dc.contributor | 問題與研究 | - |
dc.creator (作者) | 李美賢 | - |
dc.creator (作者) | Lee, Mei-Hsien | - |
dc.date (日期) | 1999-08 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 15-Apr-2019 16:24:04 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.available | 15-Apr-2019 16:24:04 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 15-Apr-2019 16:24:04 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.identifier.uri (URI) | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/123022 | - |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 「亞洲式民主」為許多政治學者及大部分的亞洲領袖所推崇。他們相信,因為「亞洲式民主」標榜許多與群體價值優先相關的價值,使得一些亞洲國家免於面對西方所面臨的諸多困境。他們同時堅信,人民內心深處渴望的是經濟生活面的滿足,民主與否則非重要問題。然而本研究的基本論點認為,「亞洲式民主」事實上不民主,也因為它不民主,所以它即具有不穩定的本質。當支持「亞洲式民主」政體合法性的經濟發展消失時,尤其又必須面對政治領導繼承問題時,以上所稱的不穩定的本質往往就會轉變為政治危機。本研究即以透過對印尼一九九八年政權轉移的觀察,來檢視「亞洲式民主」的不穩定本質與政治危機間的關係。 | - |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | “Asian Democracy”- which stresses conformity and communal loyalties over pluralism and individualism – has been upheld by most of the leaders of Asian countries. They argued that “Asian Democracy” is a foundation of a strong-and-stable state and that a strong-and-stable state is a prerequisite for rapid economic development (which is highly desired by people in developing countries). This paper, however, argues that “Asian Democracy” is inherently unstable due to its “non-democratic” traits (e.g., personal rule, electoralism, etc.). Asian democratic systems, therefore, largely depend on economic performance legitimacy. In such a system, once economic performance stalls, a legitimacy crisis follows. This paper examines the dynamics between the spirit of “Asian Democracy” and the fall of Suharto to exemplify the inherent instability of the “Asian democracy” theory. | - |
dc.format.extent | 1406853 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.relation (關聯) | 問題與研究, 38(8), 1-20 | - |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 「亞洲式民主」;亞洲價值;證明危機;蘇哈托;哈比比 | - |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Asian democracy ; political crisis ; political succession ; Indonesia ; Suharto | - |
dc.title (題名) | 「亞洲式民主」與政治危機─印尼個案研究,1997-1998─ | - |
dc.title (題名) | Asian Democracy | - |
dc.type (資料類型) | article | - |