1983年至2012年之臺北市違章建築查報資料為基礎，歸納查報違章建築的型態及特徵。結果顯示，臺北市以水平增建違建為多數，且隨著年份推近，建物專有部分違建的比例增加，高單價建材之違建比例減少。再者，本研究以里為分析單元，利用1999至2012年之資料，透過追蹤資料迴歸模型（panel data regression model）及多元線性迴歸模型探討影響臺北市各里違章建築查報之社會、經濟等影響因素。實證結果發現，管理委員會為重要的影響因素，且在公告現值較高和較新興的里，違章建築查報數量固定較多。最後，本研究以羅吉特模型（logit model）分析促使政府處理查報後違建之因素。實證結果顯示，政府對於具有水平增建性質，或是屬於拆後重建和新違建類型的違建，採取較積極的處理態度。於政策和實際執行上，政府是一致採納遏止新違建產生的作法。
"Illegal building" is often associated with the least developed countries. While Taiwan is considered a developed country, with existing building laws and related government agencies regulating the industry, illegal buildings are still spreading over various regions. This case can be described as an urban development issue. With a number of serious public security incidents in recent years, increasing importance have been attached to the issue of illegal buildings.This study summarizes the patterns and characteristics of reported illegal buildings based on the data of reported illegal buildings in Taipei City from 1983 to 2012. The results show that there were a large number of horizontal extensions of illegal buildings in Taipei City. As time went on, the percentage of illegal individual units increased, and the proportion of illegal buildings of high-priced materials decreased. In addition, this study uses the data from 1999 to 2012, via regression models to explore factors affecting the reported number of illegal buildings per village. The empirical results show that the management committee is an important influence factor, and the villages where are more newly developing or higher current land value, the number of reported illegal buildings is higher.Lastly, this study uses logit model to analyze the factors that prompted the government to deal with illegal buildings after the investigation. The empirical results show that the government adopts a more active attitude towards the illegal buildings of horizontal extensions or the reconstructions, and new illegal buildings. The results also point out that in terms of policy and actual implementation, the government has consistently adopted the practice of curbing the emergence of new illegal buildings.參考文獻 一、中文參考文獻1.李永山、李惠玲，2013，「結合群集分析與關聯規則於違章建築管理之研究」，『資訊管理展望』，15(1&2)：1-17。2.李宗霖，2008，「高雄市違章建築管理之研究」，國立中山大學社會科學院高階公共政策碩士學程碩士在職專班碩士論文：高雄。3.林玄苗，2014，「臺中市民國100年後新違建拆除排序評估之研究」，國立台灣大學建築與城鄉環境研究所碩士論文：臺北。4.林庭毅，2006，「臺灣都市違章建築處理模式之研究-以臺北市為例」，國立臺灣科技大學設計學院建築研究所碩士論文：臺北。5.周昱賢，2016，「影響臺北市住宅供給之因素探討－土地細碎與開發政策的觀點」，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文：臺北。6.張紹勳，2016，『Panel-data迴歸模型：Stata在廣義時間序列的應用』，台北：五南圖書出版。7.張廖萬益，2013，「違章建築管理問題與對策之研究—以新北市為例」，國立中央大學土木工程學系碩士論文：桃園。8.曾鵬光、陳佳欣，2012，「建蔽率與容積率管制誘發開發商建築違建現象之探討─臺南市新建透天住宅之實證分析」，『住宅學報』，21(1)：19-36。9.曾鵬光、江哲銘、陳肇堯，2010，「違章建築現象分類與其對外部環境衝擊之研究-以臺南市為例」，『住宅學報』，19(2)：59-80。10.溫在弘、劉擇昌、林民浩，2010，「犯罪地圖繪製與熱區分析方法及其應用：以1998-2007年臺北市住宅竊盜犯罪為例」，『地理研究』，52：43-63。11.謝崑滄，2006，「都市違章建築問題之探討—以高雄市為例」，國立中山大學中山學術研究所碩士論文：高雄。二、外文參考文獻1. Gujarati, D., 2011, Econometrics by Examples, London: Palgrave MacMillan.2. Hoffman, T. K., 1990, “Unauthorized Housing in Greece: A Response to High Costs and Land Scarcity”, International Journal on World Peace, 7(2), 71-74.3. Ho, D. C. W., Chau, K. W., and Yau, Y., 2008, “Evaluating Unauthorized Appendages in Private Apartment Building”, Building Research and Information, 36(6), 568-579.4. Kapoor, M. and David, B., 2008, “Measuring Risk on Investment in Informal (Illegal) Housing: Theory and Evidence from Pune, India,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 38, 311-329.5. Krivoruchko, K., Gribov, A. and Krause, E., 2011, “Multivariate Areal Interpolation for Continuous and Count Data”, Procedia Environmental Sciences, 3:14-19.6. Lai, L. W. C., and Ho, D. C.W., 2001, “Unauthorised Structures in a High-rise High-density Environment-The Case of Hong Kong”, Property Management, 19(2), 112-123.7. Park, H. M., 2009, “Linear Regression Models for Panel Data Using SAS, Stata, LIMDEP, and SPSS”, Working Paper, The University Information Technology Services (UITS) Center for Statistical and Mathematical Computing, Indiana University.8. Patton, C. V. and Sophoulis, C. M., 1989, “Unauthorized Suburban Housing Production in Greece”, Urban Geography, 10(2), 138-156.9. Polyzos, S. and Minetos, D., 2007, “Past and Present Patterns of Informal Housing in Greece: A Spatial Analysis, Discussion Paper Series, University of Thessaly, Greece, 13(6), 137-164.10. Polyzos, S. and Minetos, D., 2009, “ Informal Housing in Greece: A Quantitative Spatial Analysis”, Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 4(2), 7-33.11. Sietchiping, R., 2004, “Calibration and Validation of a Proposed Informal Settlement Growth Model”, 7th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science , Heraklion, Greece, April 29-May 1.12. Tanasescu, A., Wing-tak, E. C., and Smart, A., 2010, “Tops and Bottoms: State Tolerance of Illegal Housing in Hong Kong and Calgary”, Habitat International, 34(4), 478-484.13. Tseng, P. K., Chiang, C. M., Hu, H. Y., and Chen, C. Y., 2009, “The Externality of Building Violations in Urban Environment-empirical Observation in Taiwan”, Paper presented at the Future Trends in Architectural Management, International Symposium CIBW096 2009 Taiwan, November2- November4.14. Yiu, C. Y., 2005, “Institutional Arrangement and Unauthorised Building Works in Hong Kong”, Structural Survey, 23(1), 22-29.15. Yau, Y., 2015, “The Value of Building Safety: A Hedonic Price Approach”, Urbani izziv, 26(1), 92-104.16. Zanfi, F., 2013, “The Città Abusiva in Contemporary Southern Italy: Illegal Building and Prospects for Change”, Urban Studies, 50(16), 3428-3445. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
地政學系
105257023資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105257023 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 林子欽 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Lin, Tzu-Chin en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 朱永恩 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chu, Yung-En en_US dc.creator (作者) 朱永恩 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Chu, Yung-En en_US dc.date (日期) 2018 en_US dc.date.accessioned 1-Apr-2019 15:04:28 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 1-Apr-2019 15:04:28 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 1-Apr-2019 15:04:28 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0105257023 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/122791 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 地政學系 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 105257023 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 「違章建築」一詞往往令人聯想到落後國家。但臺灣是個已開發國家，立有建管法規規範以及相關政府機關管理。於此之下，違章建築現象仍是遍布各地區，甚至因長久的存在而形成特殊街道景觀，此可謂都市發展上的問題。在近年多起嚴重的公共安全事件發生下，也引起政府與民眾逐漸重視此議題。本研究以1983年至2012年之臺北市違章建築查報資料為基礎，歸納查報違章建築的型態及特徵。結果顯示，臺北市以水平增建違建為多數，且隨著年份推近，建物專有部分違建的比例增加，高單價建材之違建比例減少。再者，本研究以里為分析單元，利用1999至2012年之資料，透過追蹤資料迴歸模型（panel data regression model）及多元線性迴歸模型探討影響臺北市各里違章建築查報之社會、經濟等影響因素。實證結果發現，管理委員會為重要的影響因素，且在公告現值較高和較新興的里，違章建築查報數量固定較多。最後，本研究以羅吉特模型（logit model）分析促使政府處理查報後違建之因素。實證結果顯示，政府對於具有水平增建性質，或是屬於拆後重建和新違建類型的違建，採取較積極的處理態度。於政策和實際執行上，政府是一致採納遏止新違建產生的作法。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) "Illegal building" is often associated with the least developed countries. While Taiwan is considered a developed country, with existing building laws and related government agencies regulating the industry, illegal buildings are still spreading over various regions. This case can be described as an urban development issue. With a number of serious public security incidents in recent years, increasing importance have been attached to the issue of illegal buildings.This study summarizes the patterns and characteristics of reported illegal buildings based on the data of reported illegal buildings in Taipei City from 1983 to 2012. The results show that there were a large number of horizontal extensions of illegal buildings in Taipei City. As time went on, the percentage of illegal individual units increased, and the proportion of illegal buildings of high-priced materials decreased. In addition, this study uses the data from 1999 to 2012, via regression models to explore factors affecting the reported number of illegal buildings per village. The empirical results show that the management committee is an important influence factor, and the villages where are more newly developing or higher current land value, the number of reported illegal buildings is higher.Lastly, this study uses logit model to analyze the factors that prompted the government to deal with illegal buildings after the investigation. The empirical results show that the government adopts a more active attitude towards the illegal buildings of horizontal extensions or the reconstructions, and new illegal buildings. The results also point out that in terms of policy and actual implementation, the government has consistently adopted the practice of curbing the emergence of new illegal buildings. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究動機與目的 1第二節 研究架構與流程 5第二章 文獻回顧 7第一節 國內外違章建築現象 7第二節 違章建築相關實證研究 11第三章 違章建築相關法令制度 15第一節 違章建築之定義與分類 15第二節 中央違章建築相關法令 19第三節 臺北市違章建築相關法制 21第四章 探討違章建築影響因素之研究設計 29第一節 研究範圍與方法 29第二節 資料說明與處理 33第三節 模型設定與變數選取 47第五章 實證結果與分析 57第一節 違章建築查報之影響因素實證結果與說明 57第二節 查報違章建築後續有無處理實證結果與說明 64第六章 結論與建議 69第一節 結論 69第二節 研究限制與後續研究建議 72參考文獻 i附錄一 iv附錄二 v附錄三 x zh_TW dc.format.extent 2431426 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105257023 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 違章建築 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 違章建築類型 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 違章建築處理 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 追蹤資料迴歸模型 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 羅吉特模型 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Illegal building en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) The patterns of illegal buildings en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) The handling of illegal buildings en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Panel data regression model en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Logit model en_US dc.title (題名) 臺北市違章建築類型及其影響因素 zh_TW dc.title (題名) The patterns and determinants of illegal buildings in Taipei City en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文參考文獻1.李永山、李惠玲，2013，「結合群集分析與關聯規則於違章建築管理之研究」，『資訊管理展望』，15(1&2)：1-17。2.李宗霖，2008，「高雄市違章建築管理之研究」，國立中山大學社會科學院高階公共政策碩士學程碩士在職專班碩士論文：高雄。3.林玄苗，2014，「臺中市民國100年後新違建拆除排序評估之研究」，國立台灣大學建築與城鄉環境研究所碩士論文：臺北。4.林庭毅，2006，「臺灣都市違章建築處理模式之研究-以臺北市為例」，國立臺灣科技大學設計學院建築研究所碩士論文：臺北。5.周昱賢，2016，「影響臺北市住宅供給之因素探討－土地細碎與開發政策的觀點」，國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文：臺北。6.張紹勳，2016，『Panel-data迴歸模型：Stata在廣義時間序列的應用』，台北：五南圖書出版。7.張廖萬益，2013，「違章建築管理問題與對策之研究—以新北市為例」，國立中央大學土木工程學系碩士論文：桃園。8.曾鵬光、陳佳欣，2012，「建蔽率與容積率管制誘發開發商建築違建現象之探討─臺南市新建透天住宅之實證分析」，『住宅學報』，21(1)：19-36。9.曾鵬光、江哲銘、陳肇堯，2010，「違章建築現象分類與其對外部環境衝擊之研究-以臺南市為例」，『住宅學報』，19(2)：59-80。10.溫在弘、劉擇昌、林民浩，2010，「犯罪地圖繪製與熱區分析方法及其應用：以1998-2007年臺北市住宅竊盜犯罪為例」，『地理研究』，52：43-63。11.謝崑滄，2006，「都市違章建築問題之探討—以高雄市為例」，國立中山大學中山學術研究所碩士論文：高雄。二、外文參考文獻1. Gujarati, D., 2011, Econometrics by Examples, London: Palgrave MacMillan.2. Hoffman, T. K., 1990, “Unauthorized Housing in Greece: A Response to High Costs and Land Scarcity”, International Journal on World Peace, 7(2), 71-74.3. Ho, D. C. W., Chau, K. W., and Yau, Y., 2008, “Evaluating Unauthorized Appendages in Private Apartment Building”, Building Research and Information, 36(6), 568-579.4. Kapoor, M. and David, B., 2008, “Measuring Risk on Investment in Informal (Illegal) Housing: Theory and Evidence from Pune, India,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 38, 311-329.5. Krivoruchko, K., Gribov, A. and Krause, E., 2011, “Multivariate Areal Interpolation for Continuous and Count Data”, Procedia Environmental Sciences, 3:14-19.6. Lai, L. W. C., and Ho, D. C.W., 2001, “Unauthorised Structures in a High-rise High-density Environment-The Case of Hong Kong”, Property Management, 19(2), 112-123.7. Park, H. M., 2009, “Linear Regression Models for Panel Data Using SAS, Stata, LIMDEP, and SPSS”, Working Paper, The University Information Technology Services (UITS) Center for Statistical and Mathematical Computing, Indiana University.8. Patton, C. V. and Sophoulis, C. M., 1989, “Unauthorized Suburban Housing Production in Greece”, Urban Geography, 10(2), 138-156.9. Polyzos, S. and Minetos, D., 2007, “Past and Present Patterns of Informal Housing in Greece: A Spatial Analysis, Discussion Paper Series, University of Thessaly, Greece, 13(6), 137-164.10. Polyzos, S. and Minetos, D., 2009, “ Informal Housing in Greece: A Quantitative Spatial Analysis”, Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 4(2), 7-33.11. Sietchiping, R., 2004, “Calibration and Validation of a Proposed Informal Settlement Growth Model”, 7th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science , Heraklion, Greece, April 29-May 1.12. Tanasescu, A., Wing-tak, E. C., and Smart, A., 2010, “Tops and Bottoms: State Tolerance of Illegal Housing in Hong Kong and Calgary”, Habitat International, 34(4), 478-484.13. Tseng, P. K., Chiang, C. M., Hu, H. Y., and Chen, C. Y., 2009, “The Externality of Building Violations in Urban Environment-empirical Observation in Taiwan”, Paper presented at the Future Trends in Architectural Management, International Symposium CIBW096 2009 Taiwan, November2- November4.14. Yiu, C. Y., 2005, “Institutional Arrangement and Unauthorised Building Works in Hong Kong”, Structural Survey, 23(1), 22-29.15. Yau, Y., 2015, “The Value of Building Safety: A Hedonic Price Approach”, Urbani izziv, 26(1), 92-104.16. Zanfi, F., 2013, “The Città Abusiva in Contemporary Southern Italy: Illegal Building and Prospects for Change”, Urban Studies, 50(16), 3428-3445. zh_TW dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.6814/THE.NCCU.LE.006.2019.A05 en_US
