學術產出-Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 「亞洲式民主」與政治危機─印尼個案研究,1997-1998─
Asian Democracy
作者 李美賢
Lee, Mei-Hsien
貢獻者 問題與研究
關鍵詞 「亞洲式民主」;亞洲價值;證明危機;蘇哈托;哈比比
Asian democracy ; political crisis ; political succession ; Indonesia ; Suharto
日期 1999-08
上傳時間 15-Apr-2019 16:24:04 (UTC+8)
摘要 「亞洲式民主」為許多政治學者及大部分的亞洲領袖所推崇。他們相信,因為「亞洲式民主」標榜許多與群體價值優先相關的價值,使得一些亞洲國家免於面對西方所面臨的諸多困境。他們同時堅信,人民內心深處渴望的是經濟生活面的滿足,民主與否則非重要問題。然而本研究的基本論點認為,「亞洲式民主」事實上不民主,也因為它不民主,所以它即具有不穩定的本質。當支持「亞洲式民主」政體合法性的經濟發展消失時,尤其又必須面對政治領導繼承問題時,以上所稱的不穩定的本質往往就會轉變為政治危機。本研究即以透過對印尼一九九八年政權轉移的觀察,來檢視「亞洲式民主」的不穩定本質與政治危機間的關係。
“Asian Democracy”- which stresses conformity and communal loyalties over pluralism and individualism – has been upheld by most of the leaders of Asian countries. They argued that “Asian Democracy” is a foundation of a strong-and-stable state and that a strong-and-stable state is a prerequisite for rapid economic development (which is highly desired by people in developing countries). This paper, however, argues that “Asian Democracy” is inherently unstable due to its “non-democratic” traits (e.g., personal rule, electoralism, etc.). Asian democratic systems, therefore, largely depend on economic performance legitimacy. In such a system, once economic performance stalls, a legitimacy crisis follows. This paper examines the dynamics between the spirit of “Asian Democracy” and the fall of Suharto to exemplify the inherent instability of the “Asian democracy” theory.
關聯 問題與研究, 38(8), 1-20
資料類型 article
dc.contributor 問題與研究-
dc.creator (作者) 李美賢-
dc.creator (作者) Lee, Mei-Hsien-
dc.date (日期) 1999-08-
dc.date.accessioned 15-Apr-2019 16:24:04 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 15-Apr-2019 16:24:04 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 15-Apr-2019 16:24:04 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/123022-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 「亞洲式民主」為許多政治學者及大部分的亞洲領袖所推崇。他們相信,因為「亞洲式民主」標榜許多與群體價值優先相關的價值,使得一些亞洲國家免於面對西方所面臨的諸多困境。他們同時堅信,人民內心深處渴望的是經濟生活面的滿足,民主與否則非重要問題。然而本研究的基本論點認為,「亞洲式民主」事實上不民主,也因為它不民主,所以它即具有不穩定的本質。當支持「亞洲式民主」政體合法性的經濟發展消失時,尤其又必須面對政治領導繼承問題時,以上所稱的不穩定的本質往往就會轉變為政治危機。本研究即以透過對印尼一九九八年政權轉移的觀察,來檢視「亞洲式民主」的不穩定本質與政治危機間的關係。-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) “Asian Democracy”- which stresses conformity and communal loyalties over pluralism and individualism – has been upheld by most of the leaders of Asian countries. They argued that “Asian Democracy” is a foundation of a strong-and-stable state and that a strong-and-stable state is a prerequisite for rapid economic development (which is highly desired by people in developing countries). This paper, however, argues that “Asian Democracy” is inherently unstable due to its “non-democratic” traits (e.g., personal rule, electoralism, etc.). Asian democratic systems, therefore, largely depend on economic performance legitimacy. In such a system, once economic performance stalls, a legitimacy crisis follows. This paper examines the dynamics between the spirit of “Asian Democracy” and the fall of Suharto to exemplify the inherent instability of the “Asian democracy” theory.-
dc.format.extent 1406853 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.relation (關聯) 問題與研究, 38(8), 1-20-
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 「亞洲式民主」;亞洲價值;證明危機;蘇哈托;哈比比-
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Asian democracy ; political crisis ; political succession ; Indonesia ; Suharto-
dc.title (題名) 「亞洲式民主」與政治危機─印尼個案研究,1997-1998─-
dc.title (題名) Asian Democracy-
dc.type (資料類型) article-